Current speech evaluation suffers from two critical limitations: the need and difficulty of designing specialized systems targeting individual audio characteristics, and poor correlation between automatic evaluation methods and human preferences. This work presents a systematic study of Large Audio Model (LAM) as a Judge, AudioJudge, investigating whether it can provide a unified evaluation framework that addresses both challenges. We systematically explore AudioJudge across audio characteristic detection tasks, including pronunciation, speaking rate, speaker identification and speech quality, and system-level human preference simulation for automated benchmarking. We investigate different prompt engineering strategies, finding that audio concatenation combined with in-context learning significantly improves performance across both audio characteristic detection and human preference simulation tasks. We further introduce a multi-aspect ensemble AudioJudge to enable general-purpose multi-aspect audio evaluation. This method decomposes speech assessment into specialized judges for lexical content, speech quality, and paralinguistic features, achieving up to 0.91 Spearman correlation with human preferences on our system ranking benchmark. Robustness analysis reveals that while LAMs maintain strong performance under acoustic noise, they exhibit significant verbosity and positional biases that require careful mitigation.

Steering methods have emerged as effective tools for guiding large language models’ behavior, yet multimodal large language models (MLLMs) lack comparable techniques due to architectural diversity and limited availability of multimodal steering vectors. Inspired by this gap, we demonstrate that steering vectors derived solely from text-only LLM backbones can effectively guide and enhance their multimodal counterparts, revealing a novel cross-modal transfer that enables reuse of existing interpretability tools. Using community-standard methods—Sparse Autoencoders (SAE), Mean Shift, and Linear Probing—we validate this transfer effect across diverse MLLM architectures and visual reasoning tasks. Text-derived steering consistently enhances multimodal performance, with Mean Shift achieving up to +7.3% improvement in spatial relationship accuracy and +3.3% in counting accuracy on CV-Bench, and exhibits strong generalization to out-of-distribution datasets, for example reaching +34.2% on CLEVR counting tasks. This reveals that textual representations alone can effectively enhance visual grounding in MLLMs, bridging the mature ecosystem of text-based steering to MLLMs with minimal additional data collection or computational overhead.

The rapid proliferation of large audio models (LAMs) demands efficient approaches for model comparison, yet comprehensive benchmarks are costly. To fill this gap, we investigate whether minimal subsets can reliably evaluate LAMs while reducing costs and data redundancy. Analyzing 10 subset selection methods with 18 audio models across 40 tasks covering major LAM evaluation dimensions, we show that subsets of just 50 examples (0.3% of data) can achieve over 0.93 Pearson correlation with full benchmark scores. To understand how well these scores align with what practitioners ultimately care about—user satisfaction—we collect 776 human preference ratings from realistic voice assistant conversations, finding that both subsets and full benchmark achieve only 0.85 correlation with human. To better predict preferences, we trained regression models on these selected subsets, achieving 0.98 correlation—outperforming regression models trained on both random subsets and the full benchmark. This demonstrates that in regression modeling, well-curated subsets outpredict the full benchmark, showing quality over quantity. We open-source these regression-weighted subsets as the HUMANS benchmark, an efficient proxy for LAM evaluation that captures both benchmark performance and user preferences.