EduMARS: Can Vision-Language Models Grade Like Teachers? Benchmarking Multimodal, Rubric-Based Assessment on Chinese K-12 Answers

Xuan Zhao, Jiashun Chen, Wanting xu, Huiyuan Yan, Chaowei Fang, Xing Wei


Abstract
Automated grading of student work is a critical application of AI in education. However, existing benchmarks fall short in evaluating models on realistic, cognitively demanding tasks. Most rely on synthetic, well-structured text inputs, overlooking the multimodal, error-prone, and often handwritten nature of real student responses, especially in K-12 settings. We introduce EduMARS, a multimodal benchmark designed for rubric-aligned evaluation of real Chinese K-12 student answers. The dataset contains over 4,500 authentic responses from high-stakes exams across eight subjects, featuring noisy handwriting,mixed-layout diagrams,mathematical expressions, and narrative reasoning. Each response is meticulously annotated by expert teachers using step-wise scoring rubrics, error classifications, and key-point mappings, providing fine-grained supervision aligned with real-world pedagogical practices. We evaluated existing SOTA MLLMs across the dimensions of final score and the reasoning process of grading, reveals a significant gap between existing SOTA MLLMs and human-level performance. To bridge this performance gap, we propose the Retrieval-Augmented Adaptive-Rubric Grading (RARG), enabling models to emulate expert grading logic by dynamically synthesizing case-specific evaluation schemas. RARG effectively enhances the performance and interpretability of various MLLMs on EduMARS, surpassing in-context learning and chain-of-thought.
Anthology ID:
2026.findings-acl.466
Volume:
Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL 2026
Month:
July
Year:
2026
Address:
San Diego, California, United States
Editors:
Maria Liakata, Viviane P. Moreira, Jiajun Zhang, David Jurgens
Venue:
Findings
SIG:
Publisher:
Association for Computational Linguistics
Note:
Pages:
9561–9583
Language:
URL:
https://preview.aclanthology.org/ingest-acl/2026.findings-acl.466/
DOI:
Bibkey:
Cite (ACL):
Xuan Zhao, Jiashun Chen, Wanting xu, Huiyuan Yan, Chaowei Fang, and Xing Wei. 2026. EduMARS: Can Vision-Language Models Grade Like Teachers? Benchmarking Multimodal, Rubric-Based Assessment on Chinese K-12 Answers. In Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL 2026, pages 9561–9583, San Diego, California, United States. Association for Computational Linguistics.
Cite (Informal):
EduMARS: Can Vision-Language Models Grade Like Teachers? Benchmarking Multimodal, Rubric-Based Assessment on Chinese K-12 Answers (Zhao et al., Findings 2026)
Copy Citation:
PDF:
https://preview.aclanthology.org/ingest-acl/2026.findings-acl.466.pdf
Checklist:
 2026.findings-acl.466.checklist.pdf