@inproceedings{ji-etal-2026-finestate,
    title = "{F}ine{S}tate-Bench: Benchmarking State-Conditioned Grounding for Fine-grained {GUI} State Setting",
    author = "Ji, Fengxian  and
      Yang, Jingpu  and
      Song, Zirui  and
      Wang, Yuanxi  and
      Cui, Zhexuan  and
      Li, Yuke  and
      Jiang, Qian  and
      Chen, Xiuying",
    editor = "Liakata, Maria  and
      Moreira, Viviane P.  and
      Zhang, Jiajun  and
      Jurgens, David",
    booktitle = "Findings of the {A}ssociation for {C}omputational {L}inguistics: {ACL} 2026",
    month = jul,
    year = "2026",
    address = "San Diego, California, United States",
    publisher = "Association for Computational Linguistics",
    url = "https://preview.aclanthology.org/ingest-acl/2026.findings-acl.2136/",
    pages = "43073--43088",
    ISBN = "979-8-89176-395-1",
    abstract = "Despite the rapid progress of large vision-language models (LVLMs), fine-grained, state-conditioned GUI interaction remains challenging. Current evaluations offer limited coverage, imprecise target-state definitions, and an overreliance on final-task success, obscuring where and why agents fail.To address this gap, we introduce \textbf{FineState-Bench}, a benchmark that evaluates whether an agent can correctly ground an instruction to the intended UI control and reach the exact target state.FineState-Bench comprises 2,209 instances across desktop, web, and mobile platforms, spanning four interaction families and 23 UI component types, with each instance explicitly specifying an exact target state for fine-grained state setting.We further propose \textit{FineState-Metrics}, a four-stage diagnostic pipeline with stage-wise success rates: Localization Success Rate (SR@Loc), Interaction Success Rate (SR@Int), Exact State Success Rate at Locate (ES-SR@Loc), and Exact State Success Rate at Interact (ES-SR@Int), and a plug-and-play \textit{Visual Diagnostic Assistant} (VDA) that generates a Description and a bounding-box Localization Hint to diagnose visual grounding reason via controlled w/ vs. w/o comparisons.On FineState-Bench, exact goal-state success remains low: ES-SR@Int peaks at 32.8{\%} on Web and 22.8{\%} on average across platforms. With VDA localization hints, Gemini-2.5-Flash gains +14.9 ES-SR@Int points, suggesting substantial headroom from improved visual grounding, yet overall accuracy is still insufficient for reliable fine-grained state-conditioned interaction{~}Github."
}