Most affective computing research treats emotion as a static property of text, focusing on the writer’s sentiment while overlooking the reader’s perspective. This approach ignores how individual personalities lead to diverse emotional appraisals of the same event. Although role-playing Large Language Models (LLMs) attempt to simulate such nuanced reactions, they often suffer from "personality illusion”—relying on surface-level stereotypes rather than authentic cognitive logic. A critical bottleneck is the absence of ground-truth human data to link personality traits to emotional shifts. To bridge the gap, we introduce Persona-E² (Persona-Event2Emotion), a large-scale dataset grounded in annotated MBTI and Big Five traits to capture reader-based emotional variations across news, social media, and life narratives. Extensive experiments reveal that state-of-the-art LLMs struggle to capture precise appraisal shifts, particularly in social media domains. Crucially, we find that personality information significantly improves comprehension, with the Big Five traits alleviating "personality illusion.’

Vision-Language Models (VLMs) have demonstrated strong capabilities in perception, yet holistic Affective Image Content Analysis (AICA)—which integrates perception, reasoning, and generation into a unified framework—remains underexplored. To address this, we introduce AICA-Bench, a comprehensive benchmark comprising three core tasks: Emotion Understanding (EU), Reasoning (ER), and Generation (EGCG). We evaluate 23 VLMs, revealing critical gaps: models struggle with intensity calibration and suffer from descriptive shallowness in open-ended tasks. To bridge these gaps, we propose Grounded Affective Tree (GAT) Prompting, a training-free framework that integrates visual scaffolding with hierarchical reasoning. Experiments show that GAT effectively corrects intensity errors and significantly enhances descriptive depth, establishing a robust baseline for future affective multimodal research.

Multimodal Emotion Recognition (MER) is critical for interpreting real-world interactions. While Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLM) have shown promise in MER, their internal decision-making mechanisms under modality conflict and missingness remain largely underexplored. In this paper, to systematically investigate these behaviors, we introduce EmoMM, a comprehensive benchmark featuring modality-aligned, conflict, and missing subsets. Through extensive evaluation, we uncover a Video Contribution Collapse (VCC) phenomenon, where MLLM marginalize video evidence due to high token redundancy and modality preferences. To address this, we propose Conflict-aware Head-level Attention Steering (CHASE), a lightweight mechanism that detects modality conflicts and performs inference-time attention steering, effectively mitigating decision bias without retraining the backbone. Experimental results demonstrate that CHASE consistently improves performance across various settings, significantly enhancing the reliability of MLLM in complex affective scenarios.