Solving complex reasoning tasks may involve visual understanding, domain knowledge retrieval, numerical calculation, and multi-step reasoning. Existing methods augment large language models (LLMs) with external tools but are restricted to specialized domains, limited tool types, or require additional training data. In this paper, we introduce OctoTools, a training-free, user-friendly, and easily extensible multi-agent framework designed to tackle complex reasoning across diverse domains. OctoTools introduces standardized tool cards to encapsulate tool functionality, a planner for both high-level and low-level planning, and an executor to carry out tool usage. We validate OctoTools’ generality across 16 diverse tasks (including MathVista, MMLU-Pro, MedQA, and GAIA-Text), achieving substantial average accuracy gains of 9.3% over GPT-4o. Furthermore, OctoTools also outperforms AutoGen, GPT-Functions, and LangChain by up to 10.6% when given the same set of tools. Through comprehensive analysi, ablations, and robustness tests with compact backbones and noisy tool environments, OctoTools demonstrates advantages in task planning, effective tool usage, and multi-step problem solving. Code, demos, and visualization are publicly available at https://octotools.github.io/.

The Plain Writing Act in the United States requires government documents to be written in clear and simple language. However, existing summarization systems struggle to address diverse linguistic and cognitive barriers among general readers. We propose NRLB (No Reader Left Behind), a unified multi-agent framework for plain language summarization that simulates three representative reader groups: elementary school students, non-native speakers, and readers with attention deficits. NRLB integrates template-based planning with an iterative feedback loop guided by simulated readers and domain expert revision to address comprehension barriers such as unknown terms, missing contexts, and confusing sentences. Evaluations across multiple datasets demonstrate consistent improvements in both readability and factuality. Human evaluation further supports these findings, with annotator preference rates ranging from 55% to 76%, highlighting NRLB’s ability to generate summaries that are both faithful to the source and accessible to a wide range of readers.

Most ATP benchmarks embed the final answer within the formal statement — a convention we call "Easy Mode" — a design that simplifies the task relative to what human competitors face and may lead to optimistic estimates of model capability.We call the stricter, more realistic setting "Hard Mode": the system must independently discover the answer before constructing a formal proof.To enable Hard Mode research, we make two contributions.First, we release MiniF2F-Hard and FIMO-Hard, expert-reannotated Hard Mode variants of two widely-used ATP benchmarks.Second, we introduce Discover And Prove (DAP), an agentic framework that uses LLM natural-language reasoning with explicit self-reflection to discover answers, then rewrites Hard Mode statements into Easy Mode ones for existing ATP provers.DAP sets the state of the art: on CombiBench it raises solved problems from 7 (previous SOTA, Pass@16) to 10; on PutnamBench it is the first system to formally prove 36 theorems in Hard Mode — while simultaneously revealing that state-of-the-art LLMs exceed 80% answer accuracy on the same problems where formal provers manage under 10%, exposing a substantial gap that Hard Mode benchmarks are uniquely suited to measure.

The increasing reliance on cloud-hosted Large Language Models (LLMs) exposes sensitive client data, such as prompts and responses, to potential privacy breaches by service providers.Existing approaches fail to ensure privacy, maintain model performance, and preserve computational efficiency simultaneously.To address this challenge, we propose Talaria, a confidential inference framework that partitions the LLM pipeline between a client-verified Confidential Virtual Machine (CVM) and the public cloud to protect client data without compromising the cloud’s model intellectual property or inference quality.The interaction between the CVM and the cloud is secured by our Reversible Masked Outsourcing (ReMO) protocol, which uses a hybrid masking technique to reversibly obscure intermediate data before outsourcing computations.Extensive evaluations show that Talaria can defend against state-of-the-art token inference attacks, reducing token reconstruction accuracy from over 97.5% to an average of 1.34%, all while being a lossless mechanism that guarantees output identical to the original model without significantly decreasing efficiency and scalability.To the best of our knowledge, this is the first work that ensures clients’ prompts and responses remain inaccessible to the cloud, while also preserving model privacy, performance, and efficiency.

Rhetorical questions are asked not to seek information but to persuade or signal stance. How large language models internally represent them remains unclear. We analyze rhetorical questions in LLM representations using linear probes on two social-media datasets with different discourse contexts, and find that rhetorical signals emerge early and are most stably captured by last-token representations. Rhetorical questions are linearly separable from information-seeking questions within datasets, and remain detectable under cross-dataset transfer, reaching AUROC around 0.7-0.8. However, we demonstrate that transferability does not simply imply a shared representation. Probes trained on different datasets produce different rankings when applied to the same target corpus, with overlap among the top-ranked instances often below 0.2. Qualitative analysis shows that these divergences correspond to distinct rhetorical phenomena: some probes capture discourse-level rhetorical stance embedded in extended argumentation, while others emphasize localized, syntax-driven interrogative acts. Together, these findings suggest that rhetorical questions in LLM representations are encoded by multiple linear directions emphasizing different cues, rather than a single shared direction.

Achieving seamless, human-like interaction remains a key challenge for full-duplex spoken dialogue models (SDMs). Reinforcement learning (RL) has substantially enhanced text- and vision-language models, while well-designed reward signals are crucial for the performance of RL. We consider RL a promising strategy to address the key challenge for SDMs. However, a fundamental barrier persists: prevailing automated metrics for assessing interaction quality rely on superficial proxies, such as behavioral statistics or timing-prediction accuracy, failing to provide reliable reward signals for RL. On the other hand, human evaluations, despite their richness, remain costly, inconsistent, and difficult to scale. We tackle this critical barrier by proposing a Dual-Axis Generative Reward Model, which is trained to understand complex interaction dynamics using a detailed taxonomy and an annotated dataset, produces a single score and, crucially, provides separate evaluations for semantic quality and interaction timing. Such dual outputs furnish precise diagnostic feedback for SDMs and deliver a dependable, instructive reward signal suitable for online reinforcement learning. Our model achieves state-of-the-art performance on interaction-quality assessment across a wide spectrum of datasets, spanning synthetic dialogues and complex real-world interactions.

Large language models (LLMs) can reliably distinguish grammatical from ungrammatical sentences, but how grammatical knowledge is represented within the model remains an open question. We investigate whether different syntactic phenomena recruit shared or distinct components in LLMs. Using a functional localization approach inspired by cognitive neuroscience, we identify the LLM units most responsive to 67 English syntactic phenomena in seven open-weight models. These units are consistently recruited across sentence instances and causally support model performance. Critically, different types of syntactic agreement (e.g., subject-verb, anaphor, determiner-noun) recruit overlapping sets of units, suggesting that agreement constitutes a meaningful functional category in LLMs. This pattern holds in Russian and Chinese, and further, across languages: in a cross-lingual analysis of 57 languages, syntactically similar languages share more units for subject-verb agreement. Taken together, these findings reveal that syntactic agreement—a critical marker of syntactic dependencies—constitutes a meaningful category within LLMs’ representational spaces.

Data preparation is a critical step in enhancing the usability of tabular data and thus boosts downstream data-driven tasks. Traditional methods often face challenges in capturing the intricate relationships within tables and adapting to the tasks involved. Recent advances in Language Models (LMs), especially in Large Language Models (LLMs), offer new opportunities to automate and support tabular data preparation. However, why LMs suit tabular data preparation (i.e., how their capabilities match task demands) and how to use them effectively across phases still remain to be systematically explored. In this survey, we systematically analyze the role of LMs in enhancing tabular data preparation processes, focusing on four core phases: data acquisition, integration, cleaning, and transformation. For each phase, we present an integrated analysis of how LMs can be combined with other components for different preparation tasks, highlight key advancements, and outline prospective pipelines.

Large language models (LLMs) have shown strong performance on hard reasoning and general instruction-following tasks. However, when sampling multiple outputs for the same prompt, they often produce highly homogeneous, repetitive responses, resulting in inefficient exploration. This limits the gains from test-time scaling and constrains the upper bound of RL training. We attribute this issue in part to supervised fine-tuning (SFT): when a single prompt is paired with multiple reference responses, the model is trained to generate diverse outputs under the same prior condition, which induces optimization interference and can lead to diversity collapse. To address this, we propose Prefix-Conditioned SFT (P-SFT), a simple yet effective method that constructs semantically consistent yet distributionally distinct prior contents to different responses, thereby projecting the instruction into distinct latent regions to establish diverse prior distributions and decouple the one-to-many mapping. Experiments on large reasoning language models show that our approach improves absolute performance by 5.3% and increases generation diversity by 198.3% on average, while substantially enhancing output diversity and test-time scaling. Notably, even without any additional training, our prefixing strategy can be applied at inference time alone and still yields significant gains in both diversity and reasoning performance for instruction-tuned LLMs and reasoning-enhanced models.

Recent advancements in table-based question answering (table QA) have been driven by the development of table-specific reasoning strategies for leveraging large language models. Previous works employ sub-table-based reasoning, which involves matching query-relevant table values and aggregating them into sub-tables for precise reasoning. However, these approaches are limited to scenarios with query-relevant single tables, failing to handle real-world table QA settings that involve noisy multi-table sets. To address the challenges of real-world table QA, we propose **EASE**: **E**ntity-**A**ware **S**ub-table Generation for R**E**al-world Multi-table QA framework. Given a noisy multi-table set, EASE first extracts key entities from the question to construct a sub-table schema. It then populates this schema by utilizing a selected set of column values from the noisy multi-table set, thereby facilitating efficient and effective sub-table-based reasoning. We introduce a Noisy Multi-table QA dataset and conduct extensive experiments to evaluate EASE’s effectiveness on real-world table QA. Our results demonstrate that EASE effectively filters out irrelevant information while incorporating pertinent table values, leading to efficient and effective performance on real-world table QA. Our dataset can be found https://github.com/Metalchaos8527/ease_noisy_multi-table_qa.git

Large language models (LLMs) integrated with retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) have become a dominant framework for building intelligent assistants. In real-world applications such as ChatGPT with web search, the retrieved document often comes from diverse, potentially unreliable sources and may contain inconsistent claims. Unlike traditional search engines that rely on users to manually compare information, LLM-based systems typically feed all retrieved content into the model’s context, requiring LLMs to autonomously identify, differentiate, and reason over conflicting viewpoints. Unlike mainstream LLM evaluation tasks like math and code generation that are primarily focused on reasoning with factual context, question-answering with multi-source references requires fundamentally different capabilities to identify and reason over knowledge contradictions. In this paper, we introduce ConfRAG, a benchmark for evaluating LLMs’ reasoning capability over real-world conflicting documents retrieved from the web. It consists of 1,814 real-world questions, each paired with an average of 9.58 retrieved paragraphs from heterogeneous online sources. A total of 57.2% of the questions exhibit explicit contradictions. We further propose three structured evaluation tasks, answer clustering, answer coverage, and reason coverage, to quantify a model’s ability to organize and explain contradictory content. Experiments with state-of-the-art models such as GPT-4.1 and Claude-3-7-Sonnet reveal substantial performance gaps, highlighting the need for more targeted research in contradiction-aware question answering. To the best of our knowledge, ConfRAG is the first benchmark specifically designed to evaluate contradiction-aware reasoning on real-world long web documents.

Counterfactuals refer to minimally edited inputs that cause a model’s prediction to change, serving as a promising approach to explaining the model’s behavior. Large language models (LLMs) excel at generating English counterfactuals and demonstrate multilingual proficiency. However, their effectiveness in generating multilingual counterfactuals remains unclear. To this end, we conduct a comprehensive study on multilingual counterfactuals. We first conduct automatic evaluations on both directly generated counterfactuals in the target languages and those derived via English translation across six languages. Although translation-based counterfactuals offer higher validity than their directly generated counterparts, they demand substantially more modifications and still fall short of matching the quality of the original English counterfactuals. Second, we find the patterns of edits applied to high-resource European-language counterfactuals to be remarkably similar, suggesting that cross-lingual perturbations follow common strategic principles. Third, we reveal that multilingual counterfactual data augmentation (CDA) yields larger model performance improvements than cross-lingual CDA, especially for lower-resource languages. Yet, the imperfections of the generated counterfactuals limit gains in model performance and robustness. Finally, we identify and categorize four main types of errors that consistently appear in the generated counterfactuals across languages.

Existing multilingual embedding models often encounter challenges in cross-lingual scenarios due to imbalanced linguistic resources and less consideration of cross-lingual alignment during training. Although standardized contrastive learning approaches for cross-lingual adaptation are widely adopted, they may struggle to capture fundamental alignment between languages and degrade performance in well-aligned languages such as English. To address these challenges, we propose Cross-Lingual Enhancement in RetrievAl via Reverse-training (CLEAR), a novel loss function utilizing a reverse training scheme to improve retrieval performance across diverse cross-lingual retrieval scenarios. CLEAR leverages an English passage as a bridge to strengthen alignments between the target language and English, ensuring robust performance in the cross-lingual retrieval task. Our extensive experiments demonstrate that CLEAR achieves notable improvements in cross-lingual scenarios, with gains up to 15%, particularly in low-resource languages, while minimizing performance degradation in English. Furthermore, our findings highlight that CLEAR offers promising effectiveness even in multilingual training, suggesting its potential for broad application and scalability. We release the code at https://github.com/dltmddbs100/CLEAR.

Knowledge editing aims to modify outdated knowledge in language models efficiently while retaining their original capabilities. Mainstream datasets for knowledge editing are predominantly static and fail to keep in pace with the evolving real-world knowledge. In this work, we introduce CRAFT, an ever-evolving real-world dataset for knowledge editing. It evaluates models on temporal locality, common-sense locality, composite portability and alias portability, providing a comprehensive and challenging evaluation for knowledge editing, on which previous methods hardly achieve balanced performance. Towards flexible real-time knowledge editing, we propose KEDAS, a novel paradigm of knowledge editing alignment featuring diverse edit augmentation and self-adaptive post-alignment inference, exhibiting significant performance gain on both CRAFT and traditional datasets compared to previous methods. We hope this work may serve as a catalyst for shifting the focus of knowledge editing from static update to dynamic evolution.

Automating scientific poster generation requires hierarchical document understanding and coherent content-layout planning.Existing methods often rely on flat summarization or optimize content and layout separately.As a result, they often suffer from information loss, weak logical flow, and poor visual balance.We present PosterForest, a training-free framework for scientific poster generation.Our method introduces the Poster Tree, a structured intermediate representation that captures document hierarchy and visual-textual semantics across multiple levels.Building on this representation, content and layout agents perform hierarchical reasoning and recursive refinement, progressively optimizing the poster from global organization to local composition.This joint optimization improves semantic coherence, logical flow, and visual harmony.Experiments show that PosterForest outperforms prior methods in both automatic and human evaluations, without additional training or domain-specific supervision.

We introduce SLR, an end-to-end framework for systematic evaluation and training of Large Language Models (LLMs) via Scalable Logical Reasoning. Given a user’s task specification, SLR automatically synthesizes (i) an instruction prompt for an inductive reasoning task, (ii) a validation program, executable on model outputs to provide verifiable rewards, and (iii) the latent ground-truth rule. This process is fully automated, scalable, requires no human annotations, and offers precise control over task difficulty. Using SLR, we create SLR-Bench, a benchmark comprising 19k prompts organized into 20 curriculum levels that progressively increase in relational, arithmetic, and recursive complexity. Large-scale evaluation reveals that contemporary LLMs readily produce syntactically valid rules, yet often fail at correct logical inference. Recent reasoning LLMs demonstrate improved performance but incur very high test-time computation, with costs exceeding 300 for just 1,000 prompts. Finally, curriculum learning via SLR doubles Llama-3-8B accuracy on SLR-Bench, achieving parity with Gemini-Flash-Thinking at a fraction of computational cost. Moreover, these reasoning capabilities generalize to a wide range of established benchmarks, underscoring the effectiveness of SLR for downstream reasoning.

This paper narrows the performance gap between small, specialized models and significantly larger general-purpose models through domain adaptation via continual pre-training and merging. We address the scarcity of specialized non-English data by constructing a high-quality German medical corpus (FineMed-de) from FineWeb2. This corpus is used to continually pre-train and merge three well-known LLMs (ranging from 7B to 24B parameters), creating the DeFineMed model family. A comprehensive evaluation confirms that specialization dramatically enhances 7B model performance on German medical benchmarks. Furthermore, the pairwise win-rate analysis of the Qwen2.5-based models demonstrates an approximately 3.5-fold increase in the win-rate against the much larger Mistral-Small-24B-Instruct through domain adaptation. This evidence positions specialized 7B models as a competitive, resource-efficient solution for complex medical instruction-following tasks. While model merging successfully restores instruction-following abilities, a subsequent failure mode analysis reveals inherent trade-offs, including the introduction of language mixing and increased verbosity, highlighting the need for more targeted fine-tuning in future work. This research provides a robust, compliant methodology for developing specialized LLMs, serving as the foundation for practical use in German-speaking healthcare contexts.

Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) enhances large language models (LLMs) by integrating external knowledge, enabling them to tackle knowledge-intensive tasks. However, limited research has explored how LLMs effectively leverage RAG techniques for multi-hop question answering (QA), particularly when handling knowledge with with varying degrees of familiarity. In this paper, we introduce MINTQA (Multi-hop Question Answering on New and Tail Knowledge), a benchmark designed to evaluate multi-hop QA performance on questions involving 10,479 question-answer pairs for evaluating old/new knowledge and 17,887 pairs for assessing popular/unpopular knowledge, with each question equipped with corresponding sub-questions and answers. This benchmark primarily evaluates the multi-hop reasoning ability of LLMs and their capacity to handle knowledge with varying levels of familiarity during the reasoning process. We evaluate 22 state-of-the-art LLMs using three distinct QA strategies: LLM-based parameterized knowledge QA, direct RAG-enhanced QA, and multi-hop RAG-enhanced QA. Our experiments reveal key challenges in how LLMs handle knowledge with different familiarity and offer insights into improving their multi-hop reasoning capabilities when combined with RAG techniques.

Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed for understanding large codebases, but whether they understand operational semantics of long code context or rely on pattern matching shortcuts remains unclear. We distinguish between lexical recall (retrieving code verbatim) and semantic recall (understanding operational semantics). Evaluating 10 state-of-the-art LLMs, we find that while frontier models achieve near-perfect, position-independent lexical recall, semantic recall degrades severely when code is centrally positioned in long contexts. We introduce semantic recall sensitivity to measure whether tasks require understanding of code’s operational semantics vs. permit pattern matching shortcuts. Through a novel counterfactual measurement method, we show that models rely heavily on pattern matching shortcuts to solve existing code understanding benchmarks. We propose a new task SemTrace, which achieves high semantic recall sensitivity through unpredictable operations; LLMs’ accuracy exhibits severe positional effects, with median accuracy drops of 92.73% versus CRUXEval’s 53.36% as the relevant code snippet approaches the middle of the input code context. Our findings suggest current evaluations substantially underestimate semantic recall failures in long context code understanding.

Polysemy enables a single word to convey multiple related meanings, reflecting the conceptual and emotional aspects of the evolution of the senses. We introduce the first sense-level benchmark, SenseRel, for modeling semantic relations between word senses, uniting denotational and connotational aspects of meaning. SenseRel distinguishes denotational relations, such as generalization or metaphor, as well as two connotational dimensions: valence and arousal. We evaluate large language models (LLMs), GPT-4o, Llama 3.1, and DeepSeek, in zero-shot and fine-tuned settings. Results show that GPT-4o best aligns with human affective judgments, while a fine-tuned RoBERTa model excels at classifying denotational relations.

Computer use agents (CUAs) can operate real-world digital interfaces but remain difficult to train due to the high cost of graphical user interface (GUI) interaction and the scarcity of high-quality trajectory data. Existing datasets rely on human demonstrations, limiting scalability. A natural alternative is to synthesize data from strong CUAs, yet their rollouts are highly noisy, with incorrect or suboptimal actions consisting a large proportion of the steps, making naive imitation ineffective. To tackle this challenge, we introduce a scalable data synthesis pipeline that transforms noisy rollouts into reliable supervision without human annotation. The core idea is step-level filtering, which evaluates actions individually to retain only correct steps, complemented by reasoning augmentation for improved planning. Using this pipeline, we construct WebSTAR, a dataset of 13.3K trajectories and 267K graded, reasoning-rich steps synthesized from OpenAI’s computer-use-preview model. We train Qwen-2.5-VL-Instruct models (7B and 32B) on WebSTAR. On WebVoyager, our 7B model surpasses SoTA open-source CUA model UI-TARS-1.5-7B by more than 15% with only supervised finetuning. Building on step-level grading, we further create WebSCORE, a dataset of graded step-level actions, and train StepRM, a 7B multimodal reward model distilled from o4-mini, which matches its grading quality while being far more efficient to deploy at scale. Our results establish step-level filtering as a key principle for scalable CUA training and construct two new datasets (WebSTAR, WebSCORE) and a lightweight reward model (StepRM) as practical tools to advance robust and efficient CUAs.

We introduce PR-XAI, a feature attribution method for transformer models based on the PageRank algorithm. The proposed PR-XAI models the attention mechanism as a directed graph, with weights derived from attention weights and their gradients. Evaluations across five well-known text classification datasets and three different architectures show that PR-AG, one variant of PR-XAI, outperforms state-of-the-art attribution methods in faithfulness and classification metrics, with significant gains on long-form text.

Large language models (LLMs) have recently been applied to 3D vision-language (3D-VL) tasks, which require spatial reasoning to identify target objects relative to anchors. Scene graphs are commonly employed to represent such relations, but reasoning over complete graphs incurs high token costs and computational inefficiencies, motivating the need for pruning. Existing pruning methods primarily rely on spatial proximity and often remove task-relevant relations, thereby undermining reliable spatial reasoning. To address these limitations, we derive a key requirement for scene graph pruning: preserving spatial relations that are most pertinent to the specific 3D-VL task. Guided by this insight, we propose the Conceptual-Adjacent Scene Graph Pruner (CAPruner). CAPruner integrates fuzzy semantic relevance with spatial proximity to estimate the importance of relations, enabling the selection of critical relations in a task-specific context. Moreover, to avoid costly relation-level annotations, CAPruner is trained by supervising the aggregated scores of each node’s incident edges. Extensive experiments demonstrate that CAPruner effectively preserves relations essential for spatial reasoning, leading to substantial performance improvements of LLMs on 3D-VL tasks. Code is available at https://github.com/fz-zsl/CAPruner.

This paper introduces MauBERT, a multilingual extension of HuBERT that leverages articulatory features for robust cross-lingual phonetic representation learning. We continue HuBERT pre-training with supervision based on a phonetic-to-articulatory feature mapping in 55 languages. Our models learn from multilingual data to predict articulatory features or phones, resulting in language-independent representations that capture multilingual phonetic properties. Through comprehensive ABX discriminability testing, we show MauBERT models produce more context-invariant representations than state-of-the-art multilingual self-supervised learning models. Additionally, the models effectively adapt to unseen languages and casual speech with minimal self-supervised fine-tuning (10 hours of speech). This establishes an effective approach for instilling linguistic inductive biases in self-supervised speech models.

Chain-of-Thought (CoT) reasoning is crucial for the performance of Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) but is often hindered by redundant and distracting segments, which incur excessive inference costs and degrade robustness. Existing approaches try to solve this problem by enforcing brevity through external supervision, such as length-based penalties or heuristic truncation. However, these approaches often degrade performance because they disregard the model’s intrinsic reasoning dependency and thus fail to distinguish between essential and redundant CoT segments. To address this problem, we propose SGP-CoT, a novel Self-Guided Pruning framework that leverages the model’s intrinsic likelihood landscape to identify segments that are extraneous to its specific reasoning pattern. Specifically, SGP-CoT treats the reasoning trajectory as a sequence of semantic units and assesses the necessity of each one via internal likelihood signals, measuring its contribution to the answer and local coherence. Based on this, it selectively removes non-essential segments and then forms high-quality pruning-based preference pairs, enabling the model to learn focused reasoning via self-optimization. Extensive experiments across diverse benchmarks demonstrate that the proposed SGP-CoT significantly reduces output length while maintaining or improving accuracy. These results validate that LRMs intrinsically possess the capability to discern reasoning utility, positioning SGP-CoT as a robust pathway toward scalable inference.

Reasoning over long contexts remains a major challenge for language models, particularly when solving tasks that require integrating multiple facts in sequence or generalizing to new distributions. We argue that this difficulty stems from a lack of structural inductive bias. Recently, alternative frameworks have been proposed to explicitly encode contexts as ordered memory and perform iterative retrieval to construct reasoning chains. Despite the promising results shown in prior arts, they are still heavily reliant on intermediate chain supervision and fall short in showing emergent reasoning generalization in the presence of hard distractions in reasoning-in-a-haystack tasks. Furthermore, we discover that as the amount of distractions increases, traditional episodic memory reads suffer from ill-conditioning problems, which lead to inaccurate context retrievals. In this work, we formalize the motivation for necessary inductive bias in reasoning-in-a-Haystack tasks, propose inference-time memory update procedures mimicking the "identify and remove unnecessary and unrelated details" in *constructively responsive reading*, introduce staged training inspired by human conceptual understanding, and finally demonstrate the possibilities and limits of such framework in the weakly supervised scenario.

Memory is a critical component in large language model (LLM)-based agents, enabling them to store and retrieve past executions to improve task performance over time. In this paper, we conduct an empirical study on how memory management choices impact the LLM agents’ behavior, especially their long-term performance. Specifically, we focus on two fundamental memory management operations that are widely used by many agent frameworks—memory addition and deletion—to systematically study their impact on the agent behavior. Through our quantitative analysis, we find that LLM agents display an *experience-following* property: high similarity between a task input and the input in a retrieved memory record often results in highly similar agent outputs. Our analysis further reveals two significant challenges associated with this property: *error propagation*, where inaccuracies in past experiences compound and degrade future performance, and *misaligned experience replay*, where some seemingly correct executions can provide limited or even misleading value as experiences. Through controlled experiments, we demonstrate the importance of regulating experience quality within the memory bank and show that future task evaluations can serve as free quality labels for stored memory. Our findings offer insights into the behavioral dynamics of LLM agent memory systems and provide practical guidance for designing memory components that support robust, long-term agent performance.

Translating software written in C to Rust has significant benefits in improving memory safety. However, manual translation is cumbersome, error-prone, and often produces unidiomatic code. Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated promise in producing idiomatic translations, but offer no correctness guarantees. We propose SACTOR, an LLM-driven C-to-Rust translation tool that employs a two-step process: an initial "unidiomatic" translation to preserve semantics, followed by an "idiomatic" refinement to align with Rust standards. SACTOR leverages static analysis of the C source to handle pointer semantics and dependency resolution. To validate correctness of our function-wise incremental translation that mixes C and Rust, we use end-to-end testing via the foreign function interface. We evaluate SACTOR on 200 programs from two public datasets and on two more complex scenarios (a 50-sample subset of CRust-Bench and the libogg library), comparing multiple LLMs. Across datasets, SACTOR delivers high end-to-end correctness and produces safe, idiomatic Rust with up to 7× fewer Clippy warnings; On CRust-Bench, SACTOR achieves an average (across samples) of 85% unidiomatic and 52% idiomatic success, and on libogg it attains full unidiomatic and up to 78% idiomatic coverage on GPT-5.

Scientific research relies on accurate information retrieval from literature to support analytical decisions.In this work, we introduce a new task, *INformation reTRieval through literAture reVIEW* (IntraView), which aims to automate fine-grained information retrieval *faithfully* grounded in the provided content in response to research-driven queries, and propose IntrAgent, an LLM-based agent that addresses this challenging task.In particular, IntrAgent is designed to mimic human behaviors when reading literature for information retrieval - identifying relevant sections and then iteratively extracting key details to refine the retrieved information.It follows a two-stage pipeline: a *Section Ranking* stage that prioritizes relevant literature sections through structural-knowledge-enabled reasoning, and an *Iterative Reading* stage that continuously extracts details and synthesizes them into concise, contextually grounded answers.To support rigorous evaluation, we introduce IntraBench, a new benchmark consisting of 315 test instances built from expert-authored questions paired with literature spanning *five* STEM domains.Across seven backbone LLMs, IntrAgent achieves on average 13.2% higher cross-domain accuracy than state-of-the-art RAG and research-agent baselines.

Ensuring that Large Language Models (LLMs) adhere to safety principles without refusing benign requests remains a significant challenge. While OpenAI introduces deliberative alignment (DA) to enhance the safety of its o-series models through reasoning over detailed “code-like” safety rules, the effectiveness of this approach in open-source LLMs, which typically lack advanced reasoning capabilities, is understudied. In this work, we systematically evaluate the impact of explicitly specifying extensive safety codes versus demonstrating them through illustrative cases. We find that referencing explicit codes inconsistently improves harmlessness and systematically degrades helpfulness, whereas training on case-augmented simple codes yields more robust and generalized safety behaviors. By guiding LLMs with case-augmented reasoning instead of extensive code-like safety rules, we avoid rigid adherence to narrowly enumerated rules and enable broader adaptability. Building on these insights, we propose CADA, a case-augmented deliberative alignment method for LLMs utilizing reinforcement learning on self-generated safety reasoning chains. CADA effectively enhances harmlessness, improves robustness against attacks, and reduces over-refusal while preserving utility across diverse benchmarks, offering a practical alternative to rule-only DA for improving safety while maintaining helpfulness.

Earlier Sign Language Production (SLP) models typically relied on autoregressive methods that generate output tokens one by one, which inherently provide temporal alignment. Although techniques like Teacher Forcing can prevent model collapse during training, they still cannot solve the problem of error accumulation during inference, since ground truth is unavailable at that stage. In contrast, more recent approaches based on diffusion models leverage step-by-step denoising to enable high-quality generation. However, the iterative nature of these models and the requirement to denoise entire sequences limit their applicability in real-time tasks like SLP. To address it, we propose a hybrid autoregressive-diffusion model for Sign Language Production (SLP), combining sequential dependency modeling with iterative refinement. A Multi-Scale Pose Representation module captures fine-grained articulator features, while a Confidence-Aware Causal Attention mechanism guides generation using joint-level confidence scores. Experiments on PHOENIX14T and How2Sign show improved generation quality and real-time efficiency.

Large language models (LLM) have emerged as a promising avenue for time series forecasting, offering the potential to integrate multimodal data. However, existing LLM-based approaches face notable limitations—such as marginalized role in model architectures, reliance on coarse statistical text prompts, and lack of interpretability. In this work, we introduce Augur, a fully LLM driven time series forecasting framework that exploits LLM causal reasoning to discover and use directed causal associations among covariates. Augur uses a two stage teacher student architecture where a powerful teacher LLM infers a directed causal graph from time series using heuristic search together with pairwise causality testing. A lightweight student agent then refines the graph and fine tune on high confidence causal associations that are encoded as rich textual prompts to perform forecasting. This design improves predictive accuracy while yielding transparent, traceable reasoning about variable interactions. Extensive experiments on real-world datasets with 25 baselines demonstrate that Augur achieves competitive performance and robust zero-shot generalization.

Large language models (LLMs) and agent-based frameworks have advanced rapidly, enabling diverse applications. Yet, with the proliferation of models and agentic strategies, practitioners face substantial uncertainty in selecting the best configuration for a downstream task. Prior studies show that different agents and backbones exhibit complementary strengths, and that larger models are not always superior, underscoring the need for adaptive routing mechanisms. Existing approaches to agent routing, however, often emphasize cost efficiency while overlooking the fine-grained contextual and relational structure inherent in QA tasks. In this paper, we propose AgentRouter, a framework that formulates multi-agent QA as a knowledge-graph–guided routing problem supervised by empirical performance signals. Specifically, we convert QA instance into a heterogeneous knowledge graph that jointly encodes queries, contextual entities, and agents, and then train a heterogeneous graph neural network (GNN) to propagate information across node types and produce task-aware routing distributions over agents. By leveraging soft supervision and weighted aggregation of agent outputs, AgentRouter learns principled collaboration schemes that capture the complementary strengths of diverse agents. Extensive experiments demonstrate that our framework consistently outperforms single-agent and ensemble baselines, while generalizing across benchmarks and LLM backbones. These results highlight the effectiveness and robustness of graph-supervised multi-agent routing for question answering. Our code repo is available at https://anonymous.4open.science/r/AgentRouter.

Multimodal embedding models, built upon causal Vision Language Models (VLMs), have shown promise in various tasks. However, current approaches face three limitations: causal attention in VLM backbones is suboptimal for embedding tasks; scalability issues due to reliance on high-quality labeled paired data for contrastive learning; and limited diversity in training objectives and data. To address these issues, we propose MoCa, a two-stage framework for transforming pre-trained VLMs into bidirectional multimodal embedding models. The first stage, Modality-aware Continual Pre-training, introduces a joint reconstruction objective that simultaneously denoises interleaved texts and images, enhancing bidirectional context-aware reasoning. The second stage, Heterogeneous Contrastive Fine-tuning, leverages diverse, semantically rich multimodal data beyond simple image-caption pairs to enhance generalization and alignment. Our method addresses the stated limitations by introducing bidirectional attention through continual pre-training, scaling effectively with massive unlabeled datasets via joint reconstruction objectives, and utilizing diverse multimodal data for enhanced representation robustness. Experiments demonstrate that MoCa consistently improves performance across MMEB and ViDoRe-v2 benchmarks, achieving new state-of-the-arts, and exhibits strong scalability with both model size and training data on MMEB.We have released the model weights and data on our project page https://haon-chen.github.io/MoCa/.

Current Text-to-SQL reasoning models often lack integrated execution feedback during generation, and most existing approaches utilize feedback only for post-hoc correction. This separation not only limits real-time error correction, but may also introduce mistakes by altering otherwise correct SQL queries. To address these challenges, we present **ReEx-SQL** (Reasoning with Execution-Aware Reinforcement Learning), a Text-to-SQL framework that interacts with the SQL execution engine during decoding and dynamically adjusts reasoning based on execution feedback, thereby enabling context-sensitive query refinement and improved accuracy. ReEx-SQL achieves this through structured prompts with markup tags and a stepwise rollout strategy that incorporates execution feedback at each generation stage. For policy supervision, we design a composite reward function—featuring an exploration reward—to explicitly encourage effective interaction with the database. Furthermore, ReEx-SQL adopts a tree-based decoding strategy to facilitate exploratory reasoning and primarily aims to enhance parallel decoding efficiency. Notably, ReEx-SQL achieves 89.1% accuracy on Spider and 65.3% on BIRD at the 7B scale, surpassing baseline models by 2.7% and 2.6%, respectively. In addition, its tree-based decoding accelerates inference by 51.9% compared to linear decoding during sampling.

We propose a novel data synthesis framework, DecIF, which automatically generates accurate and diverse instruction-following data from scratch for supervised fine-tuning (SFT) and reinforcement learning (RL), leveraging large language models (LLMs) and minimal external resources. By decomposing the data synthesis pipeline into fine-grained steps, DecIF achieves meticulous quality and diversity control over generated instruction-following data. Extensive experiments across both SFT and RL demonstrate DecIF’s strong capability to flexibly synthesize accurate instruction-following data for both paradigms compared to comprehensive baselines. Further analysis demonstrates the framework’s robustness, scalability, and computational efficiency in instruction-following data generation, while its modular design ensures straightforward implementation and reproducibility.

Embodied navigation is a fundamental capability of embodied intelligence, enabling robots to move and interact within physical environments. However, existing navigation tasks primarily focus on predefined object navigation or instruction following, which significantly differs from human needs in real-world scenarios involving complex, open-ended scenes. To bridge this gap, we introduce a challenging long-horizon navigation task that requires understanding high-level human instructions and performing spatial-aware object navigation in real-world environments. Existing embodied navigation methods struggle with such tasks due to their limitations in comprehending high-level human instructions and localizing objects with an open vocabulary. In this paper, we propose NavA³, a hierarchical framework divided into two stages: global and local policies. In the global policy, we leverage the reasoning capabilities of Reasoning-VLM to parse high-level human instructions and integrate them with global 3D scene views. This allows us to reason and navigate to regions most likely to contain the goal object. In the local policy, we have collected a dataset of 1.0 million samples of spatial-aware object affordances to train the NaviAfford model (PointingVLM), which provides robust open-vocabulary object localization and spatial awareness for precise goal identification and navigation in complex environments. Extensive experiments demonstrate that NavA³ achieves SOTA results in navigation performance and can successfully complete long-horizon navigation tasks across different robot embodiments in real-world settings, paving the way for universal embodied navigation. The dataset and code will be made available.

Vision–Language Models (VLMs) excel at visual reasoning but still struggle with external knowledge integration. Retrieval-Augmented Generation(RAG) is a promising solution, but current methods remain inefficient and often fail to maintain high answer quality. To address these challenges, we propose VideoSpeculateRAG, an efficient VLM-based RAG framework built on two key ideas. First, we introduce a speculative decoding pipeline: a lightweight draft model quickly generates multiple answer candidates, which are then verified and refined by a more accurate heavyweight model, substantially reducing inference latency without sacrificing correctness. Second, we identify a major source of error, incorrect entity recognition in retrieved knowledge, and mitigate it with a simple yet effective similarity-based filtering strategy that improves entity alignment and boosts overall answer accuracy. Experiments demonstrate that VideoSpeculateRAG achieves comparable or higher accuracy than standard RAG approaches, while speeding up the inference by approximately 2x. Our framework highlights the potential of combining speculative decoding with retrieval-augmented reasoning to enhance efficiency and reliability in complex, knowledge-intensive multimodal tasks.

Linguistic steganography involves embedding secret messages within seemingly innocuous texts to enable covert communication. Provable security, which is a long-standing goal and key motivation, has been extended to language-model-based steganography. Previous provably secure approaches have achieved perfect imperceptibility, measured by zero Kullback-Leibler (KL) divergence, but at the expense of embedding capacity. In this paper, we attempt to directly use a classic entropy coding method (**range coding**) to achieve secure steganography, and then propose an efficient and provably secure linguistic steganographic method with a rotation mechanism. Experiments across various language models show that our method achieves around 100% entropy utilization (embedding efficiency) for embedding capacity, outperforming the existing baseline methods. Moreover, it achieves high embedding speeds (up to 1554.66 bits/s on GPT-2). The code is available at github.com/ryehr/RRC_steganography.

Unified multimodal models aim to jointly enable visual understanding and generation, yet current benchmarks rarely examine their true integration. Existing evaluations either treat the two abilities in isolation or overlook tasks that inherently couple them. To address this gap, we present Uni-MMMU, a comprehensive and discipline-aware benchmark that systematically unfolds the bidirectional synergy between generation and understanding across eight reasoning-centric domains, including science, coding, mathematics, and puzzles. Each task is bidirectionally coupled, demanding models to (i) leverage conceptual understanding to guide precise visual synthesis, or (ii) utilize generation as a cognitive scaffold for analytical reasoning. Uni-MMMU incorporates verifiable intermediate reasoning steps, unique ground truths, and a reproducible scoring protocol for both textual and visual outputs. Through extensive evaluation of state-of-the-art unified, generation-only, and understanding-only models, we reveal substantial performance disparities and cross-modal dependencies, offering new insights into when and how these abilities reinforce one another, and establishing a reliable foundation for advancing unified models.

Recent advances in large language models (LLMs) have scaled the potential for reasoning and agentic search, wherein models autonomously plan, retrieve, and reason over external knowledge to answer complex queries. However, the iterative think–search loop accumulates long system memories, leading to memory dilution problem. In addition, existing memory management methods struggle to capture fine-grained semantic relations between queries and documents and often lose substantial information. Therefore, we propose MemSearch-o1, an agentic search framework built on reasoning-aligned memory growth and retracing. MemSearch-o1 dynamically grows fine-grained memory fragments from memory seed tokens from the queries, then retraces and deeply refines the memory via a contribution function, and finally reorganizes a globally connected memory path. This shifts memory management from stream-like concatenation to structured, token-level growth with path-based reasoning. Experiments on eight benchmark datasets show that MemSearch-o1 substantially mitigates memory dilution, and more effectively activates the reasoning potential of diverse LLMs, establishing a solid foundation for memory-aware agentic intelligence.

We introduce CAPC-CG, the Chinese Adaptive Policy Communication (Central Government) Corpus, the first open dataset of Chinese policy directives annotated with a five-color typology of policy signals, capturing clarity and ambiguity, grounded in the theory of adaptive policy communication. Spanning 1949–2023, this corpus includes laws, regulations, and rules issued by Chinese central authorities, segmented into 3.3 million paragraph units. We further propose and validate an expert-directed LLM annotation method that integrates codebook design, structured training, a two-step workflow, and LLM-based scaling. Alongside the corpus, we release metadata and a gold-standard labeled set developed by trained coders. Inter-annotator agreement achieves a Fleiss’ kappa of κ = 0.86 on directive labels, indicating high reliability. We provide baseline classification results with several large language models (LLMs), together with our codebook, and describe patterns from the data. This release enables downstream tasks and multilingual NLP research in communication strategies under complexity and uncertainty.

