In complex domains like interior design, user requests are often ambiguous and multimodal. Professional designers address this by asking strategic clarification questions based on hierarchical priorities, a capability lacking in current Vision-Language Models (VLMs). When fine-tuned on dialogue data, existing models often exhibit modality forgetting, overfitting to textual patterns while neglecting visual cues and thus producing hallucinated or visually irrelevant questions. To bridge this gap, we introduce VIDA (Visual Intent-driven Design Assistant), an assistant designed to generate proactive, visually grounded, and strategically prioritized clarification questions. Instead of standard fine-tuning, we propose a strategy-aware alignment framework that evolves from imitation learning to value-driven reinforcement. We utilize Group Sequence Policy Optimization to strictly enforce expert protocols, ensuring the model not only mimics fluent speech but also adheres to optimal inquiry strategies. Crucially, we design a novel hierarchical reward mechanism with Dynamic Intent Binding to align the assistant with professional prioritization standards. To facilitate this research, we construct and release InteriorClarify, a multimodal benchmark dataset comprising 1,016 real-world consultation cases annotated with this three-tier intent hierarchy. Extensive experiments demonstrate that VIDA sets a new state-of-the-art, improving the Strategic Alignment Score (SAS) by 20.59% over SFT baselines and effectively restoring visual grounding capabilities lost during standard fine-tuning.

Advances in Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) intensify concerns about data safety, making Machine Unlearning (MU), the selective removal of harmful/private information, a critical necessity. However, existing MU benchmarks for MLLMs are limited by a lack of image diversity, coarse-grained unlearning target, and insufficient evaluation scenarios, which fail to capture the complexity of real-world applications. To facilitate the development of MLLMs unlearning and alleviate the aforementioned limitations, we introduce OFFSIDE, a novel benchmark for evaluating misinformation unlearning in MLLMs. This manually curated dataset contains 15.68K records for 80 players, providing a comprehensive framework with four test sets to assess forgetting efficacy, generalization, utility, and robustness. OFFSIDE supports advanced unlearning targets, such as fine-grained unlearning and visual rumor removal. Our extensive evaluation of multiple baselines not only extends key findings from LLM MU to MLLM MU: (1) unlearned rumors can be easily recovered through relearning and (2) all methods are vulnerable to prompt attacks, but also introduces novel insights in the context of MLLM: (1) unimodal methods fail to handle multimodal rumors, (2) unlearning efficacy is primarily driven by catastrophic forgetting statistically, and (3) all methods struggle with visual rumors (rumors embedded in images). These results expose significant vulnerabilities in current approaches, highlighting the need for more robust multimodal unlearning solutions.

The efficacy of Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) is critically dependent on the quality of their training data, requiring a precise balance between visual fidelity and instruction-following capability. Existing datasets, however, are plagued by inconsistent quality, and current data filtering methods rely on coarse-grained scores that lack the granularity to identify nuanced semantic flaws like logical fallacies or factual errors. This creates a fundamental bottleneck in developing more reliable models. To address this, we make three core contributions. First, we construct a large-scale, 300K-sample benchmark by systematically injecting diverse, subtle defects to provide a challenging testbed for data auditing. Second, we introduce a novel "Decomposition-then-Evaluation" paradigm that breaks model responses into constituent cognitive components: visual description, subjective inference, and factual claim, enabling targeted analysis. Third, we instantiate this paradigm via EVIAN (Explainable Visual Instruction-tuning Data AuditiNg), an automated framework that evaluates these components along the orthogonal axes of Image-Text Consistency, Logical Coherence, and Factual Accuracy. Our empirical findings challenge the prevailing scale-centric paradigm: a model fine-tuned on a compact, high-quality subset curated by EVIAN consistently surpassed models trained on orders-of-magnitude larger datasets. We also reveal that dividing complex auditing into verifiable subtasks enables robust curation, and that Logical Coherence is the most critical factor in data quality evaluation.

Large Language Models are increasingly deployed for decision-making, yet their adoption in high-stakes domains remains limited by miscalibrated probabilities, unfaithful explanations, and inability to incorporate expert knowledge precisely. We propose **IDEA**, a framework that extracts LLM decision knowledge into an interpretable parametric model over semantically meaningful factors. Through joint learning of verbal-to-numerical mappings and decision parameters via EM, correlated sampling that preserves factor dependencies, and direct parameter editing with mathematical guarantees, IDEA produces calibrated probabilities while enabling quantitative human-AI collaboration. Experiments across five datasets show IDEA with Qwen-3-32B (78.6%) outperforms DeepSeek R1 (68.1%) and GPT-5.2 (77.9%), achieving perfect factor exclusion and exact calibration—precision unattainable through prompting alone.