Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) is a mainstream approach to mitigating hallucinations in Large Language Models (LLMs), yet in dynamic real-world scenarios, such as weather forecasting or evolving news events, existing retrievers suffer from both temporal-semantic misalignment and outdated-document interference. To address this, we propose Relevance Recency Retrieval (Re³), a novel framework that mitigates temporal hallucinations via two core components: a Time-Aware Dual Relevance Encoder that embeds heterogeneous temporal signals into the semantic space to ensure retrieval fidelity, and a Conflict-Aware Recency Filter that performs listwise arbitration to identify and suppress obsolete factual versions. To rigorously evaluate this setting, we introduce Re² Bench, a large-scale benchmark comprising over 1.3 million instances designed to assess system robustness in realistic environments where temporal constraints and conflicting factual versions coexist. Experiments on three public benchmarks and Re² Bench demonstrate that Re³ consistently outperforms the strongest baselines by an average of 9.7% in generation accuracy, with gains of up to 25.2% on challenging dynamic tasks, while demonstrating robustness across diverse RAG settings.

While Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) has emerged as an effective approach for addressing the knowledge outdating problem in Large Language Models (LLMs), it still faces a critical challenge: the prevalence of outdated information in knowledge bases. Current research primarily focuses on incorporating up-to-date information, yet the impact of outdated information coexisting in retrieval sources remains inadequately addressed. To bridge this gap, we introduce HoH, the first benchmark specifically designed to evaluate the impact of outdated information on RAG. Our benchmark leverages token-level diff algorithms combined with LLM pipelines to efficiently create a large-scale QA dataset that accurately captures the evolution of temporal knowledge in real-world facts.Through comprehensive experiments, we reveal that outdated information significantly degrades RAG performance in two critical ways: (1) it substantially reduces response accuracy by distracting models from correct information, and (2) it can mislead models into generating potentially harmful outputs, even when current information is available. Current RAG approaches struggle with both retrieval and generation aspects when handling outdated information. These findings highlight the urgent need for innovative solutions to address the temporal challenges in RAG.

Accurately assessing internal human states is key to understanding preferences, offering personalized services, and identifying challenges in real-world applications. Originating from psychometrics, adaptive testing has become the mainstream method for human measurement and has now been widely applied in education, healthcare, sports, and sociology. It customizes assessments by selecting the fewest test questions . However, current adaptive testing methods face several challenges. The mechanized nature of most algorithms leads to guessing behavior and difficulties with open-ended questions. Additionally, subjective assessments suffer from noisy response data and coarse-grained test outputs, further limiting their effectiveness. To move closer to an ideal adaptive testing process, we propose TestAgent, a large language model (LLM)-powered agent designed to enhance adaptive testing through interactive engagement. This is the first application of LLMs in adaptive testing. TestAgent supports personalized question selection, captures test-takers’ responses and anomalies, and provides precise outcomes through dynamic, conversational interactions. Experiments on psychological, educational, and lifestyle assessments show our approach achieves more accurate results with 20% fewer questions than state-of-the-art baselines, and testers preferred it in speed, smoothness, and other dimensions.