Despite strong results on many tasks, multimodal large language models (MLLMs) still underperform on visual mathematical problem solving, especially in reliably perceiving and interpreting diagrams. Inspired by human problem-solving, we hypothesize that the ability to extract meaningful information from diagrams is pivotal, as it directly conditions subsequent inference.Hence, we introduce FlowVerse, a comprehensive benchmark that provides a fine-grained evaluation of MLLMs’ perception and reasoning capabilities. Our preliminary results on FlowVerse reveal that existing MLLMs exhibit substantial limitations when extracting essential information and reasoned properties from diagrams and performing complex reasoning based on these visual inputs. In response, we introduce MathFlow, a modular problem-solving pipeline that decouples perception and inference into distinct stages, thereby optimizing each independently. Given the perceptual limitations observed in current MLLMs, we trained MathFlow-P-7B as a dedicated perception model.Experimental results indicate that MathFlow-P-7B yields substantial performance gains when integrated with various closed-source and open-source inference models. This demonstrates the effectiveness of the MathFlow pipeline and its compatibility with diverse inference frameworks. Project page: https://github.com/MathFlow-zju/MathFlow.

Linguistic steganography based on language models typically assumes that steganographic texts are transmitted without alteration, making them fragile to even minor modifications. While previous work mitigates this fragility by limiting the context window, it significantly compromises text quality. In this paper, we propose the **anchored sliding window (ASW)** framework to improve imperceptibility and robustness. In addition to the latest tokens, the prompt and a **bridge context** are anchored within the context window, encouraging the model to compensate for the excluded tokens. We formulate the optimization of the bridge context as a variant of **prompt distillation**, which we further extend using self-distillation strategies. Experiments show that our ASW significantly and consistently outperforms the baseline method in text quality, imperceptibility, and robustness across diverse settings. The code is available at github.com/ryehr/ASW_steganography.

Instruction-tuning datasets often contain substantial redundancy and low-quality samples, necessitating effective data selection methods. We propose an instruction data selection framework based on weighted in-context influence (wICI), which measures how effectively each candidate example reduces instruction-following difficulty for semantically related peers. Through systematic experiments, we address three key questions: what constitutes effective instruction tuning data from an in-context perspective, whether sample difficulty correlates with in-context influence, and how in-context influence translates to instruction tuning effectiveness. Experiments across multiple models and benchmarks demonstrate that our method consistently outperforms existing baselines under constrained data budgets, while empirically showing that sample difficulty negatively correlates with in-context influence.

Large Language Models (LLMs) have rapidly advanced in recent years, scaling up in both parameter count and context length. However, as context windows extend from thousands to hundreds of thousands of tokens, attention computation becomes the dominant source of memory usage and runtime in decoding stages, severely limiting the efficiency and scalability of long-context LLMs. Sparse attention has emerged as a promising solution, reducing complexity by computing attention over only a subset of context tokens. However, the sparse attention for Multi-head Latent Attention(MLA) which is a variant of standard MHA is rarely studied. In this paper, we introduce RoPE-based Blockwise Sparse Attention (RoBSA), a method designed specifically for MLA during the decoding stage of model inference. RoBSA leverages the decoupled nature of RoPE within MLA to implement token selection in a blockwise manner. RoBSA is a lightweight, training-free, and layer-aware algorithm that can be integrated in a plug-and-play fashion. Our method significantly reduces end-to-end inference latency in the decoding stage by up to 2.55x with minimal accuracy loss compared to full attention in long-context scenarios for very large models.

Despite the growing adoption of large language models (LLMs) in academic workflows, their capabilities remain limited in supporting high-quality scientific writing. Most existing systems are designed for general-purpose scientific text generation and fail to meet the sophisticated demands of research communication beyond surface-level polishing, for example, maintaining conceptual coherence across sections. Furthermore, academic writing is inherently iterative and revision-driven, a process that is not well supported by direct prompting-based paradigms. To address these scenarios, we propose a human-AI collaboration framework for academic paper revision, centered on criteria-guided intent alignment and context-aware modeling. To validate the framework, we curate a dataset of 7,000 research papers from top-tier venues, annotated with 140,000 instruction–response pairs that reflect realistic, section-level scientific revisions. We instantiate the framework in XtraGPT, the first suite of open-source LLMs (1.5B to 14B parameters) specifically fine-tuned for context-aware academic paper revision. Extensive experiments show that XtraGPT significantly outperforms same-scale baselines and rivals the quality of proprietary counterparts. Both automated preference assessments and human evaluations confirm the effectiveness of XtraGPT in improving scientific drafts. Our code and models are available at https://github.com/Xtra-Computing/XtraGPT and https://huggingface.co/collections/Xtra-Computing/xtragpt.

Large Language Model (LLM)-based optimization has recently shown promise for autonomous problem solving, yet most approaches still cast LLMs as passive constraint checkers rather than proactive strategy designers, limiting their effectiveness on complex Constraint Optimization Problems (COPs). To address this, we present AutoCO, an end-to-end Automated Constraint Optimization method that tightly couples operations-research principles of constraint relaxation with LLM reasoning. A core innovation is a unified triple-representation that binds relaxation strategies, algorithmic principles, and executable codes. This design enables the LLM to synthesize, justify, and instantiate relaxation strategies that are both principled and executable. To navigate fragmented solution spaces, AutoCO employs a bidirectional global–local coevolution mechanism, synergistically coupling Monte Carlo Tree Search (MCTS) for global relaxation-trajectory exploration with Evolutionary Algorithms (EAs) for local solution intensification. This continuous exchange of priors and feedback explicitly balances diversification and intensification, thus preventing premature convergence. Extensive experiments on three challenging COP benchmarks validate AutoCO’s consistent effectiveness and superior performance, especially in hard regimes where current methods degrade. Results highlight AutoCO as a principled and effective path toward proactive, verifiable LLM-driven optimization.

Large language models (LLMs) are shaping global values, yet they frequently exhibit a pronounced WEIRD (Western, Educated, Industrialized, Rich, Democratic) cultural bias, marginalizing diverse viewpoints and posing challenges for reconciling diverse populations with varying cultural backgrounds and value systems. In this work, we move beyond simple alignment methods to propose a new paradigm for cross-cultural fairness. We introduce a Nash Consensus Negotiation framework under the formulation of cross-cultural consensus as a Nash Equilibrium. Each LLM iteratively proposes and refines natural-language guidelines, guided by a utility function balancing self-consistency with mutual acceptance, while penalizing redundancy. The process expands the proposal space and converges to a consensus, yielding fair and interpretable consensus outcomes. We evaluate our framework against baselines using quantitative metrics, qualitative analysis, and large-scale human studies. Experiments demonstrate that our framework generates higher-quality and more balanced consensus, effectively mitigating assimilation toward WEIRD values. Furthermore, we finetune diverse LLM architectures with negotiation data via preference optimization and supervised reasoning, reducing cultural distances by up to 95.53%. Overall, our work offers a systematic path to mitigate cultural bias in LLMs by guiding them toward self-consistency, mutually-acceptable equilibria.

Extracting conditional text embeddings from large language models (LLMs) is a promising paradigm, as it requires neither additional data nor fine-tuning. Existing methods incorporate conditions into prompts to guide LLMs to focus on specific aspects and elicit conditional text embeddings. However, relying solely on prompts often fails to produce high-quality conditional text embeddings, as they remain entangled with general text embeddings, ultimately degrading their quality. To this end, we propose an inference-time, plug-and-play Self-Contrastive Steering (SCS) method that constructs unconditional general text embeddings and uses them to refine conditional text embeddings, making them more focused on the target condition. Specifically, we modify the attention mask and positional encodings to mask the condition, thereby obtaining unconditional text embeddings and intervening in the multi-head self-attention computation process. Notably, our method is highly efficient, requiring only a single additional multi-head self-attention computation at inference time. Extensive experiments on clustering, Semantic Textual Similarity, and triplet alignment datasets demonstrate that our method can seamlessly improve the performance of existing prompt-based methods across different LLMs in a training-free and plug-and-play manner.

This paper explores attention attractors, tokens that draw significantly high attention, in large language models. We analyze them from three perspectives: (1) Functionality: We demonstrate their role in aggregating information from preceding contexts to facilitate future predictions. (2) Distribution: Through layer-wise and token-wise analysis, we reveal that attention attractors are widely distributed across layers but predominantly originate from low-semantic words like "_the". (3) Mechanism: We demonstrate the correlation between attention weights allocated to tokens with their specific activation dimension values. We hope these findings provide new insights into the attention mechanisms of large language models and inspire further exploration.

Recent theoretical advancement of information density in natural language has brought the following question on desk: To what degree does natural language exhibit periodicity pattern in its encoded information? We address this question by introducing a new method called AutoPeriod of Surprisal (APS). APS adopts a canonical periodicity detection algorithm and is able to identify any significant periods that exist in the surprisal sequence of a single document. By applying the algorithm to a set of corpora, we have obtained the following interesting results: Firstly, a considerable proportion of human language demonstrates a strong pattern of periodicity in information; Secondly, new periods that are outside the distributions of typical structural units in text (e.g., sentence boundaries, elementary discourse units, etc.) are found and further confirmed via harmonic regression modeling. We conclude that the periodicity of information in language is a joint outcome from both structured factors and other driving factors that take effect at longer distances. The advantages of our periodicity detection method and its potentials in LLM-generation detection are further discussed.

Current evaluation paradigms for emotional support conversations tend to reward generic empathetic responses, yet they fail to assess whether the support is genuinely personalized to users’ unique psychological profiles and contextual needs. We introduce EmoHarbor, an automated evaluation framework that adopts a User-as-a-Judge paradigm by simulating the user’s inner world. EmoHarbor employs a Chain-of-Agent architecture that decomposes users’ internal processes into three specialized roles, enabling agents to interact with supporters and complete assessments in a manner similar to human users. We instantiate this benchmark using 100 real-world user profiles that cover diverse personality traits and situations, and define 10 evaluation dimensions of personalized support quality. Comprehensive evaluation of 20 advanced LLMs on EmoHarbor reveals a critical insight: while these models excel at generating empathetic responses, they consistently fail to tailor support to individual user contexts. This finding reframes the central challenge, shifting research focus from merely enhancing generic empathy to developing truly user-aware emotional support. EmoHarbor provides a reproducible and scalable framework to guide the development and evaluation of more nuanced and user-aware emotional support systems.

In this paper, we introduce **ReasonEmbed**, a novel text embedding model developed for reasoning-intensive document retrieval. Our work includes three key technical contributions. First, we propose **ReMixer**, a new data synthesis method that overcomes the triviality problem prevalent in previous synthetic datasets, enabling large-scale production of 82K high-quality training samples. Second, we design **Redapter**, a self-adaptive learning algorithm that dynamically adjusts training each sample’s weight based on its reasoning intensity. This allows the model to effectively capture the complex semantic relationships between queries and documents. Third, we implement ReasonEmbed across multiple backbones of varying sizes, all of which achieve **superior performance** on reasoning-intensive retrieval tasks. Notably, our ReasonEmbed-Qwen3-8B model offers a record-high nDCG@10 score of 38.1 on the BRIGHT benchmark, which significantly outperforms existing text embedding models. We will fully open-source our created resource in ReasonEmbed to push forward the research advancement in this field.

Large language models (LLMs) are being increasingly used in urban planning, but since gendered space theory highlights how gender hierarchies are embedded in spatial organization, there is concern that LLMs may reproduce or amplify such biases. We introduce SPAGBias — the first systematic framework to evaluate spatial gender bias in LLMs. It combines a taxonomy of 62 urban micro-spaces, a prompt library, and three diagnostic layers: explicit (forced-choice resampling), probabilistic (token-level asymmetry), and constructional (semantic and narrative role analysis). Testing six representative models, we identify structured gender-space associations that go beyond the public-private divide, forming nuanced micro-level mappings. Story generation reveals how emotion, wording, and social roles jointly shape “spatial gender narratives”. We also examine how prompt design, temperature, and model scale influence bias expression. Tracing experiments indicate that these patterns are embedded and reinforced across the model pipeline (pre-training, instruction tuning, and reward modeling), with model associations found to substantially exceed real-world distributions. Downstream experiments further reveal that such biases produce concrete failures in both normative and descriptive application settings. This work connects sociological theory with computational analysis, extending bias research into the spatial domain and uncovering how LLMs encode social gender cognition through language.

Video anomaly understanding (VAU) is critical for real-world scenarios. Recent advances in Video Large Language Models (Video-LLMs) enhance the ability of VAU models to describe and interpret anomalies. However, progress in anomaly localization is still limited by two key issues. First, most existing video anomaly datasets only annotate segments that are clearly inconsistent with the context, often omitting subsequent segments that are semantically part of the same abnormal event. Second, the field lacks systematic evaluation protocols. To bridge these gaps, we introduce VALU, a new benchmark that explicitly defines anomalies across five semantic levels and provides comprehensive temporal boundaries and detailed textual descriptions for each. Based on these annotations, we design three evaluation tasks that comprehensively assess models’ capabilities across different dimensions, including temporal grounding, anomaly localization, and anomaly detail discrimination. Evaluation results reveal persistent challenges in current models’ capabilities on VAU. We further analyze and discuss these findings, and hope that both VALU and insights will advance research in VAU and the development of Video-LLMs. Our benchmark will be publicly available.

Referring multimodal large language models enable users to ground queries to specific image regions via spatial prompts, supporting fine-grained referring dialogue. However, existing methods rely on extensive fine-tuning to mitigate attention distraction, which incurs high computational costs and limits adaptability. Without sufficient training data, irrelevant regions in single images easily divert model focus, leading to redundant outputs or hallucinations. To address this, we propose CoreGaze, a training-free framework that simulates human visual gaze diffusion for fine-grained comprehension. First, CoreGaze constructs a sparse semantic graph from visual tokens, modeling region-wise affinities via thresholded similarity. It then maps the user’s visual prompt to a core subgraph with amplified initial influence, which drives a degree-normalized diffusion process using restart-equipped random walks to propagate relevance to contextual neighborhoods. This process prunes irrelevant tokens while preserving user-indicated targets and semantically linked context, distilling a focused yet comprehensive subgraph. Finally, CoreGaze fuses this subgraph with prompt tokens in the frozen large language model decoder, facilitating fine-grained referring generation. Experimental results show that CoreGaze achieves outstanding performance in multiple referring dialogue tasks, showcasing its effectiveness.

Respiratory diseases remain a leading cause of global mortality, where timely and accurate diagnosis is critical to improving patient outcomes and reducing healthcare burdens. While prior work has explored audio-based models for respiratory disease detection, such unimodal approaches often suffer from limited generalizability and diagnostic precision. In this paper, we propose RespiraMFM, a Multimodal Foundation Model that integrates respiratory sounds with patient medical history and symptoms to enhance diagnostic accuracy and disease detection capabilities. We introduce an effective contrastive alignment strategy for audio-text multimodal integration, allowing the model to learn better cross-modal representations between respiratory sounds and corresponding textual clinical information. We evaluate RespiraMFM across five major respiratory diseases using seven real-world datasets in both supervised fine-tuning and zero-shot settings, achieving a 9.15% improvement in AUROC on supervised tasks and a 20.98% gain on zero-shot tasks over existing baselines. These findings underscore the potential of our framework to advance early diagnosis and improve clinical decision-making in respiratory disease management.

Large Language Models (LLMs) often fail to recognize fallacious reasoning in real-world interactions, despite strong performance on static fallacy detection tasks. We define this ability as fallacy awareness, the capacity to autonomously perceive and resist fallacies in dynamic, pragmatic contexts. To study this, we introduce ISFallacy, a large-scale Chinese benchmark of 50K interactive scenarios spanning six fallacy types, five social interaction settings, diverse role relationships, and personality traits. We further propose FATE, a two-stage evaluation framework that assesses fallacy awareness without explicit cues, combining natural dialogue responses and reasoning-based decisions. Experiments on five representative LLMs reveal a substantial gap between fallacy classification and awareness, with models particularly vulnerable to emotion-driven fallacies and scenarios involving cooperative or trust-based relationships. Deeper analysis uncovers a cognition–behavior gap and fragile internal representations underlying awareness failures. Our work establishes a foundation for evaluating and enhancing the robustness of LLMs against fallacious reasoning in interactive settings.

Large language models (LLMs) learn non-trivial abstractions during pretraining, such as detecting irregular plural noun subjects. However, because traditional evaluation methods (e.g., benchmarking) fail to reveal how models acquire these concepts and capabilities, it is not well understood when and how these specific linguistic abilities emerge. To bridge this gap and better understand model training at the concept level, we use sparse crosscoders to discover and align features across model checkpoints. Using this approach, we track the evolution of linguistic features during pretraining. We train crosscoders between open-sourced checkpoint triplets with significant performance and representation shifts, and introduce a novel metric, Relative Indirect Effects (RelIE), to trace training stages at which individual features become causally important for task performance. We show that crosscoders can detect feature emergence, maintenance, and discontinuation during pretraining. Our approach is architecture-agnostic and scalable, offering a promising path toward more interpretable and fine-grained analysis of representation learning throughout pretraining.

Translating brain signals into text could restore communication for people with severe paralysis, yet practically usable systems to date rely on invasive electrocorticography (ECoG). Electroencephalography (EEG) offers a non-invasive alternative, and EEG-to-text (EEG2Text) has been widely explored. Interestingly, however, EEG2Text models generally rely on teacher-forcing evaluation; without it, they fail to generate meaningful decoding. This reliance prevents EEG2Text from being applied in real-world, non-academic settings. This has fueled numerous debates about whether EEG2Text is a meaningful direction, by extension, and whether EEG truly contains decodable linguistic information. Here, using a neuropsychology-informed paradigm, we find that existing EEG2Text benchmarks have neglected EEG instability, a flaw that has confounded inference and sparked debate. Our experiments furnish key evidence for the feasibility of teacher-forcing-free EEG2Text decoding. Accordingly, we assemble the Corpus OF Eeg-To-Text (COFETT) using a 128-channel high-density EEG cap, providing a benchmark dedicated to evaluating EEG2Text models. In comparisons with multiple existing benchmarks, COFETT achieves SOTA ability to distinguish among model performances and enables robust, teacher-forcing-free evaluation, thereby opening a path toward practical EEG2Text applications. COFETT is open sourced in https://github.com/baoyudu/COFETT.

Recent efforts on text-to-audio (TTA) generation are starting to explore fine-grained controllability, e.g., precise timing control, with innovations on conditioning techniques or training-free latent manipulations. However, constrained by data scarcity, their generation performance at scale is still limited. In this study, we recast high-controllability TTA generation as a multi-task learning problem, and introduce a progressive diffusion modeling approach, ControlAudio. Our method adeptly fits distributions conditioned on fine-grained information, including text, timing, and phoneme features, through a step-by-step strategy. First, we propose a data construction method spanning both annotation and simulation, augmenting condition information in the sequence of text, timing, and phoneme. Second, at the model training stage, we pretrain a scalable diffusion transformer (DiT) on large-scale text-audio pairs, achieving high-fidelity TTA generation, and then incrementally integrate the timing and phoneme features, expanding controllability. Finally, at the inference stage, we propose progressively guided generation, which sequentially emphasizes more fine-grained information, aligning inherently with the coarse-to-fine sampling nature of DiT. Extensive experiments show that ControlAudio achieves state-of-the-art performance in terms of temporal accuracy and speech clarity, significantly outperforming existing methods on both objective and subjective evaluations. Demo samples are available at: https://control-audio.github.io/Control-Audio.

Natural Language Inference (NLI) models have been used in various ways to improve the factuality of LLM outputs. This is typically done by applying an NLI model to judge whether the model output is entailed from the supposed evidence, triggering some corrective actions, such as beam reranking at inference time or RL rewards during training. While NLI models are trained to detect factual inconsistencies over complete sentences, decisions in the common autoregressive generation architecture are made for each evolving text prefix, during decoding. Addressing this setting, we generalize the entailment detection task to apply over arbitrary text prefixes, and suggest its utility for improving generation faithfulness. Providing suitable evaluation and training datasets for this task, we train MiniTruePrefixes, a novel specialized model that better detects factual inconsistencies over text prefixes, outperforming comparable baseline NLI models by 5-14 F1 points in prefix-level entailment. We further demonstrate that integrating MiniTruePrefixes into a controlled decoding framework substantially improves factual consistency in abstractive summarization. When guided by MiniTruePrefixes, LLaMA-3.2-3B-Instruct matches the faithfulness and runtime of the 8B model from the same model family, while using only half the memory.

Sarcasm detection remains a significant challenge due to its reliance on nuanced contextual understanding, world knowledge, and multi-faceted linguistic cues that vary substantially across different sarcastic expressions. Existing approaches, from fine-tuned transformers to large language models, apply a uniform reasoning strategy to all inputs, struggling to address the diverse analytical demands of sarcasm. These demands range from modeling contextual expectation violations to requiring external knowledge grounding or recognizing specific rhetorical patterns. To address this limitation, we introduce RAM-SD, a Retrieval-Augmented Multi-Agent framework for Sarcasm Detection. The framework operates through four stages: (1) contextual retrieval grounds the query in both sarcastic and non-sarcastic exemplars; (2) a meta-planner classifies the sarcasm type and selects an optimal reasoning plan from a predefined set; (3) an ensemble of specialized agents performs complementary, multi-view analysis; and (4) an integrator synthesizes these analyses into a final, interpretable judgment with a natural language explanation. Evaluated on four standard benchmarks, RAM-SD achieves a state-of-the-art Macro-F1 of 77.74%, outperforming the strong GPT-4o+CoC baseline by 7.01 points. Our framework not only sets a new performance benchmark but also provides transparent and interpretable reasoning traces, illuminating the cognitive processes behind sarcasm comprehension.

Learning structural information from observational data is central to producing new knowledge outside the training corpus. This holds for mechanistic understanding in scientific discovery as well as flexible test-time compositional generation. We thus study how language models learn abstract structures and utilize the learnt structural information at test-time. To ensure a controlled setup, we design a natural language dataset based on linguistic structural transformations. We empirically show that the emergence of learning structural information correlates with complex reasoning tasks, and that the ability to perform test-time compositional generation remains limited.

As Large Language Models (LLMs) become increasingly used for question-answering (QA), relying on static, pre-annotated references for evaluation poses significant challenges in cost, scalability, and completeness. Meanwhile, using LLMs themselves as evaluators without external grounding remains unreliable for objective tasks, as they systematically over-accept incorrect answers, fabricate supporting rationales, and degrade sharply on questions that fall outside their training data. We propose Search-AuGmented Evaluation (SAGE), a framework to assess LLM outputs without fixed ground-truth answers. Unlike conventional metrics that compare to static references or depend solely on LLM-as-a-judge knowledge, SAGE acts as an agent that actively retrieves and synthesizes external evidence. It iteratively generates web queries, collects information, summarizes findings, and refines subsequent searches through reflection. By reducing dependence on static reference-driven evaluation protocols, SAGE offers a scalable and adaptive alternative for evaluating the factuality of LLMs. Experimental results on multiple free-form QA benchmarks show that SAGE achieves substantial to perfect agreement with human evaluations.

To keep pace with the increasing velocity of large language models (LLM) development, model output evaluation has transitioned away from time-consuming human evaluation to automatic evaluation, where LLMs themselves are tasked with assessing and critiquing other model outputs. LLM-as-judge models are a class of generative evaluators that excel in evaluating relatively simple domains, like chat quality, but struggle in reasoning intensive domains where model responses contain more substantive and challenging content. To remedy existing judge shortcomings, we explore training judges with reinforcement learning (RL). We make three key contributions: (1) We propose the Equivalent Initial State Group Relative Policy Optimization (EIS-GRPO) algorithm, which allows us to train our judge to be robust to positional biases that arise in more complex evaluation settings. (2) We introduce ReasoningJudgeBench, a benchmark that evaluates judges in diverse reasoning settings not covered by prior work. (3) We train Judge for Reasoning (J4R), a 7B judge trained with EIS-GRPO that outperforms GPT-4o and the next best small judge by 6.7% and 9%, matching or exceeding the performance of larger GRPO-trained judges on both JudgeBench and ReasoningJudgeBench.

Web agents have shown great promise in performing many tasks on e-commerce websites. To assess their capabilities, several benchmarks have been introduced. However, current benchmarks in the e-commerce domain face two major problems. First, they primarily focus on product search tasks (e.g., "Find an Apple Watch"), failing to capture the broader range of functionalities offered by real-world e-commerce services such as Amazon, including account management and gift card operations. Second, existing benchmarks typically evaluate whether the agent completes the user query, but ignore the potential risks involved. In practice, web agents can make unintended changes that negatively impact the user’s account or status. For instance, an agent might purchase the wrong item, delete a saved address, or incorrectly configure an auto-reload setting. To address these gaps, we propose a new benchmark called Amazon-Bench. To generate user queries that cover a broad range of tasks, we propose a data generation pipeline that leverages webpage content and interactive elements (e.g., buttons, check boxes) to create diverse, functionality-grounded user queries covering tasks such as address management, wishlist management, and brand store following. To enhance agent evaluation, we propose an automated evaluation framework that assesses both the performance and safety of web agents. We systematically evaluate various agents, finding that current agents struggle with complex queries and pose safety risks. These results highlight the need for developing more robust and reliable web agents.

Large Language Model (LLM)-based agents have demonstrated remarkable capabilities in complex reasoning and multi-turn interactions but struggle to continuously improve and adapt when deployed in new environments. One promising approach is implementing skill libraries that allow agents to learn, validate, and apply new skills. However, current skill library approaches rely primarily on LLM prompting, making consistent skill library implementation challenging. To overcome these challenges, we propose a Reinforcement Learning (RL)-based approach to enhance agents’ self-improvement capabilities with a skill library. Specifically, we introduce Skill Augmented GRPO for self-Evolution (SAGE), a novel RL framework that systematically incorporates skills into learning. The framework’s key component, Sequential Rollout, iteratively deploys agents across a chain of similar tasks for each rollout. As agents navigate through the task chain, skills generated from previous tasks accumulate in the library and become available for subsequent tasks. Additionally, the framework enhances skill generation and utilization through a Skill-integrated Reward that complements the original outcome-based rewards. Experimental results on AppWorld demonstrate that SAGE, when applied to supervised-finetuned model with expert experience, achieves 8.9% higher Scenario Goal Completion while requiring 26% fewer interaction steps and generating 59% fewer tokens, substantially outperforming existing approaches in both accuracy and efficiency. Our code is available at https://github.com/amazon-science/SAGE.

Large Language Models (LLMs) are susceptible to indirect prompt injection attack, where the model inadvertently responds to instructions injected into the prompt context. This vulnerability stems from LLMs’ inability to distinguish between data and instructions within a prompt. We propose CachePrune that defends against this attack by identifying and pruning neurons associated with instruction-following, during KV cache encoding of the prompt context. The pruning steers the LLM toward interpreting the context purely as data rather than as instructions to follow. To identify these neurons, we introduce a neural attribution mechanism guided by a preferential attribution loss, and theoretically connect this loss to an upper bound of the Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) objective. Further, we improve on the fidelity of neural attribution by leveraging an observed triggering effect in instruction-following. Our approach does not interfere with prompt formatting or incur test-time overhead in response generation. Experiments show that CachePrune significantly reduces the attack success rate while preserving the LLM’s ability to follow user instructions.

Large Language Models (LLMs) often produce inconsistent answers when faced with different phrasings of the same prompt. In this paper, we propose Flip-Flop Consistency (F²C), an unsupervised training method that improves robustness to such perturbations. F²C is composed of two key components. The first, Consensus Cross-Entropy (CCE), uses a majority vote across prompt variations to create a hard pseudo-label. The second is a representation alignment loss that pulls lower-confidence and non-majority predictors toward the consensus established by high-confidence, majority-voting variations. We evaluate our method on 11 datasets spanning four NLP tasks, with 4–15 prompt variations per dataset. On average, F²C raises observed agreement by 11.62%, improves mean F₁ by 8.94%, and reduces performance variance across formats by 3.29%. In out-of-domain evaluations, F²C generalizes effectively, increasing  ̅F₁ and agreement while decreasing variance across most source-target pairs. Finally, when trained on only a subset of prompt perturbations and evaluated on held-out formats, F²C consistently improves both performance and agreement while reducing variance. These findings highlight F²C as an effective unsupervised method for enhancing LLM consistency, performance, and generalization under prompt perturbations.

Multi-modal large language models (MLLMs) have emerged as powerful tools for analyzing Internet-scale image data, offering significant benefits but also raising critical safety and societal concerns. In particular, these models may be misused to extract sensitive information from personal images, such as identifying individuals or revealing locations. In this work, we propose ImageProtector, a method designed to protect images from unauthorized analysis by MLLMs. Before an image is shared online, ImageProtector embeds a carefully crafted, nearly imperceptible perturbation that acts as a visual prompt injection attack on MLLMs. Consequently, when a malicious actor downloads and queries a protected image, the MLLM is consistently misled into generating a refusal response such as "I’m sorry, I can’t help with that request." We empirically demonstrate the effectiveness of ImageProtector across six MLLMs and four datasets. Additionally, we evaluate three potential countermeasures, Gaussian noise, DiffPure, and adversarial training, and show that while they partially mitigate the impact of ImageProtector, they simultaneously degrade model accuracy and/or efficiency.

We propose a lightweight, modular framework for hallucination detection in Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) systems, addressing the critical challenge where logical dependencies span across fragmented retrieval results. To address the inherent limitations of compact models in processing long-context information and performing multi-hop reasoning, our approach systematically analyzes the logical relationships among retrieved documents within the vector space. By capturing these geometric patterns through a novel feature extraction framework, the proposed classifier significantly enhances context-aware hallucination detection without requiring complex architectures or pre-training on datasets. Meanwhile, to evaluate multi-document reasoning, we release HotPotQA-derived, a hallucination dataset preserving separate retrieved texts. Experimental results on HotPotQA-derived and several open-source datasets demonstrate that our framework can achieve results comparable to or even surpassing those of large language models (LLMs) on the task of hallucination detection.

Recent advances in model distillation show that data from advanced reasoning models can effectively train smaller student models. However, standard practices discard incorrect reasoning traces—valuable, yet underutilized data. This paper addresses the critical question: How can both positive and negative distilled reasoning traces be effectively leveraged to maximize LLM reasoning performance in an offline setting? We employ a two-stage training recipe: first, Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT) on positive traces, followed by a refinement stage using both positive and negative traces. We find that a simple REINFORCE-style objective, which we term the Reinforcement Distillation (REDI) objective, outperforms established preference optimization methods like DPO and SimPO in this distillation context. Our empirical evaluations demonstrate the effectiveness of this approach. Notably, our Qwen-REDI-1.5B model, trained on just 131k traces from the open Open-R1 dataset, achieves an 83.1% score on MATH-500. Its performance matches that of DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-1.5B, a model trained on 800k proprietary data. This result showcases the remarkable data efficiency of utilizing previously discarded negative traces.

Automatic search for Multi-Agent Systems has recently emerged as a key focus in agentic AI research. Several prior approaches have relied on LLM-based free-form search over the code space. In this work, we propose a more structured framework that explores the same space through a fixed set of composable components. We show that, despite lacking the generative flexibility of LLMs during the candidate generation stage, our method outperforms prior approaches on a majority of evaluated benchmarks across two backbone LLMs and two domains: mathematics and question answering. Furthermore, our method offers additional advantages, including a more cost-efficient search process and the generation of modular, interpretable multi-agent systems.

Large language models (LLMs) have shown great performance on complex reasoning tasks but often require generating long intermediate thoughts before reaching a final answer. During generation, LLMs rely on a key-value (KV) cache for autoregressive decoding. However, the memory footprint of the KV cache grows with output length. Prior work on KV cache optimization mostly focus on compressing the long input context, while retaining the full KV cache for decoding. For tasks requiring long output generation, this leads to increased computational and memory costs. In this paper, we introduce ZoomR, a novel approach that enables LLMs to adaptively compress verbose reasoning thoughts into summaries and uses a dynamic KV cache selection policy that leverages these summaries while also strategically "zooming in" on fine-grained details. By using summary keys as a coarse-grained index during decoding, ZoomR uses the query to retrieve details for only the most important thoughts. This hierarchical strategy significantly reduces memory usage by avoiding full-cache attention at each step. Experiments across math and reasoning tasks show that our approach achieves competitive performance compared to baselines, while reducing inference memory requirements by more than 4 ×. These results demonstrate that a multi-granularity KV selection enables more memory efficient decoding, especially for long output generation.

LLM-based multi-agent systems (MAS) show promise on complex tasks but remain prone to coordination failures such as goal drift, error cascades, and misaligned behaviors. We propose Explicit Trait Inference (ETI), a psychologically grounded method for improving coordination. ETI enables agents to infer and track partner characteristics along two established psychological dimensions—warmth (e.g., trust) and competence (e.g., skill)—from interaction histories to guide decisions. We evaluate ETI in controlled settings (economic games), where it reduces payoff loss by 45–77%, and in more realistic, complex multi-agent settings (MultiAgentBench), where it improves performance by 3–29% depending on the scenario and model, relative to a CoT baseline. Additional analysis shows that gains are closely linked to trait inference: ETI profiles predict agents’ actions, and informative profiles drive improvements. These results highlight ETI as a lightweight and robust mechanism for improving coordination in diverse multi-agent settings, and provide the first systematic evidence that LLM agents can (i) reliably infer others’ traits from interaction histories and (ii) leverage structured awareness of others’ traits for coordination.

To acquire instruction-following capabilities, large language models (LLMs) undergo instruction tuning, where they are trained on instruction-response pairs using next-token prediction (NTP). Efforts to improve instruction tuning often focus on higher-quality supervised fine-tuning (SFT) datasets, typically requiring data filtering with proprietary LLMs or human annotation. In this paper, we take a different approach by proposing SFTMix, a novel Mixup-based recipe that elevates LLM instruction tuning without relying on well-curated datasets. We observe that LLMs exhibit uneven confidence across the semantic representation space. We argue that examples with different confidence levels should play distinct roles in instruction tuning: Confident data is prone to overfitting, while unconfident data is harder to generalize. Based on this insight, SFTMix leverages training dynamics to identify examples with varying confidence levels. We then interpolate them to bridge the confidence gap and apply a Mixup-based regularization to support learning on these additional, interpolated examples. We demonstrate the effectiveness of SFTMix in both instruction-following and healthcare-specific SFT tasks, with consistent improvements across LLM families and SFT datasets of varying sizes and qualities. Extensive analyses across six directions highlight SFTMix’s compatibility with data selection, adaptability to compute-constrained scenarios, and scalability to broader applications.

The ability to control LLMs’ emulated emotional states and personality traits is an essential step in enabling rich, human-centered interactions in socially interactive settings. We introduce PsySET, a Psychologically-informed benchmark to evaluate LLM Steering Effectiveness and Trustworthiness across the emotion and personality domains. Our study spans four models from different LLM families paired with various steering strategies, including prompting, fine-tuning, and representation engineering. Our results indicate that prompting is consistently effective but limited in intensity control, whereas vector injections achieve finer controllability while slightly reducing output quality. Moreover, we explore the trustworthiness of steered LLMs by assessing safety, truthfulness, fairness, and ethics, highlighting potential side effects and behavioral shifts. Notably, we observe idiosyncratic effects; for instance, even a positive emotion like joy can degrade robustness to adversarial factuality, lower privacy awareness, and increase preferential bias. Meanwhile, anger predictably elevates toxicity yet strengthens leakage resistance. Our framework establishes the first holistic evaluation of emotion and personality steering, offering insights into its interpretability and reliability for socially interactive applications.

Simultaneous speech translation (SST) generates translations while receiving partial speech input. Recent advances show that large language models (LLMs) can substantially improve SST quality, but at the cost of high computational overhead. To reduce this cost, prior work reformulates SST as a multi-turn dialogue task, enabling full reuse of the LLM’s key–value (KV) cache and eliminating redundant feature recomputation. However, this approach relies on supervised fine-tuning (SFT) data in dialogue form, for which few human annotations exist, and existing synthesis methods cannot guarantee data quality. In this work, we propose a Hierarchical Policy Optimization (HPO) approach that post-train models trained on imperfect SFT data. We introduce a hierarchical reward that balances translation quality and latency objectives. Experiments on English to Chinese/German/Japanese demonstrate improvements of over +7 COMET score and +1.25 MetricX score at a latency of 1.5 seconds. Comprehensive ablation studies further validate the effectiveness of different quality rewards, hierarchical reward formulations, and segmentation strategies.

While reinforcement learning from verifiable rewards (RLVR) has been proven highly effective for enhancing reasoning, its application to medical visual question answering (Med-VQA) is hampered by models producing reasoning inconsistent with either the visual evidence or the final answer. Our analysis reveals a critical flaw in RLVR training: it paradoxically encourages models to disregard visual evidence and generate answers that contradict their own reasoning. This degradation is most pronounced in specialized medical modalities (e.g., Fundus, Ultrasound) where base VLMs lack robust understanding, a failure we attribute to a flawed reward mechanism exacerbated by the scarcity of diverse training data. To tackle this, we introduce Med-Zero-17K, a large-scale dataset spanning over 30 modalities and 24 clinically relevant tasks, and the Multi-Consistency Reward (MCR) framework, which explicitly rewards both perceptual grounding and logical coherence. Extensive experiments validate our approach: integrating MCR into the RLVR framework delivers robust performance gains. This success stems from our crucial finding that rewarding internal consistency is significantly more effective than attempting to judge reasoning correctness. Furthermore, MCR proves highly versatile, exhibiting strong generalization across diverse VLM backbones, compatibility with RL algorithms like GRPO and DPO, and extending its effectiveness to 3D VQA tasks and R1-style training paradigms. Code and dataset will be released.

As large language models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed in real-world applications, the need to selectively remove unwanted knowledge while preserving model utility has become paramount. Recent work has explored sparse autoencoders (SAEs) to perform precise interventions on monosemantic features. However, most SAE-based methods operate at inference time, which does not create persistent changes in the model’s parameters. Such interventions can be bypassed or reversed by malicious actors with parameter access. We introduce CRISP, a parameter-efficient method for persistent concept unlearning using SAEs. CRISP automatically identifies salient SAE features across multiple layers and suppresses their activations. We experiment with two LLMs and show that our method outperforms prior approaches on safety-critical unlearning tasks from the WMDP benchmark, successfully removing harmful knowledge while preserving general and in-domain capabilities. Feature-level analysis reveals that CRISP achieves semantically coherent separation between target and benign concepts, allowing precise suppression of the target features.

As Large Language Models (LLMs) can now process extremely long contexts, efficient inference over these extended inputs has become increasingly important, especially for emerging applications like LLM agents that highly depend on this capability. Speculative decoding (SD) offers a promising lossless acceleration technique compared to lossy alternatives such as quantization and model cascades. However, most state-of-the-art SD methods are trained on short texts (typically fewer than 4k tokens), making them unsuitable for long-context scenarios. Specifically, adapting these methods to long contexts presents three key challenges: (1) the excessive memory demands posed by draft models due to large Key-Value (KV) cache; (2) performance degradation resulting from the mismatch between short-context training and long-context inference; and (3) inefficiencies in tree attention mechanisms when managing long token sequences. This work introduces LongSpec, a framework that addresses these challenges through three core innovations: a memory-efficient draft model with a constant-sized KV cache; novel position indices that mitigate the training–inference mismatch; and an attention aggregation strategy that combines fast prefix computation with standard tree attention to enable efficient decoding. Experimental results confirm the effectiveness of LongSpec, achieving up to a 3.26x speedup over strong Flash Attention baselines across five long-context understanding datasets, as well as a 2.34x reduction in wall-clock time on four math reasoning tasks with the QwQ model, demonstrating significant latency improvements for long-context applications.

Multimodal language models (MLMs) increasingly demonstrate human-like communication, yet their use of everyday perspectival words remains poorly understood. To address this gap, we compare humans and MLMs in their use of three word types, which we predict impose increasing cognitive demands: vocabulary (e.g., ’boat’ or ’cup’), possessives (e.g., ’mine’ vs. ’yours’), and demonstratives (e.g., ’this one’ vs. ’that one’). Testing seven MLMs against human participants, we find that perspectival words are harder than vocabulary words for both groups. The gap is even larger for MLMs: while models approach human-level performance on using vocabulary, they exhibit clear deficits with possessives and even greater difficulties with demonstratives. Ablation analyses point to limitations in perspective-taking and spatial reasoning as key sources of these gaps in MLMs. Instruction-based prompting helps close the gap for possessives but still leaves demonstratives far below human performance. These results show that, unlike vocabulary, perspectival words pose a greater challenge in human communication—and this difficulty is further amplified in MLMs, revealing a crucial shortfall in their pragmatic and social-cognitive abilities.

A hallmark of human innovation is recombination—the creation of novel ideas by integrating elements from existing concepts and mechanisms. In this work, we introduce CHIMERA, the first large-scale Knowledge Base (KB) of recombination examples automatically mined from the scientific literature. CHIMERA enables empirical analysis of how scientists recombine concepts and draw inspiration from different areas, and enables training models that propose cross-disciplinary research directions. To construct this KB, we define a new information extraction task: identifying recombination instances in papers. We curate an expert-annotated dataset and use it to fine-tune an LLM-based extraction model, which we apply to a broad corpus of AI papers. We also demonstrate generalization to a biological domain. We showcase the utility of CHIMERA through two applications. First, we analyze patterns of recombination across AI subfields. Second, we train a scientific hypothesis generation model using the KB, showing that it can propose directions that researchers rate as inspiring.

