@inproceedings{xu-etal-2026-gcig,
title = "{GCIG}: {G}raph{RAG}-based Cross-document Instruction Generation for Boosting {LLM} Reasoning",
author = "Xu, Xiaoliang and
Yuan, Huang and
Wang, Junmei and
Xu, Can",
editor = "Liakata, Maria and
Moreira, Viviane P. and
Zhang, Jiajun and
Jurgens, David",
booktitle = "Findings of the {A}ssociation for {C}omputational {L}inguistics: {ACL} 2026",
month = jul,
year = "2026",
address = "San Diego, California, United States",
publisher = "Association for Computational Linguistics",
url = "https://preview.aclanthology.org/ingest-acl/2026.findings-acl.871/",
pages = "17593--17609",
ISBN = "979-8-89176-395-1",
abstract = "Automatic instruction generation offers a low-cost, high-efficiency pathway for fine-tuning large language models (LLMs). However, existing methods struggle in knowledge-intensive domains and complex reasoning tasks due to their dependence on high-quality seed data, limited coverage of single-document knowledge, and repetitive content. To overcome these limitations, this paper presents GCIG, a GraphRAG-based Cross-document Instruction Generation framework. We begin by constructing an enhanced knowledge graph to provide a structural representation of the raw corpus, followed by LLM-driven selection of reliable subgraph-text pairs based on factuality and logical complementarity. Subsequently, we adaptively generate diverse questions through task-aware prompts and context-sensitive retrieval. Finally, we employ Chain-of-Thought reasoning to anchor entity paths and integrate scattered evidence, thereby closing logical gaps and improving answer coherence. Experiments on knowledge-intensive and multi-hop question-answering tasks demonstrate that GCIG outperforms existing methods, producing instruction data with stronger logical consistency and broader knowledge coverage for effective LLM fine-tuning. The code and data are publicly available at https://github.com/WhitEiller/GCIG."
}Markdown (Informal)
[GCIG: GraphRAG-based Cross-document Instruction Generation for Boosting LLM Reasoning](https://preview.aclanthology.org/ingest-acl/2026.findings-acl.871/) (Xu et al., Findings 2026)
ACL