With the generative capabilities of large language models (LLMs) reshaping the information ecosystem, the concern with the sociological validity of claim detection benchmarks is increasing. Current claim detection benchmarks predominantly treat claims as static textual artifacts, overlooking the sociological etiology of how information naturally emerges and mutates. In this paper, we propose an evolutionary paradigm that models claims as socially evolving entities. In specific, we introduce a socially generative framework for synthetic claim generation, a multi-agent simulation grounded in the Open Claims Model. By decomposing claims into context, utterance, and proposition, our approach enables the precise simulation of unmitigated propagation to capture truth decay, and intervened propagation with multi-auditor oversight for targeted generation. Furthermore, we propose the background-user-perspective (BUP) framework, which reformulates check-worthiness as a condition-dependent probability rooted in social environment. Experiments on our datasets verify the data quality and reveal how network topology and user attributes systematically shape veracity drift.

Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) mitigates hallucinations in large language models by incorporating external knowledge. However, retrieval does not always return relevant documents and may return noisy ones. Indiscriminately retrieving and utilizing this external knowledge can interfere with the model’s originally correct reasoning. In this work, we propose Dual-Decision Retrieval-Augmented Generation (D²-RAG), which integrates multi-dimensional uncertainty estimation to decide whether to retrieve and employs adaptive contrastive decoding to handle retrieved contexts of varying quality. Specifically, we first integrate uncertainty estimation scores that assess model uncertainty from multiple perspectives, construct them into a comprehensive feature vector, and train a lightweight retrieval decision model to accurately identify the model’s knowledge boundaries and determine whether to retrieve. Subsequently, we dynamically adjust the contrastive decoding strategy based on the utility of retrieved contexts to enhance the utilization of relevant contexts while suppressing interference from noisy contexts. Extensive experiments on four medical question-answering datasets demonstrate that D²-RAG significantly outperforms baselines, enabling retrieval-augmented Llama3.1-8B to surpass non-retrieval-augmented Llama3.1-70B on the MedMCQA dataset. The source code is available on https://github.com/zakelawen/d–rag.

Argumentative essay generation (AEG) is a complex task that requires advanced semantic understanding, logical reasoning, and organized integration of perspectives. Despite showing a promising performance, current efforts often overlook the dynamical and hierarchical nature of structural argumentative planning, and struggle with flexible rhetorical expression, leading to limited argument divergence and rhetorical optimization. Inspired by human debate behavior and Bitzer’s rhetorical situation theory, we propose a debate-driven rhetorical framework for argumentative writing. The uniqueness lies in three aspects: (1) dynamic assesses the divergence of viewpoints and progressively reveals the hierarchical outline of arguments based on a depth-then-breadth paradigm, improving the perspective divergence within argumentation; (2) simulates human debate through iterative defender-attacker interactions, improving the logical coherence of arguments; (3) incorporates Bitzer’s rhetorical situation theory to flexibly select appropriate rhetorical techniques, enabling the rhetorical expression. Experiments on four benchmarks validate that our approach significantly improves logical depth, argumentative diversity, and rhetorical persuasiveness over existing state-of-the-art models.

The alignment of large language models (LLMs) aims to ensure their outputs adhere to human values, ethical standards, and legal norms. Traditional alignment methods often rely on resource-intensive fine-tuning (FT), which may suffer from knowledge degradation and face challenges in scenarios where the model accessibility or computational resources are constrained. In contrast, training-free (TF) alignment techniques—leveraging in-context learning, decoding-time adjustments, and post-generation corrections—offer a promising alternative by enabling alignment without heavily retraining LLMs, making them adaptable to both open-source and closed-source environments. This paper presents the first systematic review of TF alignment methods, categorizing them by stages of **pre-decoding**, **in-decoding**, and **post-decoding**. For each stage, we provide a detailed examination from the viewpoint of LLMs and multimodal LLMs (MLLMs), highlighting their mechanisms and limitations. Furthermore, we identify key challenges and future directions, paving the way for more inclusive and effective TF alignment techniques. By synthesizing and organizing the rapidly growing body of research, this survey offers a guidance for practitioners and advances the development of safer and more reliable LLMs.