Current Information Seeking (InfoSeeking) agents struggle to maintain focus and coherence during long-horizon exploration, as tracking search states, including planning procedure and massive search results, within one plain-text context is inherently fragile.To address this, we introduce Table-as-Search (TaS), a structured planning framework that reformulates the InfoSeeking task as a Table Completion task.TaS maps each query into a structured table schema maintained in an external database, where rows represent search candidates and columns denote constraints or required information.This table precisely manages the search states: filled cells strictly record the history and search results, while empty cells serve as an explicit search plan.Crucially, TaS unifies three distinct InfoSeeking tasks: Deep Search, Wide Search, and the challenging DeepWide Search.Extensive experiments demonstrate that TaS significantly outperforms numerous state-of-the-art baselines across three kinds of benchmarks, including multi-agent framework and commercial systems.Furthermore, our analysis validates the TaS’s superior robustness in long-horizon InfoSeeking, alongside its efficiency, scalability and flexibility.Code and datasets are publicly released at https://github.com/AIDC-AI/Marco-Search-Agent.

The critical therapist shortage demands scalable training solutions. Standardized Patients, the gold standard, are scarce and costly. Current LLM-based approaches focus on patient simulation for conversational realism but lack pedagogical rigor as Virtual Standardized Patients, lacking faithful reactions to clinical errors and explainable feedback. To bridge this gap, we propose PUPPET, the first neural-symbolic Virtual Standardized Patient governed by an OBSERVE-THINK-BEHAVE architecture. PUPPET externalizes LLM reasoning into a symbolic system where experts implant causal associations between intervention logic (propositional logic) and patient mental states (state machine). This allows PUPPET to behave coherently with controllable and explainable psychological dynamics: intervention logic (OBSERVE) → state transition (THINK) → response (BEHAVE). Our PUPPET-TRAINER further leverages this chain to educate trainees about intervention consequences, standardizing and scaling mental health training. Experiments across three clinical scenarios confirm that PUPPET outperforms baselines in clinical faithfulness and pedagogical value.

Despite recent progress, existing agent benchmarks neglect a fundamental real-world capability: hierarchical rule application, a critical requirement in fields such as law and medicine where agents must reason from broad categories down to specific exceptions to reach rule-compliant decisions.This introduces significant challenges in resolving logical dependencies and disambiguating vague boundaries.To bridge this gap, we introduce HSCodeComp, a novel benchmark derived from e-commerce, requiring agents to assign a unique 10-digit Harmonized System (HS) Code to products by aligning their fuzzy attributes with strict tariff classification rules.HSCodeComp comprises 632 realistic products across 32 categories, featuring detailed yet noisy product information (titles, attributes, and images). The HS Codes are annotated by a panel of 26 tariff experts, strictly adhering to official rules and an empirical knowledge base, both of which we jointly open-source.Through a comprehensive evaluation of 23 LLMs, VLMs, and agents on HSCodeComp, we demonstrate that: 1) a substantial performance gap remains between state-of-the-art agents and human experts (46.8% vs. 95.0%); and 2) test-time scaling fails to close this gap. Further analysis reveals that 1) excessive reasoning steps frequently induce “reasoning drift,” which degrades accuracy; and 2) agents are prone to premature decisions on high-level categories and reasoning hallucinations that lack factual grounding.

Chain-of-Thought (CoT) reasoning is crucial for the performance of Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) but is often hindered by redundant and distracting segments, which incur excessive inference costs and degrade robustness. Existing approaches try to solve this problem by enforcing brevity through external supervision, such as length-based penalties or heuristic truncation. However, these approaches often degrade performance because they disregard the model’s intrinsic reasoning dependency and thus fail to distinguish between essential and redundant CoT segments. To address this problem, we propose SGP-CoT, a novel Self-Guided Pruning framework that leverages the model’s intrinsic likelihood landscape to identify segments that are extraneous to its specific reasoning pattern. Specifically, SGP-CoT treats the reasoning trajectory as a sequence of semantic units and assesses the necessity of each one via internal likelihood signals, measuring its contribution to the answer and local coherence. Based on this, it selectively removes non-essential segments and then forms high-quality pruning-based preference pairs, enabling the model to learn focused reasoning via self-optimization. Extensive experiments across diverse benchmarks demonstrate that the proposed SGP-CoT significantly reduces output length while maintaining or improving accuracy. These results validate that LRMs intrinsically possess the capability to discern reasoning utility, positioning SGP-CoT as a robust pathway toward scalable inference.

Recent advances in text-to-audio-video (T2AV) generation have enabled models to synthesize audio-visual videos with multi-participant dialogues. However, existing evaluation benchmarks remain largely designed for human-recorded videos or single-speaker settings. As a result, structural failures in generated multi-talker dialogue videos, such as identity drift, unnatural turn transitions, and audio-visual misalignment, cannot be effectively diagnosed. To address this issue, we introduce MTAVG-Bench, a failure-driven diagnostic benchmark for multi-talker dialogue-centric audio-video generation. MTAVG-Bench is built via a semi-automatic pipeline, where 1.8k videos are generated using mainstream T2AV models with carefully designed prompts, yielding 2.4k manually annotated QA pairs for fine-grained failure diagnosis. The benchmark evaluates multi-speaker dialogue generation at four levels: audio-visual signal fidelity, temporal attribute consistency, social interaction, and cinematic expression. Built on a hierarchical failure taxonomy and a targeted QA protocol, MTAVG-Bench is primarily designed to evaluate whether proprietary and open-source omni-models can reliably identify failure modes in multi-speaker T2AV outputs. We benchmark 12 proprietary and open-source omni-models on MTAVG-Bench, with Gemini 3 Pro achieving the strongest overall performance, while leading open-source models remain competitive in signal fidelity and consistency. Overall, MTAVG-Bench enables fine-grained failure analysis for rigorous model comparison and targeted video generation refinement.

