Large language models (LLMs) have shown strong performance on hard reasoning and general instruction-following tasks. However, when sampling multiple outputs for the same prompt, they often produce highly homogeneous, repetitive responses, resulting in inefficient exploration. This limits the gains from test-time scaling and constrains the upper bound of RL training. We attribute this issue in part to supervised fine-tuning (SFT): when a single prompt is paired with multiple reference responses, the model is trained to generate diverse outputs under the same prior condition, which induces optimization interference and can lead to diversity collapse. To address this, we propose Prefix-Conditioned SFT (P-SFT), a simple yet effective method that constructs semantically consistent yet distributionally distinct prior contents to different responses, thereby projecting the instruction into distinct latent regions to establish diverse prior distributions and decouple the one-to-many mapping. Experiments on large reasoning language models show that our approach improves absolute performance by 5.3% and increases generation diversity by 198.3% on average, while substantially enhancing output diversity and test-time scaling. Notably, even without any additional training, our prefixing strategy can be applied at inference time alone and still yields significant gains in both diversity and reasoning performance for instruction-tuned LLMs and reasoning-enhanced models.

Large reasoning models ( e.g., R1, o3) have demonstrated remarkable mathematical problem-solving abilities. However, the high reported accuracy of these advanced models on popular datasets and reliance on purely numerical evaluation often mask their true reasoning shortcomings. To address this, we propose leveraging the inherent rigor and methodological complexity of mathematical proofs as a diagnostic tool to expose these hidden failures. Specifically, we introduce the RFMDataset (Reveal Failure Modes), a collection of 200 diverse mathematical proof problems to thoroughly evaluate the performance of advanced models. Our in-depth analysis of their failures uncovers 10 fine-grained error types, which shows fundamental limitations in current large reasoning models: 1) Large reasoning models still have limited capability in generating entirely correct mathematical proofs, with some models solving less than 20% of problems and even making mistakes on fundamental ones; 2) models exhibit a diverse spectrum of reasoning failures, prominently demonstrating the lack of guarantees for the correctness and rigor intermediate reasoning steps; and 3) models show hallucination and incompleteness during the reasoning process. Our findings also reveal that directly prompting models to self-reflect on specific failure modes is insufficient to resolve the current logical dilemmas, necessitating domain knowledge and formal verification.

Multimodal Retrieval-Augmented Generation (MM-RAG) has emerged as a promising approach for enhancing the reliability and factuality of large vision-language models (LVLMs). While end-to-end loss backpropagation is infeasible due to non-differentiable operations during the forward process, current methods primarily focus on component-level optimizations, necessitate extensive component-specific training datasets and suffer from a gap between local and global optimization objectives. In this paper, we propose a new paradigm that backpropagates global rewards from the system output to each component and then transforms these rewards into specific local losses, enabling each component to perform gradient descent and thus ensuring end-to-end optimization. Specifically, we first insert two lightweight multimodal components, a query translator and an adaptive reranker, to address the heterogeneity of multimodal knowledge and the varying knowledge demands for different questions, and then tune only these inserted components using our proposed paradigm to integrate the entire system. Our method achieves SOTA performance on multiple knowledge-intensive multimodal benchmarks with high training efficiency, relying exclusively on supervised signals from an external reward model. Experimental results and our detailed analysis of the evolution of components during training collectively reveal the advantages and considerable potential of this paradigm as a promising direction for MM-RAG research.

The rapid development of language models (LMs) brings unprecedented accessibility and usage for both models and users. On the one hand, powerful LMs achieve state-of-the-art performance over numerous downstream NLP tasks. On the other hand, more and more attention is paid to unrestricted model accesses that may bring malicious privacy risks of data leakage. To address these issues, many recent works propose privacy-preserving language models (PPLMs) with differential privacy (DP). Unfortunately, different DP implementations make it challenging for a fair comparison among existing PPLMs. In this paper, we present PrivLM-Bench, a multi-perspective privacy evaluation benchmark to empirically and intuitively quantify the privacy leakage of LMs. Instead of only reporting DP parameters, PrivLM-Bench sheds light on the neglected inference data privacy during actual usage. PrivLM-Bench first clearly defines multi-faceted privacy objectives. Then, PrivLM-Bench constructs a unified pipeline to perform private fine-tuning. Lastly, PrivLM-Bench performs existing privacy attacks on LMs with pre-defined privacy objectives as the empirical evaluation results. The empirical attack results are used to fairly and intuitively evaluate the privacy leakage of various PPLMs. We conduct extensive experiments on three datasets of GLUE for mainstream LMs.

With the rapid progress of large language models (LLMs), many downstream NLP tasks can be well solved given appropriate prompts. Though model developers and researchers work hard on dialog safety to avoid generating harmful content from LLMs, it is still challenging to steer AI-generated content (AIGC) for the human good. As powerful LLMs are devouring existing text data from various domains (e.g., GPT-3 is trained on 45TB texts), it is natural to doubt whether the private information is included in the training data and what privacy threats can these LLMs and their downstream applications bring. In this paper, we study the privacy threats from OpenAI’s ChatGPT and the New Bing enhanced by ChatGPT and show that application-integrated LLMs may cause new privacy threats. To this end, we conduct extensive experiments to support our claims and discuss LLMs’ privacy implications.