While Chain-of-Thought (CoT) reasoning empowers Large Language Models (LLMs) to tackle complex tasks, its reliance on discrete token decoding imposes an inherent Discreteness Bottleneck, limiting expressiveness within a restricted vocabulary space. Existing continuous reasoning approaches, such as SoftCoT, mitigate this but typically rely on external auxiliary models, resulting in complex deployment and fractured inference pipelines. To address these challenges, we propose Self-SoftCoT, a self-contained framework that enables a frozen LLM to internally generate and consume latent thoughts without external assistants. By establishing a single-stream "Thinking → Speaking" closed-loop, we decouple latent planning from explicit generation. Furthermore, we adopt Group Sequence Policy Optimization (GSPO) to stabilize learning and employ Position-Aware Independent Projection to mitigate representation homogenization. Experimental results on five reasoning benchmarks demonstrate that our method significantly improves the reasoning performance of frozen LLMs. Specifically, our Qwen2.5-based model uses only N=2 soft tokens to outperform the SoftCoT baseline (N=4), improving the average accuracy from 75.06% to 78.42%. Similarly, LLaMA-3.1 performance increases from 70.52% to 74.55%.

Evaluating code large language models (Code LLMs) requires reliable detection of data leakage, where benchmark performance is artificially inflated by exposure to benchmark data during pre-training. Existing approaches either assume access to proprietary training corpora, rely on brittle heuristics such as timestamp filtering, or use external reference sets with manually tuned, non-generalizable thresholds. To address these limitations, we introduce SrDetection, a unified self-referential leakage detection framework for both gray-box (access to model logits) and black-box (access to model outputs) settings. SrDetection generates semantically equivalent variants of a benchmark sample and detects leakage by contrasting the model’s behavior on the original versus its variants, flagging cases where the original is disproportionately easier for the model. We further design a controlled leakage detection testbed and evaluate SrDetection in this environment. Across different models and training stages, SrDetection improves average F1 by 21.52 points in the gray-box setting and 14.46 points in the black-box setting over strong baselines, demonstrating robust, threshold-independent leakage detection. Finally, a gray-box study of 15 widely used Code LLMs on four popular benchmarks reveals benchmark-specific leakage patterns beyond prior overlap-based analyses[Source code and data are available at <https://github.com/SMinL/SrDetectionCode>].

Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) have demonstrated strong performance by producing extended Chain-of-Thought (CoT) traces before answering. However, this paradigm often induces over-reasoning: redundant calculations and circular self-verification that increase computational cost without improving outcomes. Existing evaluations largely emphasize final accuracy or coarse token counts, and lack automated tools to separate essential logic from structural redundancy. We introduce CoTJudger, a graph-driven framework that quantifies reasoning efficiency by converting free-form CoTs into directed dependency graphs and extracting the Shortest Effective Path (SEP) needed to reach a correct solution. This yields an interpretable efficiency signal – how much of a CoT is necessary versus structurally redundant – that is comparable across models and tasks. Evaluating 21 LRMs, CoTJudger reveals pervasive redundancy and surfaces recurring failure modes, including verification obsession and compensatory redundancy. These results provide a practical metric for disentangling reasoning ability from computational waste, enabling more targeted evaluation and diagnosis of LRM efficiency.

Word sense disambiguation (WSD) is a foundational task in natural language processing. Recent research has reformulated WSD for large language models (LLMs) as a generative task, where the model produces a definition to convey the intended meaning of an ambiguous word in context.In practice, most existing approaches implement this formulation through straightforward supervised fine-tuning, which tends to prioritize superficial context-to-gloss memorization over true contextual sense discrimination, leading to degraded performance on less frequent senses (LFS), particularly in unseen settings.To address this issue, we propose WSDPO, a training framework for generative WSD with chain-of-thought (CoT) and preference optimization. WSDPO consists of three stages: (1) disambiguation-aware CoT construction, which produces training data containing explicit disambiguation steps for the later stage;(2) disambiguation-guided supervised fine-tuning, which explicitly trains the model to discriminate word sense before generating the final definition; and(3) preference-based optimization, which further strengthens the model’s ability to generate sense-faithful definitions by optimizing it using preference pairs constructed from multiple sampled CoT outputs.Extensive experiments across benchmark datasets and multiple backbone LLMs demonstrate that WSDPO achieves substantial performance gains on rare and unseen settings, and exhibits strong generalization in standard evaluation settings.