Automatic evaluation for Open Domain Event Detection (ODED) is a highly challenging task, because ODED is characterized by a vast diversity of un-constrained output labels from various domains. Nearly all existing evaluation methods for ODED usually first construct evaluation benchmarks with limited labels and domain coverage, and then evaluate ODED methods using metrics based on token-level label matching rules. However, this kind of evaluation framework faces two issues: (1) The limited evaluation benchmarks lack representatives of the real world, making it difficult to accurately reflect the performance of various ODED methods in real-world scenarios; (2) Evaluation metrics based on token-level matching rules fail to capture semantic similarity between predictions and golden labels. To address these two problems above, we propose a scalable and reliable Semantic-level Evaluation framework for Open domain Event detection (SEOE) by constructing a more representative evaluation benchmark and introducing a semantic evaluation metric. Specifically, our proposed framework first constructs a scalable evaluation benchmark that currently includes 564 event types covering 7 major domains, with a cost-effective supplementary annotation strategy to ensure the benchmark’s representativeness. The strategy also allows for the supplement of new event types and domains in the future. Then, the proposed SEOE leverages large language models (LLMs) as automatic evaluation agents to compute a semantic F1-score, incorporating fine-grained definitions of semantically similar labels to enhance the reliability of the evaluation. Extensive experiments validate the representatives of the benchmark and the reliability of the semantic evaluation metric. Existing ODED methods are thoroughly evaluated, and the error patterns of predictions are analyzed, revealing several insightful findings.

Driven by the remarkable progress in diffusion models, text-to-image generation has achieved substantial advancements, underscoring the urgent need for robust automatic quality assessment. This task is inherently complex, requiring evaluations that range from object presence and attribute correctness to relational consistency and visual fidelity. Consequently, current state-of-the-art MLLM-based approaches often rely on powerful commercial models such as GPT-4o, which offer superior reasoning and instruction-following capabilities but are not universally accessible. In contrast, while open-source MLLMs demonstrate promising skills in vision and language understanding, they underperform in comprehensive image quality assessment.To address these challenges, we propose a task decomposition evaluation framework based on GPT-4o to automatically construct a specialized training dataset, breaking down the multifaceted evaluation process into simpler sub-tasks and thus reducing learning complexity. Building on this dataset, we design novel training strategies to distill GPT-4o’s evaluation capabilities into a 7B open-source MLLM, MiniCPM-V-2.6, enabling it to better follow instructions across diverse assessment criteria. Furthermore, to reliably and comprehensively assess prior works and our proposed model, we manually annotate a meta-evaluation benchmark that includes chain-of-thought explanations alongside quality scores for generated images.Experimental results demonstrate that our distilled open-source MLLM significantly outperforms the current state-of-the-art GPT-4o-base baseline, VIEScore, with over 4.6% improvement in Spearman and Kendall correlations with human judgments.

Critique ability, a meta-cognitive capability of humans, presents significant challenges for LLMs to improve. While utilizing human annotation can enhance critique ability effectively, most recent works primarily rely on supervised fine-tuning (SFT) using critiques generated by a single LLM like GPT-4, which is more scalable and cost-effective.However, such model-generated critiques often suffer from inherent flaws due to the complexity of critique. Consequently, fine-tuning LLMs on these flawed critiques not only limits performance but also propagates errors into the learned model.To address this issue, we propose MultiCritique, a unified framework that leverages multi-agent feedback to improve critique ability in both the supervised fine-tuning (SFT) and reinforcement learning (RL) stages.In the SFT stage, MultiCritique aggregates high-quality multi-agent critiques through a fine-grained meta-critique mechanism. In the RL stage, preference critiques are constructed and refined by validating their contributions to revisions, thereby enhancing robustness of RL in improving critique ability.Based on MultiCritique, we construct SFT and RL datasets. Extensive experimental results on two benchmarks highlight the key benefits of our dataset, including superior quality, enhanced data efficiency, strong generalization on unseen tasks, and improvements in the general capability of LLMs.Notably, our fine-tuned 7B model significantly surpasses advanced 7B-13B models, approaching advanced 70B LLMs and GPT-4.Resources have been publicly available.

Cross-lingual retrieval aims to retrieve relevant text across languages. Current methods typically achieve cross-lingual retrieval by learning language-agnostic text representations in word or sentence level. However, how to learn phrase representations for cross-lingual phrase retrieval is still an open problem. In this paper, we propose , a cross-lingual phrase retriever that extracts phrase representations from unlabeled example sentences. Moreover, we create a large-scale cross-lingual phrase retrieval dataset, which contains 65K bilingual phrase pairs and 4.2M example sentences in 8 English-centric language pairs. Experimental results show that outperforms state-of-the-art baselines which utilize word-level or sentence-level representations. also shows impressive zero-shot transferability that enables the model to perform retrieval in an unseen language pair during training. Our dataset, code, and trained models are publicly available at github.com/cwszz/XPR/.

Masked language models (MLMs) such as BERT have revolutionized the field of Natural Language Understanding in the past few years. However, existing pre-trained MLMs often output an anisotropic distribution of token representations that occupies a narrow subset of the entire representation space. Such token representations are not ideal, especially for tasks that demand discriminative semantic meanings of distinct tokens. In this work, we propose TaCL (Token-aware Contrastive Learning), a novel continual pre-training approach that encourages BERT to learn an isotropic and discriminative distribution of token representations. TaCL is fully unsupervised and requires no additional data. We extensively test our approach on a wide range of English and Chinese benchmarks. The results show that TaCL brings consistent and notable improvements over the original BERT model. Furthermore, we conduct detailed analysis to reveal the merits and inner-workings of our approach.