Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) is widely used for question answering over well-structured document corpora. However, a large amount of real-world problem-solving knowledge is captured in goal-oriented dialogues, where common ground misalignment between users and helpers gives rise to sparse, diffuse, and dynamically refined evidence that challenges standard RAG pipelines. We propose Structured Dialogue Refinement (SDR), a unified framework that adapts dialogue corpora for RAG at both the retrieval and generation stages without altering the underlying pipeline. Specifically, SDR introduces Dual Dialogue Querying for intent-aligned retrieval via issue-centric and solution-centric pseudo-documents, and Graph-Structured Dialogues coupled with a relevance-driven subgraph selection strategy to enable effective utilization of conversational evidence. We further adopt a nugget-based evaluation setup for dialogue-grounded RAG, enabling fine-grained analysis of retrieval coverage and grounded answer generation. Experiments demonstrate that SDR substantially improves both retrieval quality and grounded QA performance under dialogue-specific structural challenges.

Large language models (LLMs) increasingly act as tool-using agents, and existing methods for evaluating and optimizing tool usage by LLMs typically assume a static tool environment with fixed APIs and documentation. In practice, toolsets evolve as tools are added, changed, or deprecated, introducing instability for agents that must retain prior competence while adapting to new capabilities. We formalize this challenge as the stability–adaptation dilemma. To address it, we propose ContDa, a continual documentation adaptation framework that provides a generalizable solution to this problem, enabling LLM agents to self-evolve by updating tool documentation. ContDa combines relation-guided exploration, which leverages functionally related existing tools as anchors to probe and identify new tool capabilities, with relation-aware adjustment that organizes overlapping tools and explicitly encodes usage preferences and fallback options among them. We then introduce complementary metrics that disentangle performance from stability and adaptation. Experiments across three evolution patterns on dynamic extensions of StableToolBench and RestBench show that ContDa consistently improves average performance by enhancing the discovery of new capabilities while incurring only limited loss of previously solved tasks, demonstrating documentation adaptation as an effective and lightweight mechanism for robust tool use in evolving environments. Our code is available at https://github.com/Bingo-W/ContDa.

Recent research empowers Large Language Models (LLMs) as multi-turn search agents to iteratively retrieve and generate outputs until complex tasks are solved. However, the contexts of multi-turn search agents are lengthy and complex. For example, the retrieved set of documents in each turn would inevitably introduce irrelevant information that distracts LLMs, referring to context interference, potentially hindering the reliability and efficiency of search agents. Therefore, we conduct a systematic study on context interference in multi-turn search agents, focusing on investigating i) which parts of the context of search agents will contribute to the context interference, ii) how to refine the contexts of search agents to mitigate the interference, and iii) can incorporating context refinement into search agent training yield further improvements. We reveal that interference primarily arises from the latest retrieved documents. Based on the explored findings, we then introduce a distill-based context refiner to dynamically mitigate context interference for multi-turn search agents. Finally, we validate that incorporating context refinement into RL training pipelines of search agents can significantly enhance both reliability and efficiency. This study highlights the importance of mitigating context interference of search agents, inspiring a novel paradigm of “refine context and then generate” for AI agents.

Large Language Models (LLMs) augmented with external tools have demonstrated remarkable capabilities in complex problem solving. Existing efforts for tool utilization typically involve an LLM agent that contains instructions on using the description of the available tools to determine and call the tools required to solve the problem. Inference Scaling techniques, such as chain-of-thought and tree-of-thought reasoning, are commonly used but require significant computational overhead and rendering such methods impractical in real-world applications. In this work, we recognize and formalize the critical role of instructions provided in agent prompts and tool descriptions—collectively referred to as *context*—and show that incomplete *context* is one of the reasons for this computational overhead.To fill this efficiency gap, we propose an optimization framework that jointly refines both the instructions provided in the agent prompt and tool description, enhancing their interaction. Experiments on StableToolBench and RestBench demonstrate that our optimized agents achieve superior efficiency while maintaining effectiveness. Our findings underscore the critical role of context optimization in improving LLM agents for tool utilization, paving the way for more responsive and cost-effective LLM agents. Our code is available at [https://github.com/Bingo-W/ToolOptimization](https://github.com/Bingo-W/ToolOptimization).

Augmenting Large Language Models (LLMs) with retrieved external knowledge has proven effective in improving the factual accuracy of generated responses. Despite their success, retrieval-augmented LLMs still face the distractibility issue, where the generated responses are negatively influenced by noise from both external and internal knowledge sources. In this paper, we introduce a novel, training-free decoding method guided by entropy considerations to mitigate this issue. Our approach utilizes entropy-based document-parallel ensemble decoding to prioritize low-entropy distributions from retrieved documents, thereby enhancing the extraction of relevant information of context. Additionally, it incorporates a contrastive decoding mechanism that contrasts the obtained low-entropy ensemble distribution with the high-entropy distribution derived from the model’s internal knowledge across layers, which ensures a greater emphasis on reliable external information. Extensive experiments on open-domain question answering datasets demonstrate the superiority of our method.

Molecular structure elucidation involves deducing a molecule’s structure from various types of spectral data, which is crucial in chemical experimental analysis. While large language models (LLMs) have shown remarkable proficiency in analyzing and reasoning through complex tasks, they still encounter substantial challenges in molecular structure elucidation. We identify that these challenges largely stem from LLMs’ limited grasp of specialized chemical knowledge. In this work, we introduce a Knowledge-enhanced reasoning framework for Molecular Structure Elucidation (K-MSE), leveraging Monte Carlo Tree Search for test-time scaling as a plugin. Specifically, we construct an external molecular substructure knowledge base to extend the LLMs’ coverage of the chemical structure space. Furthermore, we design a specialized molecule-spectrum scorer to act as a reward model for the reasoning process, addressing the issue of inaccurate solution evaluation in LLMs. Experimental results show that our approach significantly boosts performance, particularly gaining more than 20% improvement on both GPT-4o-mini and GPT-4o.