@inproceedings{li-etal-2026-verified,
    title = "Verified Critical Step Optimization for {LLM} Agents",
    author = "Li, Mukai  and
      Zeng, Qingcheng  and
      Fang, Tianqing  and
      Liang, Zhenwen  and
      Song, Linfeng  and
      Liu, Qi  and
      Mi, Haitao  and
      Yu, Dong",
    editor = "Liakata, Maria  and
      Moreira, Viviane P.  and
      Zhang, Jiajun  and
      Jurgens, David",
    booktitle = "Findings of the {A}ssociation for {C}omputational {L}inguistics: {ACL} 2026",
    month = jul,
    year = "2026",
    address = "San Diego, California, United States",
    publisher = "Association for Computational Linguistics",
    url = "https://preview.aclanthology.org/ingest-acl/2026.findings-acl.1974/",
    pages = "39627--39639",
    ISBN = "979-8-89176-395-1",
    abstract = "As large language model agents tackle increasingly complex long-horizon tasks, effective post-training becomes critical. Prior work faces fundamental challenges: outcome-only rewards fail to precisely attribute credit to intermediate steps, estimated step-level rewards introduce systematic noise, and Monte Carlo sampling approaches for step reward estimation incur prohibitive computational cost. Inspired by findings that only a small fraction of high-entropy tokens drive effective RL for reasoning, we propose Critical Step Optimization (CSO), which focuses preference learning on verified critical steps{---}decision points where alternate actions demonstrably flip task outcomes from failure to success. Crucially, our method starts from failed policy trajectories rather than expert demonstrations, directly targeting the policy model{'}s weaknesses. We use a process reward model (PRM) to identify candidate critical steps, leverage expert models to propose high-quality alternatives, then continue execution from these alternatives using the policy model itself until task completion. Only alternatives that the policy successfully executes to correct outcomes are verified and used as DPO training data, ensuring both quality and policy reachability. This yields fine-grained, verifiable supervision at critical decisions while avoiding trajectory-level coarseness and step-level noise. Experiments on GAIA-Text-103 and XBench-DeepSearch show that CSO achieves 37{\%} and 26{\%} relative improvement over the SFT baseline and substantially outperforms other post-training methods, while requiring supervision at only 16{\%} of trajectory steps. This demonstrates the effectiveness of selective verification-based learning for agent post-training."
}