Spreadsheets are central to real-world applications such as enterprise reporting, auditing, and scientific data management. Despite their ubiquity, existing large language model based approaches typically treat tables as plain text, overlooking critical layout cues and visual semantics. Moreover, real-world spreadsheets are often massive in scale, exceeding the input length that LLMs can efficiently process. To address these challenges, we propose SpreadsheetAgent, a two-stage multi-agent framework for spreadsheet understanding that adopts a step-by-step reading and reasoning paradigm. Instead of loading the entire spreadsheet at once, SpreadsheetAgent incrementally interprets localized regions through multiple modalities, including code execution results, images, and LaTeX tables. The method first constructs a structural sketch and row/column summaries, and then performs task-driven reasoning over this intermediate representation in the Solving Stage. To further enhance reliability, we design a verification module that validates extracted structures via targeted inspections, reducing error propagation and ensuring trustworthy inputs for downstream reasoning. Extensive experiments on two spreadsheet datasets demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach. With GPT-OSS-120B, SpreadsheetAgent achieves 38.16% on Spreadsheet Bench, outperforming the ChatGPT Agent baseline (35.27%) by 2.89 absolute points. These results highlight the potential of SpreadsheetAgent to advance robust and scalable spreadsheet understanding in real-world applications. Code is available at https://github.com/renhouxing/SpreadsheetAgent.

Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown great promise in tool-making, yet existing frameworks often struggle to efficiently construct reliable toolsets and are limited to single-task settings. To address these challenges, we propose GATE (Graph-based Adaptive Tool Evolution), an adaptive framework that dynamically constructs and evolves a hierarchical graph of reusable tools across multiple scenarios. We evaluate GATE on open-ended tasks (Minecraft), agent-based tasks (TextCraft, DABench), and code generation tasks (MATH, Date, TabMWP). Our results show that GATE achieves up to 4.3× faster milestone completion in Minecraft compared to the previous state-of-the-art method, and provides an average improvement of 9.23% over existing tool-making methods in code generation tasks and 10.03% in agent tasks. Further analysis shows that GATE exhibits strong adaptive evolution capabilities, effectively balancing tool quantity, complexity, and functionality while maintaining high efficiency. Code and data are available at https://github.com/ayanami2003/GATE.

In this paper, we investigate knowledge forgetting in large language models with a focus on its generalisation—ensuring that models forget not only specific training samples but also related implicit knowledge. To this end, we begin by identifying a broader unlearning scope that includes both target data and logically associated samples, including rephrased, subject-replaced, relation-reversed, and one-hop reasoned data. We then conduct a rigorous evaluation of 15 state-of-the-art methods across three datasets, revealing that unlearned models still recall paraphrased answers and retain target facts in their intermediate layers. This motivates us to take a preliminary step toward more generalised implicit knowledge forgetting by proposing PERMU—a novel probability perturbation-based unlearning paradigm. PERMU simulates adversarial unlearning samples to eliminate fact-related tokens from the logit distribution, collectively reducing the probabilities of all answer-associated tokens. Experiments are conducted on a diverse range of datasets, including TOFU, Harry Potter, ZsRE, WMDP, and MUSE, using models ranging from 1.3B to 13B in scale. The results demonstrate that PERMU delivers up to a 50.40% improvement in unlearning vanilla target data while maintaining a 40.73% boost in forgetting implicit knowledge. Our code can be found in the supplementary material.

Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) exhibit powerful generative capabilities but frequently produce hallucinations that compromise output reliability. Fine tuning on annotated data devoid of hallucinations offers the most direct solution, while its high computational cost motivates recent representation-based methods, which focus on mitigating hallucinatory components within hidden representations. Though efficient, we empirically observe that these methods degrade general generation capacity due to incomplete extraction of hallucination components and non-selective parameter updates. To address these limitations, we propose MPD, a dual-stage framework for mitigating hallucinations without performance degradation. Specifically, our MPD relies on two essential factors: (1) semantic-aware component disentanglement to extract pure hallucination components, and (2) interpretable parameter updates that selectively modify parameters most relevant to hallucination. Extensive experiments demonstrate that MPD achieves state-of-the-art performance, reducing hallucinations by 23.4% while maintaining 97.4% of general generative capability as evaluated on LLaVA-Bench and MME, with no additional computational cost.

The efficiency of long-video inference remains a critical bottleneck, mainly due to the dense computation in the prefill stage of Large Multimodal Models (LMMs). Existing methods either compress visual embeddings or apply sparse attention on a single GPU, yielding limited acceleration or degraded performance and restricting LMMs from handling longer, more complex videos. To overcome these issues, we propose APB-V, a sequence-parallel framework with optimized attention that accelerates long-video inference across multiple GPUs. By distributing approximate attention, APB-V reduces computation and increases parallelism, enabling efficient processing of more visual embeddings without compression and thereby improving task performance. System-level optimizations, such as load balancing and fused forward passes, further unleash the potential of APB-V, delivering speedups of 12.72x, 1.70x, and 1.18x over FlashAttn, ZigZagRing, and APB, without notable performance loss.

The development of large-scale Visual Question Answering (VQA) datasets has traditionally relied on resource-intensive manual annotation. In addition, most of the existing Arabic VQA datasets focus on culturally-specific and dialect-aware domains. To address these limitations, we propose a new pipeline that leverages Wikipedia template tags to extract the relevant information for each image, which is subsequently utilized by the Large Language Model (LLM) to synthetically generate a new visual question answering dataset. Using this pipeline, we have constructed AraVQA, the most comprehensive Arabic Factoid Visual Question Answering dataset, containing more than 50,000 questions and covering over 20 varied primary subjects within Arabic general knowledge. Our detailed analysis shows that our dataset can serve as a post-training dataset to enhance the performance of existing Visual Language Models (VLMs) on Arabic VQA tasks. Furthermore, we present a novel benchmark, derived from our dataset and validated through manual annotation, that poses more challenges to Arabic VLMs than existing Arabic VQA datasets.

Generative large language models (LLMs) are now used extensively for text classification in computational social science (CSS). In this work, we focus on the steps before and after LLM prompting: conceptualization of the categories to classify and using LLM predictions in downstream statistical inference. We argue these steps have been overlooked in much of LLM-era CSS and LLMs can tempt analysts to skip conceptualization altogether. For example, a political scientist classifying "protest" with LLMs may never be forced to craft a definition: unlike human annotators who would ask clarifying questions, an LLM can silently accept an underspecified concept to classify and return plausible-looking labels. Using simulations, we show that conceptualization failures induce downstream inferential bias that cannot be corrected solely by a more accurate LLM or post-hoc bias correction methods. We conclude by reminding CSS analysts that conceptualization is still a first-order concern in the LLM-era and provide concrete advice for pursuing low-cost, unbiased, low-variance downstream estimates.

Audio platforms have evolved beyond entertainment. They have become central to public discourse, from podcasts and radio to WhatsApp voice notes and live streams. With millions of shows and hundreds of millions of listeners, audio platforms are now a major channel for misinformation. Yet existing fact-checking pipelines are mostly designed for written claims, overlooking the unique properties of spoken media. We argue that audio misinformation is not merely textual content with transcripts: it is structurally different because it is both spoken—carrying persuasive force through prosody, pacing, and emotion—and conversational—unfolding across turns, speakers, and episodes. These dual properties introduce verification difficulties that traditional methods rarely face. This position paper synthesizes evidence across modalities and platforms, examines datasets and methods, and highlights why existing pipelines fail on audio. We argue that advancing fact-checking requires rethinking verification pipelines around the spoken and conversational realities of audio.

Reranking algorithms have made progress in improving document retrieval quality by efficiently aggregating relevance judgments generated by large language models (LLMs). However, identifying relevant documents for queries that require in-depth reasoning remains a major challenge. Reasoning-intensive queries often exhibit multifaceted information needs and nuanced interpretations, rendering document relevance inherently context dependent and often noisy. To address this, we propose contextual relevance, which we define as the probability that a document is relevant to a given query, marginalized over the distribution of different reranking contexts it may appear in (i.e., the set of candidate documents it is ranked alongside and the order in which the documents are presented to a reranking model). While prior works have studied methods to mitigate the positional bias LLMs exhibit by accounting for the ordering of documents, we empirically show that batch composition also materially affects relevance judgments. To efficiently estimate contextual relevance, we propose TS-SetRank, a sampling-based, uncertainty-aware reranking algorithm. Empirically, TS-SetRank improves nDCG@10 over retrieval and reranking baselines by 15–25% on BRIGHT and 6–21% on BEIR, highlighting the importance of modeling relevance as context-dependent.

In-Context Learning (ICL) allows large language models to adapt to new tasks from a few demonstrations, but its reliability remains a concern: predictions are highly sensitive to both prompt design and the model’s ability to understand the context, obscuring whether failures arise from data properties or model limitations. Uncertainty decomposition—separating aleatoric from epistemic sources—is particularly crucial in this setting, yet existing methods, designed for standard generation tasks, fail to capture the unique dynamics of ICL. To address this, we introduce a concept of self-function vectors, built upon Bayesian views and the mechanistic interpretability of ICL. These vectors leverage internal model representations to model the latent concept learned during in-context prompting, thereby enabling a direct estimation of aleatoric uncertainty within a Bayesian framework and circumventing the reliance on brittle input or decoding manipulations. Given the lack of established benchmarks and suitable evaluation protocols, we also propose the first and rigorous evaluation framework, initially grounded in synthetic tasks for conceptual development and subsequently extended to real-world datasets, in which aleatoric and epistemic uncertainty can be quantified separately under controlled settings. Moreover, we show it can be used as a practical tool for trustworthy-related applications, such as hallucination detection. Our findings pave a new direction for connecting the quantitative view of uncertainty with the mechanistic understanding of model behavior.

Large language models (LLMs) exhibit strong general reasoning, yet the community lacks controllable, scalable, and verifiable tools to analyze and improve these abilities. We present SATQuest, a verifier that generates diverse SAT-based reasoning tasks directly from Conjunctive Normal Form (CNF) instances and checks answers objectively with PySAT. SATQuest factorizes evaluation along three orthogonal dimensions—instance, problem type, and question format—enabling fine-grained, multi-dimensional analysis and reinforcement fine-tuning. Randomized CNF generation mitigates memorization and supports reproducible experiments. Using SATQuest, we benchmark a range of open- and closed-weight LLMs and uncover persistent gaps in logical reasoning, particularly on higher-complexity tasks and in transfer beyond familiar mathematical notation to machine or narrative formats. We further show that reinforcement fine-tuning with SATQuest rewards substantially boosts targeted performance and generalizes to larger instances, while cross-format robustness remains challenging. Collectively, SATQuest provides verifier-backed infrastructure for controlled, scalable, and reproducible empirical research on LLM logical reasoning and its training.

Low-Rank Adaptation (LoRA) has become a cornerstone of parameter-efficient fine-tuning (PEFT). Yet, its efficacy is hampered by two fundamental limitations: semantic drift, arising from treating all update directions with equal importance, and structural incoherence, due to adapting layers independently, resulting in uncoordinated and suboptimal updates. To address these issues, we propose StructLoRA, a framework that tackles both limitations through a principled dual-component design: (1) an Information Bottleneck-guided filter that prunes task-irrelevant directions to mitigate semantic drift, and (2) a lightweight, training-only graph-based coordinator that enforces inter-layer consistency to resolve structural incoherence. Extensive experiments across large language models, vision language models, and vision models (including LLaMA, LLaVA, and ViT) demonstrate that StructLoRA consistently establishes a new state of the art, outperforming not only vanilla LoRA but also advanced dynamic rank allocation and sparsity-based methods. Notably, the gains are particularly pronounced in challenging low-rank and low-data regimes. Crucially, since the proposed modules operate only during training, StructLoRA improves performance with zero additional inference cost, shifting the focus of PEFT from mere parameter compression to a more holistic optimization of information quality and structural integrity.

Effective poster design requires rapidly capturing attention and clearly conveying messages. Inspired by the “contrast effects” principle, we propose ReContraster, the first training-free model to leverage regional contrast to make posters stand out. By emulating the cognitive behaviors of a poster designer, ReContraster introduces the compositional multi-agent system to identify elements, organize layout, and evaluate generated poster candidates. To further ensure harmonious transitions across region boundaries, ReContraster integrates the hybrid denoising strategy during the diffusion process. We additionally contribute a new benchmark dataset for comprehensive evaluation. Seven quantitative metrics and four user studies confirm its superiority over relevant state-of-the-art methods, producing visually striking and aesthetically appealing posters.

Sparse Autoencoders (SAEs) are a prominent tool in mechanistic interpretability (MI) for decomposing neural network activations into interpretable features. However, the aspiration to identify a canonical set of features is challenged by the observed inconsistency of learned SAE features across different training runs, undermining reproducibility and complicating model comparison. We study run-to-run feature consistency in SAEs and argue that it should be reported as a standard evaluation axis alongside reconstruction and sparsity. We propose the Pairwise Dictionary Mean Correlation Coefficient (PW-MCC) as an assignment-based metric to quantify consistency and demonstrate that high levels are achievable (PW-MCC ≈ 0.80 for TopK SAEs on LLM activations) with appropriate architectural choices.Our contributions include: (i) theoretical grounding for strong consistency in the idealized setting of TopK SAEs; (ii) synthetic validation using a model organism, which verifies PW-MCC as a reliable proxy for ground-truth recovery; and (iii) empirical analysis on LLM activations, where PW-MCC correlates with the similarity of automatically generated natural-language feature explanations.

Large Language Models (LLMs) excel at complex reasoning through search algorithms, yet current strategies often suffer from massive token consumption due to redundant exploration of semantically equivalent steps. Existing semantic similarity methods struggle to accurately identify such equivalence in domain-specific contexts like mathematical reasoning. To address this, we propose EquivPruner, a simple yet effective approach that identifies and prunes semantically equivalent actions during LLM reasoning search. We also introduce MathEquiv, the first dataset we created for mathematical statement equivalence, which enables the training of a lightweight equivalence detector. Extensive experiments across various models and tasks demonstrate that EquivPruner significantly reduces token consumption, improving searching efficiency and often bolstering reasoning accuracy. For instance, when applied to Qwen2.5-Math-7B-Instruct on GSM8K, EquivPruner reduced token consumption by 48.1% while also improving accuracy. Our code is available at https://github.com/Lolo1222/EquivPruner.

Reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) has recently advanced the reasoning capabilities of large language models (LLMs). We investigate RLVR from a sample-centric perspective and introduce **LPPO** (Learning-Progress and Prefix-guided Optimization), a framework of progressive optimization techniques. Our work addresses a critical question: how to best leverage a small set of trusted, high-quality demonstrations, rather than simply scaling up data volume. First, motivated by how hints aid human problem-solving, we propose **prefix-guided sampling**, an online data augmentation method that incorporates partial solution prefixes from expert demonstrations to guide the policy, particularly for challenging instances. Second, inspired by how humans focus on important questions aligned with their current capabilities, we introduce **learning-progress weighting**, a dynamic strategy that adjusts each training sample’s influence based on model progression. We estimate sample-level learning progress via an exponential moving average of per-sample pass rates, promoting samples that foster learning and de-emphasizing stagnant ones. Experiments on mathematical-reasoning benchmarks demonstrate that our methods outperform strong baselines, yielding faster convergence and a higher performance ceiling, with these gains proving robust across diverse model architectures, scales, and reinforcement learning optimizers.

Large vision–language models (VLMs) commonly process images at native or high resolution to remain effective across tasks. This inflates visual tokens to 97-99% of total tokens, resulting in high compute and latency, even when low-resolution images would suffice. We introduce CARES—a Context-Aware Resolution Selector, a lightweight preprocessing module that, given an image–query pair, predicts the minimal sufficient input resolution. CARES uses a compact VLM (350M) to extract features and predict when a target pretrained VLM’s response converges to its peak ability to answer correctly. Though trained as a discrete classifier over a set of optional resolutions, CARES interpolates continuous resolutions at inference for fine-grained control. Across five multimodal benchmarks spanning documents and natural images, as well as diverse target VLMs, CARES preserves task performance while reducing compute by up to 80%.

We present ChatR1, a reasoning framework based on reinforcement learning (RL) for conversational question answering (CQA). Reasoning plays an important role in CQA, where user intent evolves across dialogue turns, and utterances are often underspecified, requiring contextual interpretation, query reformulation, and dynamic coordination between retrieval and generation. Unlike static ‘rewrite, retrieve, and generate’ pipelines, ChatR1 interleaves search and reasoning across turns, enabling exploratory and adaptive behaviors learned through RL. To address the challenge of sparse and delayed rewards in RL, we propose an intent-aware reward that provides turn-level feedback by aligning retrieval and reasoning with evolving user goals. ChatR1 demonstrates strong performance on both 3B and 7B model backbones, outperforming competitive models on five CQA datasets, measured by different metrics (F1, BERTScore, and LLM-as-judge). We include a diverse set of CQA datasets to cover topic shifts, evolving intents, mixed-initiative dialogues, and multi-document grounding, testing ChatR1’s performance from various aspects. Ablation studies confirm the effectiveness of the intent-aware reward. Our analyses further reveal diverse reasoning trajectories and effective use of the search tool. ChatR1 also generalizes robustly across domains, demonstrating that RL-based reasoning enables more flexible and context-aware behavior than static CQA pipelines.

Researchers have explored ways to improve large language models (LLMs)’ capabilities via dummy token insertion in contexts. However, existing works focus solely on the dummy tokens themselves, but failed to leverage the inherent sentence-level structure of natural language. This is a critical oversight, as LLMs acquire linguistic capabilities through exposure to human-generated texts, which are inherently structured at the sentence level. Motivated by the gap, we proposed a method that inserts delimiters at sentence boundaries. Our method not only integrates dummy tokens into contexts, but also enables LLMs with sentence-by-sentence processing behavior during reasoning. Two approaches are proposed: (1). In-context learning and (2). Supervised fine-tuning are experimented from 7B LLMs to 600B Deepseek-V3. Experimental results demonstrate consistent improvements in various tasks, with notable gains of up to 7.7% on GSM8k and 12.5% on DROP. Furthermore, LLMs fine-tuned via our strategy further incorporate sentence awareness into their inner representations. Our work establishes a simple yet effective technique for enhancing LLM’s capabilities, offering promising directions for cognitive-inspired LLM enhancement paradigm.

While multilingual large language models (LLMs) perform well on high-level tasks like translation and question answering, their ability to handle grammatical gender and morphological agreement remains underexplored. In morphologically rich languages, gender influences verb conjugation, pronouns, and even first-person constructions with explicit and implicit mentions of gender. We introduce MORPHOGEN, a morphologically grounded large-scale benchmark dataset for evaluating gender-aware generation in three typologically diverse grammatically gendered languages: French, Arabic, and Hindi. The core task, GENFORM, requires models to rewrite a first-person sentence in the opposite gender while preserving its meaning and structure. We construct a high-quality synthetic dataset spanning these three languages and benchmark 15 popular multilingual LLMs (2B–70B) on their ability to perform this transformation. Our results reveal significant gaps and interesting insights into how current models handle morphological gender. MORPHOGEN provides a focused diagnostic lens for gender-aware language modeling and lays the groundwork for future research on inclusive and morphology-sensitive NLP.

Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning (PEFT) methods, such as Low-Rank Adaptation (LoRA), have significantly reduced the number of trainable parameters needed in fine-tuning large language models (LLMs). The developments of LoRA-style adapters have considered two main directions: (1) enhancing model expressivity with high-rank adapters, and (2) aiming for further parameter reduction, as exemplified by vector-based methods. However, these approaches come with a trade-off, as achieving the expressivity of high-rank weight updates typically comes at the cost of sacrificing the extreme parameter efficiency offered by vector-based techniques. To address this issue, we propose a vector-based random Tensor network for high-Rank Adaptation (TeRA), a novel PEFT method that achieves high-rank weight updates while retaining the parameter efficiency of vector-based PEFT adapters. This is achieved by parametrizing the tensorized weight update matrix as a Tucker-like tensor network (TN), whereby large randomly initialized factors are frozen and shared across layers, while only small layer-specific scaling vectors, corresponding to diagonal entries of factor matrices, are trained. Comprehensive experiments demonstrate that TeRA matches or even outperforms existing high-rank adapters, while requiring as few trainable parameters as vector-based methods. Theoretical analysis and ablation studies validate the effectiveness of the proposed TeRA method. The code is available at https://github.com/guyuxuan9/TeRA.

Generalized Category Discovery (GCD) aims to identify both known and novel categories from partially labeled data, reflecting more realistic open-world learning scenarios. However, most existing methods rely solely on one-hot discriminative supervision, leading to overfitting on seen classes and poor generalization to unseen ones. Recent advances introduce large language models (LLMs) to incorporate external semantics, yet they often suffer from semantic–label misalignment and weak semantic integration during training. We propose GenDis, a Generative–Discriminative Dual-View Co-Training framework that unifies discriminative classification and semantic label generation within an LLM. Discriminative pseudo-labels guide the formation of a separable generative latent space, enabling semantically meaningful supervision for novel classes. To ensure consistency between the two views, we employ Canonical Correlation Analysis (CCA)-based alignment and a curriculum-guided, dispersion-aware pseudo-labeling strategy for iterative refinement. Extensive experiments on five GCD benchmarks demonstrate that GenDis substantially outperforms prior methods, validating the effectiveness of dual-view co-training with semantically enriched supervision. The anonymized repository is available at https://anonymous.4open.science/r/GenDis.

The evaluation of Large Language Models (LLMs) for code generation relies heavily on the quality and robustness of test cases. However, existing benchmarks often lack coverage for subtle corner cases, allowing incorrect solutions to pass. To bridge this gap, we propose CodeHacker, an automated agent framework dedicated to generating targeted adversarial test cases that expose latent vulnerabilities in program submissions. Mimicking the hack mechanism in competitive programming, CodeHacker employs a multi-strategy approach—including stress testing, anti-hash attacks, and logic-specific targeting to break specific code submissions. To ensure the validity and reliability of these attacks, we introduce a Calibration Phase, where the agent iteratively refines its own Validator and Checker via self-generated adversarial probes before evaluating contestant code. Experiments demonstrate that CodeHacker significantly improves the True Negative Rate (TNR) of existing datasets, effectively filtering out incorrect solutions that were previously accepted. Furthermore, generated adversarial cases prove to be superior training data, boosting the performance of RL-trained models on benchmarks like LiveCodeBench. All code, datasets, and evaluation scripts will be open-sourced to promote further investigation in LLMs for competitive programming.

The meteoric rise in text generation capability has been accompanied by parallel growth in interest in machine-generated text detection: the capability to identify whether a given text was generated using a model or written by a person. While detection models show strong performance, they have the capacity to cause significant negative impacts. We explore potential biases in English machine-generated text detection systems. We curate a dataset of student essays and assess 16 different detection systems for bias across four attributes: gender, race/ethnicity, English-language learner (ELL) status, and economic status. We evaluate these attributes using regression-based models to determine the significance and power of the effects, as well as performing subgroup analysis. We find that while biases are generally inconsistent across systems, there are several key issues: several models tend to classify disadvantaged groups as machine-generated, ELL essays are more likely to be classified as machine-generated, economically disadvantaged students’ essays are less likely to be classified as machine-generated, and non-White ELL essays are disproportionately classified as machine-generated relative to their White counterparts. Finally, we perform human annotation and find that while humans perform generally poorly at the detection task, they show no significant biases on the studied attributes.

Anomaly detection (AD) plays a critical role in applications such as automated industrial inspection and medical image analysis. Empowered by the strong pre-trained vision-language model, CLIP, recent years have witnessed the emergence of several CLIP-based few-shot AD methods.Due to the overlap between the embedding distributions of normal and anomalous samples, many existing approaches introduce additional model training for more discriminative text embeddings.However, we demonstrate that such training is not necessary.Specifically, we find that this embedding overlap can be separated by introducing a  ̲Difference-guided vector for embedding  ̲Editing (DiffEdit).Based on this finding, we propose DE-CLIP, a simple yet effective framework based on DiffEdit, which directly edits text embeddings based on the textual and visual differences between normal and anomalous samples, resulting in more discriminative embeddings for AD.Extensive experiments on industrial and medical datasets demonstrate the superiority of our proposed DE-CLIP compared with existing baselines.For instance, on MVTec dataset, DE-CLIP achieves 96.6% and 96.7% AUROC on anomaly classification and segmentation, surpassing both training-based and training-free methods.In addition, we observe that introducing DiffEdit into other training-free baselines could also significantly improve their performance, highlighting the potential of DiffEdit to promote better AD.

In cross-cultural recipe adaptation, the goal is not only to ensure cultural appropriateness and retain the original dish’s essence, but also to provide diverse options for various dietary needs and preferences. Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) is a promising approach, combining the retrieval of real recipes from the target cuisine for cultural adaptability with large language models (LLMs) for relevance. However, it remains unclear whether RAG can generate diverse adaptation results. Our analysis shows that RAG tends to overly rely on a limited portion of the context across generations, failing to produce diverse outputs even when provided with varied contextual inputs. This reveals a key limitation of RAG in creative tasks with multiple valid answers: it fails to leverage contextual diversity for generating varied responses. To address this issue, we propose CARRIAGE, A plug-and-play RAG framework for cross-cultural recipe adaptation that enhances diversity in both retrieval and context organization. To our knowledge, this is the first RAG framework that explicitly aims to generate highly diverse outputs to accommodate multiple user preferences. Our experiments show that CARRIAGE achieves Pareto efficiency in terms of diversity and quality of recipe adaptation compared to closed-book LLMs.

Understanding and reasoning over tables is a critical capability for many real-world applications. Large language models (LLMs) have shown promise on this task, but current approaches remain limited. Fine-tuning based methods strengthen language reasoning; yet they are prone to arithmetic errors and hallucination. In contrast, tool-based methods enable precise table manipulation but rely on rigid schemas and lack semantic understanding. These complementary drawbacks highlight the need for approaches that integrate robust reasoning with reliable table processing. In this work, we propose MIXTURE-OF-MINDS, a multi-agent framework that decomposes table reasoning into three specialized roles: planning, coding, and answering. This design enables each agent to focus on a specific aspect of the task while leveraging code execution for precise table manipulation. Building on this workflow, we introduce a self-improvement training framework that employs Monte Carlo Tree Search (MCTS) rollouts to generate pseudo-gold trajectories and optimize agents with reinforcement learning (RL). Extensive experiments show that MIXTURE-OF-MINDS delivers substantial gains, reaching 62.13% on TableBench and surpassing GPT-o3-mini. These results demonstrate the promise of combining structured multi-agent workflows with RL to advance table understanding.

Vision-and-language pretraining (VLP) in medicine leverages contrastive learning on image–text pairs, often enhanced with masked modeling. However, existing methods face two challenges: difficulty reconstructing key pathological features due to limited data, and reliance on either paired or image-only datasets without combining both. To address this, we propose **MMCLIP** (**M**asked **M**edical **C**ontrastive **L**anguage–**I**mage **P**re-training), which introduces two modules: **AttMIM**: Masks image features highly correlated with text to improve reconstruction of fine medical details. **EntMLM**: Masks key medical entities in text and reconstructs them using visual cues. Furthermore, **MMCLIP** incorporates unpaired data through disease-kind prompts, achieving state-of-the-art performance in zero-shot and fine-tuning across five benchmarks.

Robust deployment of large multimodal models (LMMs) in real-world scenarios requires access to external knowledge sources, given the complexity and dynamic nature of real-world information. Existing approaches such as retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) and prompt engineered search agents rely on rigid pipelines, often leading to inefficient or excessive search behaviors. We present MMSearch-R1, the first end-to-end reinforcement learning framework that enables LMMs to perform on-demand, multi-turn search in real-world Internet environments. Our framework integrates both image and text search tools, allowing the model to reason about when and how to invoke them guided by an outcome-based reward with a search penalty. To support training, We collect a multimodal search VQA dataset through a semi-automated pipeline that covers diverse visual and textual knowledge needs and curate a search-balanced subset with both search-required and search-free samples, which proves essential for shaping efficient and on-demand search behavior. Extensive experiments on knowledge-intensive and info-seeking VQA tasks show that our model not only outperforms traditional RAG-based baselines of the same model size, but also matches the performance of a larger RAG-based model while reducing search calls by over 30%. We further analyze key empirical findings to offer actionable insights for advancing research in multimodal search.

Instruction Fine-Tuning (IFT) has emerged as a critical technique for customizing Large Language Models (LLMs) to meet diverse downstream applications. However, recent studies have revealed that IFT can compromise the built-in security mechanisms of LLMs, thereby posing significant security risks. Although defense methods targeting various training stages have been proposed, they either face challenges in practical deployment or exhibit instability and limited performance gains. In our study, we propose a novel SWAT method that introduces a key idea: shifting more of the learning burden onto security-robust parameters. To this end, our study investigates how module-level parameters affect LLMs’ internal security feature space, aiming to uncover robustness patterns in parameters. Guided by this analysis, we identify a robust module set (Mods_Rob) that exhibits minimal effects on LLMs’ security feature space. Leveraging this insight, SWAT proceeds in two phases: (1) a warm-up phase that preferentially trains Mods_Rob to learn low-level features with minimal security risk, followed by (2) standard tuning to achieve optimal task performance. Across diverse knowledge-intensive datasets, scenarios, and LLMs, SWAT substantially reduces security risks without sacrificing task performance gains.

Recent advances in large language models (LLMs) have led to substantial progress on the Text-to-SQL task. However, existing approaches typically depend on static, pre-processed database information supplied at inference time, which restricts the model’s capacity to deeply comprehend the underlying database content. In the absence of dynamic interaction, LLMs are limited to fixed, human-curated context and lack the ability to autonomously query or explore the data. To overcome this limitation, we introduce SDE-SQL, a novel framework that empowers LLMs to perform Self-Driven Exploration of databases during inference. This is achieved through the generation and execution of SQL probes, enabling the model to actively retrieve information and iteratively refine its understanding of the database. Unlike prior methods, SDE-SQL operates in a zero-shot setting, requiring no in-context demonstrations or question-SQL pairs. Evaluated on the BIRD benchmark with Qwen2.5-72B-Instruct, SDE-SQL achieves an 8.02 % relative improvement in execution accuracy over the vanilla Qwen2.5-72B-Instruct baseline, establishing a new state-of-the-art among open-source methods without supervised fine-tuning (SFT) or model ensembling. Furthermore, when combined with SFT, SDE-SQL delivers an additional 0.52 % performance gain.

Variation in language use, shaped by speakers’ sociocultural background and specific context of use, offers a rich lens into cultural perspectives, values, and opinions. For example, Chinese students discuss *healthy eating* with words like *timing*, *regularity*, and *digestion*, whereas Americans use vocabulary like *balancing food groups* and *avoiding fat and sugar*, reflecting distinct cultural models of nutrition (Banna et al., 2016). The computational study of these Sociocultural Linguistic Phenomena (SLP) has traditionally been done in NLP via tailored analyses of specific groups or topics, requiring specialized data collection and experimental operationalization—a process not well-suited to quick hypothesis exploration and prototyping. To address this, we propose constructing a "sandbox" designed for systematic and flexible sociolinguistic research. Using our method, we construct a demographically/topically split Reddit dataset, **Splits!**, validated by self-identification and by replicating several known SLPs from existing literature. We showcase the sandbox’s utility with a scalable, two-stage process that filters large collections of *potential* SLPs (PSLPs) to surface the most promising candidates for deeper, qualitative investigation.

Anthropomorphism, or the attribution of human traits to technology, is an automatic and unconscious response that occurs even in those with advanced technical expertise. In this position paper, we analyze hundreds of thousands of research articles to present empirical evidence of the prevalence and growth of anthropomorphic terminology in research on large language models (LLMs). We argue for challenging the deeper assumptions reflected in this terminology — which, though often useful, may inadvertently constrain LLM development — and broadening beyond them to open new pathways for understanding and improving LLMs. Specifically, we identify and examine five anthropomorphic assumptions that shape research across the LLM development lifecycle. For each assumption (e.g., that LLMs must use natural language for reasoning, or that they should be evaluated on benchmarks originally meant for humans), we demonstrate empirical, non-anthropomorphic alternatives that remain under-explored yet offer promising directions for LLM research and development.

Multi-hop claim verification is inherently challenging, requiring multi-step reasoning to construct verification chains while iteratively searching for information to uncover hidden bridging facts. This process is fundamentally interleaved, as effective reasoning relies on dynamically retrieved evidence, while effective search demands reasoning to refine queries based on partial information. To achieve this, we propose Hierarchical Agent Reasoning and Information Search (HARIS), explicitly modeling the coordinated process of reasoning-driven searching and search-informed reasoning. HARIS consists of a high-level reasoning agent that focuses on constructing the main verification chain, generating factual questions when more information is needed, and a low-level search agent that iteratively retrieves more information, refining its search based on intermediate findings. This design allows each agent to specialize in its respective task, enhancing verification accuracy and interpretability. HARIS is trained using reinforcement learning with outcome-based rewards. Experimental results on the EX-FEVER and HOVER benchmarks demonstrate that HARIS achieves strong performance, greatly advancing multi-hop claim verification.

As large language models (LLMs) generate text that increasingly resembles human writing, the subtle cues that distinguish AI-generated content from human-written content become increasingly challenging to capture. Reliance on generator-specific artifacts is inherently unstable, since new models emerge rapidly and reduce the robustness of such shortcuts. This generalizes unseen generators as a central and challenging problem for AI-text detection. To tackle this challenge, we propose a progressively structured framework that disentangles AI-detection semantics from generator-aware artifacts. This is achieved through a compact latent encoding that encourages semantic minimality, followed by perturbation-based regularization to reduce residual entanglement, and finally a discriminative adaptation stage that aligns representations with task objectives. Experiments on MAGE benchmark, covering 20 representative LLMs across 7 categories, demonstrate consistent improvements over state-of-the-art methods, achieving up to 24.2% accuracy gain and 26.2% F₁ improvement. Notably, performance continues to improve as the diversity of training generators increases, confirming strong scalability and generalization in open-set scenarios. Our source code will be publicly available at https://github.com/PuXiao06/DRGD.

The critical therapist shortage demands scalable training solutions. Standardized Patients, the gold standard, are scarce and costly. Current LLM-based approaches focus on patient simulation for conversational realism but lack pedagogical rigor as Virtual Standardized Patients, lacking faithful reactions to clinical errors and explainable feedback. To bridge this gap, we propose PUPPET, the first neural-symbolic Virtual Standardized Patient governed by an OBSERVE-THINK-BEHAVE architecture. PUPPET externalizes LLM reasoning into a symbolic system where experts implant causal associations between intervention logic (propositional logic) and patient mental states (state machine). This allows PUPPET to behave coherently with controllable and explainable psychological dynamics: intervention logic (OBSERVE) → state transition (THINK) → response (BEHAVE). Our PUPPET-TRAINER further leverages this chain to educate trainees about intervention consequences, standardizing and scaling mental health training. Experiments across three clinical scenarios confirm that PUPPET outperforms baselines in clinical faithfulness and pedagogical value.

Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable progress in reasoning, often through supervised fine-tuning (SFT). However, SFT is resource-intensive, relying on large curated datasets, rejection-sampled demonstrations, and uniform optimization across all tokens—even though only a fraction carry meaningful learning value. In this work, we explore a counterintuitive idea: can smaller language models (SLMs) teach larger language models (LLMs) by revealing high-value reasoning moments that reflect the latter’s unique strength? We propose LightReasoner, a novel framework that leverages the behavioral divergence between a stronger expert model (LLM) and a weaker amateur model (SLM). LightReasoner operates in two stages: (1) a sampling stage that pinpoints critical reasoning moments and constructs supervision examples capturing the expert’s advantage through expert–amateur contrast, and (2) a fine-tuning stage that aligns the expert model with these distilled examples, amplifying its reasoning strengths. Across seven benchmarks, LightReasoner improves accuracy by up to 28.1%, while reducing time consumption by 90%, sampled problems by 80%, and tuned token usage by 99%, all without relying on ground-truth labels. By turning weaker SLMs into effective teaching signals, LightReasoner offers a scalable and resource-efficient approach for advancing LLM reasoning.

The powerful generative capacity of Large Language Models (LLMs) has instigated a paradigm shift in recommendation. However, existing generative models (e.g., OneRec) operate as implicit predictors, critically lacking the capacity for explicit and controllable reasoning—a key advantage of LLMs. To bridge this gap, we propose OneRec-Think, a unified framework that seamlessly integrates dialogue, reasoning, and personalized recommendation. OneRec-Think incorporates: (1) Itemic Alignment: cross-modal Item-Textual Alignment for semantic grounding; (2) Reasoning Activation: Reasoning Scaffolding to activate LLM reasoning within the recommendation context; and (3) Reasoning Enhancement, where we design a recommendation-specific reward function that accounts for the multi-validity nature of user preferences. Experiments across public benchmarks show state-of-the-art performance. Moreover, our proposed "Think-Ahead" architecture enables effective industrial deployment, achieving a 0.159% gain in APP Stay Time and validating the practical efficacy of the model’s explicit reasoning capability.

As language models (LMs) exhibit increasingly consciousness-like behaviors, evaluating their cognitive abilities becomes essential. We introduce AwarenessBench, the first comprehensive benchmark for assessing the cognitive abilities of LMs in four dimensions: metacognition, self-awareness, social awareness, and situational awareness, covering 15 cognitive functions and 14,381 samples. Evaluating 18 state-of-the-art LMs, we find that all consistently surpass random baselines, with more advanced models performing better. We further compare LMs with human performance across three demographic groups, where the best-performing model surpasses human averages overall, but most still fall markedly short in metacognition and self-awareness. Finally, we show that awareness is a distinct capability: progress in language modeling or reasoning does not necessarily translate into improved cognition.

Defending large language models (LLMs) against jailbreak attacks is essential for their safe and reliable deployment. Existing defenses often rely on shallow pattern matching, which struggles to generalize to novel and unseen attack strategies. To address this challenge, we propose the Cognitive-Driven Defense (CDD) framework, which targets the underlying structure of jailbreak prompts by applying meta-operations, defined as basic manipulations that conceal harmful intent. CDD emulates human cognitive reasoning through a structured reasoning chain. It begins with a global perception of the prompt and follows with a localized analysis to uncover hidden manipulations. By applying supervised fine-tuning on this structured chain, the model learns to identify and reason about known manipulation patterns. To enhance generalization to unseen threats, an entropy-guided reinforcement learning algorithm (EG-GRPO) is introduced to encourage exploration of new types and variants of meta-operations. Experiments demonstrate that CDD can achieve state-of-the-art defense performance and exhibit strong generalization to unseen jailbreak attacks.

Evaluating Large Language Models (LLMs) has become increasingly important, with automatic evaluation benchmarks gaining prominence as alternatives to human evaluation. While existing research has focused on approximating model rankings, such benchmarks fail to provide users and developers with a comprehensive and fine-grained understanding of a specific model’s capabilities. To fill this gap, we propose SCAN (Structured Capability Assessment and Navigation), a practical framework that enables detailed characterization of LLM capabilities through comprehensive and fine-grained evaluation. SCAN incorporates four key components: (1) TaxBuilder, which extracts capability-indicating tags from extensive queries to construct a hierarchical taxonomy automatically; (2) RealMix, a query synthesis and filtering mechanism that ensures sufficient evaluation data for each capability tag; (3) a suite of visualization and analysis tools that facilitate efficient navigation and analysis of model capabilities; and (4) a PC²-based (Pre-Comparison-derived Criteria) LLM-as-a-Judge approach that achieves significantly higher accuracy compared to classic LLM-as-a-Judge method. Using SCAN, we conduct a comprehensive evaluation of 21 mainstream LLMs. Our detailed analysis of the GPT-OSS family reveals substantial performance variations, even within sub-capabilities belonging to the same category of capability. This finding highlights the importance of fine-grained evaluation in accurately understanding LLM behavior. Project homepage and resources are available at https://github.com/liudan193/SCAN.

Large Language Models (LLMs) have achieved impressive progress across a wide range of tasks, yet their heavy reliance on English-centric training data leads to significant performance degradation in non-English languages. While existing multilingual prompting methods emphasize reformulating queries into English or enhancing reasoning capabilities, they often fail to incorporate the language- and culture-specific grounding that is essential for some queries. To address this limitation, we propose EMCEE (Extracting synthetic Multilingual Context and merging), a simple yet effective framework that enhances the multilingual capabilities of LLMs by explicitly extracting and utilizing query-relevant knowledge from the LLM itself. In particular, EMCEE first extracts synthetic context to uncover latent, language-specific knowledge encoded within the LLM, and then dynamically merges this contextual insight with reasoning-oriented outputs through a judgment-based selection mechanism. Extensive experiments on four multilingual benchmarks covering diverse languages and tasks demonstrate that EMCEE consistently outperforms prior approaches, achieving an average relative improvement of 16.4% overall and 31.7% in low-resource languages.

