@inproceedings{eo-lim-2026-unveiling,
title = "Unveiling the Limits of Large Language Models in Inferring Pragmatic Meaning from Non-Verbal Responses",
author = "Eo, Sugyeong and
Lim, Heuiseok",
editor = "Liakata, Maria and
Moreira, Viviane P. and
Zhang, Jiajun and
Jurgens, David",
booktitle = "Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the {A}ssociation for {C}omputational {L}inguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers)",
month = jul,
year = "2026",
address = "San Diego, California, United States",
publisher = "Association for Computational Linguistics",
url = "https://preview.aclanthology.org/ingest-acl/2026.acl-long.2101/",
pages = "45304--45316",
ISBN = "979-8-89176-390-6",
abstract = "Although large language models (LLMs) have shown considerable progress in pragmatic language understanding, prior research has focused mainly on their comprehension of verbal behavior. Nonetheless, non-verbal behavior remains a fundamental component of human communication, especially when deliberately utilized in isolation to convey indirect meanings. In this work, we present the first systematic evaluation of LLMs' ability to infer pragmatic meaning in dialogue consisting solely of non-verbal responses. We explore three research questions: (1) Can LLMs recognize indirect intent conveyed through non-verbal responses? (2) When and how do LLMs fail to capture non-verbal intent? (3) How can we improve LLMs' ability to interpret non-verbal intent?. Through the evaluation, we observe that LLMs struggle to infer underlying meaning from non-verbal responses, with accuracy dropping by up to 60{\%} points compared to verbal ones. Further extensive analysis reveals a behavioral pattern in LLMs' interpretations of non-verbal behavior and demonstrates that in-context learning facilitates pragmatic inference."
}Markdown (Informal)
[Unveiling the Limits of Large Language Models in Inferring Pragmatic Meaning from Non-Verbal Responses](https://preview.aclanthology.org/ingest-acl/2026.acl-long.2101/) (Eo & Lim, ACL 2026)
ACL