This paper proposes shortcut decoding, an efficient framework for accelerating Chain-of-Thought (CoT) reasoning in Large Language Models (LLMs). Existing methods that prune or employ early stopping to reduce latency often compromise reasoning reliability. Motivated by the observation that LLMs frequently converge to correct solutions internally before completing explicit textual reasoning, we propose a dual-signal adaptive controller that integrates lightweight probes over internal hidden states with step-level entropy. This controller detects convergence of reasoning during generation and adaptively selects between a fast-exit path and a stability-verified path to remove redundant steps while preserving answer correctness. Experiments across multiple mathematical reasoning benchmarks demonstrate that shortcut decoding reduces token usage by approximately 35%, maintains accuracy comparable to full CoT decoding, and achieves final-answer accuracy comparable to the full CoT baseline, outperforming existing early-stopping methods without updating the base model. Our code is available at https://github.com/kuromi9527/shortcut_decoding.

Despite significant advances in LLM-driven GUI agents, the field remains constrained by the challenge of reconciling high-fidelity realism with verifiable evaluation accuracy. To address this, we introduce NaturalGAIA, a verifiable evaluation dataset grounded in real-world human GUI interaction intents. By decoupling logical causal pathways from linguistic narratives, it rigorously simulates natural human intent, characterized by cognitive non-linearity and contextual dependencies. Furthermore, we propose LightManus-Jarvis, a hierarchical collaborative framework where LightManus manages dynamic topological planning and context evolution, while Jarvis ensures execution precision via hybrid visual-structural perception. Experiments demonstrate that our approach achieves a Weighted Pathway Success Rate of 45.6%, significantly outperforming the state-of-the-art baseline (21.1%), while reducing token consumption by 75% and execution time by 76%. These results validate the efficacy of the macro-planning and micro-execution paradigm in handling complex naturalized tasks. Our code is publicly available at: https://anonymous.4open.science/r/NatureGAIA-721F/.

One of the research focuses of large language models (LLMs) is the ability to generate action plans. Recent studies have revealed that the performance of LLMs can be significantly improved by integrating external tools. Based on this, we propose a benchmark framework called PlanningArena, which aims to simulate real application scenarios and provide a series of apps and API tools that may be involved in the actual planning process. This framework adopts a modular task structure and combines user portrait analysis to evaluate the ability of LLMs in correctly selecting tools, logical reasoning in complex scenarios, and parsing user information. In addition, we deeply diagnose the task execution effect of LLMs from both macro and micro levels. The experimental results show that even the most outstanding GPT-4o and DeepSeekV3 models only achieved a total score of 56.5% and 41.9% in PlanningArena, respectively, indicating that current LLMs still face challenges in logical reasoning, context memory, and tool calling when dealing with different structures, scenarios, and their complexity. Through this benchmark, we further explore the path to optimize LLMs to perform planning tasks.

Generating logically coherent video from text (T2V) for reasoning-intensive tasks like mathematical problem-solving presents a significant challenge for Vision-Language Models (VLMs). Therefore, we introduce VisualEDU, a benchmark based on Manim package to rigorously evaluate VLM capabilities in producing coherent, step-by-step video solutions for educational purposes, with a framework that integrates meta-prompt learning, visual and code feedback, and a modular drawing toolkit to enhance output quality. Novel metrics for temporal consistency, logical correctness, and visual clarity are proposed, and extensive experiments across nine VLMs reveal that while advanced proprietary models show promise, all struggle significantly with increasing task complexity (e.g., the performances of Claude-3.7-Sonnet and GPT-4o are below 56% on difficult tasks ), highlighting limitations in code generation, visual feedback correction and precise tool invocation. VisualEDU offers a robust platform for systematic T2V assessment in reasoning-intensive domains and guides future VLM improvements in this area.