Large Language Models (LLMs) have become integral to personalized education systems, particularly in the realm of student behavior simulation. By predicting fine-grained learning behaviors, these simulations enable intelligent systems to provide tailored instructional support. However, most existing methods rely on a single high-capacity LLM to represent an entire population of diverse learners. In this work, we demonstrate that this “one-size-fits-all” approach induces a systematic ability-dependent bias, where high-capacity models tend to overestimate low-ability students while lower-capacity models underestimate high-ability ones. To mitigate this distortion, we propose an **ability-aware student simulation framework** that dynamically matches students with appropriate LLM backbones through cognitive alignment. We leverage Neural Cognitive Diagnosis (NeuralCD) to extract multidimensional cognitive profiles for both human students and LLM agents within a shared skill space, subsequently pairing each student with the most cognitively representative model. Extensive experiments demonstrate that our approach substantially reduces simulation bias and consistently outperforms single-model baselines across the entire proficiency spectrum. Our findings suggest that faithful behavior simulation necessitates the **alignment of model capacity with student ability**, establishing cognitive diagnosis as a principled mechanism for model assignment in educational AI.

The rapid advancement of large language models (LLMs) has driven the deployment of LLM-based AI tutors on online learning platforms. This widespread adoption highlights an urgent need for systematic benchmarks to evaluate their tutoring capabilities. However, existing evaluations predominantly focus on isolated, short-term interactions, overlooking the inherently long-term nature of learning. To bridge this gap, we introduce LongTutor, a benchmark for long-term personalized tutoring grounded in formative assessment theory. Built from expert-annotated real-world learning logs, LongTutor evaluates LLMs across three progressive tasks: historical evidence acquisition, knowledge state diagnosis, and adaptive teaching action. Our experiments reveal a critical capability mismatch: while LLMs excel at evidence acquisition, they struggle to effectively leverage long-term history for accurate diagnosis and adaptive teaching. To enable scalable benchmark expansion, we further propose an automated generator–verifier pipeline, paving the way toward truly long-term AI tutoring systems.

Large language models (LLMs) have achieved remarkable performance across diverse tasks, largely driven by large-scale pretraining. However, this data abundance introduces test data contamination, where benchmark datasets overlap with pretraining corpora, undermining the reliability of model evaluation by confounding memorization with genuine generalization. To mitigate this issue, existing training data detectors attempt to identify clean (unseen) samples from contaminated test sets, but often suffer from residual contamination due to the black-box nature of LLMs. As a result, contaminated data may be mistakenly retained, leading to unreliable evaluation.To address this challenge, we propose FTD (FDR-controlled Training Data detection), a principled framework that detects and filters contaminated evaluation data while providing a statistical guarantee: the proportion of contaminated samples mistakenly retained as clean, the false discovery rate (FDR), is provably controlled below a user-specified threshold. FTD combines multiple complementary detectors via an adaptive weighting strategy, and we theoretically show it achieves high statistical power under valid FDR control. Extensive experiments on real-world benchmarks demonstrate that FTD significantly reduces residual contamination compared to existing methods while preserving evaluation consistency.

Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) effectively extends the knowledge boundaries of large language models (LLMs) for complex tasks, yet current paradigms typically optimize for an interleaving of reasoning and retrieval, where models fail to critically evaluate retrieved information against the target question. Most existing methods rely on sparse outcome-based rewards, failing to provide explicit supervision for the internal reasoning process or to diagnose information inadequacy. To address this, we propose Eval-RAR, an Evaluation-driven Retrieval-Augmented Reasoning framework. Eval-RAR introduces a "Search-then-Evaluate" paradigm where the model performs explicit self-evaluation after each search step, generating a rationale to either identify sufficient evidence or specify missing information to guide subsequent queries. To optimize this process, we employ reinforcement learning with a fine-grained evaluation reward, providing intermediate feedback that encourages the model to track core entities and maintain logical consistency. Experiments on seven single-hop and multi-hop QA benchmarks demonstrate that Eval-RAR outperforms existing methods.

Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) technology effectively addresses the issues of knowledge update lag and hallucinations in large language models (LLMs) by integrating internal and external knowledge. Existing query augmentation methods improve RAG’s performance in handling complex queries but face two key challenges: (1) the separation of query augmentation and encoding tasks, which hinders information sharing and introduces cumulative errors, and (2) the difficulty of selecting the optimal augmentation strategy for different scenarios. In this work, we propose UniRAG, a unified framework for query understanding in RAG. UniRAG employs a decoder-only LLM to jointly perform query augmentation and encoding, eliminating task separation. To facilitate adaptive query augmentation, we categorize existing techniques into query paraphrasing, query expansion, and query abstraction. Our model learns to select the optimal augmentation strategy based on user queries, leveraging retrieval and generation outputs as feedback. Experimental results show that UniRAG significantly outperforms traditional query augmentation methods in five knowledge-intensive benchmark tasks in both closed and open domain question answering.

Dense retrieval has now become the mainstream paradigm in information retrieval. The core idea of dense retrieval is to align document embeddings with their corresponding query embeddings by maximizing their dot product. The current training data is quite sparse, with each document typically associated with only one or a few labeled queries. However, a single document can be retrieved by multiple different queries. Aligning a document with just one or a limited number of labeled queries results in a loss of its semantic information. In this paper, we propose a training-free Potential Query Retrieval (PQR) framework to address this issue. Specifically, we use a Gaussian mixture distribution to model all potential queries for a document, aiming to capture its comprehensive semantic information. To obtain this distribution, we introduce three sampling strategies to sample a large number of potential queries for each document and encode them into a semantic space. Using these sampled queries, we employ the Expectation-Maximization algorithm to estimate parameters of the distribution. Finally, we also propose a method to calculate similarity scores between user queries and documents under the PQR framework. Extensive experiments demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed method.

While Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) has emerged as an effective approach for addressing the knowledge outdating problem in Large Language Models (LLMs), it still faces a critical challenge: the prevalence of outdated information in knowledge bases. Current research primarily focuses on incorporating up-to-date information, yet the impact of outdated information coexisting in retrieval sources remains inadequately addressed. To bridge this gap, we introduce HoH, the first benchmark specifically designed to evaluate the impact of outdated information on RAG. Our benchmark leverages token-level diff algorithms combined with LLM pipelines to efficiently create a large-scale QA dataset that accurately captures the evolution of temporal knowledge in real-world facts.Through comprehensive experiments, we reveal that outdated information significantly degrades RAG performance in two critical ways: (1) it substantially reduces response accuracy by distracting models from correct information, and (2) it can mislead models into generating potentially harmful outputs, even when current information is available. Current RAG approaches struggle with both retrieval and generation aspects when handling outdated information. These findings highlight the urgent need for innovative solutions to address the temporal challenges in RAG.

Adaptive learning focuses on recommending personalized materials (e.g., exercises, courses) to the unique needs of learners. Despite significant research, these methods still lag behind real teachers including two main limitations: (1) Prior methods model learner-item interactions based only on ID sequences, leading to insufficient use of both learner and item information, particularly the inability to leverage semantic content from item text; (2) The data-driven reinforcement learning frameworks struggle with stable performance in scenarios with sparse learning logs. To address these challenges, we introduce the Retrieval-enhanced Agent for Adaptive Learning (ReAL) powered by large language models (LLMs), to simulate teacher decision-making with extensive prior knowledge and teaching experience. Specifically, we approach the simulation from both internal and external perspectives. From the internal perspective, we utilize the superior natural language standing ability of LLMs to analyze item texts and learner profiles. This mechanism contributes to the generation of personalized and appropriate item candidates. From the external perspective, we simulate the teacher experience by retrieving similar learners, further ensuring the model’s performance on sparse interaction data. Furthermore, we design a reflector based on learners’ feedback to refine the recommendation process. Evaluation on three real-world datasets demonstrates the superiority of ReAL in both data utilization, recommendation accuracy and stability compared to various representative baselines.

