LLM-as-a-Judge systems are increasingly used to evaluate text at scale, yet production deployment demands low latency, minimal cost, and compatibility with closed-source APIs. Current approaches fall short in different ways: some require many LLM calls and per-dataset prompt tuning, others depend on logit access unavailable in commercial APIs, and yet others demand multiple rounds of LLM interaction for iterative feature discovery. We present **SAJA** (**S**imple **A**pproach to **J**udge **A**lignment), built on the principle that task-specific alignment should reside in a lightweight calibration head, not in elaborate prompts or model internals. SAJA makes exactly one LLM call per item using a fixed structured rubric prompt, extracts a multi-dimensional feature vector, and maps it to a human-aligned score via a calibration head trained on a small number of human labels. No iterative prompt search, no logit access, and no multi-round LLM interaction are needed. Yet SAJA matches far more complex systems across four evaluation paradigms: 86% F1 on MT-Bench pairwise preference (vs. 78% uncalibrated), competitive performance on five classification benchmarks with a single call, and +5.71% F1 over prompt-optimized baselines on proprietary data. Ablations confirm that multi-dimensional rubric features outperform one-dimensional calibration (SummEval 𝜌 improves from 0.60 to 0.74) and that coarse rubric outputs recover the same human alignment as full logit distributions (𝜌 = 0.36 vs. 0.37), establishing that logit access is unnecessary for calibrated judge alignment. Moreover, SAJA is model-agnostic: a 9B open-source model with SAJA (𝜌=0.70) surpasses raw GPT-4.1 (𝜌=0.60). Its single-call design yields up to 4.8× cost savings over per-question approaches.

The text prediction (TP) workflow calls a Large Language Model (LLM), almost, after every character to get subsequent sequence of characters, till user accepts a suggestion. The confidence score of the prediction is commonly used for filtering the results to ensure that only correct predictions are shown to user. As LLMs require massive amounts of computation and storage, such an approach incurs network and high execution cost. So, we propose a Model gatekeeper (GK) to stop the LLM calls that will result in incorrect predictions at client application level itself. This way a GK can save cost of model inference and improve user experience by not showing the incorrect predictions. We demonstrate that use of a model gatekeeper saved approx 46.6% of COGS for TP, at the cost of approx 4.5% loss in character saving. Use of GK also improved the efficiency (suggestion rate) of TP model by 73%.