Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) has emerged as a promising paradigm for mitigating hallucinations in large language models (LLMs).However, the intrinsic heterogeneity between the retriever and the generator often leads to a mismatch between retrieved evidence and generation needs, hindering effective coordination.We argue that competition between discriminative retrieval and generative modeling can more effectively expose their mutual weaknesses and induce deeper interaction. Motivated by this insight, we propose CARL (Co-opetition AdveRsarial Learning), a framework that formulates retriever–generator training in RAG as a minimax game. In this game, the retriever is optimized to retrieve both useful and adversarially useless documents to challenge the generator, while the generator learns to identify useful evidence and remain robust to misleading retrievals to produce accurate answers.Experiments on seven benchmark datasets demonstrate that CARL consistently improves RAG performance, validating the effectiveness of adversarial co-opetition in enhancing retriever–generator synergy.

Listwise ranking based on Large Language Models (LLMs) has achieved state-of-the-art performance in Information Retrieval (IR).However, their effectiveness often depends on LLMs with massive parameter scales and computationally expensive sliding window processing, leading to substantial efficiency bottlenecks. In this paper, we propose a Collaborative Ranking framework (CoRanking) for LLM-based listwise ranking.Specifically, we strategically combine an efficient small reranker and an effective large reranker for collaborative ranking.The small reranker performs initial passage ranking, effectively filtering the passage set to a condensed top-k list (e.g., top-20 passages), and the large reranker (with stronger ranking capability) then reranks only this condensed subset rather than the full list, significantly improving efficiency. We further address that directly passing the top-ranked passages from the small reranker to the large reranker is suboptimal because of the LLM’s strong positional bias in processing input sequences. To resolve this issue, we propose a passage order adjuster learned by RL that dynamically reorders the top passages returned by the small reranker to better align with the large LLM’s input preferences. Our extensive experiments across three IR benchmarks demonstrate that CoRanking achieves superior efficiency, reducing ranking latency by approximately 70% while simultaneously improving effectiveness, compared to the standalone large reranker.

Large language models (LLMs) have shown promise in automating travel planning, yet they often fall short in addressing nuanced spatiotemporal rationality. While existing benchmarks focus on basic plan validity, they neglect critical aspects such as route efficiency, POI appeal, and real-time adaptability. This paper introduces **TP-RAG**, the first benchmark tailored for retrieval-augmented, spatiotemporal-aware travel planning. Our dataset includes 2,348 real-world travel queries, 85,575 fine-grain annotated POIs, and 18,784 high-quality travel trajectory references sourced from online tourist documents, enabling dynamic and context-aware planning. Through extensive experiments, we reveal that integrating reference trajectories significantly improves spatial efficiency and POI rationality of the travel plan, while challenges persist in universality and robustness due to conflicting references and noisy data. To address these issues, we propose *EvoRAG*, an evolutionary framework that potently synergizes diverse retrieved trajectories with LLMs’ intrinsic reasoning. *EvoRAG* achieves state-of-the-art performance, improving spatiotemporal compliance and reducing commonsense violation compared to ground-up and retrieval-augmented baselines. Our work underscores the potential of hybridizing Web knowledge with LLM-driven optimization, paving the way for more reliable and adaptive travel planning agents.