Debu Sinha
2026
SycoBench-600: Measuring Sycophancy and Correction Selectivity in LLM Assistants
Debu Sinha
Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL 2026
Debu Sinha
Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL 2026
Modern instruction-following language models are optimized to be helpful and cooperative, often through preference-based alignment such as RLHF and related methods. A growing body of evidence shows that this training can also induce sycophancy: models may agree with a user even when the user is wrong, undermining reliability in decision support and high-stakes advice. We introduce SycoBench-600, a controlled multiple-choice benchmark that measures (i) susceptibility to three social-pressure perturbations (doubt, authority, and an explicit wrong suggestion) and (ii) correction selectivity, the ability to accept correct suggestions while resisting incorrect ones. The released benchmark contains 600 English MCQ instances over 272 normalized question stems, covers 8 domains and 3 difficulty tiers, and evaluates each instance under 3 fixed paraphrase variants of the perturbation prompts. We evaluate seven widely used assistants spanning proprietary and open-weight families. Results show substantial variation in pressure robustness and selective updating, and further show that willingness to update does not by itself imply selectivity. We release raw logs, validation scripts, and code that regenerates every table and figure from the model outputs.
2013
Learning to translate with products of novices: a suite of open-ended challenge problems for teaching MT
Adam Lopez | Matt Post | Chris Callison-Burch | Jonathan Weese | Juri Ganitkevitch | Narges Ahmidi | Olivia Buzek | Leah Hanson | Beenish Jamil | Matthias Lee | Ya-Ting Lin | Henry Pao | Fatima Rivera | Leili Shahriyari | Debu Sinha | Adam Teichert | Stephen Wampler | Michael Weinberger | Daguang Xu | Lin Yang | Shang Zhao
Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Volume 1
Adam Lopez | Matt Post | Chris Callison-Burch | Jonathan Weese | Juri Ganitkevitch | Narges Ahmidi | Olivia Buzek | Leah Hanson | Beenish Jamil | Matthias Lee | Ya-Ting Lin | Henry Pao | Fatima Rivera | Leili Shahriyari | Debu Sinha | Adam Teichert | Stephen Wampler | Michael Weinberger | Daguang Xu | Lin Yang | Shang Zhao
Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Volume 1
Machine translation (MT) draws from several different disciplines, making it a complex subject to teach. There are excellent pedagogical texts, but problems in MT and current algorithms for solving them are best learned by doing. As a centerpiece of our MT course, we devised a series of open-ended challenges for students in which the goal was to improve performance on carefully constrained instances of four key MT tasks: alignment, decoding, evaluation, and reranking. Students brought a diverse set of techniques to the problems, including some novel solutions which performed remarkably well. A surprising and exciting outcome was that student solutions or their combinations fared competitively on some tasks, demonstrating that even newcomers to the field can help improve the state-of-the-art on hard NLP problems while simultaneously learning a great deal. The problems, baseline code, and results are freely available.