Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) scales capacity via conditional computation, but Transformers lack a native knowledge lookup primitive. We introduce conditional memory, instantiated via Deep Sparse Embedding (DSE), which indexes a massive embedding table using local n-grams for retrieval. We formalize sparsity allocation problem—how to split a fixed parameter budget between MoE experts and DSE memory—and find a U-shaped scaling law that identifies an optimal balance. Scaling to 27B parameters, DSE outperform an iso-parameter and iso-FLOPs MoE baseline across knowledge and reasoning benchmarks, and achieve markedly stronger long-context performance. Mechanistic analyses show that DSE offloads early-layer static recall into memory, freeing effective depth and attention for higher-level reasoning. DSE is also infrastructure-efficient: its deterministic hashing enables offloading massive parameters into host memory during inference with negligible throughput overhead.

In the era of large language models, Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) is a promising architecture for managing computational costs when scaling up model parameters. However, conventional MoE architectures like GShard, which activate the top-K out of N experts, face challenges in ensuring expert specialization, i.e. each expert acquires non-overlapping and focused knowledge. In response, we propose the DeepSeekMoE architecture towards ultimate expert specialization. It involves two principal strategies: (1) finely segmenting the experts into mN ones and activating mK from them, allowing for a more flexible combination of activated experts; (2) isolating K_s experts as shared ones, aiming at capturing common knowledge and mitigating redundancy in routed experts. Starting from a modest scale with 2B parameters, we demonstrate that DeepSeekMoE 2B achieves comparable performance with GShard 2.9B, which has 1.5 × expert parameters and computation. In addition, DeepSeekMoE 2B nearly approaches the performance of its dense counterpart with the same number of total parameters, which sets the upper bound of MoE models. Subsequently, we scale up DeepSeekMoE to 16B parameters and show that it achieves comparable performance with DeepSeek 7B and LLaMA2 7B, with only about 40% of computations.