Document understanding is critical for applications from financial analysis to scientific discovery. Current approaches, whether OCR-based pipelines feeding Large Language Models (LLMs) or native Multimodal LLMs (MLLMs), face key limitations: the former loses structural detail, while the latter struggles with context modeling. Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) helps ground models in external data, but documents’ multimodal nature, i.e., combining text, tables, charts, and layout, demands a more advanced paradigm: Multimodal RAG. This approach enables holistic retrieval and reasoning across all modalities, unlocking comprehensive document intelligence. Recognizing its importance, this paper presents a systematic survey of Multimodal RAG for document understanding. We propose a taxonomy based on domain, retrieval modality, and granularity, and review advances involving graph structures and agentic frameworks. We also summarize key datasets, benchmarks, and applications, and highlight open challenges in efficiency, fine-grained representation, and robustness, providing a roadmap for future progress in document AI.

Sentiment classification is a crucial task in natural language processing (NLP). To mitigate the spurious correlation, the causal word identification method estimates the impact of treatment words on sentence sentiment and removes those with low treatment effects. However, previous works regard the presence or absence of a specific word in a sentence as a binary treatment. This approach limits the generalizability to novel words and the robustness of low-frequency words. To bridge this gap, we propose a meta-causal approach that achieves causal word identification for arbitrary words with a single training task. Specifically, we begin by clustering contexts based on their embeddings obtained from a pre-trained language model. Subsequently, for each cluster, a representation and multi-head prediction networks are trained to estimate the treatment effect of each word to distinguish causally related words from spuriously correlated ones. The trained word classifier is then used to give weights for different words to train a more robust and generalizable sentiment classification model. Extensive experiments on public datasets demonstrate the effectiveness of our method in identifying causal words and improving the performance of sentiment classification.

Chain-of-Thought (CoT) prompting has improved LLM reasoning, but models often generate explanations that appear coherent while containing unfaithful intermediate steps. Existing self-evaluation approaches are prone to inherent biases: the model may confidently endorse coherence even when the step-to-step implication is not valid, leading to unreliable faithfulness evaluation. We propose FACT-E, a causality-inspired framework for evaluating CoT quality. FACT-E uses controlled perturbations as an instrumental signal to separate genuine step-to-step dependence from bias-driven artifacts, producing more reliable faithfulness estimates (intra-chain faithfulness). To select trustworthy trajectories, FACT-E jointly considers intra-chain faithfulness and CoT-to-answer consistency, ensuring that selected chains are both faithful internally and supportive of the correct final answer. Experiments on GSM8K, MATH, and CommonsenseQA show that FACT-E improves reasoning-trajectory selection and yields stronger in-context learning exemplars. FACT-E also reliably detects flawed reasoning under noisy conditions, providing a robust metric for trustworthy LLM reasoning.

Identifying causal relationships rather than spurious correlations between words and class labels plays a crucial role in building robust text classifiers. Previous studies proposed using causal effects to distinguish words that are causally related to the sentiment, and then building robust text classifiers using words with high causal effects. However, we find that when a sentence has multiple causally related words simultaneously, the magnitude of causal effects will be significantly reduced, which limits the applicability of previous causal effect-based methods in distinguishing causally related words from spuriously correlated ones. To fill this gap, in this paper, we introduce both the probability of necessity (PN) and probability of sufficiency (PS), aiming to answer the counterfactual question that ‘if a sentence has a certain sentiment in the presence/absence of a word, would the sentiment change in the absence/presence of that word?’. Specifically, we first derive the identifiability of PN and PS under different sentiment monotonicities, and calibrate the estimation of PN and PS via the estimated average treatment effect. Finally, the robust text classifier is built by identifying the words with larger PN and PS as causally related words, and other words as spuriously correlated words, based on a contrastive learning approach name CPNS is proposed to achieve robust sentiment classification. Extensive experiments are conducted on public datasets to validate the effectiveness of our method.