Can MLLMs Reason Beyond Language? VisReason: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Vision-Centric Reasoning
Longteng Guo, Yifan Wang, Pengkang Huo, Tailai Chen, Yuze Wu, Jing Liu, Xinxin Zhu
Abstract
Recent multimodal large language models (MLLMs) achieve strong performance on visual reasoning benchmarks, yet it remains unclear to what extent such performance reflects reasoning directly grounded in visual evidence. We introduce VisReason, a benchmark for vision-centric reasoning in everyday scenarios where perception and inference are tightly coupled. VisReason contains 1,505 questions across 10 categories spanning perceptual, structural, and conceptual reasoning. Our evaluation shows that VisReason poses a qualitatively different challenge from existing benchmarks, exposing substantial gaps between humans and current MLLMs and revealing limited benefits from test-time reasoning strategies. VisReason offers a focused diagnostic for evaluating vision-centric reasoning beyond language.- Anthology ID:
- 2026.findings-acl.1996
- Volume:
- Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL 2026
- Month:
- July
- Year:
- 2026
- Address:
- San Diego, California, United States
- Editors:
- Maria Liakata, Viviane P. Moreira, Jiajun Zhang, David Jurgens
- Venue:
- Findings
- SIG:
- Publisher:
- Association for Computational Linguistics
- Note:
- Pages:
- 40149–40192
- Language:
- URL:
- https://preview.aclanthology.org/ingest-acl/2026.findings-acl.1996/
- DOI:
- Cite (ACL):
- Longteng Guo, Yifan Wang, Pengkang Huo, Tailai Chen, Yuze Wu, Jing Liu, and Xinxin Zhu. 2026. Can MLLMs Reason Beyond Language? VisReason: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Vision-Centric Reasoning. In Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL 2026, pages 40149–40192, San Diego, California, United States. Association for Computational Linguistics.
- Cite (Informal):
- Can MLLMs Reason Beyond Language? VisReason: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Vision-Centric Reasoning (Guo et al., Findings 2026)
- PDF:
- https://preview.aclanthology.org/ingest-acl/2026.findings-acl.1996.pdf