Speculative decoding (SD) improves LLM inference latency by speculatively generating multiple tokens with a small draft model and verifying them with a larger target model. However, when speculation accuracy is low, the overhead from rejected tokens can negate its benefits, especially at large batch sizes.We propose Speculative Verification (SV), an efficient augmentation to SD that predicts speculation accuracy and dynamically adapts the verification length to maximize throughput. SV introduces a small companion model, similar in size to draft model, to reduce uncertainty in speculation accuracy. By exploiting the information gain from observing the companion distribution, SV reduces wasted verification on rejected tokens and improves decoding efficiency.We evaluate SV across publicly available LLMs on seven NLP tasks using over a hundred combinations of draft, companion, and target models, including 13B–72B target models spanning base, instruction-tuned, and task-specific fine-tuned variants. Compared to target-only decoding, standard SD, and state-of-the-art SD variants, SV consistently delivers higher throughput across batch sizes. SV improves SD performance by up to 1.9×, with an average 1.4× speedup at large batch sizes, showing robust and scalable gains for practical LLM inference.

Recent studies have addressed intricate phonological phenomena in French, relying on either extensive linguistic knowledge or a significant amount of sentence-level pronunciation data. However, creating such resources is expensive and non-trivial. To this end, we propose a novel two-step approach that encompasses two pronunciation tasks: grapheme-to-phoneme and post-lexical processing. We then investigate the efficacy of the proposed approach with a notably limited amount of sentence-level pronunciation data. Our findings demonstrate that the proposed two-step approach effectively mitigates the lack of extensive labeled data, and serves as a feasible solution for addressing French phonological phenomena even under resource-constrained environments.

Recently, sentiment-aware pre-trained language models (PLMs) demonstrate impressive results in downstream sentiment analysis tasks. However, they neglect to evaluate the quality of their constructed sentiment representations; they just focus on improving the fine-tuning performance, which overshadows the representation quality. We argue that without guaranteeing the representation quality, their downstream performance can be highly dependent on the supervision of the fine-tuning data rather than representation quality. This problem would make them difficult to foray into other sentiment-related domains, especially where labeled data is scarce. We first propose Sentiment-guided Textual Similarity (SgTS), a novel metric for evaluating the quality of sentiment representations, which is designed based on the degree of equivalence in sentiment polarity between two sentences. We then propose SentiCSE, a novel Sentiment-aware Contrastive Sentence Embedding framework for constructing sentiment representations via combined word-level and sentence-level objectives, whose quality is guaranteed by SgTS. Qualitative and quantitative comparison with the previous sentiment-aware PLMs shows the superiority of our work. Our code is available at: https://github.com/nayohan/SentiCSE