Reasoning over long contexts remains a major challenge for language models, particularly when solving tasks that require integrating multiple facts in sequence or generalizing to new distributions. We argue that this difficulty stems from a lack of structural inductive bias. Recently, alternative frameworks have been proposed to explicitly encode contexts as ordered memory and perform iterative retrieval to construct reasoning chains. Despite the promising results shown in prior arts, they are still heavily reliant on intermediate chain supervision and fall short in showing emergent reasoning generalization in the presence of hard distractions in reasoning-in-a-haystack tasks. Furthermore, we discover that as the amount of distractions increases, traditional episodic memory reads suffer from ill-conditioning problems, which lead to inaccurate context retrievals. In this work, we formalize the motivation for necessary inductive bias in reasoning-in-a-Haystack tasks, propose inference-time memory update procedures mimicking the "identify and remove unnecessary and unrelated details" in *constructively responsive reading*, introduce staged training inspired by human conceptual understanding, and finally demonstrate the possibilities and limits of such framework in the weakly supervised scenario.