Knowledge editing is a technique for efficiently and accurately updating the knowledge of large language models (LLMs) to alleviate obsolescence and correct errors. However, most existing methods overfit to specific models, causing edited knowledge to be discarded during each LLM update and requiring frequent re-editing, which is particularly burdensome in today’s rapidly evolving open-source community. To address this issue, we propose the problem of cross-model knowledge editing and introduce **MindBridge**, a scalable solution inspired by the low coupling between modality processing and LLMs in multi-modal models. MindBridge introduces the novel concept of **memory modality**, which encodes edited knowledge as an independent modality. It first performs LLM-agnostic pre-training of the memory modality and then integrates it with various LLMs. Extensive experiments on multiple LLMs and popular knowledge editing datasets demonstrate that MindBridge achieves superior performance even in editing tens of thousands of knowledge entries and can flexibly adapt to different LLMs. Our code is available at https://github.com/CrashBugger/MindBridge.

Offline preference optimization methods are efficient for large language models (LLMs) alignment. Direct Preference optimization (DPO)-like learning, one of the most popular approaches, stands out for its efficiency in reward modeling. However, these methods typically follow the convention to use Bradley-Terry (BT) reward modeling that faces several critical assumptions, including the requirement for pairwise training data, model distribution shifting, human rationality assumption, etc. To address these limitations, we propose a general framework for offline preference optimization methods, Adaptive Preference Optimization with Utility Anchor (UAPO), which introduces an anchoring function to estimate the uncertainties brought from preference data annotation. Our method enables training even in scenarios where the data is unpaired, significantly enhancing data utilization efficiency. Moreover, the anchor design makes UAPO more robust in the training process. Experimental results demonstrate that UAPO achieves competitive outcomes without the strict dependency on data pairing, paving the way for more flexible and effective preference optimization methods.

Large language models (LLMs) have made remarkable strides in complex reasoning tasks, but their safety and robustness in reasoning processes remain unexplored, particularly in third-party platforms that facilitate user interactions via APIs. Existing attacks on LLM reasoning are constrained by specific settings or lack of imperceptibility, limiting their feasibility and generalizability. To address these challenges, we propose the Stepwise rEasoning Error Disruption (SEED) attack, which subtly injects errors into prior reasoning steps to mislead the model into producing incorrect subsequent reasoning and final answers. Unlike previous methods, SEED is compatible with zero-shot and few-shot settings, maintains the natural reasoning flow, and ensures covert execution without modifying the instruction. Extensive experiments on four datasets across four different models demonstrate SEED’s effectiveness, revealing the vulnerabilities of LLMs to disruptions in reasoning processes. These findings underscore the need for greater attention to the robustness of LLM reasoning to ensure safety in practical applications. Our code is available at: https://github.com/Applied-Machine-Learning-Lab/SEED-Attack

Accurately assessing internal human states is key to understanding preferences, offering personalized services, and identifying challenges in real-world applications. Originating from psychometrics, adaptive testing has become the mainstream method for human measurement and has now been widely applied in education, healthcare, sports, and sociology. It customizes assessments by selecting the fewest test questions . However, current adaptive testing methods face several challenges. The mechanized nature of most algorithms leads to guessing behavior and difficulties with open-ended questions. Additionally, subjective assessments suffer from noisy response data and coarse-grained test outputs, further limiting their effectiveness. To move closer to an ideal adaptive testing process, we propose TestAgent, a large language model (LLM)-powered agent designed to enhance adaptive testing through interactive engagement. This is the first application of LLMs in adaptive testing. TestAgent supports personalized question selection, captures test-takers’ responses and anomalies, and provides precise outcomes through dynamic, conversational interactions. Experiments on psychological, educational, and lifestyle assessments show our approach achieves more accurate results with 20% fewer questions than state-of-the-art baselines, and testers preferred it in speed, smoothness, and other dimensions.

Information retrieval has evolved from traditional sparse and dense retrieval methods to approaches driven by large language models (LLMs). Recent techniques, such as Generation-Augmented Retrieval (GAR) and Generative Document Retrieval (GDR), leverage LLMs to enhance retrieval but face key challenges: GAR’s generated content may not always align with the target document corpus, while GDR limits the generative capacity of LLMs by constraining outputs to predefined document identifiers. To address these issues, we propose Context-Aware Generation-Augmented Retrieval (CA-GAR), which enhances LLMs by integrating corpus information into their generation process. CA-GAR optimizes token selection by incorporating relevant document information and leverages a Distribution Alignment Strategy to extract corpus information using a lexicon-based approach. Experimental evaluations on seven tasks from the BEIR benchmark and four non-English languages from Mr.TyDi demonstrate that CA-GAR outperforms existing methods.