@inproceedings{xie-etal-2026-lorefact,
    title = "{L}o{R}e{F}act: Bridging the Logic Gap in Fact-Checking",
    author = "Xie, Qiming  and
      Zheng, Wenjie  and
      Shen, Xiangqing  and
      Xia, Rui",
    editor = "Liakata, Maria  and
      Moreira, Viviane P.  and
      Zhang, Jiajun  and
      Jurgens, David",
    booktitle = "Findings of the {A}ssociation for {C}omputational {L}inguistics: {ACL} 2026",
    month = jul,
    year = "2026",
    address = "San Diego, California, United States",
    publisher = "Association for Computational Linguistics",
    url = "https://preview.aclanthology.org/ingest-acl/2026.findings-acl.346/",
    pages = "6974--6996",
    ISBN = "979-8-89176-395-1",
    abstract = "The rise of social media and generative AI has led to a surge of misinformation online, making reliable fact-checking increasingly critical.Most existing fact-checking research adheres to the decompose-then-verify paradigm, emphasizing verification of individual facts while overlooking the validity of logical dependencies among them. As a result, text containing logical errors may still be misjudged as factual. Moreover, existing datasets and metrics focus on fact completeness and coverage, failing to capture the logical dimension.To help bridge this gap, we propose a content{--}logic coupled factuality evaluation paradigm, which conceptualizes factuality along two complementary dimensions: content factuality and logic factuality. Under this paradigm, we introduce a holistic solution consisting of LoReFact, the first long-form fact-checking dataset that systematically incorporates the logical dimension; LoRe-Factcheck, a simple yet effective framework for joint content{--}logic evaluation; and a logic-aware metric named LoReFactScore for exposing and penalizing logical fallacies.Experiments demonstrate the importance of logical factuality and the effectiveness of our proposed paradigm for fact-checking.[Our data and code are publicly available at https://github.com/NUSTM/LoReFact]"
}