Unified Information Extraction (UIE) aims to handle heterogeneous IE tasks within a single framework, but existing methods often suffer from inconsistent schema representation, implicitly intermediate reasoning and full-parameter adaptation, which limit generalization, interpretability and parameter efficiency. To address these issues, we propose UC-UIE (Universal Capabilities-based Unified Information Extractor), a unified framework based on Large Language Model (LLM), which introduces a unified frame-and-slots schema for IE tasks and explicitly decomposes IE reasoning into three universal capabilities: judging, locating, and associating. Furthermore, UC-UIE adopts a Low-Rank Adaptation (LoRA) based hierarchical Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) adapter to fine-tune LLMs for IE tasks, which explicitly models these three capabilities in a task-driven way while ensuring parameter efficiency. With only 1.24% trainable parameters, UC-UIE outperforms full-parameter tuning methods, showing excellent parameter efficiency. Zero-shot evaluation reveals its strong generalization ability to unseen domains and schemas, benefiting from unified schema representation and explicit capability decomposition. Further experiments validate that the hierarchical MoE adapter learns capability specialization and composition, which enhances both UIE performance and interpretability.

Relation extraction (RE) identifies semantic relations between entities in text, with existing methods falling into two main paradigms: discriminative and generative. Discriminative models encode sentences and entities into relation representations and classify the most likely relation, whereas generative models directly produce relation labels through sequence generation. Although the latter have benefited from recent advances in large language models (LLMs), their performance remains limited by bottlenecks. In this work, we present the systematic investigation of how discriminative models can support generative RE. We propose the Discriminative-to-Generative (D2G) framework, which first leverages discriminative models to produce a top-k set of candidate relations, and then integrates this knowledge into generative models via in-context or prompt learning. Extensive experiments on five widely used RE benchmarks demonstrate that D2G consistently achieves state-of-the-art performance, with notable gains on long-tailed relation classes.

Most large language models are fine-tuned using either expensive human-annotated data or GPT-4 generated data which cannot guarantee performance in certain domains. We argue that although the web-crawled data often has formatting errors causing semantic inaccuracies, it can still serve as a valuable source for high-quality supervised fine-tuning in specific domains without relying on advanced models like GPT-4. To this end, we create a paired training dataset automatically by aligning web-crawled data with a smaller set of high-quality data. By training a language model on this dataset, we can convert web data with irregular formats into high-quality ones. Our experiments show that training with the model-transformed data yields better results, surpassing training with only high-quality data by an average score of 9.4% in Chinese math problems. Additionally, our 7B model outperforms several open-source models larger than 32B and surpasses well-known closed-source models such as GPT-3.5, highlighting the efficacy of our approach. We have released our code at https://github.com/zhouj8553/Web_to_SFT.

Generative modeling has been the dominant approach for large-scale pretraining and zero-shot generalization. In this work, we challenge this convention by showing that discriminative approaches perform substantially better than generative ones on a large number of NLP tasks. Technically, we train a single discriminator to predict whether a text sample comes from the true data distribution, similar to GANs. Since many NLP tasks can be formulated as selecting from a few options, we use this discriminator to predict the concatenation of input and which option has the highest probability of coming from the true data distribution. This simple formulation achieves state-of-the-art zero-shot results on the T0 benchmark, outperforming T0 by 16.0%, 7.8%, and 11.5% respectively on different scales. In the finetuning setting, our approach also achieves new state-of-the-art results on a wide range of NLP tasks, with only 1/4 parameters of previous methods. Meanwhile, our approach requires minimal prompting efforts, which largely improves robustness and is essential for real-world applications. Furthermore, we also jointly train a generalized UD in combination with generative tasks, which maintains its advantage on discriminative tasks and simultaneously works on generative tasks.

Most previous methods for text data augmentation are limited to simple tasks and weak baselines. We explore data augmentation on hard tasks (i.e., few-shot natural language understanding) and strong baselines (i.e., pretrained models with over one billion parameters). Under this setting, we reproduced a large number of previous augmentation methods and found that these methods bring marginal gains at best and sometimes degrade the performance much. To address this challenge, we propose a novel data augmentation method FlipDA that jointly uses a generative model and a classifier to generate label-flipped data. Central to the idea of FlipDA is the discovery that generating label-flipped data is more crucial to the performance than generating label-preserved data. Experiments show that FlipDA achieves a good tradeoff between effectiveness and robustness—it substantially improves many tasks while not negatively affecting the others.

The few-shot natural language understanding (NLU) task has attracted much recent attention. However, prior methods have been evaluated under a disparate set of protocols, which hinders fair comparison and measuring the progress of the field. To address this issue, we introduce an evaluation framework that improves previous evaluation procedures in three key aspects, i.e., test performance, dev-test correlation, and stability. Under this new evaluation framework, we re-evaluate several state-of-the-art few-shot methods for NLU tasks. Our framework reveals new insights: (1) both the absolute performance and relative gap of the methods were not accurately estimated in prior literature; (2) no single method dominates most tasks with consistent performance; (3) improvements of some methods diminish with a larger pretrained model; and (4) gains from different methods are often complementary and the best combined model performs close to a strong fully-supervised baseline. We open-source our toolkit, FewNLU, that implements our evaluation framework along with a number of state-of-the-art methods.