The saturation of high-quality pre-training data has shifted research focus toward evolutionary systems capable of continuously generating novel artifacts, leading to the success of AlphaEvolve. However, the progress of such systems is hindered by the lack of rigorous, quantitative evaluation. To tackle this challenge, we introduce CreativeBench, a benchmark for evaluating machine creativity in code generation, grounded in a classical cognitive framework. Comprising two subsets – CreativeBench-Combo and CreativeBench-Explore – the benchmark targets combinatorial and exploratory creativity through an automated pipeline utilizing reverse engineering and self-play. By leveraging executable code, CreativeBench objectively distinguishes creativity from hallucination via a unified metric defined as the product of quality and novelty. Our analysis of state-of-the-art models reveals distinct behaviors: (1) scaling significantly improves combinatorial creativity but yields diminishing returns for exploration; (2) larger models exhibit “convergence-by-scaling,” becoming more correct but less divergent; and (3) reasoning capabilities primarily benefit constrained exploration rather than combination. Finally, we propose EvoRePE, a plug-and-play inference-time steering strategy that internalizes evolutionary search patterns to consistently enhance machine creativity.

As Large Language Models (LLMs) continue to advance in capability, prompt engineering has emerged as a crucial method for optimizing their performance on specialized tasks. While prompting strategies like Zero-shot, Few-shot, Chain-of-Thought, and Tree-of-Thought have demonstrated significant improvements in reasoning tasks, their application to machine translation has received comparatively less attention. This paper systematically evaluates these prompting techniques across diverse language pairs and domains, measuring their effect on translation quality. Our findings reveal substantial performance variations between prompting methods, with certain strategies offering consistent improvements for specific language directions and complexity levels. These results provide valuable insights for developing more effective LLM-based translation systems without requiring model fine-tuning and complement existing works in the field.