Recent advances in Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated strong capabilities in tasks such as code generation and mathematical reasoning. However, their potential to internalize structured spatial knowledge remains underexplored. This study investigates whether LLMs, grounded in locally relative human observations, can construct coherent global spatial cognition by integrating fragmented relational descriptions. We focus on two core aspects of spatial cognition: spatial perception, where models infer consistent global layouts from local positional relationships, and spatial navigation, where models learn road connectivity from trajectory data and plan optimal paths between unconnected locations. Experiments conducted in a simulated urban environment demonstrate that LLMs not only generalize to unseen spatial relationships between points of interest (POIs) but also exhibit latent representations aligned with real-world spatial distributions. Furthermore, LLMs can learn road connectivity from trajectory descriptions, enabling accurate path planning and dynamic spatial awareness during navigation.

Large Language Models (LLMs) often produce unnecessarily lengthy reasoning traces, which significantly increase computational cost and latency. Existing approaches typically rely on fixed length penalties, but such penalties are hard to tune and fail to adapt to the evolving reasoning abilities of LLMs, leading to suboptimal trade-offs between accuracy and conciseness. To address this challenge, we propose **LEASH** (*adaptive LEngth penAlty and reward SHaping*), a reinforcement learning framework for efficient reasoning in LLMs. We formulate length control as a constrained optimization problem and employ a Lagrangian primal–dual method to dynamically adjust the penalty coefficient. When generations exceed the target length, the penalty is intensified; when they are shorter, it is relaxed. This adaptive mechanism guides models toward producing concise reasoning without sacrificing task performance. Experiments on Deepseek-R1-Distill-Qwen-1.5B and Qwen3-4B-Thinking-2507 show that LEASH reduces the average reasoning length by 60% across diverse tasks—including in-distribution mathematical reasoning and out-of-distribution domains such as coding and instruction following—while maintaining competitive performance. Our work thus presents a practical and effective paradigm for developing controllable and efficient LLMs that balance reasoning capabilities with computational budgets.

Large language models (LLMs) exhibit cultural bias from over-represented viewpoints in training data, yet cultural alignment remains a challenge due to limited cultural knowledge and a lack of exploration into effective learning approaches. We introduce a cost-efficient and cognitively grounded method: fine-tuning LLMs on native speakers’ word-association norms, leveraging cognitive psychology findings that such associations capture cultural knowledge. Using word association datasets from native speakers in the US (English) and China (Mandarin), we train Llama-3.1-8B and Qwen-2.5-7B via supervised fine-tuning and preference optimization. We evaluate models’ cultural alignment through a two-tier evaluation framework that spans low-level lexical associations and high-level cultural value alignment using the World Values Survey. Results show significant improvements in lexical alignment (16–20% English, 43–165% Mandarin on Precision@5) and high-level cultural value shifts. On a subset of 50 questions where US and Chinese respondents diverge most, fine-tuned Qwen nearly doubles its response alignment with Chinese values (13 to 25). Remarkably, our trained 7–8B models match or exceed vanilla 70B baselines, demonstrating that a few million of culture-grounded associations achieve value alignment without expensive retraining. Our work highlights both the promise and the need for future research grounded in human cognition in improving cultural alignment in AI models.

Recent advances in speech large language models (e.g., GPT-4o) have enabled end-to-end spoken interactions, yet their robustness in real-world applications remains unclear, where systems must assist users in completing specific tasks under complex conditions such as multi-turn, ambiguous, and often spontaneous speech, as well as natural alternation between speech and text. Task-oriented dialogue (TOD) offers a realistic scenario to evaluate whether models can effectively help users accomplish such task-oriented goals, but existing benchmarks are mainly text-based, and the few speech datasets are limited to English and often neglect spontaneous disfluencies and speaker diversity. To address this gap, we introduce RealTalk-CN, the first Chinese multi-turn, multi-domain speech–text TOD dataset, containing 5.4k dialogues (60K turns, ~150 hours) of real human-to-human recordings with detailed annotations for dialogue states, disfluency types, and speaker characteristics. Based on this dataset, we propose a cross-modal interaction task supporting dynamic speech-text switching and a comprehensive evaluation protocol assessing robustness to disfluencies, sensitivity to speaker variation, and cross-domain generalization. Experiments on state-of-the-art models demonstrate the challenges posed by RealTalk-CN and establish its value as a benchmark for developing reliable and fair Speech LLMs in real-world deployments. The dataset and evaluation framework are available to encourage further research.

Timely detection of depression symptoms is essential for early intervention, and the continuous stream of user-generated content on social media provides an ideal source for this purpose. To address this challenge, we propose **HOPE**, a **H**ybrid **O**ptimized **P**arallel **E**ncoding framework that combines supervised symptom relevance signals with unsupervised intrinsic semantic clustering. This parallel design enables robust symptom detection under limited labeled data and introduces a distinctive semantic-similarity perspective with automatic class-anchor adjustment. We also propose an optimized hybrid semantic fusion mechanism to combine supervised and unsupervised scores through a learnable module. We evaluate our system on multiple benchmark datasets and surpass previous approaches, demonstrating its effectiveness in detecting fine-grained symptoms and early warning of mental health risk. Source code is available at https://github.com/candleMind/hope.

Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) relies on reward models to align large language models with human preferences. However, RLHF often suffers from reward hacking, wherein policy learning exploits flaws in the trained reward model to maximize reward scores without genuinely aligning with human preferences. A significant example of such reward hacking is length bias, where reward models usually favor longer responses irrespective of actual response quality. Previous works on tackling length bias have notable limitations, these approaches either mitigate bias without characterizing the bias form, or simply assume a linear length-reward relation. To accurately model the intricate nature of length bias and facilitate more effective bias mitigation, we propose FiMi-RM (Bias Fitting to Mitigate Length Bias of Reward Model), a framework that autonomously learns and corrects underlying bias patterns. Our approach consists of three stages: First, we warm up by training a standard reward model which inherently contains length bias. Next, we deploy a lightweight fitting model to capture the non-linear relation between length and reward. Finally, we incorporate this learned relation into the reward model, effectively decoupling length from reward while preserving preference modeling capabilities. Experimental results demonstrate that FiMi-RM achieves a more balanced length-reward distribution. Furthermore, when applied to alignment algorithms such as Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) and Best-of-N (BoN), our debiased reward model improves length-controlled win rate and reduces verbosity without compromising its performance.

Large reasoning models (LRMs) are typically trained using reinforcement learning with verifiable reward (RLVR) to enhance their reasoning abilities. In this paradigm, policies are updated using both positive and negative self-generated rollouts, which correspond to distinct ***sample polarities***. In this paper, we provide a systematic investigation into how these sample polarities affect RLVR training dynamics and behaviors. We find that positive samples sharpen existing correct reasoning patterns, while negative samples encourage exploration of new reasoning paths. We further explore how adjusting the advantage values of positive and negative samples at both the polarity level and the token level affects RLVR training. Based on these insights, we propose an **A**daptive and **A**symmetric token-level **A**dvantage shaping method for **P**olicy **O**ptimization, namely **A3PO**, that more precisely allocates advantage signals to key tokens across different polarities. Experiments across five reasoning benchmarks demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach.

In-context learning (ICL) leverages demonstrations to enhance the performance of large language models (LLMs). However, traditional ICL struggles with complex reasoning mainly due to superficial, example-level implicit imitation. To address these limitations, we introduce **ThoughtICR**, an automated **Thought**-level **I**n-**C**ontext **R**easoning paradigm that shifts from surface-level examples to more guidance-oriented thought patterns. Specifically, we first define atomic reasoning actions and construct thought patterns on small-scale seed data using Monte Carlo Tree Search (MCTS). During inference, we dynamically select appropriate thought patterns based on target problem attributes, providing explicit guidance for model reasoning. Thanks to its automated and strategic design, our method enables seamless plug-and-play integration with various post-training techniques. Experimental results demonstrate that our method improves performance across different model sizes and generalizes effectively across reasoning domains. Using only small-scale seed data, we achieve 80.6% accuracy on MATH and 62.5% on AMC, surpassing GPT-4o’s 77.2% and 57.5%, respectively. Moreover, compared to test-time scaling methods, our approach reduces computational costs by over 10. Our code is available at https://github.com/jinyangwu/ThoughtICR.

The deployment of large language models (LLMs) is largely hindered by their large number of parameters. Structural pruning has emerged as a promising solution. Prior structured pruning methods directly remove unimportant parameters based on certain metrics, which often causes knowledge loss and necessitates extensive retraining. To overcome this, we introduce a novel pruning method **TRSP**: **T**wo-Stage **R**egularization-Based **S**tructured **P**runing for LLMs. Specifically, we multiply the output of each transformer layer by an initial learnable weight and iteratively learn these weights by adding their ℓ₁-norm as a regularization term to the loss function, serving as the first-stage regularization. Subsequently, we apply additional regularization to the difference between the output and input of layers with smaller weights, encouraging the shift of knowledge to the preserved layers. This serves as the second-stage regularization. TRSP retains more knowledge and better preserves model performance than direct parameter elimination. Through extensive experimentation we show that TRSP outperforms strong layer-wise structured pruning methods without requiring retraining. As a layer-wise pruning method, it delivers notable end-to-end acceleration, making it a promising solution for efficient LLM deployment.

On-device deployment of Large Language Models (LLMs) frequently leverages Low-Rank Adapters (LoRAs) to support diverse downstream tasks under tight resource constraints. To address the limited storage capacity of mobile devices, recent works have explored model merging techniques to fuse multiple LoRAs into a single one. In practice, however, LoRAs are often delivered incrementally, as users request support for new tasks (e.g., novel problem types or languages). This scenario introduces a new challenge: on-device online continual merging, where the objective is to incorporate new LoRAs while preserving the performance on previously supported tasks. In this paper, we propose a data-free and computationally efficient strategy for selecting and merging LoRAs when a new one becomes available, assuming the device can store only a limited number of adapters. Extensive experiments across real-world tasks demonstrate the superiority of our approach compared to alternative strategies while adhering to the storage budget and compute limitations of on-device settings. The project page is available at: https://donaldssh.github.io/K-Merge.

Speech codecs that convert continuous speech signals into discrete tokens have become essential for speech language models. However, existing codecs struggle to balance high-quality reconstruction with semantically rich representations, limiting their effectiveness in both generative and understanding tasks. In this work, we propose SAC, a neural speech codec with semantic-acoustic dual-stream quantization. By disentangling semantic and acoustic modeling into two dedicated streams, SAC enables each to be optimized for its respective role. Comprehensive evaluations show that SAC achieves strong reconstruction performance across diverse bitrates under both clean and noisy conditions, with particularly high scores on UTMOS and WER, indicating superior naturalness and intelligibility. Moreover, SAC substantially surpasses prior codecs in semantic representation, approaching the level of continuous self-supervised embeddings. When used as a tokenizer for LLM-based text-to-speech, SAC enables a single-stage autoregressive (AR) TTS model that clearly outperforms state-of-the-art AR systems. Our disentanglement analysis further validates the effectiveness of the dual-stream design, offering new potential for controllable speech generation.

Translating natural language mathematical statements into formal, executable code is a fundamental challenge in automated theorem proving. While prior work has focused on generation and compilation success, little attention has been paid to the critic phase—the evaluation of whether generated formalizations truly capture the semantic intent of the original problem. In this paper, we introduce CriticLean, a novel critic-guided reinforcement learning framework that elevates the role of the critic from a passive validator to an active learning component. Specifically, first, we propose the CriticLeanGPT, trained via supervised fine-tuning and reinforcement learning, to rigorously assess the semantic fidelity of Lean 4 formalizations. Then, we introduce CriticLeanBench, a benchmark designed to measure models’ ability to distinguish semantically correct from incorrect formalizations, and demonstrate that our trained CriticLeanGPT models can significantly outperform strong open- and closed-source baselines. Building on the CriticLean framework, we construct FineLeanCorpus, a dataset comprising over 509K problems that exhibits rich domain diversity, broad difficulty coverage, and high correctness based on human evaluation.Overall, our findings highlight that optimizing the critic phase is essential for producing reliable formalizations and we hope our CriticLean will provide valuable insights for future advances in formal mathematical reasoning.

While Large Language Models (LLMs) have substantially improved the functional correctness of code translation, the critical dimension of execution efficiency remains overlooked. We present Trace, the first benchmark to explicitly assess efficiency in LLM-translated code. Trace includes 1,000 efficiency-critical tasks across C++, Java, and Python, each augmented with stress tests that reveal efficiency disparities often overlooked by small-scale tests. Using Trace, we conduct an extensive evaluation of 28 representative LLMs and highlight several key insights: 1) Correctness and efficiency are often misaligned: the correctness leader Claude-Sonnet-4-Think achieves only moderate time efficiency, outperformed by smaller open-source LLMs such as Qwen2.5-Coder-14B-Instruct. 2) Inefficiency is both prevalent and patterned: 23.5% of correct translations suffer from notable inefficiency, mainly arising from algorithm implementation discrepancy (11.9%), language construct mismatch (66.4%), and resource management inefficiency (21.7%).3) Inference-time prompt strategies bring only modest improvements, indicating that simple prompting alone is insufficient to improve translation efficiency. Together, our results establish execution efficiency as an essential dimension of code translation and position Trace as a principled foundation for efficiency-oriented evaluation. Our code and data are available at: https://github.com/Albert-Gong/TRACE.

Pretraining massively multilingual Large Language Models (LLMs) for many languages at once is challenging due to limited model capacity, scarce high-quality data, and compute constraints. Moreover, the lack of language coverage in the tokenizer makes it harder to address the gap for new languages purely at the post-training stage. In this work, we study what relatively cheap interventions early on in training improve *language plasticity*, or adaptation capabilities of the model post-training to new languages. We focus on tokenizer design and propose using a *universal* tokenizer that is trained for more languages than the primary pretraining languages to enable efficient adaptation in expanding language coverage after pretraining. Our systematic experiments across diverse groups of languages and different training strategies show that a universal tokenizer enables significantly higher language adaptation, with up to 20.2% increase in win rates compared to tokenizers specific to pretraining languages. Furthermore, a universal tokenizer also leads to better plasticity towards languages that are completely unseen in the tokenizer and pretraining, by up to 5% win rate gain. We achieve this adaptation to an expanded set of languages with minimal compromise in performance on the majority of languages included in pretraining.

Users frequently express their beliefs to large language models (LLMs). In some situations, the LLM should accept these contextual beliefs as true. In others, they should stick to their prior knowledge. Notably, users’ expressions of belief (EoBs) can take linguistically diverse forms—using presuppositions, evidential and certainty markers, or varied tones—each of which may have a different persuasiveness over the LLMs. We introduce a typology to systematically evaluate how different EoBs affect whether models follow context versus prior knowledge. The typology is grounded in four linguistically motivated dimensions: form, evidentiality, epistemic stance, and tone, spanning 17 fine-grained types. By pairing these EoBs with world knowledge facts, we generate controlled EoB–query pairs that isolate the effect of linguistic variation. Using this benchmark, we evaluate 16 LLMs that differ in architecture (Llama3, Qwen3, Gemma3), scale (1B-30B parameters), and training stages (base vs instruct). We identify meaningful variations in response behavior across these axes, e.g., that bigger models and instruction models tend to be less context–following than smaller models and base models. We further identify specific EoBs that statistically significantly persuade LMs more consistently than others. Our work reveals systematic patterns in how linguistic framing affects LLM context integration, with implications for prompt engineering and model robustness.

Machine unlearning has gained increasing attention in recent years, as a promising technique to selectively remove unwanted privacy or copyrighted information from Large Language Models that are trained on a massive scale of human data. However, the emergence of Large Reasoning Models (LRMs), which emphasize long chain-of-thought (CoT) reasoning to address complex questions, presents a dilemma to unlearning: existing methods either struggle to completely eliminate undesired knowledge from the CoT traces or degrade the reasoning performances due to the interference with the reasoning process. To this end, we introduce Counterfactual Unlearning through iterative Preference Optimization (CiPO), a novel framework that redefines unlearning as the targeted intervention of the CoT reasoning in LRMs. More specifically, given a desired unlearning target answer, CiPO instructs LRMs to generate a logically valid counterfactual reasoning trace for preference tuning. As the LRM adjusts to the counterfactual trace, CiPO iteratively updates the preference learning data to increase the discrepancy from the original model. This iterative loop ensures both desirable unlearning and smooth optimization, effectively mitigating the dilemma. Experiments on challenging benchmarks demonstrate that CiPO excels at unlearning, completely removing knowledge from both the intermediate CoT steps and the final answer, while preserving the reasoning abilities of LRMs.

Harmful content detectors—particularly disinformation classifiers—are predominantly developed and evaluated on Standard American English (), leaving their robustness to dialectal variation unexplored. We present , the first benchmark for evaluating disinformation detection robustness across 50 English dialects spanning U.S., British, African, Caribbean, and Asia-Pacific varieties. Using Multi-VALUE’s linguistically-grounded transformations, we introduce D-CUBE (Dialectal Disinformation Detection Corpus), a core corpus component of comprising 195K samples derived from established disinformation benchmarks. Our evaluation of 16 detection models reveals systematic vulnerabilities: human-written dialectal content degrades detection by 1.4–3.6% F1, while AI-generated content remains stable. Fine-tuned transformers substantially outperform zero-shot LLMs (96.6% vs. 78.3% best-case F1), with some models exhibiting catastrophic failures exceeding 33% degradation on mixed content. Cross-dialectal transfer analysis across 2,450 dialect pairs shows that multilingual models (mDeBERTa: 97.2% average F1) generalize effectively, while monolingual models like RoBERTa and XLM-RoBERTa fail on dialectal inputs. These findings demonstrate that current disinformation detectors may systematically disadvantage hundreds of millions of non- speakers worldwide. We release the benchmark, including the , and evaluation tools.

Large language models (LLMs) require frequent knowledge updates to reflect changing facts and mitigate hallucinations. To meet this demand, lifelong knowledge editing has emerged as a continual approach to modify specific pieces of knowledge without retraining the entire model. Existing parameter-editing methods struggle with stability during sequential edits due to catastrophic forgetting. While retrieval-based approaches are proposed to alleviate this issue, their applicability remains limited across various datasets because of high training costs. To address these limitations and enhance scalability in lifelong settings, we propose LightEdit. Our framework first selects relevant knowledge from retrieved information to modify the query effectively. It then incorporates a decoding strategy to suppress the model’s original knowledge probabilities, thereby enabling efficient edits based on the selected information. Extensive experiments on ZSRE, Counterfact, and RIPE benchmarks demonstrate that LightEdit outperforms existing lifelong knowledge editing methods. Furthermore, by minimizing training costs, LightEdit achieves cost-effective scalability, enabling easy adaptation to various datasets.

Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) have achieved remarkable success, yet they often suffer from producing unnecessary and verbose reasoning chains. We identify a core aspect of this issue as ”invalid thinking”— models tend to repeatedly double-check their work after having derived the correct answer. To address this specific inefficiency, we move beyond the general principles of Efficacy and Efficiency to propose two new, fine-grained principles: Brevity, which advocates for eliminating redundancy, and Sufficiency, which ensures critical reasoning steps are preserved. Guided by these principles, we introduce LC-R1, a post-training method based on Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO). LC-R1 employs a novel combination of a Length Reward for overall conciseness and a Compress Reward that is specifically designed to remove the invalid portion of the thinking process. Extensive experiments on multiple reasoning benchmarks demonstrate that LC-R1 achieves a significant reduction in sequence length (5̃0%) with only a marginal (2̃%) drop in accuracy, achieving a favorable trade-off point on the Pareto frontier that prioritizes high compression. Our analysis further validates the robustness of LC-R1 and provides valuable insights for developing more powerful yet computationally efficient LRMs.

Feature engineering has long been central to recommender systems, yet effectively leveraging textual item features remains challenging. Recent advances in large language models (LLMs) have enabled their use as semantic encoders for recommendation, but their roles and behaviors in this setting are still not well understood. Prior studies often rely on general-purpose embedding benchmarks (e.g., MTEB) when selecting LLMs, overlooking the unique characteristics of recommendation tasks. To address this gap, we introduce BLaIR, a comprehensive benchmark for evaluating LLMs as semantic encoders in recommendation scenarios. We contribute (1) a new large-scale Amazon Reviews 2023 dataset with over 570 million reviews and 48 million items, (2) a unified benchmark covering sequential recommendation, collaborative filtering, and product search, and (3) a new complex-query product search task featuring both semi-synthetic and real-world evaluation datasets. Experiments with 11 leading LLMs show that their rankings on BLaIR show little correlation with MTEB, highlighting the unique challenges of semantic encoding in recommendation.

While guided decoding, especially value-guided methods, has emerged as a cost-effective alternative for controlling language model outputs without re-training models, its effectiveness is limited by the accuracy of the value function. We identify that this inaccuracy stems from a core distributional gap: existing methods train static value functions on trajectories sampled exclusively from the base policy, which inherently confines their training to a narrow and suboptimal view of the potential output space. We propose Iterative Value Refinement, a novel framework designed to bridge this gap. It employs Value Exploration to provide a more comprehensive and robust training signal, complemented by Iterative Self-Refinement, which uses the improved value function from one iteration to guide the generation of higher-quality data for the next. Extensive experiments on text summarization, multi-turn dialogue, and instruction following demonstrate the effectiveness of our framework in aligning language models. Our approach not only achieves alignment but also significantly reduces computational costs by leveraging principled value function optimization for efficient and effective control.

Open-Domain Table Question Answering (TQA) involves retrieving relevant tables from a large corpus to answer natural language queries. Traditional dense retrieval models, such as DTR and DPR, not only incur high computational costs for large-scale retrieval tasks but also require retraining or fine-tuning on new datasets, limiting their adaptability to evolving domains and knowledge. In this work, we propose **CRAFT**, a zero-shot, cascaded retrieval approach that first uses a sparse retrieval model to filter a subset of candidate tables before applying more computationally expensive dense models as re-rankers.To improve retrieval quality, we enrich table representations with descriptive titles and summaries generated by *Gemini Flash 1.5*, enabling richer semantic matching between queries and tabular structures. Our method outperforms state-of-the-art (SOTA) sparse, dense, and hybrid retrievers on the NQ-Tables dataset. It also demonstrates strong zero-shot performance on the more challenging OTT-QA benchmark, achieving competitive results at higher recall thresholds, where the task requires multi-hop reasoning across both textual passages and relational tables.This work establishes a scalable and adaptable paradigm for table retrieval, bridging the gap between fine-tuned architectures and lightweight, plug-and-play retrieval systems. Code and data are available at: [https://coral-lab-asu.github.io/CRAFT/](https://coral-lab-asu.github.io/CRAFT/)

Evaluating the quality of LLM-generated reasoning traces in expert domains (e.g., law) is essential for ensuring credibility and explainability, yet remains challenging due to the inherent complexity of such reasoning tasks. We introduce LEGIT (LEGal Issue Trees), a novel large-scale (24K instances) expert-level legal reasoning dataset with an emphasis on reasoning trace evaluation. We convert court judgments into hierarchical trees of opposing parties’ arguments and the court’s conclusions, which serve as rubrics for evaluating the issue coverage and correctness of the reasoning traces. We verify the reliability of these rubrics via human expert annotations and comparison with coarse, less informative rubrics. Using the LEGIT dataset, we show that (1) LLMs’ legal reasoning ability is seriously affected by both legal issue coverage and correctness, and that (2) retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) and RL with rubrics bring complementary benefits for legal reasoning abilities, where RAG improves overall reasoning capability, whereas RL improves correctness albeit with reduced coverage.

We introduce KG-MuLQA (Knowledge-Graph-based Multi-Level Question-Answer Extraction): a framework that (1) extracts QA pairs at multiple complexity levels (2) along three key dimensions – multi-hop retrieval, set operations, and answer plurality, (3) by leveraging knowledge-graph-based document representations. This approach enables fine-grained assessment of model performance across controlled difficulty levels. Using this framework, we construct a dataset of 20,139 QA pairs based on financial credit agreements and evaluate 16 proprietary and open-weight Large Language Models, observing that even the best-performing models struggle with set-based comparisons and multi-hop reasoning over long contexts. Our analysis reveals systematic failure modes tied to semantic misinterpretation and inability to handle implicit relations.

Long-horizon tasks that require sustained reasoning and multiple tool interactions remain challenging for LLM agents: small errors compound across steps, and even state-of-the-art models often hallucinate or lose coherence. We identify context management as the central bottleneck—extended histories cause agents to overlook critical evidence or become distracted by irrelevant information, thus failing to replan or reflect from previous mistakes. To address this, we propose COMPASS (Context-Organized Multi-Agent Planning and Strategy System), a lightweight hierarchical framework that separates tactical execution, strategic oversight, and context organization into three specialized components: (1) a Main Agent that performs reasoning and tool use, (2) a Meta-Thinker that monitors progress and issues strategic interventions, and (3) a Context Manager that maintains concise, relevant progress briefs for different reasoning stages. Across three challenging benchmarks—GAIA, BrowseComp, and Humanity’s Last Exam—COMPASS improves accuracy by up to 20% relative to both single- and multi-agent baselines. We further introduce a test-time scaling extension that elevates performance to match established DeepResearch agents, and a post-training pipeline that delegates context management to smaller models for enhanced efficiency.

Although Large Language Models (LLMs) show strong potential for zero-shot document ranking, current listwise approaches face three critical limitations. First, context length constraints prevent processing many documents simultaneously. Second, sequential generation creates bottlenecks that cannot run in parallel. Third, ranking results depend heavily on initial document order, leading to inconsistent performance. We introduce BracketRank, a reasoning-driven competitive elimination framework that addresses these challenges through systematic group competition. Our method uses adaptive grouping to automatically optimise group sizes based on LLM context limits, reasoning-enhanced prompts that require explicit relevance explanations, and bracket-style elimination where documents compete through winner and loser brackets. This structure ensures every document has fair advancement opportunities regardless of initial positioning while allowing for parallel processing across competition stages. We evaluate BracketRank on TREC DL 19, TREC DL 20, and eight BEIR benchmark datasets. Results show that BracketRank achieves 77.90 NDCG@5 on TREC DL 19 and 75.85 NDCG@5 on TREC DL 20, outperforming RankGPT and other state-of-the-art methods. On BEIR datasets, BracketRank reaches 54.66 average NDCG@10, demonstrating robust performance across diverse domains.

Causal tracing systematically intervenes on a large language model’s (LLM’s) internal representations to uncover and quantify the causal pathways linking specific inputs or computations to specific metrics of interest, quantifying the LLM’s behavior. Building on previous single-component or single-layer studies, this paper presents a unified framework for causally tracing multiple components simultaneously. This framework systematically identifies the subsets of components (e.g., attention heads and multi-layer perceptron neurons) most critical to a desired target performance metric (e.g., accuracy and fairness). This is achieved by incorporating flexible interventions applied to a wide range of desired metrics. To address the combinatorial complexity of the multi-component problem, an efficient algorithm is designed that leverages soft interventions and a carefully designed metric transformation, converting the combinatorial search problem into a continuous one that can be solved efficiently under proper constraints, thereby generating proper binary decisions for selecting components. Experimental results demonstrate that the proposed method efficiently identifies subsets of the model’s components that have a high impact on the target metric, outperforming existing baseline approaches.

We identify semantically coherent, context-consistent network components in large language models (LLMs) using coactivation of sparse autoencoder (SAE) features collected from just a handful of prompts. Focusing on concept-relation prediction tasks, we show that ablating these components for concepts (e.g., countries and words) and relations (e.g., capital city and translation language) changes model outputs in predictable ways, while amplifying these components induces counterfactual responses. Notably, composing relation and concept components yields compound counterfactual outputs. Further analysis reveals that while most concept components emerge from the very first layer, more abstract relation components are concentrated in later layers. Lastly, we show that extracted components more comprehensively capture concepts and relations than individual features while maintaining specificity. Overall, our findings suggest a modular organization of knowledge and advance methods for efficient, targeted LLM manipulation.

Attention matrices are fundamental to transformer research, supporting a broad range of applications including interpretability, visualization, manipulation, and distillation. Yet, most existing analyses focus on individual attention heads or layers, failing to account for the model’s global behavior. While prior efforts have extended attention formulations across multiple heads via averaging and matrix multiplications or incorporated components such as normalization and FFNs, a unified and complete representation that encapsulates all transformer blocks is still lacking. We address this gap by introducing TensorLens, a novel formulation that captures the entire transformer as a single, input-dependent linear operator expressed through a high-order attention-interaction tensor. This tensor jointly encodes attention, FFNs, activations, normalizations, and residual connections, offering a theoretically coherent and expressive linear representation of the model’s computation. TensorLens is theoretically grounded and our empirical validation shows that it yields richer representations than previous attention-aggregation methods. Our experiments demonstrate that the attention tensor can serve as a powerful foundation for developing tools aimed at interpretability and model understanding.

A common goal in analyzing time series data is to understand how events cause observed variations. We study whether Large Language Models (LLMs) can infer natural language events associated with time series data.We introduce an automated method for generating tasks that test a model’s ability to reason about events associated with time series data based on sports data, and develop a new benchmarking method. In experiments spanning 18 LLMs, we prompt LLMs to infer unobserved events given time series data and observe surprising successes, even when providing minimal context. We then show that combining distillation with Reinforcement Learning (RL) can improve the performance for small language models to approach that of large proprietary reasoning models. All resources needed to reproduce our work are available: https://github.com/hartvigsen-group/GAMETime.

In continual instruction tuning (CIT) scenarios, where new instruction tuning data continuously arrive in an online streaming manner, training delays from large-scale data significantly hinder real-time adaptation. Data selection can mitigate this overhead, but existing strategies often rely on pre-trained reference models, which are impractical in CIT setups since future data are unknown. Recent reference model-free online sample selection methods address this, but typically select a fixed number of samples per batch (e.g., top-k), making them vulnerable to distribution shifts where informativeness varies across batches. To address these limitations, we propose OASIS, an adaptive online sample selection approach for CIT that (1) selects informative samples by estimating each sample’s informativeness relative to all previously seen data, beyond batch-level constraints, and (2) minimizes informative redundancy of selected samples through iterative selection score updates. Experiments on various large foundation models show that , using only 25% of the data, achieves comparable performance to full-data training and outperforms the state-of-the-art sampling methods.

While mechanistic interpretability (MI) has produced important insights into neural network internals, the field has yet to establish a standardized system to audit experiments. As such, many of its findings remain underutilized in safety-critical applications such as medical AI and autonomous systems, as stakeholders cannot certify their validity. Recent work demonstrates this concretely: two papers found conflicting conclusions for the same behavior, and a third study revealed that both were partially correct but incomparable due to methodological inconsistencies. Without standardized auditing, such ambiguities hinder adoption in high-stakes contexts requiring strong correctness guarantees. We call for the MI community to work towards developing a novel reviewing system that complements peer review via: (1) Continuous reviewing supported by a Collaborative Reviewing Platform where meta-science results and discussions (such as critiques, negative results, post-hoc extensions, reproductions, replications, and partial results) that fit outside of papers are organized and discussed, allowing for comments and revisions to be made at any time (2) Generalizing good practices found on this platform into expert-verified guidelines and protocols to improve auditing efficiency, and (3) Source-based auditing systems that track arguments which claims depend on. This position paper encourages constructive debate over the necessity, design and implementation of such a framework, providing early concrete examples to help catalyze these dialogues. Overall, we propose that auditing MI itself is essential for its application in AI safety, industry, and governance.

Recent research empowers Large Language Models (LLMs) as multi-turn search agents to iteratively retrieve and generate outputs until complex tasks are solved. However, the contexts of multi-turn search agents are lengthy and complex. For example, the retrieved set of documents in each turn would inevitably introduce irrelevant information that distracts LLMs, referring to context interference, potentially hindering the reliability and efficiency of search agents. Therefore, we conduct a systematic study on context interference in multi-turn search agents, focusing on investigating i) which parts of the context of search agents will contribute to the context interference, ii) how to refine the contexts of search agents to mitigate the interference, and iii) can incorporating context refinement into search agent training yield further improvements. We reveal that interference primarily arises from the latest retrieved documents. Based on the explored findings, we then introduce a distill-based context refiner to dynamically mitigate context interference for multi-turn search agents. Finally, we validate that incorporating context refinement into RL training pipelines of search agents can significantly enhance both reliability and efficiency. This study highlights the importance of mitigating context interference of search agents, inspiring a novel paradigm of “refine context and then generate” for AI agents.

Long-context modeling is critical for a wide range of real-world tasks, including long-context question answering, summarization, and complex reasoning tasks. Recent studies have explored fine-tuning Large Language Models (LLMs) with synthetic data to enhance their long-context capabilities. However, the effectiveness of such approaches is often limited by the low diversity and factual inconsistencies in the generated data. To address these challenges, we propose LongMab, a novel framework that leverages a Multi-Armed Bandit (MAB) rollout strategy to identify the most informative chunks from the given long context for sampling high-quality and diverse responses and constructing preference data pairs for Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) training. Specifically, we treat context chunks as arms of MAB, select chunks based on their expected reward scores to input into LLMs to generate responses, and iteratively update these scores based on reward feedback. Both exploration and exploitation during the rollout process enable the LLM to focus on the most relevant context segments, thereby generating and collecting high-quality and diverse responses. Experimental results on both Llama and Qwen show the effectiveness of LongMab by achieving more than a 4% improvement on long-context reasoning benchmarks. All data and code will be released on https://github.com/NEUIR/LongMab-PO.

Effective long-term memory management is crucial for language models handling extended contexts. We introduce the Enhanced Ranked Memory Augmented Retrieval ERMAR framework, which dynamically ranks memory entries based on relevance. Unlike prior models, ERMAR employs a novel relevance scoring mechanism and a pointwise re-ranking model for key-value embeddings, inspired by learning-to-rank techniques in information retrieval. By integrating historical usage patterns and adaptive retrieval, ERMAR achieves state-of-the-art results on standard benchmarks, demonstrating superior scalability and performance in long-context tasks.

Large Language Models (LLMs) have advanced reasoning ability, yet conventional alignment remains dominated by outcome reward models (ORMs) that judge only final answers. Process Reward Models(PRMs) address this gap by evaluating and guiding reasoning at the step or trajectory level. This survey provides a systematic overview of PRMs through the full loop: how to generate process data, build PRMs, and use PRMs for test-time scaling and reinforcement learning. We summarize applications across math, code, text, multimodal reasoning, robotics, and agents, and review emerging benchmarks. Our goal is to clarify design spaces, reveal open challenges, and guide future research toward fine-grained, robust reasoning alignment.

While Large Language Models (LLMs) excel at code generation by learning from vast code corpora, a fundamental semantic gap remains between their training on textual patterns and the goal of functional correctness, which is governed by formal execution semantics. Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR) approaches attempt to bridge this gap using outcome rewards from executing test cases. However, solely relying on binary pass/fail signals is inefficient for establishing a well-aligned connection between the textual representation of code and its execution semantics, especially for subtle logical errors within the code. In this paper, we propose CODERL+, a novel approach that integrates execution semantics alignment into the RLVR training pipeline for code generation. CODERL+ enables the model to infer variable-level execution trajectory, providing a direct learning signal of execution semantics. CODERL+ can construct execution semantics alignment directly using existing on-policy rollouts and integrates seamlessly with various RL algorithms. Extensive experiments demonstrate that CODERL+ outperforms post-training baselines (including RLVR and Distillation), achieving a 4.6% average relative improvement in pass@1. CODERL+ generalizes effectively to other coding tasks, yielding 15.5% and 4.4% higher accuracy on code-reasoning and test-output-generation benchmarks, respectively. CODERL+ shows strong applicability across diverse RL algorithms and LLMs. Furthermore, probe analyses provide compelling evidence that CODERL+ strengthens the alignment between code’s textual representations and its underlying execution semantics.

Diffusion language models (DLMs) are emerging as a compelling alternative to the dominant autoregressive paradigm, offering inherent advantages in parallel generation and bidirectional context modeling. However, for the tasks with strict structural constraints such as code generation, DLMs face a critical trade-off between inference speed and output quality, where accelerating generation by reducing sampling steps often leads to catastrophic performance collapse.We find that the fundamental reasons are: 1) the generation difficulty is uneven in the structured sequence decoding steps, making DLM’s static acceleration strategy suboptimal; 2) the context of tokens generated by DLM evolves continuously, causing early high-confidence predictions to turn into irreversible errors.In this paper, we introduce efficient **S**ampling with **A**daptive acceleration and **B**acktracking **E**nhanced **R**emasking (i.e., **Saber**), a novel training-free sampling algorithm for DLMs that the first to improve both inference speed and output quality in code generation. Saber dynamically adjusts the number of tokens unmasked per step based on the model’s evolving confidence, and utilizes a backtracking mechanism to revert tokens whose confidence drops as new context emerges, with its effectiveness supported by theoretical analysis.Extensive experiments on multiple mainstream code generation benchmarks show that Saber boosts Pass@1 accuracy by an average of 1.9% over mainstream DLM sampling methods, while achieving an average 251.4% inference speedup. By leveraging the inherent advantages of DLMs, our work significantly narrows the performance gap with autoregressive models in code generation.

Mitigating the detrimental effects of noisy labels on the training process has become increasingly critical, as obtaining entirely clean or human-annotated samples for large-scale pre-training tasks is often impractical. Nonetheless, existing noise mitigation methods often encounter limitations in practical applications due to their task-specific design, model dependency, and significant computational overhead. In this work, we exploit the properties of high-dimensional orthogonality to identify a robust and effective boundary in cone space for separating clean and noisy samples. Building on this, we propose One-Step Anti-noise (OSA), a model-agnostic noisy label mitigation paradigm that employs an estimator model and a scoring function to assess the noise level of input pairs through just one-step inference. We empirically validate the superiority of OSA, demonstrating its enhanced training robustness, improved task transferability, streamlined deployment, and reduced computational overhead across diverse benchmarks, models, and tasks. Our code is released at https://github.com/leolee99/OSA.

Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) enhances Large Language Models (LLMs), especially for knowledge-intensive tasks. Despite its advantages, current RAG methods often struggle to fully exploit knowledge during generation. In particular, the synergy between the model’s internal parametric knowledge and external retrieved knowledge remains limited. Retrieved contents may sometimes mislead generation, while certain generated content can guide the model toward more accurate outputs. In this work, we propose Collaborative Chain-of-Agents, a framework designed to enhance explicitly synergy over both parametric and retrieved knowledge. Specifically, we first introduce CoCoA-zero, a multi-agent RAG framework that first performs conditional knowledge induction and then reasons answers. Building on this, we develop CoCoA, a long-chain training strategy that synthesizes extended multi-agent reasoning trajectories from CoCoA-zero to fine-tune the LLM. This strategy enhances the model’s capability to explicitly integrate and jointly leverage parametric and retrieved knowledge. Experimental results demonstrate the superiority of CoCoA in open-domain QA and multi-hop QA.

Privacy policies are essential for users to understand how service providers handle their personal data. However, these documents are often long and complex, as well as filled with technobabble and legalese, causing users to unknowingly accept terms that may even contradict the law. While summarizing and interpreting these privacy policies is crucial, there is a lack of high-quality English parallel corpus optimized for legal clarity and readability. To address this issue, we introduce APPSI-139, a high-quality English privacy policy corpus meticulously annotated by domain experts, specifically designed for summarization and interpretation tasks. The corpus includes 139 English privacy policies, 15,692 rewritten parallel corpora, and 36,351 fine-grained annotation labels across 11 data practice categories. Concurrently, we propose TCSI-pp-V2, a hybrid privacy policy summarization and interpretation framework that employs an alternating training strategy and coordinates multiple expert modules to effectively balance computational efficiency and accuracy. Experimental results show that the hybrid summarization system built on APPSI-139 corpus and the TCSI-pp-V2 framework outperform large language models, such as GPT-4o and LLaMA-3-70B, in terms of readability and reliability. The source code and dataset are available at https://github.com/EnlightenedAI/APPSI-139.

Multimodal Large Language Models advance multimodal representation learning by acquiring transferable semantic embeddings, thereby substantially enhancing performance across a range of vision-language tasks, including cross-modal retrieval, clustering, and classification. An effective embedding is expected to comprehensively preserve the semantic content of the input while simultaneously emphasizing features that are discriminative for downstream tasks. Recent approaches demonstrate that MLLMs can be adapted into competitive embedding models via large-scale contrastive learning, enabling the simultaneous optimization of two complementary objectives. We argue that the two aforementioned objectives can be decoupled: a comprehensive understanding of the input enables the embedding model to achieve superior performance on downstream tasks via contrastive learning. In this paper, we propose CoMa, a compressed pre-training phase, which serves as a warm-up stage for contrastive learning. Experiments demonstrate that with only a small amount of pre-training data, we can transform an MLLM into a competitive embedding model. CoMa achieves new state-of-the-art results among MLLMs of comparable size on the MMEB, realizing optimization in both efficiency and effectiveness. Our project is available at https://github.com/Trustworthy-Information-Access/CoMa.

