Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) excel at visual understanding but face severe computational bottlenecks when processing high-resolution images and long videos due to massive visual token counts. Token pruning mitigates this by selectively removing less informative tokens while maintaining performance. However, existing methods vary widely in pruning location (vision encoder vs. LLM decoder), importance criteria (attention vs. similarity vs. learned scores), and application strategy, lacking systematic comparison. This survey presents the first comprehensive review of token pruning for LVLMs. We propose a taxonomy categorizing methods into vision-side, LLM-side, and hybrid paradigms, systematically analyze token selection mechanisms and pruning strategy. We further discuss evaluation protocols and identify key challenges including prompt-adaptive pruning and hardware-aware design. Our survey provides a structured foundation for this rapidly growing research area.

Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) is widely adopted for its effectiveness and cost-efficiency in mitigating hallucinations and enhancing the domain-specific generation capabilities of large language models (LLMs). However, is this effectiveness and cost-efficiency truly a free lunch? In this study, we comprehensively investigate the fairness costs associated with RAG by proposing a practical three-level threat model from the perspective of user awareness of fairness. Specifically, varying levels of user fairness awareness result in different degrees of fairness censorship on external datasets. We examine the fairness implications of RAG using uncensored, partially censored, and fully censored datasets. Our experiments demonstrate that fairness alignment can be easily undermined through RAG without the need for fine-tuning or retraining. Even with fully censored and supposedly unbiased external datasets, RAG would still lead to biased outputs. Our findings underscore the limitations of current alignment methods in the context of RAG-based LLMs and highlight the urgent need for new strategies to ensure fairness. We propose potential mitigations and call for further research to develop robust fairness safeguards in RAG-based LLMs.