Xuancheng Ren
Other people with similar names: Xuancheng Ren
Unverified author pages with similar names: Xuancheng Ren
2023
Transferring General Multimodal Pretrained Models to Text Recognition
Junyang Lin | Xuancheng Ren | Yichang Zhang | Gao Liu | Peng Wang | An Yang | Chang Zhou
Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL 2023
Junyang Lin | Xuancheng Ren | Yichang Zhang | Gao Liu | Peng Wang | An Yang | Chang Zhou
Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL 2023
This paper proposes a new method, OFA-OCR, to transfer multimodal pretrained models to text recognition. Specifically, we recast text recognition as image captioning and directly transfer a unified vision-language pretrained model to the end task. Without pretraining on large-scale annotated or synthetic text recognition data, OFA-OCR outperforms the baselines and achieves state-of-the-art performance in the Chinese text recognition benchmark. Additionally, we construct an OCR pipeline with OFA-OCR, and we demonstrate that it can achieve competitive performance with the product-level API.
Delving into the Openness of CLIP
Shuhuai Ren | Lei Li | Xuancheng Ren | Guangxiang Zhao | Xu Sun
Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL 2023
Shuhuai Ren | Lei Li | Xuancheng Ren | Guangxiang Zhao | Xu Sun
Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL 2023
Contrastive Language-Image Pre-training (CLIP) formulates image classification as an image-to-text matching task, i.e., matching images to the corresponding natural language descriptions instead of discrete category IDs. This allows for open-vocabulary visual recognition, where the model can recognize images from an open class set (also known as an open vocabulary) in a zero-shot manner. However, evaluating the openness of CLIP-like models is challenging, as the models are open to arbitrary vocabulary in theory, but their accuracy varies in practice. To address this, we resort to an incremental perspective to assess the openness through vocabulary expansions, and define extensibility to measure a model’s ability to handle novel classes. Our evaluation shows that CLIP-like models are not truly open, and their performance deteriorates as the vocabulary expands. We further dissect the feature space of CLIP from the perspectives of representation alignment and uniformity. Our investigation reveals that the overestimation of openness is due to confusion among competing text features, rather than a failure to capture the similarity between image features and text features of novel classes. We hope that our investigation and analysis will facilitate future research on the CLIP openness issue.