Cross-lingual topic modeling aims to discover shared semantic structures across languages, yet existing models depend on sparse bilingual resources and often yield incoherent or weakly aligned topics. Recent LLM-based refinements improve interpretability but are costly, document-level, and prone to hallucination, with prior white-box approaches requiring inaccessible token probabilities. We propose LLM-XTM, a framework that integrates LLM-guided topic refinement with self-consistency uncertainty quantification, enabling black-box, stable, and scalable enhancement of cross-lingual topic models. Experiments on multilingual corpora show that LLM-XTM achieves superior topic coherence and alignment while reducing reliance on bilingual dictionaries and expensive LLM calls.

Backchannels, which signal listener states like empathy and understanding, are fundamental to natural human interaction. However, current approaches rely solely on audio and text. This omits crucial visual cues, such as facial expressions and gestures, as well as broader conversational contexts, which are necessary for accurate prediction. In this paper, we introduce Context-Aware Multimodal Alignment for Backchannel Prediction (CAMA-BC), a novel framework that leverages visual information through Multi-layer Multimodal Alignment (MMA). Our alignment process comprises two stages. First, Context Alignment (MMA-CA) utilizes unlabeled dialogues with videos to capture conversational contexts. Next, Backchannel Alignment (MMA-BA) fine-tunes the representations specifically for backchannel prediction. Experimental results show that CAMA-BC significantly outperforms both existing methods and simple multimodal baselines, with particular effectiveness in recognizing complex backchannels such as empathy.

Recent proprietary video generation models have demonstrated remarkable proficiency in synthesizing highly realistic videos from textual instructions. Most open-source text-to-video models, however, still struggle to accurately simulate real-world physics and dynamic entity interactions. Existing approaches rely on scaling laws and large-scale, high-quality video datasets to implicitly learn physical dynamics, yet this paradigm is constrained by prohibitive costs and the burdensome demands of data curation. Motivated by this, we propose a novel framework that integrates graph-structured temporal knowledge into video latent diffusion models to enhance compositional generation and interaction fidelity. Our framework constructs video scene graphs specifically designed to capture entity relationships, temporal dynamics, and global scene context. These graph-structured representations guide the generation process through cross-attention mechanisms. Additionally, we introduce Graph-Aligned Denoising Loss (GADL), a training objective that ensures adherence to conditioned graphs by incorporating node modification tasks within the denoising process, leveraging synchronized edited video-graph pairs. Comprehensive evaluations demonstrate that incorporating graph-structured knowledge significantly enhances compositionality and the accurate portrayal of real-world interactions in generated videos.

Recent advances in zero-shot text-to-speech (TTS) have enabled accurate imitation of reference speech in terms of both speaking style and speaker timbre. However, achieving disentangled control over these aspects from separate references remains a challenging task. Several studies have proposed disentangled speech representations that decompose speech into interpretable attributes (e.g., timbre, prosody, and content), providing a promising foundation for TTS with attribute control from separate references. Yet, how to effectively integrate such representations into TTS systems to achieve independent and precise control remains underexplored. In this paper, we present FC-TTS, a zero-shot TTS framework that enables disentangled control of style and timbre by conditioning on two distinct reference utterances. Unlike existing systems that inherit limitations from those pre-trained disentangled representations, FC-TTS introduces key design strategies, including architectural choices, training framework, and auxiliary training objectives, which improve the reliability of attribute separation and dual-reference control. Experiments show that FC-TTS achieves high-fidelity synthesis and competitive zero-shot naturalness, while uniquely supporting consistent and independent manipulation of style and timbre. Audio samples are available at https://qualcomm-ai-research.github.io/fc-tts

Generating high-fidelity synthetic tabular data remains a critical challenge for enhancing data availability in privacy-sensitive and low-resource domains. Recent approaches leverage LLMs by representing table rows as sequences, yet suffer from two fundamental limitations: (1) they model feature dependencies densely, introducing spurious correlations; and (2) they assume static relationships between features, ignoring how these dependencies vary with feature values. To overcome these limitations, we introduce SAGE (Sparse Adaptive Guidance), a novel LLM-based generation framework that enforces sparse and dynamic dependency guidance. SAGE discretizes features into value-aware pseudo-features and constructs a mutual information-based sparse dependency graph. This graph adaptively guides generation through explicit context selection or implicit logit correction, enabling LLMs to focus on truly relevant information during synthesis. Our extensive experiments across six datasets and multiple tasks reveal that SAGE not only improves data fidelity and downstream utility, boosting F1 scores by 10% compared to previous LLM-based methods, but also reduces policy violations by one point. These results highlight the importance of adaptive structure in tabular data generation and provide new insights into context-sensitive control of LLMs.

The rapid spread of misinformation on social media highlights the need for robust, automated fact correction frameworks. However, existing works rely on supervised learning from manually annotated claim-evidence pairs, which are scarce and prone to biases, limiting their generalization across domains. Moreover, these methods overlook semantic faithfulness in their correction process. To address these challenges, we propose Mask-to-Correct (M₂C), a training-free, inference-only Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) based framework that leverages diversity-aware masking to identify erroneous spans of claims and evaluate the faithfulness of corrections using retrieved evidence. However, the effectiveness of RAG heavily depends on the choice of retriever, which may vary across queries. To mitigate this, we further introduce M₂C⁺, an ensemble-based framework that combines corrections across multiple rankers to reduce retrieval bias and improve robustness. Extensive experiments on the benchmark datasets demonstrate that our proposed frameworks consistently outperform all baselines, achieving up to 14% improvement in SARI scores, without using gold evidence.

Transformers excel at sequence modeling but face quadratic complexity, while linear attention offers improved efficiency but often compromises recall accuracy over long contexts. In this work, we introduce Native Hybrid Attention (NHA), a novel hybrid architecture of linear and full attention that integrates both intra inter-layer hybridization into a unified layer design. NHA maintains long-term context in key–value slots updated by a linear RNN, and augments them with short-term tokens from a sliding window. A single operation is then applied over all keys and values, enabling per-token and per-head context-dependent weighting without requiring additional fusion parameters. The inter-layer behavior is controlled through a single hyperparameter, the sliding window size, which allows smooth adjustment between purely linear and full attention while keeping all layers structurally uniform. Experimental results show that NHA surpasses Transformers and other hybrid baselines on recall-intensive and commonsense reasoning tasks. Furthermore, pretrained LLMs can be structurally hybridized with NHA, achieving competitive accuracy while delivering significant efficiency gains. Code is available at https://github.com/JusenD/NHA.

Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) has shown substantial promise in improving factual accuracy by grounding model responses with external knowledge relevant to queries. However, most existing approaches are limited to a text-only corpus, and while recent efforts have extended RAG to other modalities such as images and videos, they typically operate over a single modality-specific corpus. In contrast, real-world queries vary widely in the type of knowledge they require, which a single type of knowledge source cannot address. To address this, we introduce UniversalRAG, an any-to-any RAG framework designed to retrieve and integrate knowledge from heterogeneous sources with diverse modalities and granularities. Specifically, motivated by the observation that forcing all modalities into a unified representation space derived from a single aggregated corpus causes a modality gap, where the retrieval tends to favor items from the same modality as the query, we propose modality-aware routing, which dynamically identifies the most appropriate modality-specific corpus and performs targeted retrieval within it, and further justify its effectiveness with a theoretical analysis. Moreover, beyond modality, we organize each modality into multiple granularity levels, enabling fine-tuned retrieval tailored to the complexity and scope of the query. We validate UniversalRAG on 10 benchmarks of multiple modalities, showing its superiority over various modality-specific and unified baselines.

Reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) has been effective on tasks with structured solutions like math and coding, but its reliance on simple, rule-based verifiers creates a fundamental bottleneck. We find their applicability is surprisingly narrow even in structured domains, a limitation that is compounded at scale: rule-based systems can paradoxically degrade in performance as multi-domain, free-form training data increases. To overcome these challenges, we propose a new RLVR framework that uses a generative verifier to provide soft, probabilistic rewards. Our key insight is that powerful LLMs show high agreement with human evaluators when judging answer correctness given a ground-truth reference, allowing us to automate reward generation without costly human annotation. Our experiments demonstrate the effectiveness of this approach. We show that a compact 7B generative reward model can guide a 7B policy model to decisively outperform models up to 10x its size, including the 72B Qwen2.5-Instruct (by a margin of +8.6%). This effectiveness is robust, holding true across diverse training datasets with answers sourced from experts, web users, and other LLMs, and generalizes strongly to seven out-of-distribution benchmarks. Our work provides a scalable and effective framework for extending RLVR beyond the limitations of pattern-based verification to complex, noisy, real-world domains.

Recent studies indicate a fundamental incompatibility between ID representations and language model (LM) representations, as they capture behavioral and semantic spaces respectively. This mismatch leads LM representations to consistently underperform ID representations in recommendation tasks. In this work, we revisit this problem and show, from an information-theoretic perspective, that LLM representations retain all discriminative information in ID representations. Based on this, we introduce a Profile-then-Embedding (PtE) framework for recommendation, consisting of a Profile Stage, in which semantic user and item profiles are generated jointly through LLM-based bidirectional reasoning over user-item interactions, and a Personalized Embedding Stage, which encodes these profiles into task-aligned recommendation embeddings. We demonstrate PtE’s effectiveness across three benchmark datasets, including cold-start and long-tail scenarios, achieving substantial gains in both discriminative and generative recommendation models.

As the text generated by large language models (LLMs) increasingly resembles human-written text (HWT), detecting LLM-generated text (LGT) is crucial to avoid malicious use of LGT. Recent research treats LGT detection as an out-of-distribution (OOD) detection problem and views HWT as the OOD. However, existing OOD detection methods assume that LGT is a single homogeneous distribution. In practice, LGT exhibits different characteristics under different generation conditions. Text from weaker LLMs tends to form distinct clusters and is easy to detect, whereas text from stronger models significantly overlaps with HWTs and is hard to detect. To address the issue, in this paper, we propose an LGT detection framework based on density-aware manifold learning and the construction of hybrid Mahalanobis energy. We apply density-aware manifold learning with Laplacian smoothness and density regularization in embedding space, amplifying differences between LGT and HWT. We further propose a density-adaptive hybrid Mahalanobis metric that combines global and local covariance via density weighting, enabling adaptation to the manifold-aware embedding space. Finally, based on the metric, we define the distribution energy as a measure of distribution discrepancy, and we employ energy learning and contrastive learning to separate distributions hierarchically, establishing a clear OOD decision boundary. Experiments show that our method outperforms strong baselines.

Deception detection is of great significance for ensuring information security and conducting public opinion analysis, with personality factors and emotion cues playing a critical role. However, existing methods lack sample-level dynamic annotations for emotions and personality. In this paper, we propose an innovative multi-model multi-prompt annotation scheme and a strict label quality evaluation standard, and establish a multimodal joint detection dataset DDEP for deception, emotion, and personality. Meanwhile, we propose Rel-DDEP, an adaptive reliability-weighted fusion framework. Our framework quantifies uncertainty by mapping modal features to a high-dimensional Gaussian distribution space. It then performs reliability-weighted fusion and incorporates an alignment module and a sorting constraint module to achieve joint detection of deception, emotion, and personality. Experimental results on the MDPE and DDEP datasets show that our Rel-DDEP significantly outperforms the existing state-of-the-art baseline models in three tasks. The F1 score of the deception detection increases by 2.53%, that of the emotion detection increases by 2.66%, and that of the personality detection increases by 9.30%. The experiments fully verify the necessity of annotating dynamic emotion and personality labels for each sample and the effectiveness of reliability-weighted fusion.

Autonomous machine learning agents have revolutionized scientific discovery, yet they remain constrained by a Generate-Execute-Feedback paradigm. Previous approaches suffers from a severe Execution Bottleneck, as hypothesis evaluation relies strictly on expensive physical execution. To bypass these physical constraints, we internalize execution priors to substitute costly runtime checks with instantaneous predictive reasoning, drawing inspiration from World Models. In this work, we formalize the task of Data-centric Solution Preference and construct a comprehensive corpus of 18,438 pairwise comparisons. We demonstrate that LLMs exhibit significant predictive capabilities when primed with a Verified Data Analysis Report, achieving 61.5% accuracy and robust confidence calibration. Finally, we instantiate this framework in ForeAgent, an agent that employs a Predict-then-Verify loop, achieving a 6x acceleration in convergence while surpassing execution-based baselines by +6%.

Large language models (LLMs) achieve strong performance across diverse domains but remain difficult to deploy in resource-constrained environments due to their size. Low-rank compression is a common remedy, typically minimizing weight reconstruction error under the assumption that weights are low-rank. However, this assumption often does not hold in LLMs. In contrast, LLM activations exhibit a more pronounced low-rank structure, motivating approaches that minimize activation reconstruction error.This shift alone, however, is not sufficient: different activation dimensions contribute unequally to model performance, and treating them uniformly can lead to accuracy loss. We introduce IMPACT, an importance-aware activation reconstruction framework that links compression to its effect on model performance. IMPACT formulates compression as an optimization problem that integrates activation structure with gradient-based importance, deriving a closed-form solution where reconstruction bases arise from an importance-weighted activation covariance matrix. This yields low-rank compression explicitly optimized for accuracy preservation. Experiments across multiple models and tasks demonstrate that IMPACT achieves up to 55.4% greater model size reduction while maintaining accuracy comparable to or better than state-of-the-art baselines.

Low-Rank Adaptation (LoRA) is a widely used parameter-efficient fine-tuning (PEFT) method for large language models. Under a fixed rank budget, LoRA parameterizes each adapted weight through a single low-dimensional input-side pathway, which may couple heterogeneous behaviors through shared input directions and induce interference during optimization. We propose **Static Orthogonal Subspace LoRA** (SOS-LoRA), a drop-in extension that reparameterizes a rank-r_tot update as a sum of K *static* (always-on, non-routed) low-rank experts. SOS-LoRA (i) decomposes the total rank across experts, (ii) applies a *fixed* multi-scale scaling scheme to encourage scale-separated optimization dynamics, and (iii) promotes diverse input-side directions via cross-expert orthogonal initialization and a lightweight regularizer. SOS-LoRA remains fully mergeable, adding no inference-time parameters or latency after merging. Experiments on reasoning and knowledge-intensive benchmarks (Llama 2/3), encoder-based NLU (GLUE), and math reasoning (GSM8K/MATH) show consistent gains over matched-budget LoRA baselines and recent variants.

The rapid evolution of end-to-end spoken dialogue systems demands transcending mere textual semantics to incorporate paralinguistic nuances and the spontaneous nature of human conversation. However, current methods struggle with two critical gaps: the modality gap, involving prosody and emotion, and the colloquialness gap, distinguishing written scripts from natural speech. To address these challenges, we introduce SDiaReward, an end-to-end multi-turn reward model trained on SDiaReward-Dataset, a novel collection of episode-level preference pairs explicitly targeting these gaps. It operates directly on full multi-turn speech episodes and is optimized with pairwise preference supervision, enabling joint assessment of modality and colloquialness in a single evaluator. We further establish ESDR-Bench, a stratified benchmark for robust episode-level evaluation. Experiments demonstrate that SDiaReward achieves state-of-the-art pairwise preference accuracy, significantly outperforming general-purpose audio LLMs. Further analysis suggests that SDiaReward captures relative conversational expressiveness beyond superficial synthesis cues, improving generalization across domains and recording conditions.

Automatic radiology report generation (RRG) has emerged as a promising approach to reduce clinicians’ workload, yet existing systems are vulnerable to biases induced by spurious correlations across data, models, and evaluation pipelines. Such biases raise serious fairness concerns and may adversely affect patient care, making their mitigation critical in clinical settings. Leveraging causal inference to identify true cause-effect relationships can mitigate many biases and yield fair, reliable systems with clinically meaningful outputs. Existing surveys on RRG primarily emphasize deep learning approaches while overlooking the critical role of causality. This survey addresses this gap by analyzing bias across the RRG pipeline, formalizing RRG as a causal modeling problem, and reviewing representative causal techniques from the literature. Based on the level of intervention, we organize existing mitigation strategies into a three-tier taxonomy. We further examine commonly used public medical imaging datasets and evaluation metrics through a causal lens, revealing their biases and limitations in capturing causal alignment and clinical fidelity. To address these limitations, we advocate broader demographic coverage and causal-aware evaluation metrics to improve fairness and reliability, and identify important directions for future work.

Text understanding application often suffers from domain shifts. To handle testing domains, domain adaptation (DA) is trained to adapt to a fixed and observed testing domain; a more challenging paradigm, test-time adaptation (TTA), cannot access the testing domain during training and online adapts to the testing samples during testing, where the samples are from a fixed domain. We aim to explore a more practical and underexplored scenario, continual test-time adaptation (CTTA) for text understanding, which involves a sequence of testing (unobserved) domains in testing. Current CTTA methods struggle in reducing error accumulation over domains and enhancing generalization to handle unobserved domains: 1) Noise-filtering reduces accumulated errors but discards useful information, and 2) accumulating historical domains enhances generalization, but it is hard to achieve adaptive accumulation. In this paper, we propose a CTTA-T (continual test-time adaptation for text understanding) framework adaptable to evolving target domains: CTTA-T adopts a teacher-student framework, where the teacher is equipped with domain awareness and generalization for evolving domains. To improve teacher predictions, we propose a refine-then-filter based on dropout-driven consistency, which calibrates predictions and removes unreliable guidance. For the adaptation–generalization trade-off, we construct a domain-aware teacher by dynamically accumulating cross-domain semantics via incremental PCA, which continuously tracks domain shifts. Experiments show CTTA-T excels baselines.

While textual frequency has been validated as relevant to human cognition in reading speed, its relatedness to Large Language Models (LLMs) is seldom studied. We propose a novel research direction in terms of textual data frequency, which is an understudied topic. to the best of our knowledge. Our framework is composed of three units. First, this paper proposes Textual Frequency Law (TFL), which indicates that frequent textual data should be preferred for LLMs for both prompting and fine-tuning. Since many LLMs are closed-source in their training data, we propose using online resources to estimate the sentence-level frequency. We can then use an input paraphraser to paraphrase the input into a more frequent textual expression. Next, we propose Textual Frequency Distillation (TFD) by querying LLMs to conduct story completion by further extending the sentences in the datasets, and the resulting corpora are used to adjust the initial estimation. Finally, we propose Curriculum Textual Frequency Training (CTFT) that fine-tunes LLMs in an increasing order of sentence-level frequency. Experiments are conducted on our curated dataset Textual Frequency Paired Dataset (TFPD) on math reasoning and machine translation. Results indicate the effectiveness of our framework.

Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) has emerged as an important means of enhancing the performance of large language models (LLMs) in knowledge-intensive tasks. However, most existing RAG strategies treat retrieved passages in a flat and unstructured way, which prevents the model from capturing structural cues and constrains its ability to synthesize knowledge from dispersed evidence across documents. To overcome these limitations, we propose Disco-RAG, a discourse-aware framework that explicitly injects discourse signals into the generation process. Our method constructs intra-chunk discourse trees to capture local hierarchies and builds inter-chunk rhetorical graphs to model cross-passage coherence. These structures are jointly integrated into a planning blueprint that conditions the generation. Experiments on question answering and long-document summarization benchmarks show the efficacy of our approach. Disco-RAG achieves state-of-the-art results on the benchmarks without fine-tuning. These findings underscore the important role of discourse structure in advancing RAG systems.

Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models have demonstrated impressive capabilities in generalized robotic control; however, they remain notoriously brittle to linguistic perturbations. We identify a critical "modality collapse” phenomenon where strong visual priors overwhelm sparse linguistic signals, causing agents to overfit to specific instruction phrasings while ignoring the underlying semantic intent. To address this, we propose Residual Semantic Steering (RSS), a probabilistic framework that disentangles physical affordance from semantic execution. RSS introduces two theoretical innovations: (1) Monte Carlo Syntactic Integration, which approximates the true semantic posterior via dense, LLM-driven distributional expansion, and (2) Residual Affordance Steering, a dual-stream decoding mechanism that explicitly isolates the causal influence of language by subtracting the visual affordance prior. Theoretical analysis suggests that RSS effectively maximizes the mutual information between action and intent while suppressing visual distractors. Empirical results across diverse manipulation benchmarks demonstrate that RSS achieves state-of-the-art robustness, maintaining performance even under adversarial linguistic perturbations.

Vision-language models are increasingly employed as multimodal conversational agents (MCAs) for diverse conversational tasks. Recently, reinforcement learning (RL) has been widely explored for adapting MCAs to various human-AI interaction scenarios. Despite showing great enhancement in generalization performance, fine-tuning MCAs via RL still faces challenges in handling the extremely large text token space. To address this, we learn a compact latent action space for RL fine-tuning instead. Specifically, we adopt the learning from observation mechanism to construct the codebook for the latent action space, where future observations are leveraged to estimate current latent actions that could further be used to reconstruct future observations. However, the scarcity of paired image-text data hinders learning a codebook with sufficient coverage. Thus, we leverage both paired image-text data and text-only data to construct the latent action space, using a cross-modal projector for transforming text embeddings into image-text embeddings. We initialize the cross-modal projector on paired image-text data, and further train it on massive text-only data with a novel cycle consistency loss to enhance its robustness. We show that our latent action based method outperforms competitive baselines on two conversation tasks across various RL algorithms. Code and data are available at https://github.com/AlibabaResearch/DAMO-ConvAI/tree/main/MMLatentAction.

Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) significantly enhances Large Language Models (LLMs) by providing access to external knowledge. However, current research primarily focuses on retrieval quality, often overlooking the critical ”integration bottleneck”: even when relevant documents are retrieved, LLMs frequently fail to utilize them effectively due to conflicts with their internal parametric knowledge. In this paper, we argue that implicitly resolving this conflict in a single generation pass is suboptimal. We introduce GuarantRAG, a framework that explicitly decouples reasoning from evidence integration. First, we generate an ”Inner-Answer” based solely on parametric knowledge to capture the model’s reasoning flow. Second, to guarantee faithful evidence extraction, we generate a ”Refer-Answer” using a novel Contrastive DPO objective. This objective treats the parametric Inner-Answer as a negative constraint and the retrieved documents as positive ground truth, forcing the model to suppress internal hallucinations in favor of external evidence during this phase. Finally, rather than naive concatenation or using the DPO trained model directly, we propose a joint decoding mechanism that dynamically fuses the logical coherence of the Inner-Answer with the factual precision of the Refer-Answer at the token level. Experiments on five QA benchmarks demonstrate that GuarantRAG improves accuracy by up to 12.1% and reduces hallucinations by 16.3% compared to standard and dynamic RAG baselines.

Accurate comprehension and controllable generation of emotion and rhetoric are pivotal for enhancing the reasoning capabilities of large language models (LLMs). Existing studies mostly rely on external optimizations, lacking in-depth exploration of internal representation mechanisms, thus failing to achieve fine-grained steering at the neuron level. A handful of works on neurons are confined to emotions, neglecting rhetoric neurons and their intrinsic connections. Traditional neuron masking also exhibits counterintuitive phenomena, making reliable verification of neuron functionality infeasible. To address these issues, we systematically investigate the neurons representation mechanisms and inherent associations of 6 emotion categories and 4 core rhetorical devices. We propose a neuron identification framework that integrates multi-dimensional screening, and design an adaptive masking method incorporating dynamic filtering, attenuation masking, and feedback optimization, enabling reliable functional validation of neuron functionality. Through neuron regulation, we achieve directed induction of non-target sentences and enhancement of emotion tasks via rhetoric neurons. Experiments on 5 commonly used datasets validate the effectiveness of our method, providing a novel paradigm for the fine-grained steering of emotion and rhetoric expressions in LLMs.

Modeling fine-grained speaking styles remains challenging for language-speech representation pre-training, as existing speech-text models are typically trained with coarse captions or task-specific supervision, and scalable fine-grained style annotations are unavailable. We present FCaps, a large-scale dataset with fine-grained free-text style descriptions, encompassing 47k hours of speech and 19M fine-grained captions annotated via a novel end-to-end pipeline that directly grounds detailed captions in audio, thereby avoiding the error propagation caused by LLM-based rewriting in existing cascaded pipelines. Evaluations using LLM-as-a-judge demonstrate that our annotations surpass existing cascaded annotations in terms of correctness, coverage, and naturalness. Building on FCaps, we propose CLSP, a contrastive language-speech pre-trained model that integrates global and fine-grained supervision, enabling unified representations across multiple granularities. Extensive experiments demonstrate that CLSP learns fine-grained and multi-granular speech-text representations that perform reliably across global and fine-grained speech-text retrieval, zero-shot paralinguistic classification, and speech style similarity scoring, with strong alignment to human judgments. Code and dataset are publicly available at https://github.com/yfyeung/CLSP.

Recent efforts to accelerate inference in Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have largely focused on visual token compression. The effectiveness of these methods is commonly evaluated by measuring the accuracy drop on existing MLLM benchmarks before and after compression. However, these benchmarks are originally designed to assess general perception and reasoning abilities, rather than the specific challenges posed by visual token compression, leading to a fundamental task mismatch. In this work, we uncover a counterintuitive yet consistent phenomenon: simple image downsampling outperforms many advanced visual token compression methods across multiple widely used benchmarks. Through a comprehensive empirical study spanning eight popular benchmarks and multiple state-of-the-art compression techniques, we show that (i) current benchmarks contain substantial noise (task-irrelevant samples) for evaluating visual token compression, and (ii) downsampling can act as an effective data filter that distinguishes between simple and difficult samples with respect to compression sensitivity. Motivated by these findings, we propose VTC-Bench, an evaluation framework that explicitly leverages downsampling as a discriminator to denoise existing benchmarks, enabling a fairer and more meaningful additional assessment of visual token compression methods.

We revisit retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) by embedding retrieval control directly into generation. Instead of treating retrieval as an external intervention, we express retrieval decisions within token-level decoding, enabling end-to-end coordination without additional controllers or classifiers. Under the paradigm of Retrieval as Generation, we propose GRIP (Generation-guided Retrieval with Information Planning), a unified framework in which the model regulates retrieval behavior through control-token emission. Central to GRIP is Self-Triggered Information Planning, which allows the model to decide when to retrieve, how to reformulate queries, and when to terminate, all within a single autoregressive trajectory. This design tightly couples retrieval and reasoning and supports dynamic multi-step inference with on-the-fly evidence integration. To supervise these behaviors, we construct a structured training set covering answerable, partially answerable, and multi-hop queries, each aligned with specific token patterns. Experiments on five QA benchmarks show that GRIP surpasses strong RAG baselines and is competitive with GPT-4o while using substantially fewer parameters. Code and resources are provided in the supplementary materials.

Large Language Model safety alignment predominantly operates on a binary assumption that requests are either safe or unsafe. This classification proves insufficient when models encounter ethical dilemmas, where the capacity to reason through moral trade-offs creates a distinct attack surface. We formalize this vulnerability through TRIAL, a multi-turn red-teaming methodology that embeds harmful requests within ethical framings. TRIAL achieves consistently high attack success rates across models by exploiting the model’s own ethical reasoning to frame harmful actions as morally necessary compromises. Building on these insights, we introduce ERR (Ethical Reasoning Robustness), a defense framework that distinguishes between instrumental responses that enable harmful outcomes and explanatory responses that analyze ethical frameworks without endorsing harmful acts. ERR employs a Layer-Stratified Harm-Gated LoRA architecture, achieving robust defense against reasoning-based attacks while preserving model utility.

Large language models have improved dialogue systems, but often process conversational turns in isolation, overlooking the event structures that guide natural interactions. Hence we introduce EventWeave, a framework that explicitly models relationships between conversational events to generate more contextually appropriate dialogue responses. EventWeave constructs a dynamic event graph that distinguishes between core events (main goals) and supporting events (interconnected details), employing a multi-head attention mechanism to selectively determine which events are most relevant to the current turn. Unlike summarization or standard graph-based approaches, our method captures three distinct relationship types between events, allowing for more nuanced context modeling. Experiments on three dialogue datasets demonstrate that EventWeave produces more natural and contextually appropriate responses while requiring less computational overhead than models processing the entire dialogue history. Ablation studies confirm improvements stem from better event relationship modeling rather than increased information density. Our approach effectively balances comprehensive context understanding with generating concise responses, maintaining strong performance across various dialogue lengths through targeted optimization techniques.

Large language models with search capabilities frequently exhibit miscalibrated confidence, producing incorrect answers with high certainty. We present Deliberative Searcher, a reasoning-primary framework that integrates search operations into chain-of-thought generation while maintaining explicit confidence calibration. Our method employs constrained reinforcement learning with adaptive Lagrangian multipliers to jointly optimize correctness and reliability. Experiments across five benchmarks demonstrate substantial improvements: our 7B model reduces average false-certain rates from 54% in baselines to 2%, while our 72B variant achieves competitive accuracy with closed-source models and reduces false-certain rates to 9%. The well-calibrated confidence scores also enable more efficient test-time compute: instead of standard majority voting, we use confidence-weighted aggregation and match the performance of 16-sample majority voting with only 4 samples, a 4× reduction in inference compute. These results establish calibrated confidence as a foundation for both trustworthy outputs and adaptive test-time compute, demonstrating the value of the proposed constrained RL framework in search-augmented language models.

Improving the exploration of reasoning is essential for advancing Large Language Models’ (LLMs) problem-solving performance. Current methods primarily rely on output-level stochasticity, which decode within fixed reasoning patterns of LLM and suffer from insufficient exploration. In this paper, we introduce adjusting attention temperature to directly modulate the model’s internal focus during reasoning, which enables a dynamic shift between exploratory and focused processing. We reveal that moderate adjustments preserve LLM’s reasoning capability while producing problem hardness-dependent benefits: higher temperatures facilitate solving complex tasks by encouraging wider exploration, whereas lower temperatures mitigate overthinking on simpler problems. Leveraging this insight, we propose a two-stage inference strategy: first, attention temperature scaling modulates the LLM’s reasoning patterns to diversify the reasoning traces; then, a difficulty-aware aggregation scheme is introduced to effectively identify the most reliable solution from the generated candidates. Extensive evaluations show that our method improves Pass@10 by 6.78–14.20% and aggregation accuracy by 9.74% across 7 reasoning benchmarks.

Modern software development demands code that is maintainable, testable, and scalable by organizing the implementation into modular components with iterative reuse of existing codes. We formalize this iterative, multi-turn paradigm as codeflow and introduce CodeFlowBench, the first benchmark designed to comprehensively evaluate LLMs’ ability to perform codeflow - implementing new functionality by reusing existing functions over multiple turns. CodeFlowBench comprises two complementary components: CodeFlowBench-Comp, a core collection of 5,000+ competitive programming problems from Codeforces updated via an automated pipeline and CodeFlowBench-Repo, which is sourced from GitHub repositories to better reflect real-world scenarios. Furthermore, a novel evaluation framework featured dual assessment protocol and structural metrics derived from dependency trees is introduced. Extensive experiments reveal significant performance degradation in multi-turn codeflow scenarios. Furthermore, our in-depth analysis illustrates that model performance inversely correlates with dependency complexity. These findings not only highlight the critical challenges for supporting real-world workflows, but also establish CodeFlowBench as an essential tool for advancing code generation research.

The prevalence of fake news on social media calls for automated fact-checking systems that deliver not only accurate verdicts but also faithful explanations. However, existing large language model (LLM)-based methods often overlook deceptive misinformation styles in generated explanations, producing unfaithful rationales that may mislead human judgment. They also rely heavily on external knowledge sources, which can introduce hallucinations and incur substantial latency, undermining both reliability and responsiveness in real-time settings. To address these limitations, we propose REason-guided Fact-checking with Latent EXplanations (REFLEX), a self-refining framework that explicitly controls reasoning style by anchoring explanations to the predicted verdict. REFLEX leverages self-disagreement veracity signals between a backbone model and its fine-tuned variant to construct steering vectors, thereby naturally disentangling factual content from stylistic cues. Experiments on a real-world benchmark show that REFLEX achieves state-of-the-art performance under LLaMA-series models using only 465 self-refined samples. Owing to its transferability, REFLEX also yields gains of up to 7.54 Macro-F1 points on in-the-wild data. Further analysis shows that our method effectively mitigates faithful hallucination, leading to both more reliable explanations and more accurate verdicts than prior explainable fact-checking approaches.

As Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed in real-world settings, correctness alone is insufficient. Reliable deployment requires maintaining truthful beliefs under contextual perturbations. Existing evaluations largely rely on point-wise confidence like Self-Consistency, which can mask brittle belief. We show that even facts answered with perfect self-consistency can rapidly collapse under mild contextual interference. To address this gap, we propose Neighbor-Consistency Belief (NCB), a structural measure of belief robustness that evaluates response coherence across a conceptual neighborhood. To validate the efficiency of NCB, we introduce a new cognitive stress-testing protocol that probes outputs stability under contextual interference. Experiments across multiple LLMs show that the performance of high-NCB data is relatively more resistant to interference. Finally, we present Structure-Aware Training (SAT), which optimizes context-invariant belief structure and reduces long-tail knowledge brittleness by approximately 30%.

Document understanding is critical for applications from financial analysis to scientific discovery. Current approaches, whether OCR-based pipelines feeding Large Language Models (LLMs) or native Multimodal LLMs (MLLMs), face key limitations: the former loses structural detail, while the latter struggles with context modeling. Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) helps ground models in external data, but documents’ multimodal nature, i.e., combining text, tables, charts, and layout, demands a more advanced paradigm: Multimodal RAG. This approach enables holistic retrieval and reasoning across all modalities, unlocking comprehensive document intelligence. Recognizing its importance, this paper presents a systematic survey of Multimodal RAG for document understanding. We propose a taxonomy based on domain, retrieval modality, and granularity, and review advances involving graph structures and agentic frameworks. We also summarize key datasets, benchmarks, and applications, and highlight open challenges in efficiency, fine-grained representation, and robustness, providing a roadmap for future progress in document AI.

Large Language Models (LLMs) have significantly advanced Machine Translation (MT), applying them to linguistically complex domains-such as Social Network Services, literature etc. In these scenarios, translations often require handling non-literal expressions, leading to the inaccuracy of MT metrics. To systematically investigate the reliability of MT metrics, we first curate a meta-evaluation dataset focused on non-literal translations, namely MENT. MENT encompasses four non-literal translation domains and features source sentences paired with translations from diverse MT systems, with 7,530 human-annotated scores on translation quality. Experimental results reveal the inaccuracies of traditional MT metrics and the limitations of LLM-as-a-Judge, particularly the knowledge cutoff and score inconsistency problem. To mitigate these limitations, we propose RATE, a novel agentic translation evaluation framework, centered by a reflective Core Agent that dynamically invokes specialized sub-agents. Experimental results indicate the efficacy of RATE, achieving an improvement of at least 3.2 points in combined system- and segment-level correlation with human judgments compared with current methods. Further experiments demonstrate the robustness of RATE to general-domain MT evaluation. Code and dataset are available at: https://github.com/BITHLP/RATE.

Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR) has markedly enhanced the reasoning abilities of large language models (LLMs). Its success, however, largely depends on strong base models with rich world knowledge, yielding only modest improvements for small-size language models (SLMs). To address this limitation, we investigate Guided GRPO, which injects ground-truth reasoning steps into roll-out trajectories to compensate for SLMs’ inherent weaknesses. Through a comprehensive study of various guidance configurations, we find that naively adding guidance delivers limited gains. These insights motivate G²RPO-A, an adaptive algorithm that automatically adjusts guidance strength in response to the model’s evolving training dynamics. Experiments on mathematical reasoning and code-generation benchmarks confirm that G²RPO-A substantially outperforms vanilla GRPO. Our code and models at available at https://github.com/T-Lab-CUHKSZ/G2RPO-A.

Adapting large language models (LLMs) to low-resource languages (LRLs) is constrained by the scarcity of task data and computational resources. Although Proxy Tuning offers a logit-level strategy for introducing scaling effects, it often fails in LRL settings because the large model’s weak LRL competence might overwhelm the knowledge of specialized smaller models. We thus propose TriMix, a test-time logit fusion framework that dynamically balances capabilities from three different sources: LRL competence from a continually pretrained small model, task competence from high-resource language instruction tuning, and the scaling benefits of large models. It is data- and compute-efficient, requiring no LRL task annotations, and only continual pretraining on a small model. Experiments across four model families and eight LRLs show that TriMix consistently outperforms single-model baselines and Proxy Tuning. Our analysis reveals that prioritizing the small LRL-specialized model’s logits is crucial for success, challenging the prevalent large-model-dominant assumption.

Large language models (LLMs) are powerful at question-answering but prone to hallucinations due to limited domain-specific or up-to-date knowledge. Retrieval augmented generation (RAG) mitigates this by adding an external retriever and knowledge database, yet RAG remains vulnerable to targeted attacks that degrade outputs or manipulate opinions. Prior attacks typically assume adversaries know the service is RAG-enhanced and may even know deployment details, an assumption often invalid for real-world commercial LLMs that expose only black-box APIs.This opacity also risks misleading users about system capabilities. This work aims to bridge this gap by proposing RAG-ID, a framework for  ̲IDentifying  ̲RAG properties in LLM services.We classify adversaries into three knowledge levels and design six attack methods. Experiments show these attacks reliably detect RAG — up to 99.97% accuracy with partial or no optional knowledge, and nearly 100% when the LLM and database are known. After detection, RAG-ID can infer finer RAG properties (e.g., deployed LLM and knowledge database). We consider RAG-ID a reconnaissance tool for attackers, a way to facilitate users’ transparent selection of LLM services, and a guide for RAG developers in refining security measures.

Traditional tabular data synthesis methods often overlook the cross-modal heterogeneity of real-world tables, where structured continuous and discrete attributes coexist with unstructured long-text columns. Existing synthesis approaches struggle to simultaneously achieve accurate statistical fidelity for non-textual attributes and consistent semantic constraints between textual and non-textual attributes. In this work, we establish the first benchmark for long-text tabular data synthesis and introduce a novel metric, termed Textual Column Correlation Fidelity (TCCF), to quantify cross-modal semantic alignment. We propose AFT-Tab, an adversarial fine-tuning framework that synergistically trains an LLM-based text generator and a deep-learning-based non-textual generator. Through a dual-feedback mechanism guided by an LLM discriminator, AFT-Tab ensures both precise statistical distributions and rigorous semantic constraints. Experimental results show that AFT-Tab significantly outperforms state-of-the-art baselines in statistical fidelity, TCCF, diversity, and downstream task utility.

We present SemanticQA, an evaluation suite designed to assess language models (LMs) in semantic phrase processing tasks. The benchmark consolidates existing multiword expression (MwE) resources and reorganizes them into a unified testbed. It covers both general lexical phenomena, such as lexical collocations, and three fine-grained categories: idiomatic expressions, noun compounds, and verbal constructions. Through SemanticQA, we assess LMs of diverse architectures and scales in extraction, classification, and interpretation tasks, as well as sequential task compositions. We reveal substantial performance variation, particularly on tasks requiring semantic reasoning, highlighting differences in reasoning efficacy and semantic understanding of LMs, providing insights for pushing LMs with stronger comprehension on non-trivial semantic phrases. The evaluation harness and data of SemanticQA are available at https://github.com/jacklanda/SemanticQA.

As large language models (LLMs) increasingly tackle complex reasoning tasks, test-time scaling has become critical for enhancing capabilities. However, in agentic scenarios with frequent tool calls, the traditional generation-length-based definition breaks down: tool latency decouples inference time from generation length. We propose Timely Machine, redefining test-time as wall-clock time, where models dynamically adjust strategies based on time budgets. We introduce Timely-Eval, a benchmark spanning high-frequency tool calls, low-frequency tool calls, and time-constrained reasoning. By varying tool latency, we find smaller models excel with fast feedback through more interactions, while larger models dominate high-latency settings via superior interaction quality. Moreover, existing models fail to adapt reasoning to time budgets. We propose Timely-RL to address this gap. After cold-start supervised fine-tuning, we use reinforcement learning to enhance temporal planning. Timely-RL improves time budget awareness and consistently boosts performance across Timely-Eval. We hope our work offers a new perspective on test-time scaling for the agentic era.

Knowledge distillation is crucial for compressing Large Language Models (LLMs), enabling smaller student models to learn from larger teacher models. However, existing LLM distillation methods overly rely on student-generated outputs, which may introduce generation errors and misguide the distillation process. Moreover, existing distillation loss functions struggle to align the most informative part due to the complex output distributions of LLMs. To address these problems, we propose a multi-granularity semantic revision method for LLM distillation. At the sequence level, we propose a sequence correction and re-generation (SCRG) strategy. SCRG identifies error tokens by calculating the semantic cognitive difference between teacher and student outputs, corrects them using teacher-generated tokens, and re-generates the sequence to minimize errors. At the token level, we design a distribution adaptive clipping Kullback-Leibler (DAC-KL) loss, which uses a learnable sub-network to focus on semantically dense areas of the teacher’s output, reducing the impact of redundant information. At the span level, we utilize span priors to compute probability correlations within sequences, ensuring consistency between teacher and student outputs to enhance semantic information transfer. Extensive experiments on models ranging from 0.1B to 13B parameters demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach compared to existing methods.

