There is a growing consensus that, in order to serve as models of human language processing, language models (LMs) need to be constrained in their use of memory for context, the analogue to human working memory (WM). Here we take a novel yet simple approach to constraining WM in language models, in a way that reflects models of human cognition where memory is treated as a limited resource and deployed strategically. In order to capture this constraint on memory encoding, we inject noise into the hidden representations of Transformer-based LMs at tunable rates. Then we train the models with a hybrid objective, such that they learn to maximize the performance of next-word prediction subject to explicit constraints on the total encoding precision. We find that explicit WM constraints improve the model’s alignment with human reading times. More importantly, we find that the need to manage encoding precision reshapes the nature of the models’ context representations, making them more compressed and categorical. Our results show how resource-rational models of WM allocation can be implemented in neural models simply and successfully, and point to a dissociation between WM retrieval mechanisms and the underlying memory representations in models of human sentence processing.

Evaluating how large language models (LLMs) capture the grammatical structure of low-resource languages remains underexplored. This paper presents the Urdu Benchmark of Linguistic Minimal Pairs (UrBLiMP)—a diagnostic suite of 5,696 minimal pairs that contrast grammatical acceptability across ten core syntactic and morpho-syntactic phenomena in Urdu. The dataset is constructed from the Urdu Treebank and diverse text corpora, and human validation achieves a 96.1% inter-annotator agreement, confirming its reliability. We evaluate twenty one multilingual LLMs, including LLaMA-3-70B and Gemma-3-27B-PT, and additionally assess the proprietary GPT-4o model using grammar-prompting techniques. GPT-4o (grammar-prompted) attains the highest average accuracy (97.4%), reaching near-human performance on regular phenomena such as aspect agreement and ergativity. However, all models continue to struggle with flexible syntactic patterns like word-order variation and long-distance subject–verb agreement. UrBLiMP provides the first controlled evaluation framework for probing morpho-syntactic competence in Urdu and highlights both the progress and remaining challenges of multilingual and proprietary LLMs in low-resource settings.

Humans exhibit garden path effects: When reading sentences that are temporarily structurally ambiguous, they slow down when the structure is disambiguated in favor of the less preferred alternative. Surprisal theory (Hale, 2001; Levy, 2008), a prominent explanation of this finding, proposes that these slowdowns are due to the unpredictability of each of the words that occur in these sentences. Challenging this hypothesis, van Schijndel and Linzen (2021) find that estimates of the cost of word predictability derived from language models severely underestimate the magnitude of human garden path effects. In this work, we consider whether this underestimation is due to the fact that humans weight syntactic factors in their predictions more highly than language models do. We propose a method for estimating syntactic predictability from a language model, allowing us to weigh the cost of lexical and syntactic predictability independently. We find that treating syntactic predictability independently from lexical predictability indeed results in larger estimates of garden path. At the same time, even when syntactic predictability is independently weighted, surprisal still greatly underestimate the magnitude of human garden path effects. Our results support the hypothesis that predictability is not the only factor responsible for the processing cost associated with garden path sentences.

Recent progress in large pretrained language models (LMs) has led to a growth of analyses examining what kinds of linguistic knowledge are encoded by these models. Due to computational constraints, existing analyses are mostly conducted on publicly-released LM checkpoints, which makes it difficult to study how various factors during training affect the models’ acquisition of linguistic knowledge. In this paper, we train a suite of small-scale Transformer LMs that differ from each other with respect to architectural decisions (e.g., self-attention configuration) or training objectives (e.g., multi-tasking, focal loss). We evaluate these LMs on BLiMP, a targeted evaluation benchmark of multiple English linguistic phenomena. Our experiments show that while none of these modifications yields significant improvements on aggregate, changes to the loss function result in promising improvements on several subcategories (e.g., detecting adjunct islands, correctly scoping negative polarity items). We hope our work offers useful insights for future research into designing Transformer LMs that more effectively learn linguistic knowledge.

Sequence to sequence (seq2seq) models are often employed in settings where the target output is natural language. However, the syntactic properties of the language generated from these models are not well understood. We explore whether such output belongs to a formal and realistic grammar, by employing the English Resource Grammar (ERG), a broad coverage, linguistically precise HPSG-based grammar of English. From a French to English parallel corpus, we analyze the parseability and grammatical constructions occurring in output from a seq2seq translation model. Over 93% of the model translations are parseable, suggesting that it learns to generate conforming to a grammar. The model has trouble learning the distribution of rarer syntactic rules, and we pinpoint several constructions that differentiate translations between the references and our model.