Cheng Wang
Other people with similar names: Cheng Wang, Cheng Wang
Unverified author pages with similar names: Cheng Wang
2025
When Audio and Text Disagree: Revealing Text Bias in Large Audio-Language Models
Cheng Wang | Gelei Deng | Xianglin Yang | Han Qiu | Tianwei Zhang
Proceedings of the 2025 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing
Cheng Wang | Gelei Deng | Xianglin Yang | Han Qiu | Tianwei Zhang
Proceedings of the 2025 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing
Large Audio-Language Models (LALMs) are augmented with the ability to perceive audio, demonstrating impressive capabilities in processing combined audio and text signals. However, their reliability when faced with conflicting inputs across modalities remains largely unexplored. This study examines how LALMs prioritize information when presented with inconsistent audio-text pairs. Through extensive evaluation across diverse audio understanding tasks, we reveal a concerning phenomenon: when inconsistencies exist between modalities, LALMs display a significant bias toward textual input, often disregarding audio evidence. This tendency leads to substantial performance degradation in audio-centric tasks and raises important reliability concerns for real-world applications. We further investigate the influencing factors of text bias, explore mitigation strategies through supervised fine-tuning, and analyze model confidence patterns that reveal persistent overconfidence even with contradictory inputs. These findings underscore the need for improved modality balancing during training and more sophisticated fusion mechanisms to enhance robustness when handling conflicting multi-modal inputs. The project is available at https://github.com/WangCheng0116/MCR-BENCH.
Safety in Large Reasoning Models: A Survey
Cheng Wang | Yue Liu | Baolong Bi | Duzhen Zhang | Zhong-Zhi Li | Yingwei Ma | Yufei He | Shengju Yu | Xinfeng Li | Junfeng Fang | Jiaheng Zhang | Bryan Hooi
Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2025
Cheng Wang | Yue Liu | Baolong Bi | Duzhen Zhang | Zhong-Zhi Li | Yingwei Ma | Yufei He | Shengju Yu | Xinfeng Li | Junfeng Fang | Jiaheng Zhang | Bryan Hooi
Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2025
Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) have exhibited extraordinary prowess in tasks like mathematics and coding, leveraging their advanced reasoning capabilities. Nevertheless, as these capabilities progress, significant concerns regarding their vulnerabilities and safety have arisen, which can pose challenges to their deployment and application in real-world settings. This paper presents the first comprehensive survey of LRMs, meticulously exploring and summarizing the newly emerged safety risks, attacks, and defense strategies specific to these powerful reasoning-enhanced models. By organizing these elements into a detailed taxonomy, this work aims to offer a clear and structured understanding of the current safety landscape of LRMs, facilitating future research and development to enhance the security and reliability of these powerful models.