High-stakes domains such as finance, law, and biomedicine demand both accurate results and rigorous reasoning. Current reinforcement learning paradigms primarily rely on outcome-based rewards, often overlooking latent logical fallacies in intermediate steps. Leveraging the cognitive asymmetry where falsifying local errors is more efficient than generating global correctness, we propose RADO (Reasoning Audit-Driven Optimization). RADO introduces a specialized audit model augmented with external tools to identify local logical ruptures and calibrate reward signals. By integrating Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) with Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO), our framework enables explicit supervision over reasoning paths. Experimental results demonstrate that RADO consistently improves final accuracy while significantly enhancing logical rigor in high-stakes domains.

Instruction tuning relies on large instruction–response corpora whose quality and composition strongly affect downstream performance. We propose Answer Divergence-Guided Selection (ADG), which selects instruction data based on the geometric structure of multi-sample outputs. ADG draws several high-temperature generations per instruction, maps responses into an embedding space, and computes an output divergence score that jointly encodes dispersion magnitude and shape anisotropy. High scores correspond to instructions whose answers are both far apart and multi-modal, rather than clustered paraphrases along a single direction. Across two backbones and three public instruction pools, fine-tuning on only 10K ADG-selected examples consistently outperforms strong selectors on six benchmarks spanning reasoning, knowledge, and coding. Analyses further show that both dispersion magnitude and shape anisotropy are necessary, supporting answer divergence as a practical signal for instruction data selection. Code and appendix are included in the supplementary materials.

Safety alignment—training large language models (LLMs) to refuse harmful requests while remaining helpful—is critical for responsible deployment. Prior work established that safety behaviors are governed by low-rank structures, suggesting parameter-efficient fine-tuning (PEFT) should be well-suited for alignment. However, Low-Rank Adaptation (LoRA) consistently underperforms full fine-tuning and reinforcement learning on safety benchmarks. We attribute this gap to semantic entanglement: safety-relevant directions are intertwined with unrelated concepts due to polysemanticity, impeding implicit subspace identification. To address this, we propose SAILS (Safety Alignment via Interpretable Low-rank Subspace), which leverages Sparse Autoencoders (SAEs) to disentangle representations into monosemantic features, constructs an interpretable safety subspace from SAE decoder directions, and uses it to initialize LoRA adapters. Theoretically, we prove that SAE-based identification achieves arbitrarily small recovery error under monosemanticity assumptions, while direct identification suffers an irreducible error floor. Empirically, SAILS achieves up to 99.6% safety rates across multiple model families and scales, exceeding full fine-tuning and matching RLHF-based models, with only 0.2% of parameters updated and providing interpretability.

Recent search-augmented LLMs trained with reinforcement learning (RL) can interleave searching and reasoning for multi-hop reasoning tasks. However, they face two critical failure modes as the accumulating context becomes flooded with both crucial evidence and irrelevant information: (1) ineffective search chain construction that produces incorrect queries or omits retrieval of critical information, and (2) reasoning hijacking by peripheral evidence that causes models to misidentify distractors as valid evidence.To address these challenges, we propose **D²Plan**, a **D**ual-agent **D**ynamic global **Plan**ning paradigm for complex retrieval-augmented reasoning. D²Plan operates through the collaboration of a *Reasoner* and a *Purifier*: the *Reasoner* constructs explicit global plans during reasoning and dynamically adapts them based on retrieval feedback; the *Purifier* assesses retrieval relevance and condenses key information for the *Reasoner*.We further introduce a two-stage training framework consisting of supervised fine-tuning (SFT) cold-start on synthesized trajectories and RL with plan-oriented rewards to teach LLMs to master the D²Plan paradigm. Extensive experiments demonstrate that D²Plan enables more coherent multi-step reasoning and stronger resilience to irrelevant information, thereby achieving superior performance on challenging QA benchmarks.

Language models often struggle to follow multi-constraint instructions that are crucial for real-world applications. Existing reinforcement learning (RL) approaches suffer from dependency on external supervision and sparse reward signals from multi-constraint tasks. We propose a label-free self-supervised RL framework that eliminates dependency on external supervision by deriving reward signals directly from instructions and generating pseudo-labels for reward model training. Our approach introduces constraint decomposition strategies and efficient constraint-wise binary classification to address sparse reward challenges while maintaining computational efficiency. Experiments show that our approach generalizes well, achieving strong improvements across 3 in-domain and 5 out-of-domain datasets, including challenging agentic and multi-turn instruction following. We will open-source our code and data to facilitate future research.

Scaling large language models (LLMs) improves performance but significantly increases inference costs, with feed-forward networks (FFNs) consuming the majority of computational resources. While Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) architectures can reduce this cost through sparse activation, restructuring existing dense models into MoEs typically requires extensive retraining on hundreds of billions of tokens.We propose an analytical post-training framework that rapidly restructures FFNs into sparse MoE architectures using only a small calibration dataset. The method analyzes neuron activation patterns to partition neurons into always-active shared experts and conditionally activated routed experts, then constructs a router analytically from representative neuron statistics, enabling immediate deployment or optional lightweight fine-tuning. This approach applies both to dense models and recursively to existing MoE models for hierarchical sparsity.Experiments demonstrate up to 1.17× speedup in compute-bound scenarios with only minutes of processing and 2k-sample fine-tuning, outperforming methods requiring orders of magnitude more resources.

Large Language Models (LLMs) suffer from order bias, where their performance is affected by the arrangement order of input elements. This unfairness limits the model’s applications in scenarios such as in-context learning and Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG). Recent studies attempt to obtain optimal or suboptimal arrangements based on statistical results or using dataset-based search, but these methods increase inference overhead while leaving the model’s inherent order bias unresolved. Other studies mitigate order sensitivity through supervised fine-tuning using augmented training sets with multiple order variants, but often at the cost of accuracy, trapping the model in consistent yet incorrect hallucinations. In this paper, we propose Dual Group Advantage Optimization (DGAO), which aims to improve model accuracy and order stability simultaneously. DGAO calculates and balances intra-group relative accuracy advantage and inter-group relative stability advantage, rewarding the policy model for generating order-stable and correct outputs while penalizing order-sensitive or incorrect responses. This marks the first time reinforcement learning has been used to mitigate LLMs’ order sensitivity. We also propose two new metrics, Consistency Rate and Overconfidence Rate, to reveal the pseudo-stability of previous methods and guide more comprehensive evaluation. Extensive experiments demonstrate that DGAO achieves superior order fairness while improving performance on RAG, mathematical reasoning, and classification tasks. Our code is available at: https://anonymous.4open.science/r/DGAO-A481/

Post-hoc explanations provide transparency and are essential for guiding model optimization, such as prompt engineering and data sanitation. However, applying model-agnostic techniques to Large Language Models (LLMs) is hindered by prohibitive computational costs, rendering these tools dormant for real-world applications. To revitalize model-agnostic interpretability, we propose a budget-friendly proxy framework that leverages efficient models to approximate the decision boundaries of expensive LLMs. We introduce a screen-and-apply mechanism to statistically verify local alignment before deployment. Our empirical evaluation confirms that proxy explanations achieve over 90% fidelity with only 9.5% of the oracle’s cost. Building on this foundation, we demonstrate the actionable utility of our framework in prompt compression and poisoned example removal. Results show that reliable proxy explanations effectively guide optimization, transforming interpretability from a passive observation tool into a scalable primitive for LLM development. Additionally, we open-source code and datasets to facilitate future research.

Medical calculators are fundamental to quantitative, evidence-based clinical practice. However, their real-world use is an adaptive, multi-stage process, requiring proactive EHR data acquisition, scenario-dependent calculator selection, and multi-step computation, whereas current benchmarks focus only on static single-step calculations with explicit instructions. To address these limitations, we introduce MedMCP-Calc, the first benchmark for evaluating LLMs in realistic medical calculator scenarios through Model Context Protocol (MCP) integration. MedMCP-Calc comprises 118 scenario tasks across 4 clinical domains, featuring fuzzy task descriptions mimicking natural queries, structured EHR database interaction, external reference retrieval, and process-level evaluation. Our evaluation of 23 leading models reveals critical limitations: even top performers like GPT-5 exhibit substantial gaps, including difficulty selecting appropriate calculators for end-to-end workflows given fuzzy queries, poor performance in iterative SQL-based database interactions, and marked reluctance to leverage external tools for numerical computation. Performance also varies considerably across clinical domains. Building on these findings, we develop CalcMate, a fine-tuned model incorporating scenario planning and tool augmentation, achieving state-of-the-art performance among open-source models.

Temporal language does more than place events on a timeline. In news discourse, references to the past, present, and future can function as rhetorical devices that shape interpretation and persuasion. Here, we study temporal framing, defined as the persuasive use of time-related language to structure meaning rather than to report chronology. We propose a taxonomy of eight temporal frames grounded in prior work on temporality and framing, and we realize it through expert annotation of a multilingual news corpus. The resulting dataset includes 458 English and German news articles, with over 2K temporally framed sentences and approximately 3K temporal framing annotations identified from a corpus of more than 20K sentences. We analyze frame prevalence, co-occurrence patterns, and lexical cues, and evaluate temporal framing detection using supervised fine-tuning and zero-shot classification. Our experiments show that temporal framing is learnable at the sentence level, with supervised models substantially outperforming zero-shot approaches. We publicly release the corpus to support future research on temporal framing: https://mbzuai-nlp.github.io/temporal-framing/.

Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have achieved strong performance on vision-language tasks, yet often fail to preserve and effectively leverage visual evidence throughout generation. We identify three fundamental types of visual grounding failures: Long-Context Grounding Error, where visual information gradually decays over long sequences; Fine-Grained Grounding Error, where low-resolution or degraded inputs hinder the recovery of detailed visual information; and Regional Grounding Error, where spatially diffuse attention weakens region-level vision-language alignment. To address these issues, we propose a tool-augmented reasoning framework with three targeted compensation strategies: reuse, which re-injects the original image to mitigate visual forgetting; focus_area, which constrains attention to task-relevant regions; and zoom_in, which enhances visual resolution for fine-grained perception. We further construct the TWI-Tools-146K dataset and develop Simple-VGC, a tool-augmented MLLM that interleaves visual and textual tokens. Extensive experiments show that each tool yields targeted improvements for its corresponding grounding error, while their combination produces synergistic gains in visual reasoning. Beyond performance, our analysis provides mechanistic insights into how tool-based interventions improve visual grounding, pointing toward more reliable multimodal reasoning.

Lexical Relation Mining (LRM) aims to identify and classify lexical relations between word pairs. In this paper, we focus on two subtypes of LRM: Lexical Relation Classification (LRC) and Lexical Entailment (LE). Existing top-performing methods for them rely heavily on Pre-trained Language Models (PLMs) yet fail to distinguish nuanced lexical relations. From a linguistic perspective, intralexical tree-structured sememe information can reflect interlexical relations. Inspired by this, we are motivated to explore leveraging such structured knowledge to enhance LRC and LE. We first propose an automated Sememe Tree Construction (STC) pipeline to predict sememe trees; Then, we present the SememeLRM method to fully leverage structured sememe knowledge; Experimental results show that it achieves a notable 1.6% improvement on average across benchmarks, even outperforming Large Language Model (LLM)-based methods that contain 20 times more parameters on most benchmarks. Further results also suggest that sememe trees predicted by our pipeline can rival the gold-standard in HowNet, extending their applicability to lexico-semantic computing. Overall, this paper presents a potentially generalizable framework for leveraging complete sememe trees and makes significant progress, helping to unlock the value of such intralexical knowledge in downstream tasks.

Vision-Language Models (VLMs) excel at many multimodal tasks, yet they frequently struggle with tasks requiring precise understanding and handling of fine-grained visual elements. This is mainly due to information loss during image encoding or insufficient attention to critical regions. Recent work has shown promise by incorporating pixel-level visual information into the reasoning process, enabling VLMs to access high-resolution visual details during their thought process. However, this pixel-level information is often overused, leading to inefficiency and distraction from irrelevant visual details. To address these challenges, we propose the first framework for adaptive pixel reasoning that dynamically determines necessary pixel-level operations based on the input query. Specifically, we first apply operation-aware supervised fine-tuning to establish baseline competence in textual reasoning and visual operations, then design a novel rollout-guided reinforcement learning framework relying on feedback of the model’s own responses, which enables the VLM to determine when pixel operations should be invoked based on query difficulty. Experiments on extensive multimodal reasoning benchmarks show that our model achieves superior performance while significantly reducing unnecessary visual operations. Impressively, our model achieves 73.4% accuracy on HR-Bench 4K while maintaining a tool usage ratio of only 20.1%, improving accuracy and simultaneously reducing tool usage by 66.5% compared to the previous methods.

Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) scales capacity via conditional computation, but Transformers lack a native knowledge lookup primitive. We introduce conditional memory, instantiated via Deep Sparse Embedding (DSE), which indexes a massive embedding table using local n-grams for retrieval. We formalize sparsity allocation problem—how to split a fixed parameter budget between MoE experts and DSE memory—and find a U-shaped scaling law that identifies an optimal balance. Scaling to 27B parameters, DSE outperform an iso-parameter and iso-FLOPs MoE baseline across knowledge and reasoning benchmarks, and achieve markedly stronger long-context performance. Mechanistic analyses show that DSE offloads early-layer static recall into memory, freeing effective depth and attention for higher-level reasoning. DSE is also infrastructure-efficient: its deterministic hashing enables offloading massive parameters into host memory during inference with negligible throughput overhead.

The widespread adoption of Large Language Models (LLMs) has raised significant privacy concerns regarding the exposure of personally identifiable information (PII) in user prompts. To address this challenge, we propose a query-unrelated PII masking strategy and introduce PII-Bench, the first comprehensive evaluation framework for assessing privacy protection systems. PII-Bench comprises 2,842 test samples across 7 PII types with 55 fine-grained subcategories, featuring diverse scenarios from single-subject descriptions to complex multi-party interactions. Each sample is carefully crafted with a user query, context description, and standard answer indicating query-relevant PII. Our empirical evaluation reveals that while current models perform adequately in basic PII detection, they show significant limitations in determining PII query relevance. Even advanced LLMs struggle with this task, particularly in handling complex multi-subject scenarios, indicating substantial room for improvement in achieving intelligent PII masking.

Large language models (LLM) often hallucinate, and while adding citations is a common solution, it is frequently insufficient for accountability as users struggle to verify how a cited source supports a generated claim. Existing methods are typically coarse-grained and fail to distinguish between direct quotes and complex reasoning. In this paper, we introduce Generation-time Fine-grained Provenance, a task where models must generate fluent answers while simultaneously producing structured, sentence-level provenance triples. To enable this, we present ReFInE (Relation-aware Fine-grained Interpretability Evidence), a dataset featuring expert-verified annotations that distinguish between Quotation, Compression, and Inference. Building on ReFInE, we propose GenProve, a framework that combines Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT) with Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO). By optimizing a composite reward for answer fidelity and provenance correctness, GenProve significantly outperforms 14 strong LLMs in joint evaluation. Crucially, our analysis uncovers a reasoning gap where models excel at surface-level quotation but struggle significantly with inference-based provenance, suggesting that verifiable reasoning remains a frontier challenge distinct from surface-level citation.

Evaluating meeting effectiveness is crucial for improving organizational productivity. Current approaches rely on post-hoc surveys that yield a single coarse-grained score for an entire meeting. The reliance on manual assessment is inherently limited in scalability, cost, and reproducibility. Moreover, a single score fails to capture the dynamic nature of collaborative discussions. We propose a new paradigm for evaluating meeting effectiveness centered on novel criteria and temporal fine-grained approach. We define effectiveness as the rate of objective achievement over time and assess it for individual topical segments within a meeting. To support this task, we introduce the AMI Meeting Effectiveness (AMI-ME) dataset, a new meta-evaluation dataset containing 2,459 human-annotated segments from 130 AMI Corpus meetings. We also develop an automatic effectiveness evaluation framework that uses a Large Language Model (LLM) as a judge to score each segment’s effectiveness relative to the overall meeting objectives. Through substantial experiments, we establish a comprehensive benchmark for this new task and evaluate the framework’s generalizability across distinct meeting types, ranging from business scenarios to unstructured discussions. Furthermore, we benchmark end-to-end performance starting from raw speech to measure the capabilities of a complete system. Our results validate the framework’s effectiveness and provide strong baselines to facilitate future research in meeting analysis and multi-party dialogue. Our dataset and code will be publicly available.

Recent advances in large language models (LLMs) enable agentic systems trained with reinforcement learning (RL) over multi-turn interaction, but practical deployment is bottlenecked by rapidly growing textual histories that inflate token and memory costs. We introduce AgentOCR, a framework that exploits visual tokens’ superior information density by representing the accumulated observation-action history as a compact rendered image. To make multi-turn rollouts scalable, AgentOCR proposes segment optical caching. By decomposing history into hashable segments and maintaining a visual cache, this mechanism eliminates redundant re-rendering. Beyond fixed rendering, AgentOCR introduces agentic self-compression, where the agent actively emits a compression rate and is trained with compression-aware reward to adaptively balance task success and token efficiency. We conduct extensive experiments on challenging agentic benchmarks, ALFWorld and search-based QA. Remarkably, AgentOCR preserves over 95% of text-based agent performance while substantially reducing token consumption (>50%), yielding consistent token and memory efficiency. Further analysis validates a 20× rendering speedup from optical caching and effective self-compression balancing. Our code is available at https://github.com/langfengQ/AgentOCR.

Large Language Models (LLMs) increasingly rely on external tools to perform complex, realistic tasks, yet their ability to utilize the rapidly expanding Model Contextual Protocol (MCP) ecosystem remains limited. Existing MCP research covers few servers, depends on costly manual curation, and lacks training support, hindering progress toward real-world deployment. To overcome these limitations, we introduce MCP-Flow, an automated web-agent-driven pipeline for large-scale server discovery, data synthesis, and model training. MCP-Flow collects and filters data from 1166 servers and 11536 tools, producing 68733 high-quality instruction-function call pairs and 6439 trajectories, far exceeding prior work in scale and diversity. Extensive experiments demonstrate MCP-Flow’s effectiveness in driving superior MCP tool selection, function-call generation, and enhanced agentic task performance. MCP-Flow thus provides a scalable foundation for advancing LLM agents’ proficiency in real-world MCP environments.

Debt collection is a critical negotiation task in the financial industry, with strong practical relevance and exceptional academic value as a behaviorally rich, high-stakes testbed for human-centered dialogue systems. While large language models (LLMs) have shown promise in dialogue and negotiation, effectively evaluating their performance in this complex scenarios remains a major challenge: existing benchmarks uniformly assume users to be static, rational agents with fixed preferences, failing to capture the rich behavioral heterogeneity inherent in real-world debt collection. To bridge this gap, we propose DebtBench, the first public persona-enriched debt collection benchmark, that highlights behavioral heterogeneity in negotiation. Moreover, we develop DebtGPT, a debt collection agent trained to jointly optimize financial recovery and interaction experience. Our experimental results, using 16 state-of-the-art LLMs, find that most existing models struggle in this complex but realistic scenarios, whereas DebtGPT outperforms all open-source baselines and achieves performance on par with GPT-4o. The code and data are available at https://github.com/yyuhhhh13/DebtNegotiation.

Community Notes, the crowd-sourced misinformation governance system on X (formerly Twitter), allows users to flag misleading posts, attach contextual notes, and rate the notes’ helpfulness. However, our empirical analysis of 30.8K health-related notes reveals substantial latency, with a median delay of 17.6 hours before notes receive a helpfulness status. To improve responsiveness during real-world misinformation surges, we propose CrowdNotes+, a unified LLM-based framework that augments Community Notes for faster and more reliable health misinformation governance. CrowdNotes+ integrates two modes: (1) evidence-grounded note augmentation and (2) utility-guided note automation, supported by a hierarchical three-stage evaluation of relevance, correctness, and helpfulness. We instantiate the framework with HealthNotes, a benchmark of 1.2K health notes annotated for helpfulness, and a fine-tuned helpfulness judge. Our analysis first uncovers a key loophole in current crowd-sourced governance: voters frequently conflate stylistic fluency with factual accuracy. Addressing this via our hierarchical evaluation, experiments across 15 representative LLMs demonstrate that CrowdNotes+ significantly outperforms human contributors in note correctness, helpfulness, and evidence utility.

Reliable confidence is essential for trusting the outputs of LLMs, yet widely deployed post-trained LLMs (PoLLMs) typically compromise this trust with severe overconfidence. In contrast, we observe that their corresponding base LLMs often remain well-calibrated. This naturally motivates us to calibrate PoLLM confidence using the base LLM as a reference. This work proposes two ways to achieve this. A straightforward solution, BaseCal-ReEval, evaluates PoLLM’s responses by feeding them into the base LLM to get average probabilities as confidence. While effective, this approach introduces additional inference overhead. To address this, we propose BaseCal-Proj, which trains a lightweight projection to map the final-layer hidden states of PoLLMs back to those of their base LLMs. These projected states are then processed by the base LLM’s output layer to derive base-calibrated confidence for PoLLM’s responses. Notably, BaseCal is an unsupervised, plug-and-play solution that operates without human labels or LLM modifications. Experiments across five datasets and three LLM families demonstrate the effectiveness of BaseCal, reducing Expected Calibration Error (ECE) by an average of 42.90% compared to the best unsupervised baselines.

The misuse of large language models (LLMs) requires precise detection of synthetic text. Existing works mainly follow binary or ternary classification settings, which can only distinguish pure human/LLM text or collaborative text at best. This remains insufficient for the nuanced regulation, as the LLM-polished human text and humanized LLM text often trigger different policy consequences. In this paper, we explore fine-grained LLM-generated text detection under a rigorous four-class setting. To handle such complexities, we propose RACE (Rhetorical Analysis for Creator-Editor Modeling), a fine-grained detection method that characterizes the distinct signatures of creator and editor. Specifically, RACE utilizes Rhetorical Structure Theory (RST) to construct a logic graph for the creator’s foundation while extracting Elementary Discourse Unit (EDU)-level features for the editor’s style. Experiments show that RACE outperforms 12 baselines in identifying fine-grained types with low false alarms, offering a policy-aligned solution for LLM regulation.

Strategic planning is critical for multi-step reasoning, yet compact Language Language Models (LLMs) often lack the capacity to formulate global strategies, leading to error propagation in long-horizon tasks. Our analysis reveals that LLMs possess latent reasoning capabilities that can be unlocked when conditioned on explicit plans from a teacher model; however, runtime reliance on external guidance is often impractical due to latency and availability constraints. To bridge this gap, we propose PILOT (Planning via Internalized Latent Optimization Trajectories), a non-invasive framework designed to internalize the strategic oversight of large models into intrinsic Latent Guidance. Instead of altering backbone weights, PILOT employs a lightweight Hyper-Network to synthesize a query-conditioned Latent Guidance. This vector acts as an internal steering mechanism, guiding the model’s representations toward optimal reasoning paths. Extensive experiments on mathematical and coding benchmarks demonstrate that PILOT effectively stabilizes reasoning trajectories, consistently outperforming strong baselines (e.g., +8.9% on MATH500) with negligible inference latency. Our code is available at: https://anonymous.4open.science/r/PILOT-B266

Current critic-free RL methods for large reasoning models suffer from severe inefficiency when training on positive homogeneous prompts (where all rollouts are correct), resulting in waste of rollouts due to zero advantage estimates. We introduce a radically simple yet powerful solution to Mine intrinsic mastery (Miner), that repurposes the policy’s intrinsic uncertainty as a self-supervised reward signal, with no external supervision, auxiliary models, or additional inference cost. Our method pioneers two key innovations: (1) a token-level focal credit assignment mechanism that dynamically amplifies gradients on critical uncertain tokens while suppressing overconfident ones, and (2) adaptive advantage calibration to seamlessly integrate intrinsic and verifiable rewards. Evaluated across six reasoning benchmarks on Qwen3-4B and Qwen3-8B base models, Miner achieves state-of-the-art performance among the other four algorithms, yielding up to 4.58 absolute gains in Pass@1 and 6.66 gains in Pass@K compared to GRPO. Comparison with other methods targeted at exploration enhancement further discloses the superiority of the two newly proposed innovations. This demonstrates that latent uncertainty exploitation is both necessary and sufficient for efficient and scalable RL training of reasoning models. Code is available at https://github.com/pixas/Miner.

Computational argumentation has received increasing attention in recent years. However, existing debate datasets neglect some important labels for argument mining, generation, and evaluation. Meanwhile, the lack of comprehensively annotated Chinese oral debate datasets hinders progress in this field. To address these gaps, we introduce a comprehensive Chinese Evaluation Dataset for Computational Argumentation, named CEDAR. Compared to previous datasets, CEDAR includes the essential labels of computational argumentation (claim, stance, evidence) and five additional crucial labels: rhetorical figures, debater roles, modal words, utterance time, and debate results. Moreover, it offers complete transcripts of each debate, including speeches from the Pro and Con sides. Thus, the proposed CEDAR not only supports common argument mining and generation tasks, but also provides resources for rhetorical figure detection, argument quality evaluation, and debate result prediction. This dataset covers 600 debates about 318 topics from Chinese debate competitions. Besides providing a dataset for research, we conduct experiments on common computational argument tasks and a novel task (rhetorical figure detection), in which we also evaluate LLMs. The experimental results highlight the challenging nature of the dataset. Our corpus is available at https://github.com/VelikayaScarlet/CEDAR.

The rapid advancement of multimodal large language models (MLLMs) offers new opportunities for complex scientific challenges, yet their application in earth science—especially at the graduate level—remains underexplored due to a lack of benchmarks reflecting the depth and complexity of geoscientific reasoning. Existing datasets often rely on synthetic data or simple figure-caption pairs, failing to capture the nuanced reasoning required for real-world applications. To address this, we introduce MSEarth, a multimodal scientific dataset and benchmark curated from high-quality, open-access publications. Covering the five major spheres of Earth science—atmosphere, cryosphere, hydrosphere, lithosphere, and biosphere—MSEarth features over 289K figures with refined captions enriched by contextual discussions and reasoning from the original papers. The benchmark supports tasks such as scientific figure captioning, multiple choice questions, and open-ended reasoning, providing a scalable, high-fidelity resource for developing and evaluating MLLMs in scientific reasoning.

Large reasoning models (LRMs) achieve strong performance on complex reasoning tasks but often generate harmful responses to malicious user queries. This paper investigates the underlying cause of these safety risks and shows that the issue lies in the reasoning structure itself. Based on this insight, we claim that effective safety alignment can be achieved by altering the reasoning structure. We propose AltTrain, a simple yet effective post-training method that explicitly alters the reasoning structure of LRMs. AltTrain is both practical and generalizable, requiring no complex reinforcement learning (RL) training or reward design—only supervised fine-tuning (SFT) with a lightweight 1K training examples. Experiments across LRM backbones and model sizes demon strate strong safety alignment, along with robust generalization across reasoning, QA, summarization, and multilingual setting.

Backchannels and fillers are important linguistic expressions in dialogue, but often treated as "noise" to be bypassed in modern transformer-based language models. Our work studies the representation of them in language models using three fine-tuning strategies. The models are trained on three dialogue corpora in English and Japanese, where backchannels and fillers are preserved and annotated, to investigate how fine-tuning can help LMs learn their representations. We first apply clustering analysis to the learnt representation of backchannels and fillers, and have found increased silhouette scores in representations from fine-tuned models, which suggests that fine-tuning enables LMs to distinguish the nuanced semantic variation in different backchannel and filler use. We also use natural language generation (NLG) metrics and qualitative analysis to confirm that the utterances generated by fine-tuned language models resemble human-produced utterances more closely. Our findings suggest the potentials of transforming general LMs into conversational LMs that are more capable of producing human-like languages adequately.

Diffusion models (DMs) have recently exhibited impressive generation capability. However, their training generally requires huge computational resources and large-scale datasets. To solve these, recent studies empower DMs with Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG), yielding retrieval-augmented diffusion models (RDMs) that enhance performance with reduced parameters. Despite the success, RAG may introduce novel security issues that warrant further investigation. In this paper, we propose BadRDM, the first poisoning framework targeting RDMs, to systematically investigate their vulnerability to backdoor attacks. Our framework fully considers RAG’s characteristics by manipulating the retrieved items for specific text triggers to ultimately control the generated outputs. Specifically, we first insert a tiny portion of images into the retrieval database as target toxicity surrogates. We then exploit the contrastive learning mechanism underlying retrieval models by designing a malicious variant that establishes robust shortcuts from triggers to toxicity surrogates. In addition, we introduce novel entropy-based selection and generative augmentation strategies for better toxicity surrogates. Extensive experiments on two mainstream tasks show that the proposed method achieves outstanding attack effects while preserving benign utility. Notably, BadRDM remains effective even under common defense strategies, further highlighting serious security concerns for RDMs.

Conversation derailment prediction represents a new paradigm of toxicity detection, where a system predicts from the start of a conversation whether it will derail into toxic exchanges, allowing moderators and users to act preemptively before harm is done. This approach requires a deep understanding of conversation dynamics. Previous work relies on linguistic features rooted in linguistic and social theories. While these features provide signals of conversation dynamics, they are exploratory in nature and potentially reflect a fraction of the overall pragmatic devices shaping the conversation trajectory. To capture the pragmatic dimension of conversations systematically, we start with a framework for annotating pragmatic information of conversations systematically and design summary generation methods to capture conversation trajectory dynamically. We achieve about 10% performance increase over a simple baseline, and 6.47% increase over a strong baseline on a dataset, and a slight performance increase on a benchmark dataset for the task of summarizing conversation dynamics.

In recent years, CLIP-based text-video retrieval methods have developed rapidly, with research focusing on constructing diverse features and achieving effective interactions. However, the asymmetry of cross-modal information poses a challenge to accurately establishing retrieval relationships. To overcome this challenge, we propose a novel video retrieval framework, termed the Dual-Pathway and Dual-View model (DPDV), which consists of the Dual-Pathway Partitioning Module (DPPM) for constructing features at an appropriate granularity and the Dual-View Interaction Module (DVIM) for performing effective feature interactions. For DPPM, we simulate a human macro-level cognitive perspective by partitioning visual features into two categories based on their relevance to the text query and supplementing less relevant features with additional textual information. For DVIM, we simulate a human alignment strategy from macro to micro levels, focusing on local visual features while comprehensively modeling fine-grained interactions. We evaluate DPDV on five benchmark datasets, achieving leading retrieval performance.

The rapid development of large language models (LLMs) has extended text generation tasks into the literary domain. However, AI-generated literary creations has raised increasingly prominent issues of creative authenticity and ethics in literary world, making the detection of LLM-generated literary texts essential and urgent. While previous works have made significant progress in detecting AI-generated text, it has yet to address classical Chinese poetry. Due to the unique linguistic features of classical Chinese poetry, such as strict metrical regularity, a shared system of poetic imagery, and flexible syntax, distinguishing whether a poem is authored by AI presents a substantial challenge. To address these issues, we introduce ChangAn, a benchmark for detecting LLM-generated classical Chinese poetry that containing total 30,664 poems, 10,276 are human-written poems and 20,388 poems are generated by four popular LLMs. Based on ChangAn, we conducted a systematic evaluation of 12 AI detectors, investigating their performance variations across different text granularities and generation strategies. Our findings highlight the limitations of current Chinese text detectors, which fail to serve as reliable tools for detecting LLM-generated classical Chinese poetry. These results validate the effectiveness and necessity of our proposed ChangAn benchmark. Our dataset and code are available at https://github.com/VelikayaScarlet/ChangAn.

Large language models (LLMs) often produce incorrect or outdated content. Updating their knowledge efficiently and accurately without costly retraining is a major challenge. This problem is particularly challenging for complex, unstructured knowledge in lifelong settings, where many edits must coexist without interference. We introduce **RILKE** (**R**epresentation **I**ntervention for **L**ifelong **K**nowledg**E** Control), a robust and scalable method that treats knowledge control as interventions within the model’s representation space. Leveraging representation-space expressiveness, we identify two key properties enabling RILKE to achieve fine-grained control over complex, unstructured knowledge while maintaining general utility with frozen base weights. During training, RILKE learns paraphrase-robust and edit-localized modules that limit each update to a low-dimensional subspace to minimize cross-edit interference. In inference, a query-adaptive router selects the appropriate module to guide the model’s generation. Across LLaMA and Qwen models, RILKE scales effectively to large-scale benchmarks, demonstrating high edit success and strong paraphrase generalization while preserving general utility with modest memory overhead. These results show RILKE is an effective and scalable solution for lifelong knowledge control in LLMs.

Large language models (LLMs) have achieved remarkable success across diverse tasks through large-scale pretraining. However, they remain prone to catastrophic forgetting in continual learning. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first work to identify noise accumulation in LoRA updates as a key cause of forgetting in continual learning. A preliminary two-task experiment demonstrates that removing less important components of the second task’s LoRA parameters improves performance on the first task, suggesting that later updates introduce noisy interference. Building on this insight, we propose **S**ubspace-Denoised **Lo**w-**R**ank **A**daptation (**SLoRA**), a simple and effective framework that filters noisy components from LoRA updates via subspace similarity with the base model. SLoRA is a regularization-free method without accessing data or gradients from previous tasks or modifying the training process. It offers two variants, SLoRA-Pre and SLoRA-Post, for online and offline continual learning, respectively. Extensive experiments across tasks and models validate the effectiveness of SLoRA. It improves final accuracy by up to 12%, reduces forgetting by 29%, and filters out over 30% of LoRA parameters identified as noisy. Our code is available at https://github.com/alina1031/SLoRA.

While Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) have demonstrated remarkable proficiency in image captioning, existing research primarily focuses on real-world scenarios, leaving surreal, highly stylized, and semantically hybrid virtual-world scenarios significantly underexplored. In this work, we introduce Game Character Captioning, a novel task designed to evaluate LVLMs’ capability to perceive and describe game character from the virtual-world. To facilitate evaluation, we establish GC-Bench, a manually annotated benchmark, and propose Graph-F1 to effectively assess performance on this task. Our evaluation reveals that: (1) current state-of-the-art LVLMs, including closed-source giants such as and , struggle to maintain the high performance seen in real-world scenarios; and (2) a notable gap exists between open-source and closed-source models. To bridge this gap, we construct GC-148K, a large-scale dataset generated via a specialized data pipeline, and develop the G-Cap series. Experiments demonstrate that G-Cap series rivals the performance of advanced closed-source models at a lower cost, offering an efficient solution for industrial-grade production environment.

Existing cultural commonsense benchmarks treat nations as monolithic, assuming uniform practices within national boundaries. But does cultural commonsense hold uniformly within a nation, or does it vary at the sub-national level? We introduce **Indica**, the first benchmark designed to test LLMs’ ability to address this question, focusing on India—a nation of 28 states, 8 union territories, and 22 official languages. We collect human-annotated answers from five Indian regions (North, South, East, West, and Central) across 515 questions spanning 8 domains of everyday life, yielding 1,630 region-specific question-answer pairs. Strikingly, only 39.4% of questions elicit agreement across all five regions, demonstrating that cultural commonsense in India is predominantly regional, not national. We evaluate eight state-of-the-art LLMs and find two critical gaps: models achieve only 13.4%–20.9% accuracy on region-specific questions, and they exhibit geographic bias, over-selecting Central and North India as the "default" (selected 30-40% more often than expected) while under-representing East and West. Beyond India, our methodology provides a generalizable framework for evaluating cultural commonsense in any culturally heterogeneous nation, from question design grounded in anthropological taxonomy, to regional data collection, to bias measurement.

Large language model (LLM) agents have shown remarkable progress in social deduction games (SDGs). However, existing approaches primarily focus on information processing and strategy selection, overlooking the significance of persuasive communication in influencing other players’ beliefs and responses. In SDGs, success depends not only on making correct deductions but also on convincing others to respond in alignment with one’s intent. To address this limitation, we formalize turn-based dialogue in SDGs as a Stackelberg competition, where the current player acts as the leader who strategically influences the follower’s response. Building on this theoretical foundation, we propose a reinforcement learning framework that trains agents to optimize utterances for persuasive impact. Through comprehensive experiments across four diverse social deduction benchmarks, we demonstrate that our agents significantly outperform baselines. This work represents a significant step toward developing AI agents capable of strategic social influence, with implications extending to scenarios requiring persuasive communication. Our code and data are available at https://3dagentworld.github.io/leader_follower.

For people affected by blindness and low vision (BLV), safe and independent navigation remains a major challenge, impacting over 2.2 billion individuals worldwide. Although multimodal large language models (MLLMs) offer new opportunities for assistive navigation, progress has been limited by the scarcity of accessibility-aware datasets, requiring labor-intensive, expert annotation. To this end, we introduce GuideDog, a novel dataset containing 22K image-description pairs (2K human-verified) capturing real-world pedestrian scenes across 46 countries. Our human-AI pipeline shifts annotation from generation to verification, grounded in established BLV guidance standards from experts and research, improving scalability while maintaining quality. We also present GuideDogQA, an 818-sample benchmark evaluating object recognition and depth perception. Experiments reveal that depth perception and adherence to these standards remain challenging for current MLLMs. Code and dataset will be publicly available.

Graph-based Retrieval-Augmented Generation (GraphRAG) enhances the reasoning capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs) by grounding their responses in structured knowledge graphs. Leveraging community detection and relation filtering techniques, GraphRAG systems demonstrate inherent resistance to traditional RAG attacks, such as text poisoning and prompt injection. However, in this paper, we find that the security of GraphRAG systems fundamentally relies on the topological integrity of the underlying graph, which can be undermined by implicitly corrupting the logical connections, without altering surface-level text semantics. To exploit this vulnerability, we propose LogicPoison, a novel attack framework that targets logical reasoning rather than injecting false contents. Specifically, LogicPoison employs a type-preserving entity swapping mechanism to perturb both global logic hubs for disrupting overall graph connectivity and query-specific reasoning bridges for severing essential multi-hop inference paths. This approach effectively reroutes valid reasoning into dead ends while maintaining surface-level textual plausibility. Comprehensive experiments across multiple benchmarks demonstrate that LogicPoison successfully bypasses GraphRAG’s defenses, significantly degrading performance and outperforming state-of-the-art baselines in both effectiveness and stealth. Our code is available at <https://github.com/Jord8061/logicPoison>.

Neutralizing hyperpartisan content is essential for mitigating online polarization, yet research has largely focused on English. We present Par-ITA, a curated subset from Semeval 2023 task 3, consisting in the first human-supervised parallel corpus for Italian hyperpartisan neutralization of 2,475 paragraph pairs. The dataset is constructed using a rigorous three-stage pipeline: (1) expert-led preliminary selection of LLMs for high-quality generation, (2) human-supervised data production with high editing rates (32–68%), and (3) post-hoc human validation. We establish extensive benchmarks for this task across seq2seq and decoder-only architectures, evaluating standard fine-tuning, Direct Preference Optimization (DPO), and in-context learning. Our analysis highlights that while DPO effectively maximizes neutrality scores in seq2seq models, automated evaluators like GPT-4o-mini exhibit systematic biases, specifically over-penalizing sensitive political topics compared to human experts. Par-ITA provides a foundational resource for non-English neutralization and a reproducible framework for developing high-quality datasets in subjective domains.

Cross-cultural entity translation remains challenging for large language models (LLMs) as literal or phonetic renderings are usually yielded instead of culturally appropriate translations in context. However, relevant knowledge may already be encoded in model parameters during large-scale pre-training. To incentivize the effective use of parametric knowledge, we propose EA-RLVR (Entity-Anchored Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards), a training framework that optimizes cross-cultural entity translation without relying on external knowledge bases. EA-RLVR anchors supervision on a verifiable, entity-level reward signal and incorporates lightweight structural gates to stabilize optimization. This design steers the model toward learning a robust reasoning process rather than merely imitating reference translations. We evaluate EA-RLVR on XC-Translate and observe consistent improvements in both entity translation accuracy and out-of-domain generalization. Specifically, training on merely 7k samples boosts Qwen3-14B’s entity translation accuracy from 23.66% to 31.87% on a 50k test set comprising entirely unseen entities. The learned entity translation ability also transfers to general translation, yielding +1.35 XCOMET on WMT24pp, which scales to +1.59 with extended optimization. Extensive analyses of pass@k dynamics and reward formulations attribute these gains to superior sampling efficiency and a stable optimization landscape.

Recent advances in Large Language Models (LLMs) have enabled strong performance in long-form writing, but current training paradigms remain limited: Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT) remains constrained by data saturation and performance ceilings, while Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Reward (RLVR), though successful in verifiable domains like math and code, cannot be directly migrated to open-ended long-form writing due to a lack of ground-truths. To further advance long-form writing, we present Writing-RL: an Adaptive Curriculum Reinforcement Learning framework to advance long-form writing capabilities beyond SFT. The framework consists of three key components: Margin-aware Data Selection strategy that prioritizes samples with high learning potential, Pairwise Comparison Reward mechanism that provides discriminative learning signals in the absence of verifiable rewards, and Dynamic Reference Scheduling approach, which plays a critical role by adaptively adjusting task difficulty based on evolving model performance. Experiments on 7B-scale writer models show that Writing-RL effectively improves long-form writing performance over strong SFT baselines. Furthermore, we observe that models trained with long-output RL generalize surprisingly well to long-input reasoning tasks, potentially offering a promising perspective for rethinking long-context training.

