Human moral judgment is context-dependent and changes based on interpersonal relationships. As large language models (LLMs) increasingly serve as decision-support systems, it is critical to understand if they encode these social nuances. We characterize LLM behavior using the Whistleblower’s Dilemma, systematically varying two experimental factors: crime severity and relational closeness. Our study compares three evaluative perspectives: (1) moral rightness (general prescriptive norms), (2) predictive human behavior (how models expect people to navigate social situations), and (3) models’ own decision-making. By analyzing the reasoning processes, we find a clear cross-perspective divergence: moral rightness remains consistently fairness-oriented, while predicted human behavior shifts with relational context toward loyalty. Crucially, the model decisions mirror moral rightness judgments, rather than their behavioral predictions. This cross-perspective inconsistency suggests that LLM decision-making favors abstract rules over the social sensitivity found in their internal modeling, potentially producing conflicting expectations in real-world deployments.

Humans have an inherent need for community belongingness. This paper investigates this fundamental social motivation by compiling a large collection of parallel datasets comprising over 7 million posts and comments from Reddit and 200,000 posts and comments from Dread, a dark web discussion forum, covering similar topics. Grounded in five theoretical aspects of the Sense of Community framework, our analysis indicates that users on Dread exhibit a stronger sense of community membership. Our data analysis reveals striking similarities in post content across both platforms, despite the dark web’s restricted accessibility. However, these communities differ significantly in community-level closeness, including member interactions and greeting patterns that influence user retention and dynamics. We publicly release the parallel community datasets for other researchers to examine key differences and explore potential directions for further study.