Word sense disambiguation (WSD) is a fundamental yet challenging task in natural language processing. In recent years, the advent of large language models (LLMs) has led to significant advancements in regular WSD tasks. However, most existing LLMs face two major issues that hinder their performance in WSD. Firstly, these models are often prone to misclassifying the correct meaning of an ambiguous word when confronted with contexts containing adversarial information. Secondly, there is a lack of sufficient adversarial WSD datasets, which severely limits the development and evaluation of adversarial WSD systems. To address these gaps, we propose a novel Multi-Agent Debate framework for Adversarial Word Sense Disambiguation (MADAWSD). The MADAWSD framework simulates a real-world debate environment where multiple agent roles, namely, the Debater, Moderator, Consensus-seeker, and Judge, engage in discussions about ambiguous words in the context of adversarial information. Through a collaborative mechanism among these agents, it achieves accurate WSD. Additionally, a novel dataset for Chinese adversarial WSD has been constructed, focusing on improving and evaluating the performance of WSD models in the Chinese language. Extensive experiments on both English and Chinese adversarial WSD datasets demonstrate that MADAWSD can seamlessly integrate with existing LLMs and significantly enhance their performance, showcasing broad generality and outstanding effectiveness.

Accurately evaluating the word sense disambiguation (WSD) capabilities of large language models (LLMs) remains challenging, as existing studies primarily rely on single-task evaluations and classification-based metrics that overlook the fundamental differences between generative LLMs and traditional classification models. To bridge this gap, we proposeRoDEval, the first comprehensive evaluation framework specifically tailored for assessing LLM-based WSD methods. RoDEval introduces four novel metrics: Disambiguation Scope, Disambiguation Robustness, Disambiguation Reliability, and Definition Generation Quality Score, enabling a multifaceted evaluation of LLMs’ WSD capabilities. Experimental results using RoDEval across five mainstream LLMs uncover significant limitations in their WSD performance. Specifically, incorrect definition selections in multiple-choice WSD tasks stem not from simple neglect or forget of correct options, but rather from incomplete acquisition of the all senses for polysemous words. Instead, disambiguation reliability is often compromised by the models’ persistent overconfidence. In addition, inherent biases continue to affect performance, and scaling up model parameters alone fails to meaningfully enhance their ability to generate accurate sense definitions. These findings provide actionable insights for enhancing LLMs’ WSD capabilities. The source code and evaluation scripts are open-sourced at https://github.com/DayDream405/RoDEval.

Natural language interfaces for NoSQL databases are increasingly vital in the big data era, enabling users to interact with complex, unstructured data without deep technical expertise. However, most recent advancements focus on English, leaving a gap for multilingual support. This paper introduces MultiTEND, the first and largest multilingual benchmark for natural language to NoSQL query generation, covering six languages: English, German, French, Russian, Japanese and Mandarin Chinese.Using MultiTEND, we analyze challenges in translating natural language to NoSQL queries across diverse linguistic structures, including lexical and syntactic differences. Experiments show that performance accuracy in both English and non-English settings remains relatively low, with a 4%-6% gap across scenarios like fine-tuned SLM, zero-shot LLM, and RAG for LLM.To address the aforementioned challenges, we introduce MultiLink, a novel framework that bridges the multilingual input to NoSQL query generation gap through a Parallel Linking Process. It breaks down the task into multiple steps, integrating parallel multilingual processing, Chain-of-Thought (CoT) reasoning, and Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) to tackle lexical and structural challenges inherent in multilingual NoSQL generation. MultiLink shows enhancements in all metrics for every language against the top baseline, boosting execution accuracy by about 15% for English and averaging a 10% improvement for non-English languages.