Due to the limited generalization and interpretability of deep learning classifiers, the final vetting of rare celestial object candidates still relies on manually intensive expert visual inspection, which has become a primary bottleneck as modern spectroscopic surveys continue to scale.To bridge this gap, we propose Spec-o3, a tool-augmented vision-language agent that performs astronomer-aligned spectral inspection via interleaved multimodal chain-of-thought reasoning.Spec-o3 is trained with a two-stage post-training recipe: cold-start supervised fine-tuning on expert inspection trajectories followed by outcome-based reinforcement learning on rare-type verification tasks.Evaluated on five rare-object identification tasks from LAMOST, Spec-o3 establishes a new State-of-the-Art, boosting the macro-F1 score from 28.3 to 76.5 with a 7B parameter base model and outperforming both proprietary VLMs and specialized deep models. Beyond accuracy, Spec-o3 processes spectra at ∼0.2 s per sample on an 8×H100 server, a ∼50× throughput gain over expert manual inspection. The agent also demonstrates strong generalization to unseen inspection tasks across survey shifts (from LAMOST to SDSS/DESI). Expert evaluations further confirm that its reasoning traces are coherent and physically consistent, supporting transparent and trustworthy decision-making.Code, data, and models are available at Project HomePage.

Execution Accuracy (EX), the widely used metric for evaluating the effectiveness of Natural Language to SQL (NL2SQL) solutions, is becoming increasingly unreliable. It is sensitive to syntactic variation, ignores that questions may admit multiple interpretations, and is easily misled by erroneous ground-truth SQL. To address this, we introduce **ROSE**, an intent-centered metric that focuses on whether the predicted SQL answers the question, rather than consistency with the ground-truth SQL under the reference-dependent paradigm. ROSE employs an adversarial Prover-Refuter cascade: SQL Prover assesses the semantic correctness of a predicted SQL against the user’s intent independently, while Adversarial Refuter uses the ground-truth SQL as evidence to challenge and refine this judgment. On our expert-aligned validation set **ROSE-VEC**, ROSE achieves the best agreement with human experts, outperforming the next-best metric by nearly 24% in Cohen’s Kappa. We also conduct a large-scale re-evaluation of 19 NL2SQL methods, revealing four valuable insights. We release ROSE and ROSE-VEC to facilitate more reliable NL2SQL research.

Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) has emerged as a promising paradigm for mitigating hallucinations in large language models (LLMs).However, the intrinsic heterogeneity between the retriever and the generator often leads to a mismatch between retrieved evidence and generation needs, hindering effective coordination.We argue that competition between discriminative retrieval and generative modeling can more effectively expose their mutual weaknesses and induce deeper interaction. Motivated by this insight, we propose CARL (Co-opetition AdveRsarial Learning), a framework that formulates retriever–generator training in RAG as a minimax game. In this game, the retriever is optimized to retrieve both useful and adversarially useless documents to challenge the generator, while the generator learns to identify useful evidence and remain robust to misleading retrievals to produce accurate answers.Experiments on seven benchmark datasets demonstrate that CARL consistently improves RAG performance, validating the effectiveness of adversarial co-opetition in enhancing retriever–generator synergy.

Hallucinations arise when large language models (LLMs) guess rather than acknowledge their underlying uncertainty. Existing static strategies for mitigating hallucinations have been only partially successful, largely because they do not explicitly model the information gain from interacting with the external environment. Researchers need a general method to proactively steer users toward informative clarifications, thereby unlocking the model’s effective capacity under underspecified inputs. We model the uncertainty of LLMs in interactive settings and uncover the mechanism of active calibration between model concepts and human evaluations, improving reliability. We show that calibration error in LLMs density estimation admits a non-vanishing lower bound under non-interactive learning, while interaction empirically reduces it. We further characterize that calibration error identifies informative queries and that calibration can be accelerated by shifting query distributions from imbalanced to balanced regimes. Guided by these insights, we propose a calibration-driven Interactive Learning Strategy (ILS) that selects clarification queries by optimizing calibration error, providing both theoretical guarantees and empirical gains for reliability. Code and data are available at https://github.com/zhouyeah215/Demystifying_Uncertainty.

Safety-aligned LLMs suffer from two failure modes: jailbreak (responding to harmful inputs) and over-refusal (declining benign queries). Existing vector steering methods adjust the magnitude of answer vectors, but this creates a fundamental trade-off—reducing jailbreak increases over-refusal and vice versa. We identify the root cause: LLMs encode the decision to respond (answer vector v_a) and the judgment of input safety (benign vector v_b) as nearly orthogonal directions, treating them as independent processes. We propose LLM-VA, which aligns v_a with v_b through closed-form weight updates, making the model’s willingness to respond causally dependent on its safety assessment—without fine-tuning or architectural changes. Our method identifies vectors at each layer using SVMs, selects safety-relevant layers, and iteratively aligns vectors via minimum-norm weight modifications. Experiments on 12 LLMs demonstrate that LLM-VA achieves 11.45% higher F1 than the best baseline while preserving 95.92% utility, and automatically adapts to each model’s safety bias without manual tuning.Code and models are available at https://hotbento.github.io/LLM-VA-Web/.

The data mixture used in the pre-training of a language model is a cornerstone of its final performance. Static data mixing strategies in Large Language Model (LLM) pre-training are often suboptimal as they fail to adapt to the model’s evolving learning states. Conversely, fully online dynamic updates, while adaptive, incur prohibitive computational costs. To bridge this gap, we propose TiKMiX, an efficient semi-dynamic data mixing framework. Our approach is grounded in a key observation of influence ranking invariance: the relative importance of data domains exhibits strong temporal stability over long training intervals. Leveraging this insight, we propose Group Influence, an efficient approach for quantifying domain impact, and formulate data mixing as a periodic, low-overhead influence maximization problem. Compared with REGMIX, the proposed method reduces computational overhead by 80% and achieves an average performance gain of 2% across nine downstream benchmarks, thereby effectively mitigating data under-digestion.

Large Vision–Language Models (LVLMs) achieve strong performance across multimodal tasks by integrating visual perception with language understanding. However, how vision information contributes to the model’s decoding process remains under-explored, as reflected in frequent hallucinations. Through a series of analyses, we found that (i) vision tokens provide meaningful visual information even when hallucinations occur, and (ii) their semantics are encoded in the textual space and become explicit under appropriate vocabulary constraints. Building on these observations, we propose ReVisiT, a simple training-free decoding method that guides text generation in LVLMs by Referencing Vision Tokens. Our approach leverages the semantic information embedded within vision tokens by projecting them into the text token distribution. Specifically, ReVisiT dynamically selects the most relevant vision token at each decoding step via context-aware constrained divergence minimization. Then, ReVisiT uses its constrained projection to refine the output distribution to better incorporate visual semantics. Across five benchmarks on recent LVLMs, ReVisiT consistently enhances visual grounding with minimal computational overhead, and achieves competitive or superior results to state-of-the-art decoding baselines while reducing computational cost by up to 2×.

Ensuring the safety of LLM-generated content is essential for real-world deployment. Most existing guardrail models formulate moderation as a fixed binary classification task, implicitly assuming a fixed definition of harmfulness. In practice, enforcement strictness—how conservatively harmfulness is defined and enforced—varies across platforms and evolves over time, making binary moderators brittle under shifting requirements. In this paper, we introduce FlexBench, a strictness-adaptive LLM moderation benchmark that enables controlled evaluation under multiple strictness regimes. Experiments on FlexBench reveal substantial cross-strictness inconsistency in existing moderators: models that perform well under one regime can degrade substantially under others, limiting their practical usability. To address this, we propose FlexGuard, an LLM-based moderator that outputs a calibrated continuous risk score reflecting risk severity and supports strictness-specific decisions via thresholding. We train FlexGuard via risk-alignment optimization to improve score–severity consistency and provide practical threshold selection strategies to adapt to target strictness at deployment. Experiments on FlexBench and public benchmarks demonstrate that FlexGuard achieves higher moderation accuracy and substantially improved robustness under varying strictness.

Stance detection aims to identify the attitude expressed in text towards a given target, with applications in public opinion analysis and misinformation mitigation. Despite recent advances in large language models (LLMs), two key challenges remain: (1) spurious correlations between superficial features and stance labels, and (2) lack of cognitive modeling that simulates the transition from intuitive perception to deliberate reasoning. To address these issues, we propose Cognitive-Driven Stance Detection (CDSD), inspired by Kahneman’s Dual-Process Theory. CDSD integrates fast intuitive judgment (System 1) and analytical reasoning (System 2), enhanced by three key modules: attention-based cognitive alignment to compare system focus, uncertainty-aware belief update using Bayesian inference, and self-doubt-triggered counterfactual reasoning for re-evaluation under low consistency or high uncertainty. Experimental results on SEM16, P-Stance, and VAST show that CDSD outperforms state-of-the-art methods across multiple LLMs. Notably, CDSD exhibits strong robustness against textual perturbations such as emotional word removal and rhetorical restructuring. By integrating cognitive theory with NLP, our work provides a promising path toward more reliable and interpretable stance detection systems.

Professional financial reports serve as the cornerstone of investment decisions, demanding deep reasoning and multimodal synthesis. While recent deep research systems excel in open-domain search, they struggle with financial reporting, specifically in handling financial data, ensuring analytical depth, and integrating professional visualizations. To address this, we introduce FinSight , the first multi-agent framework for automate end-to-end professional, multimodal financial report. At its core, we propose the Code Agent with Variable Memory architecture, which unifies data, tools, and agents into a programmable variable space, enabling flexible data manipulation and reasoning through executable code. To guarantee report quality, FinSight incorporates a Two-Stage Writing Framework with Generative Retrieval. This mechanism first distills raw data into structured Chain-of-Analysis segments, and then progressively synthesizes them into a coherent, citation-aware, and multimodal narrative. Additionally, an Iterative Vision-Enhanced Mechanism leverages visual feedback to refine code-generated charts to expert standards. Experiments on company and industry-level tasks demonstrate that FinSight significantly outperforms leading deep research systems in factual accuracy, analytical depth, and presentation quality, demonstrating a clear path toward generating professional financial reports. Our code is available at https://anonymous.4open.science/r/FinSight-5841.

Large Language Models (LLMs) often struggle with structural ambiguity in optimization problems, where a single problem admits multiple related but conflicting modeling paradigms, hindering effective solution generation. To address this, we propose Dual-Cluster Memory Agent (DCM-Agent) to enhance performance by leveraging historical solutions in a training-free manner. Central to this is Dual-Cluster Memory Construction. This agent assigns historical solutions to modeling and coding clusters, then distills each cluster’s content into three structured types: Approach, Checklist, and Pitfall. This process derives generalizable guidance knowledge. Furthermore, this agent introduces Memory-augmented Inference to dynamically navigate solution paths, detect and repair errors, and adaptively switch reasoning paths with structured knowledge. The experiments across seven optimization benchmarks demonstrate that DCM-Agent achieves an average performance improvement of 11%- 21%. Notably, our analysis reveals a “knowledge inheritance” phenomenon: memory constructed by larger models can guide smaller models toward superior performance, highlighting the framework’s scalability and efficiency.

Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly multilingual, yet open models continue to underperform relative to proprietary systems, with the gap most pronounced for African languages. Continued pre-training (CPT) offers a practical route to language adaptation, but improvements on demanding capabilities such as mathematical reasoning often remain limited. This limitation is driven in part by the uneven domain coverage and missing task-relevant knowledge that characterize many low-resource language corpora. We present AfriqueLLM, a suite of open LLMs adapted to 20 African languages through CPT on 26B tokens. We perform a comprehensive empirical study across five base models spanning sizes and architectures, including Llama 3.1, Gemma 3, and Qwen 3, and systematically analyze how CPT data composition shapes downstream performance. In particular, we vary mixtures that include math, code, and synthetic translated data, and evaluate the resulting models on a range of multilingual benchmarks. Our results identify data composition as the primary driver of CPT gains. Adding math, code, and synthetic translated data yields consistent improvements, including on reasoning-oriented evaluations. Within a fixed architecture, larger models typically improve performance, but architectural choices dominate scale when comparing across model families. Moreover, strong multilingual performance in the base model does not reliably predict post-CPT outcomes; robust architectures coupled with task-aligned data provide a more dependable recipe. Finally, our best models improve long-context performance, including document-level translation.

Iterative refinement is a simple inference-time strategy for machine translation: given an initial translation, an LLM revises it without additional training. Yet document-scale refinement remains poorly understood: 1) which pipelines work best, 2) what quality dimensions improve, and 3) how refiners behave. In this paper, we present a systematic study of document-level literary translation, covering six LLMs and seven language pairs. Across nine translation-refinement granularity combinations and five refinement strategies, a) we find a robust recipe: document-level MT followed by segment-level refinement yields the strongest and most stable improvements. In our setting, doc-level refinement often makes fewer edits and leads to smaller or less reliable gains. Surprisingly, a simple general refinement prompt consistently outperforms error-specific prompting and evaluate-then-refine schemes. b) Fine-grained MQM analyses and professional-translator evaluation show that gains come primarily from fluency, with limited improvements in adequacy. c) Probing translator-refiner strength interactions suggests refinement behaves less like targeted post-editing and more like projecting outputs toward the refiner’s learned distribution while remaining anchored to the initial translation.

Modern coding scaffolds turn LLMs into capable software agents, but their ability to follow scaffold-specified instructions remains under-examined, especially when constraints are heterogeneous and persist across interactions. To fill this gap, we introduce OctoBench, which benchmarks scaffold-aware instruction following in repository-grounded agentic coding. OctoBench includes 34 environments and 217 tasks instantiated under three scaffold types, and is paired with 7,098 objective checklist items. To disentangle solving the task from following the rules, we provide an automated observation-and-scoring toolkit that captures full trajectories and performs fine-grained checks. Experiments on eight representative models reveal a systematic gap between task-solving and scaffold-aware compliance, underscoring the need for training and evaluation that explicitly targets heterogeneous instruction following. We will release the benchmark to support reproducible benchmarking and to accelerate the development of more scaffold-aware coding agents.

As large language models (LLMs) transition to autonomous agents synthesizing real-time information, their reasoning capabilities introduce an unexpected attack surface. This paper introduces a novel threat where colluding agents steer victim beliefs using only truthful evidence fragments distributed through public channels, without relying on covert communications, backdoors, or falsified documents. By exploiting LLMs’ overthinking tendency, we formalize the first **cognitive collusion attack** and propose **Generative Montage**: a Writer-Editor-Director framework that constructs deceptive narratives through adversarial debate and coordinated posting of evidence fragments, causing victims to internalize and propagate fabricated conclusions. To study this risk, we develop **CoPHEME**, a dataset derived from real-world rumor events, and simulate attacks across diverse LLM families. Our results show pervasive vulnerability across 14 LLM families: attack success rates reach 74.4% for proprietary models and 70.6% for open-weights models. Counterintuitively, stronger reasoning capabilities increase susceptibility, with reasoning-specialized models showing higher attack success than base models or prompts. Furthermore, these false beliefs then cascade to downstream judges, achieving over 60% deception rates, highlighting a socio-technical vulnerability in how LLM-based agents interact with dynamic information environments.

It is crucial to understand a specific domain by events. Extensive event extraction research has been conducted in many domains such as news, finance, and biology. However, event extraction in scientific domain is still insufficiently supported by comprehensive datasets and tailored methods. Compared with other domains, scientific domain has two characteristics: (1) denser nuggets and events, and (2) more complex information forms. To solve the above problem, considering these two characteristics, we first construct SciEvents, a large-scale multi-event document-level dataset with a schema tailored for scientific domain. It consists of 2,508 documents and 24,381 events under multi-stage manual annotation and quality control. Then, we propose EXCEEDS, an end-to-end scientific event extraction framework by encoding dense nuggets into a grid matrix and simplifying complex event extraction as a nugget-based grid modeling task. Experiments on SciEvents demonstrate state-of-the-art performances of EXCEEDS. Both the SciEvents dataset and the EXCEEDS framework are released publicly to facilitate future research.

Using entropy as a measure of heterogeneity to guide optimization has emerged as a crucial research direction in Reinforcement Learning for LLMs. However, existing methods typically treat it as a discrete filter or post-hoc regulator rather than a core optimization driver. To fully leverage the potential of entropy and achieve fine-grained regulation, we introduce **H**eterogeneous **A**daptive **P**olicy **O**ptimization (HAPO), a token-aware algorithm that continuously adapts optimization dynamics based on token-level entropy throughout the entire training process. Our algorithm includes four key components: (1) **Adaptive Temperature Sampling** that adjusts sampling temperature in real time, promoting exploration at high-entropy tokens. (2) **Token-Level Group Average Advantage Estimation** that estimates advantages at token level, accounting for sequence-length effects while preserving non-biased treatment.(3) **Differential Advantage Redistribution** that leverages entropy and importance ratios to adjust advantages for tokens with clear signals. (4) **Asymmetric Adaptive Clipping** that dynamically adjusts clipping boundaries based on token-level entropy. Through systematic investigation of entropy, we embed token-level treatment into every stage. Extensive experiments on mathematical reasoning, code, and logic tasks across multiple models demonstrate HAPO’s consistent superiority over DAPO.

User simulation is increasingly vital to develop and evaluate recommender systems (RSs). While Large Language Models (LLMs) offer promising avenues to simulate user behavior, they often struggle with the absence of specific task alignment required for RSs and the efficiency demands of large-scale simulation. A vast yet underutilized resource for enhancing this alignment is the extensive user feedback inherent in RSs, but leveraging it is challenging due to its ambiguity, noise and massive volume, which hinders efficient preference alignment. To overcome these hurdles, we introduce a novel data construction framework that leverages user feedback in RSs with advanced LLM capabilities to generate high-quality simulation data. Our framework unfolds in two key phases: (1) using LLMs to generate decision-making processes as explanatory rationales on simulation samples, thereby reducing ambiguity; and (2) data distillation based on uncertainty estimation and behavior sampling to efficiently filter the most informative, denoised samples. Accordingly, we fine-tune lightweight LLMs, as user simulators, using such high-quality dataset with corresponding decision-making processes. Extensive experiments confirm that our framework significantly boosts the alignment with human preferences and the in-domain reasoning capabilities of the fine-tuned LLMs, providing more insightful and interpretable signals for RS interaction. We believe our work, together with publicly available developed framework, high-quality mixed-domain dataset, and fine-tuned LLM checkpoints, will advance the RS community and offer valuable insights for broader human-centric AI research. Our code is available at https://github.com/Joinn99/UserMirrorer.

Model Editing, also known as knowledge editing, is receiving increasing attention in the field of Large Language Models (LLMs). However, existing model editing approaches predominantly focus on knowledge-level or static visual domains, overlooking dynamic semantics. This paper exploratively applies six representative model editing methods (FT, IKE, MEND, SERAC, MEMIT and AlphaEdit) to Video Large Language Models (Vid-LLMs) and introduces the first benchmark specifically designed for Vid-LLMs editing—VMEB (Vid-LLMs Model Editing Benchmark)—systematically extending model editing research from static modalities to dynamic video scenarios. We position this work as a forward-looking benchmark and a foundational diagnostic study: in the video paradigm, our evaluation dimensions encompass traditional metrics including Reliability, Locality, and Generality, while also introducing a video-specific metric: Robustness. Based on experimental results, we analyze the strengths and limitations of existing model editing approaches, and identify new challenges and research directions for the future development of the model editing field within the context of multimodal and video paradigms. Our benchmark is available at https://github.com/Sakabamrisa/VMEB.

Taxonomy Completion aims to automatically integrate new concepts into existing hierarchies. However, existing text-only methods suffer from a ”Sensory Gap”: they struggle to differentiate ambiguous definitions (e.g., Latte vs. Cappuccino) and miss visual grouping signals. Consequently, they often misinterpret lexical overlaps as hierarchical dependencies, leading to erroneous structural predictions. To bridge this, we propose VITC, a framework leveraging Visual Injection for Taxonomy Completion. By mapping synthesized images into intrinsic pseudo-tokens, we enable the text encoder to perform holistic structural reasoning. To address injection challenges, we introduce Adaptive Residual Fusion, which decouples magnitude from selection to prevent visual signals from being drowned out, and the Multimodal Guided Adaptive Reweighting strategy, which leverages cross-modal consensus (Mutual Rescue and Complementary Mining) to filter noise and identify hard negatives. Experiments on three datasets demonstrate that VITC achieves state-of-the-art performance, delivering an average absolute gain of over 19% in Hit@1. Code is available at https://github.com/nyh-a/VITC.

Structured pruning offers a hardware-friendly approach for efficient LLM inference. Early static methods determine fixed subnetworks through offline calibration, suffering from performance degradation and calibration sensitivity. Recent methods explore input-adaptive pruning by selecting a subset of tokens as probes to estimate hidden activations for online pruning decisions.However, existing probe selection strategies fail to identify outlier-triggering tokens, and uniform layer-wise sparsity misaligns with heterogeneous outlier distributions, leading to critical channels being incorrectly pruned. Therefore, we propose OCP (Outlier-Centric Probing for structured pruning), a principled framework that prioritizes capturing outlier-triggering tokens rather than reconstructing full hidden distributions. Specifically, OCP includes three key components: (1) sensitivity-weighted probing for FFN layers that identifies outlier patterns via precomputed weight aggregations, (2) attention-accumulated probing that leverages preceding attention matrices to identify salient tokens, and (3) online adaptive sparsity allocation that dynamically adjusts layer-wise pruning based on history-guided outlier statistics. Extensive experiments on LLaMA2, LLaMA3, and OPT demonstrate that OCP consistently outperforms state-of-the-art methods across benchmarks, achieving up to 25% perplexity reduction at 1.6× speedup.

Current approaches to memory in Large Language Models (LLMs) predominantly rely on static Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG), which often results in scattered retrieval and fails to capture the structural dependencies required for complex reasoning. For autonomous agents, these passive and flat architectures lack the cognitive organization necessary to model the dynamic and associative nature of long-term interaction. To address this, we propose **S**tructured **E**pisodic **E**vent **M**emory (**SEEM**), a hierarchical framework that synergizes a graph memory layer for relational facts with a dynamic episodic memory layer for narrative progression. Grounded in cognitive frame theory, SEEM transforms interaction streams into structured Episodic Event Frames (EEFs) anchored by precise provenance pointers. Furthermore, we introduce an agentic associative fusion and Reverse Provenance Expansion (RPE) mechanism to reconstruct coherent narrative contexts from fragmented evidence. Experimental results on the LoCoMo and LongMemEval benchmarks demonstrate that SEEM significantly outperforms baselines, enabling agents to maintain superior narrative coherence and logical consistency.

While AndroidWorld has become the dominant mobile-use benchmark due to its reproducible environment and deterministic evaluation, recent agents achieving over 90% success rates indicate saturation and motivate the need for greater challenge. In addition, its environment lacks key application categories, such as e-commerce and enterprise communication, and does not reflect realistic mobile-use scenarios characterized by vague user instructions and hybrid tool usage. We introduce MobileWorld, a substantially more challenging benchmark with 201 tasks across 20 applications that reflects real-world usage through long-horizon, cross-application workflows requiring nearly twice as many steps (27.8 vs. 14.3) and featuring significantly more multi-app tasks (62.2% vs. 9.5%) than AndroidWorld. MobileWorld balances production-grade utility and reproducible evaluation using open-source alternatives to industry standards (e.g., Mattermost for Slack), enabling full observability through source code modification and direct database access. Beyond standard GUI manipulation, MobileWorld introduces novel task categories including agent-user interaction and Model Context Protocol (MCP)-augmented tasks for evaluating agents in user-aware, hybrid-tool scenarios. We develop a planner-executor framework with extended action spaces supporting user interactions and MCP calls. Results show a sharp performance drop from AndroidWorld, with the best agentic framework and end-to-end model achieving 51.7% and 20.9% success rates, respectively, highlighting substantial room for future research.

With the growing prevalence of generative AI, an increasing amount of content is no longer exclusively generated by humans but by generative AI models with human guidance. This shift presents notable challenges for the delineation of originality due to the varying degrees of human contribution in AI-assisted works. This study raises the research question of measuring human contribution in AI-assisted content generation and introduces a framework to address this question that is grounded in information theory. By calculating mutual information between human input and AI-assisted output relative to self-information of AI-assisted output, we quantify the proportional information contribution of humans in content generation. Our experimental results demonstrate that the proposed measure effectively discriminates between varying degrees of human contribution across multiple creative domains. To further enhance real-world applicability, we extend the framework to estimate the minimal necessary human contribution for any text without requiring human input and validate its effectiveness. We hope that this work lays a foundation for measuring human contributions in AI-assisted content generation in the era of generative AI.

Despite the rapid progress of LLMs, their evaluation remains hindered by static, manually curated benchmarks with limited task coverage and poor adaptability to emerging domains. Existing automated approaches typically operate within fixed task schemas and often fail to autonomously discover new evaluation dimensions, limiting both scalability and effectiveness. To address these gaps, we propose AutoTaskEval, an automated framework that constructs domain-specific benchmarks directly from unstructured corpora. Using a refined Bloom’s Taxonomy, the framework systematically discovers tasks, enriches contextual grounding via iterative Socratic prompting, and generates diverse, progressively challenging evaluation instances. Applied to the complex and knowledge-intensive legal domain, AutoTaskEval uncovers a broader and more fine-grained task space than expert-curated benchmarks while producing high-quality instances that preserve established model-level evaluation trends. We further validate its robustness in a low-structure e-commerce review domain. Together, these results show that AutoTaskEval enables scalable, adaptive, and high-fidelity LLM assessment across domains and model families, advancing autonomous and capability-sensitive evaluation.

With the rise of the Agent Web and Model Context Protocol (MCP), the agent ecosystem is evolving into an open collaborative network, exponentially increasing accessible tools. However, current architectures face severe scalability and generality bottlenecks. To address this, we propose ACE-Router, a pipeline for training history-aware routers to empower precise navigation in large-scale ecosystems. By leveraging a dependency-rich candidate Graph to synthesize multi-turn trajectories, we effectively train routers with dynamic context understanding to create the plug-and-play Light Routing Agent. Experiments on the real-world benchmarks MCP-Universe and MCP-Mark demonstrate superior performance. Notably, ACE-Router exhibits critical properties for the future Agent Web: it not only generalizes to multi-agent collaboration with minimal adaptation but also maintains exceptional robustness against noise and scales effectively to massive candidate spaces. These findings provide a strong empirical foundation for universal orchestration in open-ended ecosystems.Our code is available at https://github.com/euyis1019/ACE-Router.

Large Language Models (LLMs) have emerged as powerful assistants for scientific writing. However, concerns remain about the quality and reliability of the generated text, including citation accuracy and faithfulness. While most recent work relies on methods such as LLM-as-a-Judge, the reliability of LLM-as-a-Judge alone is also in doubt. In this work, we reframe citation evaluation as a problem of citation attribution alignment, which assesses whether LLM-generated citations match those a human author would include for the same text. We propose CiteGuard, a retrieval-aware agent framework designed to provide more faithful grounding for citation validation. CiteGuard improves over the prior baseline by 10 percentage points and achieves up to 68.1% accuracy on the CiteME benchmark, approaching human performance (69.2%). It also identifies alternative valid citations and demonstrates generalization ability for cross-domain citation attribution.

While mechanistic interpretability tools like Sparse Autoencoders (SAEs) can uncover meaningful features within Large Language Models (LLMs), a critical gap remains in transforming these insights into practical actions for model optimization. We bridge this gap with the hypothesis that data selection guided by a model’s internal task features is a effective training strategy. Inspired by this, we propose Interpretability-Guided Data Selection (IGDS), a framework that first identifies these causal task features through frequency recall and interventional filtering, then selects “Feature-Resonant Data” that maximally activates task features for fine-tuning. We validate IGDS on mathematical reasoning, summarization, and translation tasks within Gemma-2, LLaMA-3.1, and Qwen3 models. Our experiments demonstrate exceptional data efficiency: on the Math task, IGDS surpasses full-dataset fine-tuning by a remarkable **17.4%** on Gemma-2-2B while using only 50% of the data, and outperforms established baselines focused on data quality and diversity. Analysis confirms a strong positive correlation between feature amplification and task performance improvement. IGDS thus provides a direct and effective framework to enhance LLMs by leveraging their internal mechanisms, validating our core hypothesis.

Diffusion Language Models (DLMs) have emerged as a promising alternative to Autoregressive Language Models, yet their inference strategies largely rely on prefix-based prompting inherited from the autoregressive paradigm. In this paper, we propose Template Infilling (TI), a conditioning methodology tailored for DLMs. Unlike conventional prefix prompting, TI distributes structural anchors across the target response, establishing a global template before infilling masked segments. This enables structured conditioning that leverages the bidirectional generation process of DLMs. We evaluate TI on diverse benchmarks, including mathematical reasoning, code generation, and trip planning, achieving consistent improvements of 9.40%p over baseline prompting strategies. Furthermore, TI naturally supports multi-token generation settings, providing practical speed advantages while maintaining generation quality and robustness. Overall, our results highlight a DLM-specific conditioning paradigm for structured generation, suggesting a promising direction for inference methods tailored to diffusion-based language models.

Speculative decoding accelerates large language model (LLM) inference through a draft-and-verify paradigm, yet existing methods face three key limitations: reliance on fixed draft templates that ignore device-specific verification costs, lack of mechanisms to assess draft token quality, and suboptimal tree expansion strategies. We introduce UniSpec, a training-free, lossless speculative decoding framework that enables robust, plug-and-play LLM acceleration across diverse hardware configurations and languages. UniSpec incorporates three novel components: (1) a device-aware calibration mechanism that determines the optimal draft size by measuring the acceptance-time trade-off on each target device; (2) a confidence score estimation module that assigns quality scores to n-grams based on the verifier’s token probabilities, enabling selective retention of high-quality draft candidates; and (3) an improved tree expansion strategy that broadens first-level exploration and applies threshold-based filtering to prune low-confidence nodes. To comprehensively evaluate multilingual performance, we create a comprehensive benchmark, covering seven languages across seven generation tasks. Experiments with various LLM architectures, hardware environments, and languages demonstrate that UniSpec consistently outperforms existing training-free methods, achieving speedups of up to 2.6x while maintaining output quality identical to standard autoregressive decoding. Our code and benchmark are publicly available.

Large Language Models (LLMs) are prone to factual hallucinations, risking their reliability in real-world applications. Existing hallucination detectors mainly extract micro-level intrinsic patterns for uncertainty quantification or elicit macro-level self-judgments through verbalized prompts. However, these methods address only a single facet of the hallucination, focusing either on implicit neural uncertainty or explicit symbolic reasoning, thereby treating these inherently coupled behaviors in isolation and failing to exploit their interdependence for a holistic view. In this paper, we propose LaaB (Logical Consistency-as-a-Bridge), a framework that bridges neural features and symbolic judgments for hallucination detection. LaaB introduces a "meta-judgment" process to map symbolic labels back into the feature space. By leveraging the inherent logical bridge where response and meta-judgment labels are either the same or opposite based on the self-judgment’s semantics, LaaB aligns and integrates dual-view signals via mutual learning and enhances the hallucination detection. Extensive experiments on 4 public datasets, across 4 LLMs, against 8 baselines demonstrate the superiority of LaaB.

Key Information Extraction (KIE) from real-world documents remains challenging due to substantial variations in layout structures, visual quality, and task-specific information requirements. Recent Large Multimodal Models (LMMs) have shown promising potential for performing end-to-end KIE directly from document images. To enable a comprehensive and systematic evaluation across realistic and diverse application scenarios, we introduce UNIKIE-BENCH, a unified benchmark designed to rigorously evaluate the KIE capabilities of LMMs. UNIKIE-BENCH consists of two complementary tracks: a constrained-category KIE track with scenario-predefined schemas that reflect practical application needs, and an open-category KIE track that extracts any key information that is explicitly present in the document. Experiments on 15 state-of-the-art LMMs reveal substantial performance degradation under diverse schema definitions, long-tail key fields, and complex layouts, along with pronounced performance disparities across different document types and scenarios. These findings underscore persistent challenges in grounding accuracy and layout-aware reasoning for LMM-based KIE. All codes and datasets are available at https://github.com/NEUIR/UNIKIE-BENCH.

Deep research is emerging as a representative long-horizon task for large language model (LLM) agents. However, long trajectories in deep research often exceed model context limits, compressing token budgets for both evidence collection and report writing, and preventing effective test-time scaling. We introduce FS-Researcher, a file-system-based, dual-agent framework that scales deep research beyond the context window via a persistent workspace. Specifically, a Context Builder agent acts as a librarian which browses the internet, writes structured notes, and archives raw sources into a hierarchical knowledge base that can grow far beyond context length. A Report Writer agent then composes the final report section by section, treating the knowledge base as the source of facts. In this framework, the file system serves as a durable external memory and a shared coordination medium across agents and sessions, enabling iterative refinement beyond the context window. Experiments on two open-ended benchmarks (DeepResearch Bench and DeepConsult) show that FS-Researcher achieves state-of-the-art report quality across different backbone models. Further analyses demonstrate a positive correlation between final report quality and the computation allocated to the Context Builder, validating effective test-time scaling under the file-system paradigm. The code and data are open-sourced at https://github.com/Ignoramus0817/FS-Researcher.

*Warmth* (W) (often further broken down into*Trust* (T) and *Sociability* (S)) and *Competence* (C) are central dimensions along which people evaluate individuals and social groups (Fiske, 2018). While these constructs are well established in social psychology, they are only starting to get attention in NLP research through word-level lexicons, which do not fully capture their contextual expression in larger text units and discourse. In this work, we introduce*Warmth and Competence Sentences (W C-Sent)*, the first sentence-level dataset annotated for warmth and competence. The dataset includes over 1,600 English sentence–target pairs annotated along three dimensions: *trust* and *sociability* (components of *warmth*), and *competence*. The sentences in W C-Sent are social media posts that express attitudes and opinions about specific individuals or social groups (the targets of our annotations). We describe the data collection, annotation, and quality-control procedures in detail, and evaluate a range of large language models (LLMs) on their ability to identify trust, sociability, and competence in text. W C-Sent provides a new resource for analyzing warmth and competence in language and supports future research at the intersection of NLP and computational social science.

Natural language data is inherently noisy, yet standard interpretable models often rely on scalar similarities that obscure the true evidentiary basis of a prediction. This limitation is particularly detrimental to prototype-based classification, where traditional full-alignment mechanisms force non-informative background segments to match informative prototypes, yielding unstable or misleading explanations. To mitigate this, we present SCOUT, a novel paradigm that grounds prototype reasoning in the selective correspondence of discriminative fragments. Concretely, we represent each document as a discrete distribution over span embeddings and employ differentiable Unbalanced Optimal Transport (UOT) to align them with class-specific prototypes. Unlike standard methods, this mechanism enables the model to focus strictly on decisive evidence while leaving irrelevant noise unmatched via geometric mass suppression. To ensure verifiability, we anchor prototype supports to readable training spans, establishing a transparent bridge between input segments and stored knowledge. Comprehensive experiments on seven benchmarks demonstrate that SCOUT yields prototypes focused on semantically significant spans, significantly outperforming traditional rationale extraction and post-hoc attribution methods in terms of faithfulness and stability.

In this paper, we propose a training-free method for unsupervised short text clustering that relies less on careful selection of embedders than other methods. In customer-facing chatbots, companies are dealing with large amounts of user utterances that need to be clustered according to their intent. In these settings, no labeled data is typically available, and the number of clusters is not known. Recent approaches to short-text clustering in label-free settings incorporate LLM output to refine existing embeddings. While LLMs can identify similar texts effectively, the resulting similarities may not be directly represented by distances in the dense vector space, as they depend on the original embedding. We therefore propose a method for transforming LLM judgments directly into a bag-of-texts representation in which texts are initialized to be equidistant, without assuming any prior distance relationships. Our method achieves comparable or superior results to state-of-the-art methods, but without embeddings optimization or assuming prior knowledge of clusters or labels. Experiments on diverse datasets and smaller LLMs show that our method is model agnostic and can be applied to any embedder, with relatively small LLMs, and different clustering methods. We also show how our method scales to large datasets, reducing the computational cost of the LLM use. The flexibility and scalability of our method make it more aligned with real-world training-free scenarios than existing clustering methods.

Explainability for Large Language Model (LLM) agents is especially challenging in interactive, partially observable settings, where decisions depend on evolving beliefs and other agents. We present TriEx, a tri-view explainability framework that instruments sequential decision making with aligned artifacts: (i) structured first-person self-reasoning bound to an action, (ii) explicit second-person belief states about opponents updated over time, and (iii) third-person oracle audits grounded in environment-derived reference signals. This design turns explanations from free-form narratives into evidence-anchored objects that can be compared and checked across time and perspectives. Using imperfect-information strategic games as a controlled testbed, we show that TriEx enables scalable analysis of explanation faithfulness, belief dynamics, and evaluator reliability, revealing systematic mismatches between what agents say, what they believe, and what they do. Our results highlight explainability as an interaction-dependent property and motivate multi-view, evidence-grounded evaluation for LLM agents.

Even when factually correct, social-media news previews (image-headline pairs) can induce interpretation drift: by selectively omitting crucial context, they lead readers to form judgments that diverge from what the full article supports. This covert harm is subtler than explicit misinformation, yet remains underexplored. To address this gap, we develop a multi-stage pipeline that simulates preview-based and context-based understanding, enabling construction of the MM-Misleading benchmark. Using MM-Misleading, we systematically evaluate open-source LVLMs and uncover pronounced blind spots in omission-based misleadingness detection. We further propose OMGuard, which combines (1) Interpretation-Aware Fine-Tuning for misleadingness detection and (2) Rationale-Guided Misleading Content Correction, where explicit rationales guide headline rewriting to reduce misleading impressions. Experiments show that OMGuard lifts an 8B model’s detection accuracy to the level of a 235B LVLM while delivering markedly stronger end-to-end correction. Further analysis shows that misleadingness usually arises from local narrative shifts, such as missing background, instead of global frame changes, and identifies image-driven cases where text-only correction fails, underscoring the need for visual interventions.

Individuals’ concerns about data privacy and AI safety are highly contextualized and extend beyond sensitive patterns. Addressing these issues requires reasoning about the context to identify and mitigate potential risks. Though researchers have widely explored using large language models (LLMs) as evaluators for contextualized safety and privacy assessments, these efforts typically assume the availability of complete and clear context, whereas real-world contexts tend to be ambiguous and incomplete. In this paper, we propose ContextLens, a semi-rule-based framework that leverages LLMs to ground the input context in the legal domain and explicitly identify both known and unknown factors for legal compliance. Instead of directly assessing safety outcomes, our ContextLens instructs LLMs to answer a set of crafted questions that span over applicability, general principles and detailed provisions to assess compliance with pre-defined priorities and rules. We conduct extensive experiments on existing compliance benchmarks that cover the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and the EU AI Act. The results suggest that our ContextLens can significantly improve LLMs’ compliance assessment and surpass existing baselines without any training. Additionally, our ContextLens can further identify the ambiguous and missing factors.

Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly applied in specialized domains such as finance and healthcare, where they introduce unique safety risks. Domain-specific datasets of harmful prompts remain scarce and still largely rely on manual construction; public datasets mainly focus on explicit harmful prompts, which modern LLM defenses can often detect and refuse. In contrast, implicit harmful prompts—expressed through indirect domain knowledge—are harder to detect and better reflect real-world threats. We identify two challenges: transforming domain knowledge into actionable constraints and increasing the implicitness of generated harmful prompts. To address them, we propose an end-to-end framework that first performs knowledge-graph-guided harmful prompt generation to systematically produce domain-relevant prompts, and then applies two-strategy obfuscation rewriting to convert explicit harmful prompts into implicit variants via direct and context-enhanced rewriting. This framework yields high-quality datasets combining strong domain relevance with implicitness, enabling more realistic red-teaming and advancing LLM safety research. We release our code and datasets on GitHub.

Large Language Model (LLM) based multi-agent systems (MAS) show strong potential for tackling complex tasks through collaborative intelligence. Monte Carlo Tree Search (MCTS) based methods provide promising approaches for enhancing MAS self-training by generating synthetic data, using Q-values to estimate agent contributions. However, relying solely on Q-values may misalign with the goal of selecting data most beneficial for MAS improvement. To address this discrepancy, we propose **D**ata **I**nfluence-oriented **T**ree **S**earch (**DITS**), a novel framework that incorporates influence scores to guide both tree search and data selection in data synthesis. By leveraging influence scores, we effectively identify the most impactful data for MAS improvement, thereby enhancing model performance. Furthermore, we derive a novel influence score estimation method tailored for non-differentiable metrics, significantly reducing computational overhead by calculating performance changes on the validation set. Extensive experiments on three different multi-agent tasks demonstrate the robustness and effectiveness of the proposed methods. Notably, our findings reveal that allocating more resources to estimate influence scores, rather than Q-values, during data synthesis can more effectively and efficiently enhance model training. The code is available at https://anonymous.4open.science/r/DITS-F1C4/.

