Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) excel at visual understanding but face severe computational bottlenecks when processing high-resolution images and long videos due to massive visual token counts. Token pruning mitigates this by selectively removing less informative tokens while maintaining performance. However, existing methods vary widely in pruning location (vision encoder vs. LLM decoder), importance criteria (attention vs. similarity vs. learned scores), and application strategy, lacking systematic comparison. This survey presents the first comprehensive review of token pruning for LVLMs. We propose a taxonomy categorizing methods into vision-side, LLM-side, and hybrid paradigms, systematically analyze token selection mechanisms and pruning strategy. We further discuss evaluation protocols and identify key challenges including prompt-adaptive pruning and hardware-aware design. Our survey provides a structured foundation for this rapidly growing research area.

While Large Language Models (LLMs) excel in autonomous agent settings, small language models (SLMs) remain fragile, often collapsing after encountering errors. Traditional knowledge distillation focuses on imitating successful trajectories, while existing "learning from mistakes" methods treat errors as auxiliary signals rather than states requiring recoverable policies, leaving the dynamics of failure and recovery in agent settings largely unexplored. Inspired by Donald Schön’s theory of reflective practice, we propose P-BRIDGE (Pedagogical Bridge for Reflective Insight and Distillation of Guiding Errors). P-BRIDGE combines reflection-in-action with reflection-on-action, enabling agents to diagnose and correct critical errors during execution while abstracting transferable strategies from contrastive student–teacher trajectories. Experiments across eight benchmarks demonstrate that P-BRIDGE significantly elevates SLM performance—e.g., raising the 2WikiMultiHopQA accuracy of a 0.6B model from 6.2% to 34.2%.

Agents built on large language models (LLMs) have excelled in turn-by-turn human-AI collaboration but struggle with simultaneous tasks requiring real-time interaction. Latency issues and the challenge of inferring variable human strategies hinder their ability to make autonomous decisions without explicit instructions. Through experiments with current independent *System 1* and *System 2* methods, we validate the necessity of using Dual Process Theory (DPT) in real-time tasks. We propose DPT-Agent, a novel language agent framework that integrates *System 1* and *System 2* for efficient real-time simultaneous human-AI collaboration. DPT-Agent’s *System 1* uses a Finite-state Machine (FSM) and code-as-policy for fast, intuitive, and controllable decision-making. DPT-Agent’s *System 2* integrates Theory of Mind (ToM) and asynchronous reflection to infer human intentions and perform reasoning-based autonomous decisions. We demonstrate the effectiveness of DPT-Agent through further experiments with rule-based agents and human collaborators, showing significant improvements over mainstream LLM-based frameworks. To the best of our knowledge, DPT-Agent is the first language agent framework that achieves successful real-time simultaneous human-AI collaboration autonomously. Code of DPT-Agent can be found in https://github.com/sjtu-marl/DPT-Agent.

Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown that their reasoning ability could be enhanced through approaches like Chain-of-Thought (CoT) prompting. However, these methods use single prompts for different types of questions and do not design appropriate prompts for questions with different characteristics. In this paper, we aim to explore a methodology that generates differentially diverse reasoning paths for different types of questions. To achieve this, we propose a novel prompting strategy called Differential Diversity Prompting (DDPrompt). Firstly, we generate the optimal prompts collection based on question characteristics. Then, we use this optimal prompts collection to generate multiple answers for a question and choose the final answer by voting. We evaluated DDPrompt on twelve reasoning benchmarks and significant improvement in the performance of LLMs on complex reasoning tasks (e.g., GSM8K 75%->84%, Tracking Shuffled Objects (68.8%->83.9%))