Unlearning in large language models (LLMs) aims to remove harmful training data while preserving overall utility. However, we find that existing methods often hallucinate, generate abnormal token sequences, or behave inconsistently, raising safety and trust concerns. According to prior literature on LLM honesty, such behaviors are often associated with dishonesty. This motivates us to investigate the notion of honesty in the context of model unlearning. We propose a formal definition of unlearning honesty, which includes: (1) preserving both utility and honesty on retained knowledge, and (2) ensuring effective forgetting while encouraging the model to acknowledge its limitations and respond consistently to questions related to forgotten knowledge. To systematically evaluate the honesty of unlearning, we introduce a suite of metrics that cover utility, honesty on the retained set, effectiveness of forgetting, rejection rate and refusal stability in Q&A and MCQ settings. Evaluating 9 methods across 3 mainstream families shows that all current methods fail to meet these standards. After experimental and theoretical analyses, we present ReVa, a representation-alignment procedure that fine-tunes feature-randomized unlearned models to better acknowledge forgotten knowledge. On Q A tasks from the forget set, ReVa achieves the highest rejection rate after two rounds of interaction, nearly doubling the performance of the second-best method. Remarkably, It also improves honesty on the retained set.

Hallucination remains a critical challenge for multimodal large language models (MLLMs), undermining their reliability in real-world applications. While fine-grained hallucination detection (FHD) holds promise for enhancing high-quality vision-language data construction and model alignment through enriched feedback signals, automated solutions for this task have yet to be systematically explored. Inspired by the concept of “MLLM as a Judge”, we introduce MHALO, the first comprehensive benchmark specifically designed for evaluating MLLMs’ capability in performing token-level FHD. Our benchmark encompasses 12 distinct hallucination types spanning both multimodal perception and reasoning domains. Through extensive evaluations of 9 selected MLLMs, we reveal substantial performance limitations, with the leading model achieving an average F1_IoU of only 40.59%. To address this limitation, we develop HaloDet-4B, a specialized model trained on our curated training data, which significantly outperforms existing models. We hope the benchmark can provide valuable insights for future research on hallucination mitigation in MLLMs. The code and dataset will be publicly available.

The risk of harmful contents generated by large language models (LLMs) becomes a critical concern. This paper systematically evaluates and enhances LLMs’ capability to perform course-correction, , the model can steer away from generating harmful content autonomously. First, we introduce the C²-Eval benchmark for quantitative assessment and analyze 10 popular LLMs, revealing varying proficiency of current safety-tuned LLMs in course-correction.To improve, we propose fine-tuning LLMs with preference learning, emphasizing the preference for timely course-correction. Using an automated pipeline, we create C²-Syn, a synthetic C²-Syn with 750K pairwise preferences, to teach models the concept of timely course-correction through data-driven learning.Experiments on Llama2-Chat 7B and Qwen2 7B show that our method effectively enhances course-correction skills without affecting general performance. Additionally, it effectively improves LLMs’ safety, particularly in resisting jailbreak attacks.