Intelligent embodied agents should not simply follow instructions, as real-world environments often involve unexpected conditions and exceptions. However, existing methods usually focus on directly executing instructions, without considering whether the target objects can actually be manipulated, meaning they fail to assess available affordances. To address this limitation, we introduce DynAfford, a benchmark that evaluates embodied agents in dynamic environments where object affordances may change over time and are not specified in the instruction. DynAfford requires agents to perceive object states, infer implicit preconditions, and adapt their actions accordingly. To enable this capability, we introduce ADAPT (Affordance-Driven Adaptive Planning and Task execution), a plug-and-play module that augments existing planners with explicit affordance reasoning. Experiments demonstrate that incorporating ADAPT significantly improves robustness and task success across both seen and unseen environments. We also show that a domain-adapted, LoRA-finetuned vision-language model used as the affordance inference backend outperforms a commercial LLM (GPT-4o), highlighting the importance of task-aligned affordance grounding.

Severe acoustic degradation is often caused by overlapping noise, disfluencies, and environmental distortions. This phenomenon results in the dissolution of linguistic structures and the generation of unreliable ASR outputs. Inspired by human speech comprehension, we propose Speech-MLM, a novel multimodal framework that reframes ASR as semantics-guided speech reconstruction. This perspective introduces three core challenges: (C1) collapse of linguistic structure under acoustic degradation, (C2) semantic ambiguity under noise, and (C3) misalignment across modalities. To address these issues, we propose Speech-MLM, a multimodal ASR framework that integrates speech, spectrogram-derived visual cues, and textual variants to enhance robustness. It consists of: (i) Cognitive Structure Extractor that recovers prosodic structure from visualized acoustic features, (ii) Semantic Weaver that learns semantic equivalence across varied textual forms, and (iii) Retrieval-Guided Fusion Learner that unifies modalities within a shared semantic space. Experiments on multiple real-world noisy datasets demonstrate that Speech-MLM achieves an average 38.85% reduction in WER, while also attaining 98.71% BERTScore and 96.7% USE, over advanced baselines, demonstrating substantial gains in semantic robustness and generalization across domains.

Conventional Vision-and-Language Navigation (VLN) benchmarks assume instructions are feasible and the referenced target exists, leaving agents ill-equipped to handle false-premise goals. We introduce VLN-NF, a benchmark with false-premise instructions where the target is absent from the specified area and agents must navigate, gather evidence through in-room exploration, and explicitly output . VLN-NF is constructed via a scalable pipeline that rewrites VLN instructions using an LLM and verifies target absence with a VLM, producing plausible yet factually incorrect goals. We further propose REV-SPL to jointly evaluate room reaching, exploration coverage, and decision correctness. To address this challenge, we present ROAM, a two-stage hybrid that combines supervised room-level navigation with LLM/VLM-driven in-room exploration guided by a free-space clearance prior. ROAM achieves the best REV-SPL among compared methods, while baselines often under-explore and terminate prematurely under unreliable instructions. Code and data will be released upon acceptance.

19 K-12 teachers participated in a co-design pilot study of an AI education platform, testing assessment grading. Teachers valued AI’s rapid narrative feedback for formative assessment but distrusted automated scoring, preferring human oversight. Students appreciated immediate feedback but remained skeptical of AI-only grading, highlighting needs for trustworthy, teacher-centered AI tools.

We propose a unified model combining the strength of extractive and abstractive summarization. On the one hand, a simple extractive model can obtain sentence-level attention with high ROUGE scores but less readable. On the other hand, a more complicated abstractive model can obtain word-level dynamic attention to generate a more readable paragraph. In our model, sentence-level attention is used to modulate the word-level attention such that words in less attended sentences are less likely to be generated. Moreover, a novel inconsistency loss function is introduced to penalize the inconsistency between two levels of attentions. By end-to-end training our model with the inconsistency loss and original losses of extractive and abstractive models, we achieve state-of-the-art ROUGE scores while being the most informative and readable summarization on the CNN/Daily Mail dataset in a solid human evaluation.