Shortcuts such as APIs and deep-links have emerged as efficient complements to flexible GUI operations, fostering a promising hybrid paradigm for MLLM-based mobile automation. However, systematic evaluation of GUI–shortcut hybrid agents remains largely underexplored. To bridge this gap, we introduce **MAS-Bench**, a benchmark that pioneers the evaluation of GUI-shortcut hybrid agents with a specific focus on the mobile domain. Beyond merely using predefined shortcuts, MAS-Bench assesses an agent’s capability to *autonomously generate* shortcuts by discovering and creating reusable, low-cost workflows. It features 139 complex tasks across 11 real-world applications, a knowledge base of 88 predefined shortcuts (APIs, deep-links, RPA scripts), and 9 evaluation metrics. Experiments demonstrate that hybrid agents achieve up to 68.3% success rate and 39% greater execution efficiency than GUI-only counterparts. Furthermore, our evaluation framework effectively reveals the quality gap between predefined and agent-generated shortcuts, validating its capability to assess shortcut generation methods. MAS-Bench addresses the lack of systematic benchmarks for GUI-shortcut hybrid mobile agents, providing a foundational platform for future advancements in creating more efficient and robust intelligent agents.

Document question answering plays a crucial role in enhancing employee productivity by providing quick and accurate access to information. Two primary approaches have been developed: retrieval-augmented generation (RAG), which reduces input tokens and inference costs, and long-context question answering (LC), which processes entire documents for higher accuracy. We introduce EXPLAIN (EXtracting, Pre-summarizing, Linking and enhAcINg RAG), a novel retrieval-augmented generation method that automatically extracts useful entities and generates summaries from documents. EXPLAIN improves accuracy by retrieving more informative entity summaries, achieving precision comparable to LC while maintaining low token consumption. Experimental results on internal dataset (ROUGE-L from 30.14% to 30.31%) and three public datasets (HotpotQA, 2WikiMQA, and Quality, average score from 62% to 64%) demonstrate the efficacy of EXPLAIN. Human evaluation in ant group production deployment indicates EXPLAIN surpasses baseline RAG in comprehensiveness.