Recent advances in large language models (LLMs) and text-aware graph learning have increased interest in reasoning over text-attributed graphs(TAGs). In many real-world settings, such graphs are inherently heterogeneous, with most existing benchmarks remaining largely homogeneous in structure. As a result, the lack of large-scale benchmarks for heterogeneous text-attributed graphs has hindered systematic evaluation and fair comparison of existing methods. In this work, we introduce CITE - **C**atalytic **I**nformation **T**extual **E**ntities Graph, the first and largest heterogeneous text-attributed citation graph benchmark for catalytic materials. CITE contains over 438K nodes and 1.2M edges spanning four node types and four relation types, with rich node-level textual information. We establish standardized evaluation protocols for node classification and link prediction, and conduct ablation studies to assess the impact of graph heterogeneity and textual attributes. Using CITE, we benchmark four classes of learning paradigms, including homogeneous graph models, heterogeneous graph models, LLM-centric models, and hybrid LLM–graph models. By providing a large-scale heterogeneous text-attributed benchmark together with standardized evaluation protocols and comprehensive baselines, CITE enables systematic assessment across diverse modeling paradigms and offers new insights into text-aware and LLM-enhanced graph learning. The dataset, codebase and evaluation suite are publicly available.

Scientific literature is always available in Adobe’s Portable Document Format (PDF), which is friendly for scientists to read. Compared with raw text, annotating directly on PDF documents can greatly improve the labeling efficiency of scientists whose annotation costs are very high. In this paper, we present Autodive, an integrated onsite scientific literature annotation tool for natural scientists and Natural Language Processing (NLP) researchers. This tool provides six core functions of annotation that support the whole lifecycle of corpus generation including i)annotation project management, ii)resource management, iii)ontology management, iv)manual annotation, v)onsite auto annotation, and vi)annotation task statistic. Two experiments are carried out to verify efficiency of the presented tool. A live demo of Autodive is available at http://autodive.sciwiki.cn. The source code is available at https://github.com/Autodive.