In many real-world applications, such as medical insurance, many regulations exist that define how data should comply with certain standards. Auditors typically use these regulations to identify anomalies in tabular data. However, existing tabular anomaly detection methods often focus on detecting anomalies based on data distribution without considering regulatory compliance. In this paper, we introduce a new task, Regulation-guided Tabular Anomaly Detection, which leverages regulations to detect anomalies in tabular data. We also developed three new datasets for this task. To address this task, we present RegValidator, a training-free method that integrates data validation with large language models (LLMs) for detecting anomalies. In this process, the LLMs generate ideas for anomaly detection from a regulation perspective, while the data validation validates these ideas from a data distribution perspective. This process can be framed as a Budgeted Maximum Coverage problem, which can be solved by a constant-factor approximation algorithm with provable guarantees. Empirical results on the new datasets demonstrate that our method outperforms existing baselines. A field experiment in a commercial health insurance company also reveals the practical value of our method. Our code is available at https://github.com/hnu-vis/RegValidator.

Diffusion large language models (dLLMs) have recently attracted significant attention for their ability to enhance diversity, controllability, and parallelism. However, their non-sequential, bidirectionally masked generation makes quality assessment difficult, underscoring the need for effective self-evaluation. In this work, we propose DiSE, a simple yet effective self-evaluation confidence quantification method for dLLMs. DiSE quantifies confidence by computing the probability of regenerating the tokens in the entire generated sequence, given the full context. This method enables more efficient and reliable quality assessment by leveraging token regeneration probabilities, facilitating both likelihood estimation and robust uncertainty quantification. Building upon DiSE, we further introduce a flexible-length generation framework, which adaptively controls the sequence length based on the model’s self-assessment of its own output. We analyze and validate the feasibility of DiSE from the perspective of dLLM generalization, and empirically demonstrate that DiSE is positively correlated with both semantic coherence and answer accuracy. Extensive experiments on likelihood evaluation, uncertainty quantification, and flexible-length generation further confirm the effectiveness of the proposed DiSE.

Idiom translation remains a formidable challenge for Large Language Models (LLMs), as the constraints of static parametric memory and the noise in sentence-level retrieval often lead to literal misinterpretations. To address this, we propose DeReA, a detect-retrieve-arbitrate framework. The system employs a preference-aligned detector to identify idiomatic spans by reasoning over semantic conflicts between literal and contextual meanings. Subsequently, an idiom-centric translator invokes a fine-tuned embedding model to efficiently retrieve canonical definitions from an external knowledge base. The translator then utilizes a dual-path arbitration mechanism to select the optimal rendering by weighing the retrieval-augmented translations against direct translation. To evaluate our framework, we introduce LoMI, a high-difficulty benchmark with low data contamination. Experimental results demonstrate that DeReA significantly enhances performance across various model scales, improving GPT-5-mini by over 5.2 points in both idiomatic quality and consistency according to LLM-based metrics. Furthermore, evaluations on an emerging slang dataset from Urban Dictionary validate the potential of our approach in handling novel and evolving linguistic data. Our code is available at https://github.com/jrongqing/DeReA.

Large language models (LLMs) achieve strong performance and have revolutionized NLP, but their lack of explainability keeps them treated as black boxes, limiting their use in domains that demand transparency and trust. A promising direction to address this issue is *post-hoc* text-based explanations, which aim to explain model decisions in natural language. Prior work has focused on generating convincing rationales that appear to be subjectively faithful, but it remains unclear whether these explanations are epistemically faithful - that is, whether they reflect the internal evidence the model actually relied on for its decision. In this paper, we first assess the **epistemic faithfulness** of LLM-generated explanations *via counterfactuals* and show that they are often unfaithful. We then introduce a **training-free method**, that enhances faithfulness by guiding explanation generation through attention-level interventions, informed by token-level heatmaps extracted via a faithful attribution method. This method significantly improves epistemic faithfulness across multiple models, benchmarks, and prompts. Our code is attached as supplementary material.

Reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) has significantly advanced the reasoning ability of vision-language models (VLMs). However, the inherent text-dominated nature of VLMs often leads to insufficient visual faithfulness, characterized by sparse attention activation to visual tokens. More importantly, our empirical analysis reveals that temporal visual forgetting along reasoning steps exacerbates this deficiency. To bridge this gap, we propose Visually-Guided Policy Optimization (VGPO), a novel framework to reinforce visual focus during policy optimization. Specifically, VGPO initially introduces a Visual Attention Compensation mechanism that leverages visual similarity to localize and amplify visual cues, while progressively elevating visual expectations in later steps to counteract visual forgetting. Building on this mechanism, we implement a dual-grained advantage re-weighting strategy: the intra-trajectory level highlights tokens exhibiting relatively high visual activation, while the inter-trajectory level prioritizes trajectories demonstrating superior visual accumulation. Extensive experiments demonstrate that VGPO achieves better visual activation and superior performance in mathematical multimodal reasoning and visual-dependent tasks. The code has been released at https://github.com/wzb-bupt/VGPO.

Rerankers are critical in Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) for filtering evidence that enhances the accurate generation of LLMs. With the extension to open-domain scenarios, rerankers are inevitably deployed on mixed-style corpora, whereas most existing rerankers are mainly trained on well-edited texts. A rarely explored issue lies in enabling rerankers to maximally capture the effective knowledge for downstream LLMs without being misled by stylistic features. To address this issue, we propose SARK (Style-Adaptive Reranker with Knowledge Prioritization), a style-augmented multi-task framework that prioritizes effective knowledge over stylistic perturbations. SARK performs multi-granular knowledge mining by using an LLM to derive passage-level supervision on whether a passage helps or harms answer correctness, and list-level relative ranking preferences over candidate passages. It then jointly optimizes the reranker model with passage-level classification and list-level ranking objectives via style-augmented multi-task learning, encouraging the model to focus on the information needed for answering under mixed-style scenarios. Extensive experiments demonstrate that SARK improves generation performance across multiple LLMs under mixed-style conditions.

The increasing reliance on data-driven research underscores the need for accessible datasets, particularly in the medical domain. However, raw datasets are frequently unavailable due to privacy constraints and ethical considerations, which complicates reproducibility, meta-analyses, and large-scale data-driven research. Text2Tabular addresses this challenge by reconstructing research datasets from scientific publications using advanced natural language processing and statistical modeling. Our key contributions include: (1) a unified framework combining Large Language Model driven information extraction with copula-based distribution modeling, (2) novel integration of statistical test results as distribution constraints through constrained Markov Chain Monte Carlo refinement, and (3) an own comprehensive benchmark comprising real scientific publications with corresponding raw datasets for evaluating our literature-based data reconstruction. Evaluation on both benchmark datasets and our curated collection demonstrates strong performance in Train-on-Synthetic-Test-on-Real (TSTR) evaluations, alongside accurate replication of descriptive statistics showing that Text2Tabular preserves the statistical properties and multivariate relationships of the original datasets. Text2Tabular facilitates scientific progress by enabling immediate access to realistic, domain-specific synthetic data, thus, improving data accessibility, and mitigating data scarcity in fields with limited real-world data.

Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) can exhibit step-by-step reasoning, reflection, and backtracking, but these behaviors are often unregulated, leading to overthinking. As a result, LRMs continue generating redundant reasoning even after reaching high-confidence conclusions. This increases inference cost and latency, limiting practical deployment. The root cause is the absence of an intrinsic mechanism to monitor the reasoning state and decide when to continue, backtrack, or stop. We propose MERA, a meta-cognitive reasoning framework that decouples reasoning from control to enable independent optimization of control strategies. MERA constructs high-quality reasoning–control supervision data via a takeover-based pipeline, and transforms long-horizon traces into structured reasoning–control alternating sequences for training. The model is trained with supervised fine-tuning to internalize the structured separation, and further optimized with Control-Segment Policy Optimization (CSPO), which combines segment-wise GRPO with control masking to focus learning on control segments. Experiments across reasoning benchmarks show that MERA improves both efficiency and accuracy.

This paper investigates the problem of safe decoding for Large Language Models (LLMs) during inference, particularly under jailbreak attacks. Previous approaches typically either detect malicious content or regulate the decoding alignment of LLMs to mitigate such attacks. Although effective in defending against attacks, these methods often over-reject benign content, limiting their generalizability in real-world scenarios where harmful and benign information coexist. Towards this end, we propose an innovative framework named Sequence-level risk Accumulation for calibrating test-time alignment (SEAT). Specifically, SEAT introduces a reward-guided branch decoding paradigm to incorporate safety awareness during generation. To balance the detection of harmful content with the accurate response to benign information, SEAT employs a sequence-level risk monitor that smooths risk signals over the entire sequence, preventing over-confident refusals for certain tokens. Furthermore, we conduct extensive experiments on four attack benchmarks and two neutral datasets, comparing SEAT with eight state-of-the-art baselines. Consequently, the results demonstrate that SEAT achieves superior performance both in defending against jailbreak attacks and in generating high-quality responses on neutral datasets. Our code is available at https://github.com/ShanwenTan/SEAT.

Despite recent progress in LLMs for text style transfer, most existing methods rely on costly task-specific training and offer limited control over separating stylistic modification from content preservation. We propose Diff4TST, a diffusion-based language model that formulates text style transfer as an explicit copy-and-edit process. Built upon masked diffusion language models, Diff4TST introduces a style-aware noise schedule that selectively perturbs stylistic tokens while preserving content-bearing tokens during supervised fine-tuning.At inference time, we further introduce a generate-then-refine strategy that iteratively improves style compliance via gradient-based token re-masking, without reinforcement learning or external reward models. Extensive experiments on both fine-grained and polarity-based benchmarks show that Diff4TST achieves substantially improved style accuracy and controllability while maintaining strong content preservation and fluency. These results suggest diffusion-based language models as a principled and effective alternative to autoregressive pipelines for text style transfer.

Understanding the impact of scientific publications is crucial for identifying breakthroughs and guiding future research. Traditional metrics based on citation counts often miss the nuanced ways a paper contributes to its field. In this work, we propose a new task: generating nuanced, expressive, and time-aware impact summaries that capture both praise (confirmation citations) and critique (correction citations) through the evolution of fine-grained citation intents. We introduce an evaluation framework tailored to this task, showing moderate to strong human correlation on subjective metrics such as insightfulness. Expert feedback from professors reveals a strong interest in these summaries and suggests future improvements. Data and code are made available.

As large language models become standard backends for content generation, practical provenance increasingly requires multi-bit watermarking. In provider-internal deployments, a key requirement is message symmetry: the message itself should not systematically affect either text quality or verification outcomes.Vocabulary-partition watermarks can break message symmetry in low-entropy decoding: some messages are assigned most of the probability mass, while others are forced to use tail tokens. This makes embedding quality and message decoding accuracy message-dependent.We propose QuantileMark, a white-box multi-bit watermark that embeds messages within the continuous cumulative probability interval [0, 1).At each step, QuantileMark partitions this interval into M equal-mass bins and samples strictly from the bin assigned to the target symbol, ensuring a fixed 1/M probability budget regardless of context entropy.For detection, the verifier reconstructs the same partition under teacher forcing, computes posteriors over latent bins, and aggregates evidence for verification.We prove message-unbiasedness, a property ensuring that the base distribution is recovered when averaging over messages. This provides a theoretical foundation for generation-side symmetry, while the equal-mass design additionally promotes uniform evidence strength across messages on the detection side.Empirical results on C4 continuation and LFQA show improved multi-bit recovery and detection robustness over strong baselines, with negligible impact on generation quality.

Research on cross-dialectal transfer from a standard to a non-standard dialect variety has typically focused on text data. However, dialects are primarily spoken, and non-standard spellings cause issues in text processing. We compare standard-to-dialect transfer in three settings: text models, speech models, and cascaded systems where speech first gets automatically transcribed and then further processed by a text model. We focus on German dialects in the context of written and spoken intent classification – releasing the first dialectal audio intent classification dataset – with supporting experiments on topic classification. The speech-only setup provides the best results on the dialect data while the text-only setup works best on the standard data. While the cascaded systems lag behind the text-only models for German, they perform relatively well on the dialectal data if the transcription system generates normalized, standard-like output.

Vision-language model (VLM) based web agents demonstrate impressive autonomous GUI interaction but remain vulnerable to deceptive interface elements. Existing approaches either detect deception without task integration or document attacks without proposing defenses. We formalize deception-aware web agent defense and propose DUDE (Deceptive UI Detector Evaluator), a two-stage framework combining hybrid-reward learning with asymmetric penalties and experience summarization to distill failure patterns into transferable guidance. We introduce RUC (Real UI Clickboxes), a benchmark of 1,407 scenarios spanning four domains and deception categories. Experiments show DUDE reduces deception susceptibility by 53.8% while maintaining task performance, establishing an effective foundation for robust web agent deployment.

Masked Diffusion Models (MDMs) have recently emerged as a promising non-autoregressive paradigm for sequence generation. However, their performance is highly sensitive to the choice of decoding strategy. In this work, we reveal that prevalent uncertainty-based decoding strategies induce two decoding biases in MDMs: rigid boundary bias and trivial token bias. These biases limit the model’s reasoning ability and ultimately degrade generation quality. To address these challenges, we propose UNmasking Calibration for DecOding DEbiasing (UNCODE), a decoding calibration framework that regularizes uncertainty-based decoding by incorporating two complementary priors to shape global decoding trajectories and promote content informativeness. Extensive experiments on three advanced MDMs across seven reasoning- and planning-intensive benchmarks demonstrate that UNCODE consistently outperforms existing decoding strategies by more than 7%, while achieving performance comparable to autoregressive models of similar parameter scales. Our code will be made publicly available on GitHub.

Large Language Models (LLMs) suffer from hallucinations, severely undermining their reliability. While white-box hallucination detection methods that leverage hidden states prevail, they fail to identify and focus on fact-critical information when analyzing token sequences. To address this, we propose LAFaCT, a Localize-then-Analyze detection framework. It first localizes fact-critical tokens using Factual Criticality, a novel metric derived from feature attribution. A subsequent stage then performs a focused sequential analysis on their hidden states. Extensive experiments on eight benchmarks and multiple model families confirm LAFaCT as the new state-of-the-art, with in-depth analyses validating the effectiveness of its core token-localization strategy.

While Large Language Models (LLMs) demonstrate impressive proficiency in generating SQL queries, they fundamentally lack the capability to self-evaluate correctness without an execution oracle. This limitation creates a stark Generation-Selection Gap, where high potential accuracy (Pass@K) fails to translate into execution accuracy (Pass@1). Although supervised verifiers offer mitigation, they incur prohibitive annotation costs and suffer from domain fragility. Consequently, recent research has pivoted to the training-free setting. However, existing methods—such as Self-Consistency or LLM-as-a-Judge—remain hampered by systematic bias (consensus on hallucinations) and symbolic blindness (inability to simulate execution states). We introduce DPC (Dual-Paradigm Consistency), a multi-agent framework that reformulates SQL selection from a probabilistic guessing task on hidden data into a deterministic verification task on visible data. Specifically, DPC employs a Slicer and a Tester agent to collaboratively construct a Minimal Distinguishing Database (MDD)—an adversarial, fully observable micro-environment engineered to expose logical discrepancies between candidates. To break the self-correction bias, a Solver agent then verifies the SQL candidates by cross-referencing their execution against a parallel Python/Pandas solution. By validating execution consistency between declarative (SQL) and imperative (Python) paradigms, DPC robustly discriminates correct logic from systematic hallucinations. Experiments on BIRD and Spider across multiple LLMs demonstrate that our method consistently outperforms existing selection baselines, achieving absolute accuracy improvements of up to 2.2% over strong competitors like Self-Consistency.

Metaphor reasoning is an essential cognitive ability that maps knowledge from familiar domains to more abstract domains. This ability functions as a meta-ability underlying many types of reasoning. However, existing work rarely investigates how metaphor reasoning affects other reasoning abilities. To bridge this gap, we systematically study how metaphor reasoning, particularly through metaphorical riddles, can enhance broader reasoning abilities in large language models. We propose MetaR, an automated system for synthesizing metaphorical riddles that satisfy five quality dimensions: diverse, balanced, reasoning-oriented, challenging, and verifiable. Leveraging that answer categories determine riddle categories, we employ a hierarchical answer taxonomy for the former three criteria and a multi-agent refinement framework for the latter two, generating a high-quality dataset. Training with reinforcement learning on verifiable rewards using only thousands of metaphorical riddles, we demonstrate improvements across six out-of-distribution reasoning domains. Analysis reveals transfer effectiveness depends on model scale and pattern-target domain alignment. The datasets and code are publicly available at https://github.com/Abbey4799/MetaR.

Diffusion Language Models (DLMs) offer a promising alternative for language modeling by enabling parallel decoding through iterative refinement. However, most DLMs rely on hard binary masking and discrete token assignments, which hinder the revision of early decisions and underutilize intermediate probabilistic representations. In this paper, we propose EvoToken-DLM, a novel diffusion-based language modeling approach that replaces hard binary masks with evolving soft token distributions. EvoToken-DLM enables a progressive transition from masked states to discrete outputs, supporting revisable decoding. To effectively support this evolution, we introduce continuous trajectory supervision, which aligns training objectives with iterative probabilistic updates. Extensive experiments across multiple benchmarks show that EvoToken-DLM consistently achieves superior performance, outperforming strong diffusion-based and masked DLM baselines. Our code is available at https://github.com/aim-uofa/EvoTokenDLM.

Shortcuts such as APIs and deep-links have emerged as efficient complements to flexible GUI operations, fostering a promising hybrid paradigm for MLLM-based mobile automation. However, systematic evaluation of GUI–shortcut hybrid agents remains largely underexplored. To bridge this gap, we introduce **MAS-Bench**, a benchmark that pioneers the evaluation of GUI-shortcut hybrid agents with a specific focus on the mobile domain. Beyond merely using predefined shortcuts, MAS-Bench assesses an agent’s capability to *autonomously generate* shortcuts by discovering and creating reusable, low-cost workflows. It features 139 complex tasks across 11 real-world applications, a knowledge base of 88 predefined shortcuts (APIs, deep-links, RPA scripts), and 9 evaluation metrics. Experiments demonstrate that hybrid agents achieve up to 68.3% success rate and 39% greater execution efficiency than GUI-only counterparts. Furthermore, our evaluation framework effectively reveals the quality gap between predefined and agent-generated shortcuts, validating its capability to assess shortcut generation methods. MAS-Bench addresses the lack of systematic benchmarks for GUI-shortcut hybrid mobile agents, providing a foundational platform for future advancements in creating more efficient and robust intelligent agents.

Evaluating the writing capabilities of large language models (LLMs) remains a significant challenge due to the multidimensional nature of writing skills and the limitations of existing metrics. LLM’s performance in thousand-words level and open-ended writing is inadequately assessed by traditional reference-based metrics or modern LLM-as-a-judge methods. We propose Tree-of-Writing (ToW), to resolve the implicit inconsistency often found when LLM-as-a-judge aggregates all sub-features in text evaluation. ToW incorporates a tree-structured workflow by explicitly modeling the aggregation weights of sub-features. We also present HowToBench, a large-scale Chinese writing benchmark encompassing **12** genres and **1302** instructions across three task categories: contextual **completion**, outline-**guided** writing, and **open**-ended generation. ToW successfully mitigates the biases, achieving a **0.93** Pearson correlation with human judgments. Furthermore, we detect that both overlap-based text generation metrics and popular LLM-as-a-judge practices are vulnerable to textual disturbances, while ToW is robust to them. We also uncover a negative correlation between input length and content-related scores in the Guide task, showcasing that it cannot be simply improved by input-side information piling.

Large language model (LLM) agents have demonstrated strong capabilities in complex interactive decision-making tasks.However, existing LLM agents typically rely on increasingly long interaction histories, resulting in high computational cost and limited scalability.In this paper, we propose **STEP-HRL**, a hierarchical reinforcement learning (HRL) framework that enables step-level learning by conditioning only on single-step transitions rather than full interaction histories.STEP-HRL structures tasks hierarchically, using completed subtasks to represent *global progress* of overall task. By introducing a *local progress* module, it also iteratively and selectively summarizes interaction history within each subtask to produce a compact summary of local progress.Together, these components yield augmented step-level transitions for both high-level and low-level policies.Experimental results on ScienceWorld and ALFWorld benchmarks consistently demonstrate that STEP-HRL substantially outperforms baselines in terms of performance and generalization while reducing token usage. Our code is available at https://github.com/TonyStark042/STEP-HRL.

Multimodal Sarcasm Understanding (MSU) comprises multiple subtasks, demanding both incongruity perception and intent reasoning. However, this progress is impeded by two bottlenecks. First, the lack of a unified benchmark for holistic satirical cognition hinders comprehensive evaluation of MSU. Second, jointly modeling these heterogeneous subtasks often leads to feature entanglement. Specifically, while subtasks share a dependence on incongruity, they diverge in granular focus, causing specific execution patterns to erode the fundamental perception capability. To address these challenges, we make two contributions. First, we introduce DocMSU-PLUS, a comprehensive benchmark covering five cognitive dimensions of MSU. All tasks are reformulated into multiple-choice questions (MCQs), enabling a unified accuracy-based evaluation. Second, we propose the Dual Orthogonal Stream Experts (DOSE) framework. DOSE structurally decouples experts into orthogonal shared perception and private execution streams to physically block gradient interference between tasks. Experiments demonstrate that DOSE achieves superior performance on DocMSU-PLUS, effectively balancing general perception with task-specific adaptation.

Chain-of-Thought (CoT) has become a cornerstone of reasoning in large language models, yet its effectiveness is constrained by the limited expressiveness of discrete token sampling. Recent latent reasoning approaches attempt to alleviate this limitation by replacing discrete tokens with soft embeddings (probability-weighted mixtures of token embeddings) or hidden states, but they commonly suffer from two issues: (1) global activation injects perturbations into high-confidence steps, impairing reasoning stability; and (2) soft embeddings quickly collapse toward the highest-probability token, limiting exploration of alternative trajectories. To address these challenges, we propose SeLaR (Selective Latent Reasoning), a lightweight and training-free framework. SeLaR introduces an entropy-gated mechanism that activates soft embeddings only at low-confidence steps, while preserving discrete decoding at high-confidence steps. Additionally, we propose an entropy-aware contrastive regularization that pushes soft embeddings away from the highest-probability token’s direction, encouraging sustained exploration of multiple latent reasoning paths. Experiments on five reasoning benchmarks demonstrate that SeLaR consistently outperforms standard CoT and state-of-the-art training-free methods.

Empathetic dialogue requires not only recognizing a user’s emotional state but also making strategy-aware, context-sensitive decisions throughout response generation.However, the lack of a comprehensive empathy strategy framework, explicit task-aligned multi-stage reasoning, and high-quality strategy-aware data fundamentally limits existing approaches, preventing them from effectively modeling empathetic dialogue as a complex, multi-stage cognitive and decision-making process.To address these challenges, we propose STRIDE-ED, a STRategy-grounded, Interpretable, and DEep reasoning framework that models Empathetic Dialogue through structured, strategy-conditioned reasoning.To support effective learning, we develop a strategy-aware data refinement pipeline integrating LLM-based annotation, multi-model consistency-weighted evaluation, and dynamic sampling to construct high-quality training data aligned with empathetic strategies.Furthermore, we adopt a two-stage training paradigm that combines supervised fine-tuning with multi-objective reinforcement learning to better align model behaviors with target emotions, empathetic strategies, and response formats.Extensive experiments demonstrate that STRIDE-ED generalizes across diverse open-source LLMs and consistently outperforms existing methods on both automatic metrics and human evaluations.

Large language models (LLMs) have shown promise in simulating human-like social behaviors. Social graphs provide high-quality supervision signals that encode both local interactions and global network structure, yet they remain underutilized for LLM training. To address this gap, we propose Graphia, the first general LLM-based social graph simulation framework that leverages graph data as supervision for LLM post-training via reinforcement learning. With GNN-based structural rewards, Graphia trains specialized agents to predict whom to interact with (destination selection) and how to interact (edge generation), followed by designed graph generation pipelines. We evaluate Graphia under two settings: Transductive Dynamic Graph Generation (TDGG), a micro-level task with our proposed node-wise interaction alignment metrics; and Inductive Dynamic Graph Generation (IDGG), a macro-level task with our proposed metrics for aligning emergent network properties. On three real-world networks, Graphia improves micro-level alignment by 6.1% in the composite destination selection score, 12% in edge classification accuracy, and 27.9% in edge content BERTScore over the strongest baseline. For macro-level alignment, it achieves 35.98% higher structural similarity and 28.71% better replication of social phenomena such as power laws and echo chambers. Our results show that social graphs can serve as high-quality supervision signals for LLM post-training, closing the gap between agent behaviors and network dynamics for LLM-based simulation. Code is available at https://github.com/Ji-Cather/Graphia.git.

With the widespread deployment of public large language models (LLMs) such as ChatGPT, protecting user prompt privacy has become an increasingly critical issue. Existing privacy-preserving inference methods sacrifice either utility or efficiency, and often require model-specific modifications that limit their compatibility. In this paper, we propose SharedRequest, a model-agnostic framework for privacy-preserving LLM inference that reformulates privacy protection at the batch level rather than the individual-prompt level. The key idea is to obscure sensitive information by mixing original prompts with noisy variants, while grouping semantically equivalent instructions to amortize the inference cost over a large batch of queries with minimal impact on LLM response quality. This design is independent of the LLM architecture, requiring no access to model parameters or architectural modification. Empirical results demonstrate that SharedRequest achieves over 20% higher utility compared to prior differential privacy baselines, and its shared-prompt mechanism reduces query cost by up to 5× compared to non-batched inference.

While Learned Data Compression (LDC) has achieved superior compression ratios, balancing precise probability modeling with system efficiency remains challenging. Crucially, uniform single-stream architectures struggle to simultaneously capture micro-syntactic and macro-semantic features, necessitating deep serial stacking that exacerbates latency. Compounding this, heterogeneous systems are constrained by device speed mismatches, where throughput is capped by Amdahl’s Law due to serial processing. To this end, we propose a Dual-Stream Multi-Scale Decoupler that disentangles local and global contexts to replace deep serial processing with shallow parallel streams, and incorporate a Hierarchical Gated Refiner for adaptive feature refinement and precise probability modeling. Furthermore, we design a Concurrent Stream-Parallel Pipeline, which overcomes systemic bottlenecks to achieve full-pipeline parallelism. Extensive experiments demonstrate that our method achieves state-of-the-art performance in both compression ratio and throughput, while maintaining the lowest latency and memory usage. The code is available at https://github.com/huidong-ma/FADE.

Equipping Large Language Models (LLMs) with pedagogical tutoring capabilities holds significant promise for education. Existing approaches simulate tutor behaviors or preferences and use them to prompt or fine-tune LLMs for dialogue tutoring. However, such methods often fail to sustain high-quality pedagogical conversations that provide explicit stepwise scaffolding and adapt to learners’ evolving cognitive states. To address this, we propose ScaffoldLM, a planning-guided tutoring framework with an assessment-driven memory for multi-turn math dialogue tutoring. ScaffoldLM first generates a stepwise pedagogical plan from solution steps, which serves as a stable backbone for explicit scaffolding. During tutoring, the tutoring memory is updated by an assessment-driven control loop that infers the learner’s cognitive state, evaluates whether the current step target is met, and adaptively selects tutoring actions. The plan, step-level progress, inferred learner states, and dialogue history are maintained in memory to support coherent multi-turn guidance. Experiments on multi-turn math tutoring benchmarks demonstrate that ScaffoldLM substantially improves pedagogical tutoring quality over strong baselines. Code is publicly available at https://github.com/BNU-ERC-ITEA/ScaffoldLM.

Long Chain-of-Thought (CoT) reasoning has significantly advanced the capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs), but this progress is accompanied by substantial memory and latency overhead from the extensive Key-Value (KV) cache. Although KV cache quantization is a promising compression technique, existing low-bit quantization methods often exhibit severe performance degradation on complex reasoning tasks. Fixed-precision quantization struggles to handle outlier channels in the key cache, while current mixed-precision strategies fail to accurately identify components requiring high-precision representation. We find that an effective low-bit KV cache quantization strategy must consider two factors: a key channel’s intrinsic quantization difficulty and its relevance to the query. Based on this insight, we propose MixKVQ, a novel plug-and-play method that introduces a lightweight, query-aware algorithm to identify and preserve critical key channels that need higher precision, while applying per-token quantization for value cache. Experiments on complex reasoning datasets demonstrate that our approach significantly outperforms existing low-bit methods, achieving performance comparable to a full-precision baseline at a substantially reduced memory footprint.

Multi-agent LLM systems routinely generate multiple candidate responses that are aggregated by an LLM judge. To reduce the dominant prefill cost in such pipelines, recent work advocates KV cache reuse across partially shared contexts and reports substantial speedups for generation agents. In this work, we show that these efficiency gains do not transfer uniformly to judge-centric inference. Across GSM8K, MMLU, and HumanEval, we find that reuse strategies that are effective for execution agents can severely perturb judge behavior: end-task accuracy may appear stable, yet the judge’s selection becomes highly inconsistent with dense prefill. We quantify this risk using Judge Consistency Rate (JCR) and provide diagnostics showing that reuse systematically weakens cross-candidate attention, especially for later candidate blocks. Our ablation further demonstrates that explicit cross-candidate interaction is crucial for preserving dense-prefill decisions. Overall, our results identify a previously overlooked failure mode of KV cache reuse and highlight judge-centric inference as a distinct regime that demands dedicated, risk-aware system design.

Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) excel at visual understanding but face severe computational bottlenecks when processing high-resolution images and long videos due to massive visual token counts. Token pruning mitigates this by selectively removing less informative tokens while maintaining performance. However, existing methods vary widely in pruning location (vision encoder vs. LLM decoder), importance criteria (attention vs. similarity vs. learned scores), and application strategy, lacking systematic comparison. This survey presents the first comprehensive review of token pruning for LVLMs. We propose a taxonomy categorizing methods into vision-side, LLM-side, and hybrid paradigms, systematically analyze token selection mechanisms and pruning strategy. We further discuss evaluation protocols and identify key challenges including prompt-adaptive pruning and hardware-aware design. Our survey provides a structured foundation for this rapidly growing research area.

Knowledge Graph-based Question Answering (KGQA) plays a pivotal role in complex reasoning tasks but remains constrained by two persistent challenges: the structural heterogeneity of Knowledge Graphs(KGs) often leads to semantic mismatch during retrieval, while existing reasoning path retrieval methods lack a global structural perspective. To address these issues, we propose Structure-Tracing Evidence Mining (STEM), a novel framework that reframes multi-hop reasoning as a schema-guided graph search task. First, we design a Semantic-to-Structural Projection pipeline that leverages KG structural priors to decompose queries into atomic relational assertions and construct an adaptive query schema graph. Subsequently, we execute globally-aware node anchoring and subgraph retrieval to obtain the final evidence reasoning graph from KG. To more effectively integrate global structural information during the graph construction process, we design a Triple-Dependent GNN (Triple-GNN) to generate a Global Guidance Subgraph (Guidance Graph) that guides the construction. STEM significantly improves both the accuracy and evidence completeness of multi-hop reasoning graph retrieval, and achieves State-of-the-Art performance on multiple multi-hop benchmarks.

While Large Language Model-based Multi-Agent Systems (LLM-MAS) demonstrate remarkable capabilities in solving complex tasks by orchestrating specialized agents and external tools, the implicit trust in tool outputs creates a critical attack surface. Existing tool attacks are limited by domain specificity or fixed and static templates. To address these challenges, we propose Evo-Attacker, which formulates the tool attack as a self-evolving, memory-augmented reinforcement learning process. Evo-Attacker constructs a dynamic attack memory and employs deliberative reasoning to retrieve adversarial patterns and strategize modifying interventions at critical moments. Furthermore, we introduce Attack-Flow GRPO to optimize intermediate reasoning steps via terminal outcomes, addressing the long-horizon credit assignment challenge. Comprehensive experiments demonstrate that Evo-Attacker consistently outperforms baselines, highlighting its generalization and evolutionary capabilities and the urgent need for defensive tool safeguards.

Temporal reasoning remains a critical challenge for large language models (LLMs), particularly when it requires encompassing relational dependencies and numerical constraints. Yet, existing benchmarks largely overlook the joint consideration of these two dimensions and primarily rely on single-task evaluation paradigms, making it difficult to assess whether correct answers reflect grounded reasoning or arise from superficial statistical recall. To address these gaps, we introduce TNR, a benchmark designed to evaluate both Temporal Numerical and Relational reasoning. We propose a bi-directional evaluation framework consisting of forward generation via Question Answering (QA) and backward verification via Fact Verification (FV). By measuring the alignment between QA and FV, we introduce a Consistency Rate to quantify the robustness of reasoning across these two directions. Experiments on a range of LLMs reveal notable discrepancies between QA and FV performance, particularly in numerical and interval-based tasks. Moreover, our bi-directional error analysis demonstrates that these inconsistencies often stem from heuristic shortcuts and statistical co-occurrences rather than grounded logical deduction, flaws that are frequently masked in standard single-task evaluations.

Generative recommendation with large language models (LLMs) reframes prediction as sequence generation, yet existing LLM-based recommenders remain limited in leveraging geographic signals that are crucial in mobility and local-services scenarios. Here, we present Reasoning Over Space (ROS), a framework that utilizes geography as a vital decision variable within the reasoning process. ROS introduces a Hierarchical Spatial Semantic ID (SID) that discretizes coarse-to-fine locality and POI semantics into compositional tokens, and endows LLM with a three-stage Mobility Chain-of-Thought (CoT) paradigm that models user personality, constructs an intent-aligned candidate space, and performs locality informed pruning. We further align the model with real world geography via spatial-guided Reinforcement Learning (RL). Experiments on three widely used location-based social network (LBSN) datasets show that ROS achieves over 10% relative gains in hit rate over strongest LLM-based baselines and improves cross-city transfer, despite using a smaller backbone model.

Large Language Models (LLMs) can extend their parameter knowledge limits by adopting the Tool-Integrated Reasoning (TIR) paradigm. However, existing LLM-based agent training framework often focuses on answers’ accuracy, overlooking specific alignment for behavior patterns. Consequently, agent often exhibits ineffective actions during TIR tasks, such as redundant and insufficient tool calls. How to calibrate erroneous behavioral patterns when executing TIR tasks, thereby exploring effective trajectories, remains an open-ended problem. In this paper, we propose ET-Agent, a training framework for calibrating agent’s tool-use behavior through two synergistic perspectives: Self-evolving Data Flywheel and Behavior Calibration Training. Specifically, we introduce a self-evolutionary data flywheel to generate enhanced data, used to fine-tune LLM to improve its exploration ability. Based on this, we implement an two-phases behavior-calibration training framework. It is designed to progressively calibrate erroneous behavioral patterns to optimal behaviors. Further in-depth experiments confirm the superiority of ET-Agent across multiple dimensions, including correctness, efficiency, reasoning conciseness, and tool execution accuracy. Our ET-Agent framework provides practical insights for research in the TIR field. Codes can be found in  https://github.com/RUC-NLPIR/ET-Agent

Continual Learning (CL) for Large Language Models (LLMs) faces a fundamental Stability-Plasticity Dilemma: balancing the plasticity to acquire new capabilities with the stability to preserve prior knowledge. While Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning methods, such as LoRA, enable efficient adaptation, we identify a critical flaw in current approaches termed Rank-Blindness: the enforcement of a single rank constraint across diverse tasks, which entangles task-shared and task-specific knowledge, leading to catastrophic forgetting of earlier tasks and underfitting on complex new ones. To address this, we propose SpaRTA, a novel rehearsal-free framework guided by a rank-spectrum perspective that explicitly disentangles knowledge into two orthogonal subspaces. Specifically, SpaRTA employs a low-rank branch to capture task-shared representations and a high-rank branch to model task-specific features. To integrate these complementary representations, we introduce a context-aware dynamic router that adaptively fuses the two branches based on input semantics, while an explicit orthogonality constraint minimizes interference between shared and specific parameter subspaces. This design effectively isolates task-specific updates from shared knowledge, preventing the overwriting of prior capabilities while preserving strong adaptation capacity. Extensive experiments demonstrate that SpaRTA achieves a superior stability-plasticity balance compared to single-rank baselines. Notably, the proposed spectral disentanglement strategy substantially reduces inter-task interference and yields strong zero-shot generalization on unseen tasks. Our code will be available at https://github.com/Xnhyacinth/SpaRTA.

While agent evaluation has shifted toward long-horizon tasks, most benchmarks still emphasize local, step-level reasoning rather than the global constrained optimization (e.g., time and financial budgets) that demands genuine planning ability. Meanwhile, existing LLM planning benchmarks underrepresent the active information gathering and fine-grained local constraints typical of real-world settings. To address this, we introduce DeepPlanning, a challenging benchmark for practical long-horizon agent planning. It features multi-day travel planning and multi-product shopping tasks that require proactive information acquisition, local constrained reasoning, and global constrained optimization. Evaluations on DeepPlanning show that even frontier agentic LLMs struggle with these problems, highlighting the importance of reliable explicit reasoning patterns and parallel tool use for achieving better effectiveness-efficiency trade-offs. Error analysis further points to promising directions for improving agentic LLMs over long planning horizons. We open-source the code and data to support future research.

Argument summarization aims to generate concise, structured representations of complex, multi-perspective debates. While recent work has advanced the identification and clustering of argumentative components, the generation stage remains underexplored. Existing approaches typically rely on single-pass generation, offering limited support for factual correction or structural refinement. To address this gap, we introduce Arg-LLaDA, a novel large language diffusion framework that iteratively improves summaries via sufficiency-guided remasking and regeneration. Our method combines a flexible masking controller with a sufficiency-checking module to identify and revise unsupported, redundant, or incomplete spans—yielding more faithful, concise, and coherent outputs. Empirical results on two benchmark datasets demonstrate that Arg-LLaDA surpasses state-of-the-art baselines in 7 out of 10 automatic evaluation metrics. In addition, human evaluations reveal substantial improvements across core dimensions, coverage, faithfulness, and conciseness,validating the effectiveness of our iterative, sufficiency-aware generation strategy.

Large Language Models (LLMs) based autonomous agents demonstrate multifaceted capabilities to contribute substantially to economic production. However, existing benchmarks remain focused on single agentic capability, failing to capture long-horizon real-world scenarios. Moreover, the reliance on human-in-the-loop feedback for realistic tasks creates a scalability bottleneck, hindering automated rollout collection and evaluation. To bridge this gap, we introduce AgencyBench, a comprehensive benchmark derived from daily AI usage, evaluating 6 core agentic capabilities across 32 real-world scenarios, comprising 138 tasks with specific queries, deliverables, and rubrics. These scenarios require an average of 90 tool calls, 1 million tokens, and hours of execution time to resolve. To enable automated evaluation, we employ a user simulation agent to provide iterative feedback, and a Docker sandbox to conduct visual and functional rubric-based assessment. Experiments reveal that closed-source models significantly outperform open-source models (48.4% vs 32.1%). Further analysis reveals significant disparities across models in resource efficiency, feedback-driven self-correction, and specific tool-use preferences.

Multilingual Retrieval-Augmented Generation (mRAG) leverages cross-lingual evidence to ground Large Language Models (LLMs) in global knowledge. However, we show that current mRAG systems suffer from a language bias during reranking, systematically favoring English and the query’s native language. By introducing an estimated oracle evidence analysis, we quantify a substantial performance gap between existing rerankers and the achievable upper bound. Further analysis reveals a critical distributional mismatch: while optimal predictions require evidence scattered across multiple languages, current systems systematically suppress such “answer-critical” documents, thereby limiting downstream generation performance. To bridge this gap, we propose Language-Agnostic Utility-driven Reranker Alignment (LAURA), Experiments across diverse languages and generation models show that LAURA effectively mitigates language bias and consistently improves mRAG performance.

In real-world Tool-Integrated Reasoning (TIR) scenarios, a major source of inefficiency is that the toolcalls create pauses between LLM requests and cause KV-cache eviction. Also, the long, unfiltered response returned by external tools inflates the KV-cache, so each decode step spends more time loading the growing cache and thus becomes steadily slower as context length increases. However, existing efficiency metrics like token counts and toolcall counts fail to capture this real computational cost. To address this, we introduce PTE (Prefill Token Equivalents), a hardware-aware TIR-efficiency metric that unifies internal reasoning and external tool-use costs while explicitly accounting for non-reusable KV-Cache and long-tool-response scenarios, thus better reflects real-world scenarios. We conduct extensive experiments across five TIR benchmarks, quantify their PTE costs, and identify four inefficiency patterns that appear in TIR. In a simulated high-concurrency industrial setting, PTE explains wall-clock latency significantly better than token-count metric. We also discover that trajectories with higher PTE costs tend to have lower reasoning correctness, indicating that simply using more tools does not improve the quality of the answer. PTE offers a new perspective on the efficiency of Tool-Integrated Reasoning. The code is available.