Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) models rely on an external router to assign tokens to experts. This design inherently separates the routing decision from each expert’s internal capabilities, leading to suboptimal performance. In this work, we address this limitation with Union-of-Experts (UoE), an MoE variant that performs "expert-autonomous routing”. The core mechanism of UoE is to pre-designate a minute fraction of neurons within each expert as "routing neurons”. Experts autonomously select relevant tokens by comparing the activation intensity of these neurons, aligning routing decisions with each expert’s functional profile. To prevent the waste of activations from unselected experts’ routing neurons, we aggregate all routing neuron outputs and sum them into the final layer output. This aggregation acts as a novel virtual shared expert whose parameters are distributed across the individual experts, and improves overall parameter efficiency. We pre-train UoE models with up to 3B parameters, demonstrating that they outperform traditional MoEs with matched efficiency. Furthermore, our analysis of the routing neurons provides valuable insights into expert-autonomous selection and the broader routing mechanisms of MoE models.

Large language models (LLMs) have traditionally been aligned through one-size-fits-all approaches that assume uniform human preferences, fundamentally overlooking the diversity in user values and needs. This paper introduces a comprehensive framework for scalable personalized alignment of LLMs. We establish a systematic preference space characterizing psychological and behavioral dimensions, alongside diverse persona representations for robust preference inference in real-world scenarios. Building upon this foundation, we introduce AlignX, a large-scale dataset of over 1.3 million personalized preference examples, and develop two complementary alignment approaches: in-context alignment directly conditioning on persona representations and preference-bridged alignment modeling intermediate preference distributions. Extensive experiments demonstrate substantial improvements over existing methods, with an average 17.06% accuracy gain across four benchmarks while exhibiting a strong adaptation capability to novel preferences, robustness to limited user data, and precise preference controllability. These results validate our approach toward user-adaptive AI systems.