This paper introduces the task of analytical question answering over large, semi-structured document collections. We present MuDABench, a benchmark for multi-document analytical QA, where questions require extracting and synthesizing information across numerous documents to perform quantitative analysis. Unlike existing multi-document QA benchmarks that typically require information from only a few documents with limited cross-document reasoning, MuDABench demands extensive inter-document analysis and aggregation. Constructed via distant supervision by leveraging document-level metadata and annotated financial databases, MuDABench comprises over 80,000 pages and 332 analytical QA instances. We also propose an evaluation protocol that measures final answer accuracy and uses intermediate-fact coverage as an auxiliary diagnostic signal for the reasoning process. Experiments reveal that standard RAG systems, which treat all documents as a flat retrieval pool, perform poorly. To address these limitations, we propose a multi-agent workflow that orchestrates planning, extraction, and code generation modules. While this approach substantially improves both process and outcome metrics, a significant gap remains compared to human expert performance. Our analysis identifies two primary bottlenecks: single-document information extraction accuracy and insufficient domain-specific knowledge in current systems. MuDABench is available at https://github.com/Zhanli-Li/MuDABench.

To assist humans in efficiently validating RAG-generated content, developing a fine-grained attribution mechanism that provides supporting evidence from retrieved documents for every answer span is essential. Existing fine-grained attribution methods rely on model-internal similarity metrics between responses and documents, such as saliency scores and hidden state similarity. However, these approaches suffer from either high computational complexity or coarse-grained representations. Additionally, a common problem shared by the previous works is their reliance on decoder-only Transformers, limiting their ability to incorporate contextual information after the target span. To address the above problems, we propose two techniques applicable to all model-internals-based methods. First, we aggregate token-wise evidence through set union operations, preserving the granularity of representations. Second, we enhance the attributor by integrating dependency parsing to enrich the semantic completeness of target spans. For practical implementation, our approach employs attention weights as the similarity metric. Experimental results demonstrate that the proposed method consistently outperforms all prior works.

Retrieval-augmented generation improves the factual accuracy of Large Language Models (LLMs) by incorporating external context, but often suffers from irrelevant retrieved content that hinders effectiveness. Context compression addresses this issue by filtering out irrelevant information from context before LLM generation. However, existing methods struggle to adaptively adjust compression rates for different context, maintain low latency and integrate information across multiple documents. To overcome these limitations, We introduce AttnComp, an adaptive, efficient and context-aware compression framework. By leveraging the attention mechanism of LLMs to identify relevant information, AttnComp employs a Top-P compression algorithm to retain the minimal set of documents whose cumulative attention weights exceeds a predefined threshold. In addition to compression, AttnComp estimates response confidence by assessing the overall relevance of the retrieved content, enabling users to gauge response reliability. Experiments demonstrate that AttnComp outperforms existing compression methods and uncompressed baselines, achieving higher accuracy with substantial compression rates and lower latency.