Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) combines the language understanding and reasoning capabilities of large language models (LLMs) with external retrieval to produce domain-grounded responses. Effectively adapting RAG systems to domain-specific settings requires specialized, context-rich training data beyond general-purpose question-answering datasets. Here, we propose RAGen, a scalable and modular data-centric framework for generating domain-grounded question–answer–context (QAC) triples tailored to diverse RAG adaptation strategies. These QAC triples serve as training signals for multiple RAG adaptation approaches; in this work, we demonstrate their use for contrastive fine-tuning of embedding models and supervised fine-tuning of LLMs under retrieved contexts. RAGen generates QAC triples by identifying key concepts within documents, producing diverse questions guided by Bloom’s Taxonomy–inspired principles, and pairing them with precise answers extracted from relevant contexts. Its modular pipeline incorporates semantic chunking, hierarchical concept extraction, multi-chunk retrieval, and curated distractor contexts to encourage robust reasoning. Designed for scalability, RAGen efficiently handles large and evolving document corpora without redundant processing, making it particularly suitable for dynamic domains like enterprise knowledge bases.

Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated impressive in-context learning (ICL) capabilities from few-shot demonstration exemplars. Recent learning-based demonstration selection methods have proven beneficial to ICL by choosing more useful exemplars. While these methods generally assume they learn better similarity measurements between exemplars and test cases from the proxy task, what kinds of similarities are captured by them and are vital to performing ICL still need to be explored. To dive into this question, we analyze the working mechanism of learning-based demonstration selection methods and empirically identify two essential factors of their similarity measurements: 1) Integrating task-agnostic similarities of different levels between the input of exemplars and test cases; 2) Incorporating task-specific similarity between the output of exemplars and test cases. We validate these two findings through extensive quantitative analysis across ten datasets and various LLMs. Based on these insights, we introduce two simplified exemplar selection methods, MLSM and TTF, catering to task-agnostic and task-specific demands to eliminate costly data collection. The effectiveness of both methods evince our findings again and pave the way for future studies.