@inproceedings{yang-etal-2026-cpr,
    title = "{CPR}-{RAG}: Clinical Prior-Regularized Retrieval for Anatomy-Aware 3{D} {CT} Report Generation",
    author = "Yang, Sungkyu  and
      Kim, Kang-Min  and
      Kim, Mansu",
    editor = "Liakata, Maria  and
      Moreira, Viviane P.  and
      Zhang, Jiajun  and
      Jurgens, David",
    booktitle = "Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the {A}ssociation for {C}omputational {L}inguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers)",
    month = jul,
    year = "2026",
    address = "San Diego, California, United States",
    publisher = "Association for Computational Linguistics",
    url = "https://preview.aclanthology.org/ingest-acl/2026.acl-long.1411/",
    pages = "30572--30587",
    ISBN = "979-8-89176-390-6",
    abstract = "Generating radiology reports from 3D volumetric data remains challenging due to the difficulty of grounding fine-grained pathologies within high-dimensional scans. While retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) offers a potential solution, standard approaches struggle with visual-semantic ambiguity and often introduce irrelevant ``normal'' context that dilutes pathological signals. To address this limitation, we introduce CPR-RAG, a model-agnostic RAG framework that enhances organ-level grounding by integrating clinical priors into the retrieval process. Specifically, we propose a clinical prior-regularized re-ranking module that leverages corpus-derived co-occurrence statistics to align retrieved candidates with latent disease distributions, ensuring clinical consistency beyond mere visual similarity. Furthermore, we employ clinical relevance context refinement to selectively filter out boilerplate normal descriptions, thereby maximizing the information density of the evidence provided to the generator. Extensive experiments on the RadGenome-ChestCT benchmark demonstrate that CPR-RAG significantly improves clinical efficacy across state-of-the-art radiology report generation models. Human evaluation further confirms that our approach achieves superior factual correctness, completeness, and utility compared to the existing models."
}