@inproceedings{sijan-etal-2026-banglasocialbench,
    title = "{B}angla{S}ocial{B}ench: A Benchmark for Evaluating Sociopragmatic and Cultural Alignment of {LLM}s in Bangladeshi Social Interaction",
    author = "Sijan, Tanvir Ahmed  and
      Rifat, S. M. Golam  and
      Partha, Pankaj  and
      Islam, Md. Tanjeed  and
      Anwar, Md Musfique",
    editor = "T.Y.S.S., Santosh  and
      Rodriguez, Juan Diego  and
      de Gibert, Ona",
    booktitle = "Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the {A}ssociation for {C}omputational {L}inguistics ({ACL} 2026)",
    month = jul,
    year = "2026",
    address = "San Diego, California, United States",
    publisher = "Association for Computational Linguistics",
    url = "https://preview.aclanthology.org/ingest-acl/2026.acl-srw.22/",
    pages = "247--280",
    ISBN = "979-8-89176-393-7",
    abstract = "Large Language Models have demonstrated strong multilingual fluency, yet fluency alone does not guarantee socially appropriate language use. In high-context languages, communicative competence requires sensitivity to social hierarchy, relational roles, and interactional norms that are encoded directly in everyday language. Bangla exemplifies this challenge through its three-tiered pronominal system, kinship-based addressing, and culturally embedded social customs. We introduce BanglaSocialBench, the first benchmark designed to evaluate sociopragmatic competence in Bangla through context-dependent language use rather than factual recall. The benchmark spans three domains: Bangla Address Terms, Kinship Reasoning, and Social Customs, comprising 1,719 culturally grounded instances written and verified by native Bangla speakers. We evaluate twelve contemporary LLMs in a zero-shot setting and observe systematic patterns of cultural misalignment. Models frequently default to overly formal address forms, fail to recognize multiple socially acceptable address pronouns, and conflate kinship terminology across religious contexts. Our findings show that sociopragmatic failures are often structured and non-random; for example, inappropriate addressing choices concentrate heavily in downward-hierarchy (Elder$\rightarrow$Younger) and informal contexts. This reveals persistent limitations in how current LLMs infer and apply culturally appropriate language use in realistic Bangladeshi social interactions."
}