@inproceedings{he-etal-2026-mintqa,
title = "{MINTQA}: A Multi-Hop Question Answering Benchmark for Evaluating {LLM}s on New and Long-tail Knowledge",
author = "He, Jie and
Hu, Nan and
Long, Wanqiu and
Chen, Jiaoyan and
Pan, Jeff Z.",
editor = "Liakata, Maria and
Moreira, Viviane P. and
Zhang, Jiajun and
Jurgens, David",
booktitle = "Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the {A}ssociation for {C}omputational {L}inguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers)",
month = jul,
year = "2026",
address = "San Diego, California, United States",
publisher = "Association for Computational Linguistics",
url = "https://preview.aclanthology.org/ingest-acl/2026.acl-long.18/",
pages = "445--479",
ISBN = "979-8-89176-390-6",
abstract = "Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) enhances large language models (LLMs) by integrating external knowledge, enabling them to tackle knowledge-intensive tasks. However, limited research has explored how LLMs effectively leverage RAG techniques for multi-hop question answering (QA), particularly when handling knowledge with with varying degrees of familiarity. In this paper, we introduce MINTQA (Multi-hop Question Answering on New and Tail Knowledge), a benchmark designed to evaluate multi-hop QA performance on questions involving 10,479 question-answer pairs for evaluating old/new knowledge and 17,887 pairs for assessing popular/unpopular knowledge, with each question equipped with corresponding sub-questions and answers. This benchmark primarily evaluates the multi-hop reasoning ability of LLMs and their capacity to handle knowledge with varying levels of familiarity during the reasoning process. We evaluate 22 state-of-the-art LLMs using three distinct QA strategies: LLM-based parameterized knowledge QA, direct RAG-enhanced QA, and multi-hop RAG-enhanced QA. Our experiments reveal key challenges in how LLMs handle knowledge with different familiarity and offer insights into improving their multi-hop reasoning capabilities when combined with RAG techniques."
}Markdown (Informal)
[MINTQA: A Multi-Hop Question Answering Benchmark for Evaluating LLMs on New and Long-tail Knowledge](https://preview.aclanthology.org/ingest-acl/2026.acl-long.18/) (He et al., ACL 2026)
ACL