Post-training paradigms for Large Language Models (LLMs), primarily Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT) and Reinforcement Learning (RL), face a fundamental dilemma: SFT provides stability (low variance) but suffers from high fitting bias, while RL enables exploration (low bias) but grapples with high gradient variance. Existing unified optimization strategies often employ naive loss weighting, overlooking the statistical conflict between these distinct gradient signals. In this paper, we provide a rigorous theoretical analysis of this bias-variance trade-off and propose DYPO (Dynamic Policy Optimization), a unified framework designed to structurally mitigate this conflict. DYPO integrates three core components: (1) a Group Alignment Loss (GAL) that leverages intrinsic group dynamics to significantly reduce RL gradient variance; (2) a Multi-Teacher Distillation mechanism that corrects SFT fitting bias via diverse reasoning paths; and (3) a Dynamic Exploitation-Exploration Gating mechanism that adaptively arbitrates between stable SFT and exploratory RL based on reward feedback. Theoretical analysis confirms that DYPO linearly reduces fitting bias and minimizes overall variance. Extensive experiments demonstrate that DYPO significantly outperforms traditional sequential pipelines, achieving an average improvement of 4.8% on complex reasoning benchmarks and 13.3% on out-of-distribution tasks.

State-of-the-art vision-language models (VLMs) require massive scaling that limits practical deployment. Small-scale VLMs offer a practical alternative but face out-of-domain (OOD) collapse when trained with traditional supervised fine-tuning (SFT). Through GeneralPoints experiments, we identify that OOD collapse is due to SFT’s tendency to induce visual hallucinations under distribution shifts, whereas Reinforcement Learning’s (RL) bidirectional reward-driven mechanism with iterative error correction refines visual perception. Although RL-based post-training effectively mitigates OOD degradation, it faces a critical sparse reward dilemma in complex visual reasoning tasks. To this end, we propose Curriculum Reinforcement Finetuning (Curr-ReFT), comprising two sequential stages: (1) Structured Curriculum Reinforcement Learning, which progressively evolves task formats and reward functions to match models’ growing capabilities; and (2) Rejected Sampling-based Self-improvement, which maintains the fundamental capabilities of VLMs through selective learning from high-quality examples. Extensive experiments demonstrate that Curr-ReFT achieves state-of-the-art performance across various visual tasks in both in- and out-of-domain settings and benchmarks.