Retail banks handle high volumes of customer interactions across different channels that span various topics. Early and accurate detection of the intent of the customer is critical towards streamlining contact-center operations through efficient routing and handling of conversations. Mining of customer interactions leads to identification of friction points in customer journeys and offers valuable insights about customer needs. Existing approaches to define customer intents or contact reasons remain fragmented, manually maintained across organizations and relying on knowledge of specific business processes. We propose a framework that develops a dynamic hierarchical Reason-of-Contact (RoC) taxonomy to cover customer topics across hundreds of business processes. We further demonstrate the implementation of this taxonomy to a robust solution that identifies intents for all customer conversations across different channels. Our deployed system supports real time use with a 150 to 300 ms turnaround per conversation. It achieves up to 10% improvement in F1 score over baseline approaches on a reference dataset. We also detail deployment considerations, including dynamic taxonomy updates, out-of-domain detection, and auditability. Finally, we present ablations and error analyses to characterize effectiveness.

Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed as autonomous agents for simulation and decision-making, necessitating a deeper understanding of their decision-making behaviour under risk. We investigate the relationship between LLMs’ personality traits and risk-propensity, applying Cumulative Prospect Theory (CPT) and the Big Five personality framework. We compare the behaviour of several LLMs to human baselines. Our findings show that the majority of the models investigated are risk-neutral rational agents, whilst displaying higher Conscientiousness and Agreeableness traits, coupled with lower Neuroticism. Interventions on Big Five traits, particularly Openness, influence the risk-propensity of several LLMs. Advanced models mirror human personality-risk patterns, suggesting that cognitive biases can be surfaced by optimal prompting. However, their distilled variants show no cognitive bias, suggesting limitations to knowledge transfer processes. Notably, Openness emerges as the most influential factor to risk-propensity, aligning with human baselines. In contrast, less advanced models demonstrate inconsistent generalization of the personality-risk relationship. This research advances our understanding of LLM behaviour under risk and highlights the potential and limitations of personality-based interventions in shaping LLM decision-making.