Long-horizon agents operate over extended sequences of reasoning and actions, but this inevitably accumulates context noise, resulting in excessive computational cost and information overload. Existing approaches commonly rely on fixed, rule-based summarization strategies (e.g., summarizing every few steps), which are inflexible, lack generalization, and often introduce irreversible information loss. We propose Self-Sum, a framework that empowers agents to autonomously decide when and what to summarize by modeling summarization as a first-class internal cognitive action, unified with external environmental actions within a multi-turn decision-making process. Specifically, we introduce a two-stage training recipe consisting of (i) a cold-start supervised fine-tuning stage that bootstraps summarization behavior, and (ii) a lightweight, summarization-aware reinforcement learning stage that refines summarization timing and content while discouraging unnecessary summaries. Experiments on multiple long-horizon benchmarks show that Self-Sum consistently outperforms no-summarization and rule-based baselines, with particularly strong gains in generalization. Analysis further reveals that Self-Sum learns to summarize sparsely at meaningful moments and preserves task-relevant information, highlighting the importance of jointly learning when and what to summarize for robust long-horizon agent behavior.

Recent reinforcement learning (RL) approaches, such as outcome-supervised GRPO, have advanced reasoning in Large Language Models (LLMs), yet their adaptation to multimodal LLMs (MLLMs) remains underexplored. Progress has been further limited by the lack of evaluation settings that jointly test perception and reasoning under controlled generalization challenges. To enable such analysis, we present **SEED-Bench-R1**, a structured testbed featuring real-world video tasks and hierarchical evaluation across in-distribution, cross-environment, and cross-environment-task scenarios. Our analysis reveals that standard outcome-supervised GRPO often yields "logical incoherence"—achieving correct answers through flawed reasoning—due to its exclusive focus on final-answer rewards and rigid KL penalties. To address this, we propose **GRPO-CARE**, a consistency-aware RL framework that eliminates KL penalties while introducing a two-tiered reward system: a base reward for accuracy and an adaptive bonus for consistency. This bonus, derived from a slowly evolving reference model through group-relative likelihood calibration, rewards reasoning paths that logically support the final answer without requiring expensive process supervision. Experiments on SEED-Bench-R1 show that GRPO-CARE consistently outperforms standard GRPO, achieving a 6.7% gain on the hardest evaluation level and a 24.5% increase in reasoning consistency. Moreover, models trained with GRPO-CARE transfer effectively to diverse video understanding and even language-only reasoning benchmarks, validating its robustness and generality.

Recent research empowers Large Language Models (LLMs) as multi-turn search agents to iteratively retrieve and generate outputs until complex tasks are solved. However, the contexts of multi-turn search agents are lengthy and complex. For example, the retrieved set of documents in each turn would inevitably introduce irrelevant information that distracts LLMs, referring to context interference, potentially hindering the reliability and efficiency of search agents. Therefore, we conduct a systematic study on context interference in multi-turn search agents, focusing on investigating i) which parts of the context of search agents will contribute to the context interference, ii) how to refine the contexts of search agents to mitigate the interference, and iii) can incorporating context refinement into search agent training yield further improvements. We reveal that interference primarily arises from the latest retrieved documents. Based on the explored findings, we then introduce a distill-based context refiner to dynamically mitigate context interference for multi-turn search agents. Finally, we validate that incorporating context refinement into RL training pipelines of search agents can significantly enhance both reliability and efficiency. This study highlights the importance of mitigating context interference of search agents, inspiring a novel paradigm of “refine context and then generate” for AI agents.

Large language models (LLMs) can call tools effectively, yet they remain brittle in multi-turn execution: after a tool-call error, smaller models often fall into repetitive invalid re-invocations instead of interpreting the feedback and recovering. This failure mode persists because current training paradigms do not explicitly teach models how to recover from execution errors. In particular, standard reinforcement learning (RL) collapses rich failure experience into sparse negative rewards, while pre-collected error-correction datasets become mismatched to the policy’s evolving failure modes. To bridge this gap, we propose Fission-GRPO, a framework that converts execution errors into on-policy corrective supervision within the RL training loop. Our core mechanism fissions each failed trajectory into a new training instance by augmenting it with diagnostic feedback from a fine-tuned Error Simulator, then resampling multiple recovery rollouts on-policy. This enables the model to learn from the precise errors it makes during exploration, rather than from static, pre-collected error cases. On BFCL v4 Multi-Turn, Fission-GRPO improves the error recovery rate of Qwen3-8B by 5.7% absolute and overall accuracy by 4.0% (from 42.75% to 46.75%), outperforming both RL baselines and specialized tool-use agents. The method further generalizes to TAU-Bench and TAU2-Bench, achieving leading results across most settings with gains up to +17.4%.

The hallmark of Deep Research agents lies in compositional reasoning, the capacity to aggregate distributed, heterogeneous information into coherent logical insights. However, current agentic systems are often retrieval-heavy but reasoning-light, where success is predominantly determined by simple entity-seeking rather than the multi-step aggregation of scattered evidence. To address this, we propose a data synthesis pipeline WebAggregator, designed to shift the agentic paradigm from retrieval-centric to compositional aggregation. Our approach first employs Proactive Explorer to collect interconnected knowledge, then Compositional Logic Proposer to weave knowledge into complex questions using over 12 composition guidelines derived from a rigorous deconstruction of the Deep Research problem setting. Fine-tuning on this corpus fundamentally transforms agent behavior, fostering deliberate composition reasoning and reduced tool redundancy. The resulting WebAggregator-32B surpasses GPT-4.1 and matches Claude-3.7-Sonnet on GAIA, WebWalkerQA, and XBench. To address the lack of benchmarks that emphasize both reasoning and retrieval, we introduce the WebAggregatorQA testbed, which reveals that even with perfect retrieval, top-tier models still underperformed. These results demonstrate that compositional reasoning, not retrieval, is the true performance ceiling for next-generation research agents.