Financial report generation is a complex task that requires gathering and reasoning over multi-source information. Recent advances in Large Language Models have made them a promising solution for automating this process. However, the reasoning paths in traditional Chain-of-Thought paradigms are inherently constrained by predefined, static computational topologies, rendering them ill-equipped to handle the dynamic uncertainties of real-world financial environments. To tackle this challenge, we propose Cogito, a cognitively grounded agentic framework for professional financial report generation. At its core, Cogito is driven by Dynamic Graph of Thoughts, a novel reasoning mechanism that models the agent’s reasoning process as an evolving topology for adaptive exploration.We further introduce a Social Collaboration Mechanism to facilitate coordinated agent interaction. Finally, Cogito is instantiated as a multi-agent system, where four specialized agents collaboratively execute the end-to-end report generation task. Extensive experiments on enterprise- and industry-level financial report generation benchmarks demonstrate the superiority of Cogito in data quality, analytical validity, and presentation quality.

Generating lay summaries of biomedical research remains a time-intensive task, despite their importance in bridging the gap between scientific findings and non-expert audiences. This study introduces a retrieval-augmented fine-tuning framework for biomedical lay summarization, integrating abstract-driven semantic retrieval with LoRA-tuned LLaMA 3.1 models. Abstracts are used as queries to retrieve relevant text segments from full-text articles, which are then incorporated into prompts for supervised fine-tuning. Evaluations on the PLOS and eLife datasets show that this hybrid approach significantly improves relevance and factuality metrics compared to both base models and those tuned individually, while maintaining competitive readability. Prompt design experiments highlight a trade-off between readability and factual accuracy. Our fine-tuned model demonstrates strong performance in relevance and factuality among open-source systems and rivals closed-source models such as GPT, providing an efficient and effective solution for domain-specific lay summarization.

With the widespread application of Large Language Models (LLMs) in various tasks, the mainstream LLM platforms generate massive user-model interactions daily. In order to efficiently analyze the performance of models and diagnose failures in their answers, it is essential to develop an automated framework to systematically categorize and attribute errors. However, existing evaluation models lack error attribution capability. In this work, we establish a comprehensive Misattribution Framework with 6 primary and 15 secondary categories to facilitate in-depth analysis. Based on this framework, we present AttriData, a dataset specifically designed for error attribution, encompassing misattribution, along with the corresponding scores and feedback. We also propose MisAttributionLLM, a fine-tuned model on AttriData, which is the first general-purpose judge model capable of simultaneously generating score, misattribution, and feedback. Extensive experiments and analyses are conducted to confirm the effectiveness and robustness of our proposed method.