Large Language Models (LLMs) are inherently constrained by their fixed-length context windows, which limits LLMs’ ability to retain and utilize information across long-term interactions. To address this limitation, recent work has proposed external memory modules for LLMs. Using memory modules typically involves two stages: evidence retrieval and memory utilization. While prior work focuses on the architecture of memory modules and the retrieval stage, the equally critical memory utilization stage remains underexplored. Building on this, we propose MemCoRL, a two-stage alternating co-optimization reinforcement learning method. Stage 1 optimizes evidence retrieval using citation feedback and semantic accuracy from utilization as rewards. Stage 2 optimizes utilization with rewards combining semantic similarity and lexical overlap. Iterative co-optimization establishes a positive feedback loop: better retrieval improves memory utilization, which in turn refines retrieval rewards. Experimental results show our approach outperforms the leading baselines on both lexical overlap and semantic similarity metrics, confirming the co-optimization in memory retrieval and memory utilization.

Visual mathematical reasoning, as a fundamental visual reasoning ability, has received widespread attention from the Large Multimodal Models (LMMs) community. Existing benchmarks mainly focus more on the end-to-end performance, but neglect the underlying principles of knowledge acquisition and generalization. Instead, we introduce WE-MATH, the first benchmark specifically designed to explore the problem-solving principles. We meticulously collect 6.5K visual math problems and decompose them into 10.9K step-level questions for evaluation, spanning 5 layers of knowledge granularity and 67 hierarchical knowledge concepts. Specifically, we decompose composite problems into sub-problems according to the required knowledge concepts and introduce a novel four-dimensional metric to hierarchically assess inherent issues in LMMs’ reasoning process. With WE-MATH, we conduct a thorough evaluation of existing LMMs in visual mathematical reasoning and provide comprehensive analysis and insight for future development. We anticipate that WE-MATH will open new pathways for advancements in visual mathematical reasoning for LMMs. Data and code are available at https://github.com/We-Math/We-Math.

Recently, there has been a growing interest in studying how to construct better code instruction tuning data. However, we observe Code models trained with these datasets exhibit high performance on HumanEval but perform worse on other benchmarks such as LiveCodeBench. Upon further investigation, we find that many datasets suffer from severe data leakage. After cleaning up most of the leaked data, some well-known high-quality datasets perform poorly. This discovery reveals a new challenge: identifying which dataset genuinely qualify as high-quality code instruction data. To address this, we propose an efficient code data pruning strategy for selecting good samples. Our approach is based on three dimensions: instruction complexity, response quality, and instruction diversity. Based on our selected data, we present XCoder, a family of models finetuned from LLaMA3. Our experiments show Xcoder achieves new state-of-the-art performance using fewer training data, which verify the effectiveness of our data strategy. Moreover, we perform a comprehensive analysis on the data composition and find existing code datasets have different characteristics according to their construction methods, which provide new insights for future code LLMs.

Code Large Language Models (Code LLMs) have demonstrated outstanding performance in code-related tasks. Various instruction finetuning approaches have been proposed to boost the code generation performance of pre-trained Code LLMs. In this paper, we introduce a diverse instruction model DolphCoder with self-evaluating for code generation. It learns diverse instruction targets and combines a code evaluation objective to enhance its code generation ability. Our model achieves superior performance on the HumanEval and MBPP benchmarks, demonstrating new insights for future code instruction tuning work. Our key findings are: (1) Augmenting more diverse responses with more distinct reasoning paths increases the code capability of LLMs. (2) Improving one’s ability to evaluate the correctness of code also enhances their ability to create it.