Large language model (LLM)-based conversational recommender systems (CRSs) have demonstrated strong capabilities in capturing user preferences and generating contextually relevant recommendations. Nevertheless, the recommendation quality of the models frozen after training inevitably degrades under contextual shifts, such as changes in language and social trends. While periodic model updates are essential to maintain alignment with real-world preferences, training on large-scale data incurs substantial costs. This motivates data-efficient adaptation. However, existing data selection methods struggle to distinguish learnable samples under contextual shifts. To address this, we propose Contextual Shift-Adaptive Data Pruning and Training (CAPT), a framework agnostic to underlying LLM-based CRSs. Specifically, we conceptualize a three-class data taxonomy comprising familiar, valuable, and outlier samples to formalize data behavior under contextual shifts. Based on this taxonomy, we design an importance score estimation scheme that quantifies a sample’s relative learnability for shift adaptation. Leveraging these importance scores, CAPT prioritizes highly learnable samples and further guides shift-adaptive training to actively steer the model toward evolving preferences. Experiments on three CRS benchmarks with real-world temporal splits demonstrate that CAPT outperforms baselines, matching or surpassing full-data fine-tuning performance using only 10-50% of the training data.

Knowledge graphs (KGs) provide a structured representation of real-world facts as triples consisting of entities and their relationships. With the rapid progress of large language models (LLMs), recent studies increasingly explore LLMs for end-to-end KG construction from text. In particular, generative knowledge extraction (GKE) builds KGs by directly generating structured triples from documents. However, generation errors are inevitable, and the resulting KGs often contain triples that do not align with the facts expressed in the source text. To address these issues, we propose GraphRefine, a framework that performs triple-level refinement on KGs constructed via GKE. We first analyze factual inconsistencies that arise in GKE and categorize their types based on a human evaluation. We then construct training data reflecting these types and fine-tune an LLM as a KG refiner. Given a draft KG, the fine-tuned refiner selects a refinement operation for each triple and, if needed, deletes, edits, or rewrites it to reduce factual inconsistencies. Extensive experiments demonstrate that GraphRefine goes beyond deletion-only approaches and improves KG quality from diverse perspectives.

Each utterance in multi-turn empathetic dialogues has features such as emotion, keywords, and utterance-level meaning. Feature transitions between utterances occur naturally. However, existing approaches fail to perceive the transitions because they extract features for the context at the coarse-grained level. To solve the above issue, we propose a novel approach of recognizing feature transitions between utterances, which helps understand the dialogue flow and better grasp the features of utterance that needs attention. Also, we introduce a response generation strategy to help focus on emotion and keywords related to appropriate features when generating responses. Experimental results show that our approach outperforms baselines and especially, achieves significant improvements on multi-turn dialogues.